Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

221 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Alameda x
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey x
2021.03.02 Demurrer 316
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.03.02
Excerpt: ...esired result. The attorney's billings were inadequate and did not conform to B&P 6148. Plaintiff asserts claims for (1) breach of written contract, (2) professional negligence; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; and (4) negligence. REQUEST FOR JUDICAL NOTICE The request of defendant for judicial notice is DENIED. When the items sought to be judicially noticed raise potential factual conflicts, it is inappropriate to take judicial notice on a demurrer...
2021.02.23 Motion for Summary Adjudication 408
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.23
Excerpt: ...int of the Roman Catholic Welfare Corp (Owner) filed 6/12/18 asserts claims against Contractor arising from the large scale remodeling of St Theresa School. (Cpt para 8-10.) The contract has an indemnity provision where Contractor agrees to indemnify Owner against claims arising from the performance of the work that are "attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, or injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the Wo...
2021.02.16 Motion to Reopen Discovery 921
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.16
Excerpt: ...nts motion for class certification (4 and ½ years after case filed); On 1/24/20, Judge Seligman order establishes 9/10/20 as five-year rule deadline; On 1/24/20, Judge Seligman sets trial for 8/24/20; On 5/27/20, Judge Seligman re-sets trial to 11/30/20. On 9/24/20, the parties file a stipulation setting the discovery cut off for lay witnesses for 1/8/21 and for expert witnesses for 1/25/21. The stipulation did not address written discovery or m...
2021.02.16 Motion to Remove Lien on Real Property 982
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.16
Excerpt: ...raming argues that because LMV 19H Holdings posted a release bond there is now no lien on an owner's property, and the owner has no standing to file a Lambert Motion. The court finds that LMV 19H Holdings has standing to bring a Lambert motion. If a Mechanic's lien is recorded on property, then the property owner can bring a motion to remove an improper mechanics lien or to obtain an order confirming that the filing of a release bond has released...
2021.02.11 Motion for Summary Adjudication 735
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.11
Excerpt: ...pervisor. The two had personal, non-work related, relationship. (UMF 6; DX 2 [text messages of 10/20/17].) Between 4:28 and 7:08 am in the morning of 10/30/17 Knight sent Lara multiple text messages of an arguably oversharing and arguably sexual nature. (UMF 8.) Lara reported the incident to management. (UMF 10) The Regents offered Lara paid time off. (UMF 10) The Regents decided to not discipline Knight because there was no prior history, this w...
2021.02.09 Motion to Reopen Discovery 921
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.09
Excerpt: ...nts motion for class certification (4 and ½ years after case filed); On 1/24/20, Judge Seligman order establishes 9/10/20 as five-year rule deadline; On 1/24/20, Judge Seligman sets trial for 8/24/20; On 5/27/20, Judge Seligman re-sets trial to 11/30/20. On 9/24/20, the parties file a stipulation setting the discovery cut off for lay witnesses for 1/8/21 and for expert witnesses for 1/25/21. The stipulation did not address written discovery or m...
2021.02.02 Motion for Sanctions 719
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...iff opposed the motion with a three part argument. First, as a matter of law, an employee plaintiff suing under the PAGA does so as the proxy or agent of the state's labor law enforcement agencies. (Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, 381; Z.B. N.A. v. Superior Court (2019) 8 Cal.5th 175, 185; Kim v. Reins International California (2020) 9 Cal.5th 73, 81.) Second, as a matter of fact, the state agencies are not a party...
2021.02.02 Demurrer 607
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...categories of persons. At issue in this case is CCP 203(a)(11), which states: "(a) All persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective trial jurors, except the following: ... (11) Persons who are currently required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Section 290 of the Penal Code based on a felony conviction." Plaintiff asserts a single cause of action asserting that the legislative action eliminating the categorical exclusion for most...
2021.01.26 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 566
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.26
Excerpt: ...o person in trustee capacity and in individual capacity]; Benasra v. Marciano (2001) 92 Cal. App. 4th 987 [person signed agreement as a corporate officer and not in his individual capacity]; Responsible Citizens v. Superior Court (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1717, 1731 [representing partnership is not representing partners individually]; Rule Prof Conduct 1.13 [organization as client].) The issue is complicated because a trust is a set of responsibiliti...
2021.01.21 Motion to Define Issues for Trial 832
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.21
Excerpt: ... OTO filed an appeal from the Labor Commissioner's order, decision, and award ("ODA") dated 8/25/15. Following various appellate proceedings, on 8/29/19, the California Supreme Court in the Arbitration Case found the superior court had set vacated the ODA in error and remanded the case back to the trial court. (OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho (2010) 8 Cal.5th 111, 138-141.) APPEALS FROM LABOR CODE 98 PROCEEDINGS A party that is not satisfied with the result o...
2021.01.14 Motion to Stay Case 183
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.14
Excerpt: ...["the power of a court to stay proceedings ... was inherent at common law and is now vested in the superior courