Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

268 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Alameda x
Judge: Gee, Delbert x
2020.07.06 Motion for Injunctive or Declaratory Relief 207
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.07.06
Excerpt: ...nued to May 7, 2018 with the discovery cutoff and other pretrial deadlines governed by the new trial date. Trial was continued again to May 14, 2018. After the parties stipulated to abate the case pending the Public Employment Relations Board decision on April 26, 2018, the trial date was vacated. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint asserts causes of action for wrongful termination in violation of ...
2020.07.06 Demurrer 005
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.07.06
Excerpt: ...urt must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or discloses a complete defense." (Id.) The Court assumes "the truth of the properly pleaded factual allegations, facts that reasonably can be inferred from those expressly pleaded and matters of which judicial notice has been taken." (Id.) "As a general rule in testing a pleading against a demurrer the facts alleged in the pleading are deemed to be true...
2020.06.30 Motion to Strike 229
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.30
Excerpt: ...th the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." (CCP § 436.) An "irrelevant matter," or "immaterial allegation," means: (1) an allegation that is not essential to the statement of a claim or defense; (2) an allegation that is neither pertinent to nor supported by an otherwise sufficient claim or defense; or (3) a demand for judgment requesting relief not supported by the allegations of the complaint or cross-complaint. (CCP �...
2020.06.23 Motion to Allow Filing of Certificates of Merit Under Seal 371
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.23
Excerpt: ...the action is filed shall file certificates of merit[.]" (CCP §§ 340.1(a), (f).) "In any action subject to subdivision (f), a defendant shall not be served, and the duty to serve a defendant with process does not attach, until the court has reviewed the certificates of merit filed pursuant to subdivision (g) with respect to that defendant, and has found, in camera, based solely on those certificates of merit, that there is reasonable and merito...
2020.06.22 Motion for Summary Adjudication 463
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.22
Excerpt: ...lding") that is entirely on the PG&E Property. (UMF 3.) PG&E purchased the PG&E Property for the purpose of developing the site for use as a natural gas regulation station. (UMF 1, 4.) PG&E's project requires the demolition of all existing improvements on PG&E's property. Defendants Vlazakis own 229 Brush St. (the Vlazakis Property), which shares a property line with the PG&E Property along the easterly border of the PG&E property. (UMF 6.) There...
2020.06.15 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 882
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.15
Excerpt: ... number. Hearings on matters that are properly contested will take place via a medium the court will identify. The Court will email the parties on properly contested matters notifying them of the date and time the oral argument will take place and providing instructions on how to participate in the hearing. Please be advised that due to limited video access, the oral argument may be at a later date and time than that previously calendared. Oral a...
2020.06.15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 263
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.15
Excerpt: ...nt no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. STANDARD OF LAW "A party may move for judgment on the pleadings." (CCP § 438(b)(1).) A defendant may make such a motion only if "either of the following conditions exist: (i) [t]he court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the cause of action alleged in the complaint[;] [or] (ii) [t]he complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant...
2020.06.15 Demurrer 976
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.15
Excerpt: ...AW "A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or discloses a complete defense." (Id.) Courts "construe the complaint 'liberally ... with a view to substantial justice between the parties[.]'" (Id.) "[I]f a plaintiff pleads a claim that fails to...
2020.06.15 Application for Writ of Possession 084
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.15
Excerpt: ... and shall include all of the following: (1) A showing of the basis of the plaintiff's claim and that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the property claimed. If the basis of the plaintiff's claim is a written instrument, a copy of the instrument shall be attached. (2) A showing that the property is wrongfully detained by the defendant, of the manner in which the defendant came into possession of the property, and, according to the best k...
2020.06.02 Demurrer 393
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.02
Excerpt: ...quest a partition of the property and also referencing a mortgage. (See, e.g., FAC, ¶ 12; Prayer for Relief at p. 4, item no. 1.) Deutsche Bank now demurs to the causes of action brought against it. "A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or ...
2020.06.02 Demurrer 309
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.02
Excerpt: ...f this Order, as modified for method of service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1013. (See Cal. R. Ct., Rule 3.1320(g).) As discussed at length in the Court's order on Defendants' prior demurrer, this action involves Plaintiff's allegations of various violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") by her employer, OPD. Defendant previously demurred to the Complaint's Third Cause of Action for retaliation. On November 21, 2019, t...
2020.06.01 Motion to Compel Further Responses 825
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.06.01
Excerpt: ...provides purports to convey the content of the special interrogatories and Defendant's responses thereto, no actual documentary evidence of the special interrogatories or Defendant's responses thereto was provided. Plaintiff does attach what purports to be a meet and confer letter to Defendant Wurts, but the letter is unsigned, provides no information regarding service of the interrogatories, does not include Defendant's responses to the interrog...
2020.05.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 825
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.05.26
Excerpt: ...s thereto, no actual documentary evidence of the special interrogatories themselves or Defendant's actual responses thereto was provided with the moving papers. Plaintiff's motion cannot be granted on the evidence provided and served with the moving papers. Accordingly, it is DENIED. The Court does note that Plaintiff has filed a substantive reply in relation to this motion. However, as of this writing, no opposition to the motion is on file in t...
2020.05.18 Motion to Consolidate Actions 811
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.05.18
Excerpt: .... Ct., Rule 3.350.) "When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay." (CCP § 1048(a).) Here, there are several factors that make consolidation appropriate. Initially, the t...
2020.05.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 899
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.05.08
Excerpt: ...ant McClure. On 7/31/18, McClure served Wiles with an unlawful detainer complaint based on a three-day notice citing nuisance conditions caused or maintained by Wiles. In response, Wiles raised affirmative defenses citing habitability violations, discrimination, and retaliation. On or about 9/26/18, the parties settled the unlawful detainer action by entering into a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment or Dismissal ("Stipulation"). The Stipulation r...
2020.05.05 Motion to Transfer Venue 418
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.05.05
Excerpt: ...merous provisions of the California Labor Code and Industrial Wage Orders. Plaintiff's list of violations is set forth in paragraph 7 of the Complaint. The parties agree that the Court should refer to Section 393(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine whether Alameda County is an appropriate venue for Plaintiff's action. Section 393(a) applies to actions for the recovery of penalties imposed by statute. The parties also agree that there i...
2020.05.05 Motion to Compel Responses 705
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.05.05
Excerpt: ...against Defendants Compass Transportation, Inc., SFO Airporter, Inc., Transdev Services, Inc., Transdev Bus On Demand, LLC, and Michael Johns. Defendants Michael Johns, Transdev Services, Inc., SFO Airporter, Inc., and Transdev Bus On Demand, LLC (collectively, "Moving Defendants") now seek an order compelling Plaintiffs to provide verified responses to certain discovery requests they propounded on Plaintiffs in October of 2019. As of the filing ...
2020.04.28 Demurrer 623
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.04.28
Excerpt: ...ther method. At the time of this writing the Court, generally speaking, is not accepting standard civil filings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Megan Beene provide written notice of this Order to the other parties to the action. "A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the c...
2020.04.21 Motion for Reconsideration 451
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.04.21
Excerpt: ....) With its present motion for reconsideration, however, Defendant includes a Declaration of Ekaterina A. Golovanova ("Golovanova Dec.") attesting to new or different facts which were not presented with Defendant's earlier motion to set aside the default, and, thus, were not considered as part of the Court' Order of January 14, 2020. (See CCP § 1008.) The Golovanova Dec. explains that, on January 7, 2020, after the written reply to the motion to...
2020.03.17 Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment 034
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.03.17
Excerpt: ... resolve the action. Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment is GRANTED. The Court will sign and enter the proposed consent judgment provided by the moving party. The Court finds the Consent Judgment ("CJ") meets the criteria established by Health & Safety Code section 25249.7, in that: (A) the reformulation standard required by the CJ complies with Health & Safety Code sections 25249.6 and 25249.10(...
2020.03.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 263
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.03.17
Excerpt: ...i), as the basis for their motion. (See Ntc. of Mtn., p. 2.) Section 438(c)(3) pertains to motions for judgment on the pleadings brought by the Court "on its own motion." That is not the situation here. This defect permeates Defendants' notice and is a sufficient ground for the Court to DENY Defendants' motion. Nonetheless, the Court will continue, substantively, as if Defendants had properly noticed their motion. LEGAL STANDARD "A party may move...
2020.03.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 843
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.03.17
Excerpt: ...TANDARDS "A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or discloses a complete defense." (Id.) The Court assumes "the truth of the properly pleaded factual allegations, facts that reasonably can be inferred from those expressly pleaded and matters o...
2020.03.10 Motion for Statutory Discharge, Order of Abatement or Restraining Order, for Attorneys' Fees 854
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.03.10
Excerpt: ... Code § 2924(j); see CCP § 386.5 ["[U]pon affidavit that he is a mere stakeholder with no interest in the amount or any portion thereof and that conflicting demands have been made upon him for the amount by parties to the action, upon notice to such parties, [the stakeholder may] apply to the court for an order discharging him from liability and dismissing him from the action on his depositing with the clerk of the court the amount in dispute ....
2020.03.03 Demurrer 005
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.03.03
Excerpt: ... owners of the real property, (see Exh. A to FAC), but they are not parties to the present demurrer. "A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or discloses a complete defense." (Id.) "[I]f a plaintiff pleads a claim that fails to state a cause o...
2020.02.28 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 389
Location: Alameda
Judge: Gee, Delbert
Hearing Date: 2020.02.28
Excerpt: ...ules of Court, Rule 2.108(4). The notice of motion is confusing and defective, in violation of California Rules of Court, Rules 3.110 et. seq. The motion does not include a memorandum of points and authorities, in violation of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1113(a). The motion contains no admissible evidence, in violation of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1306(a). The motion includes no proof of service related to the motion, in violation o...

268 Results

Per page

Pages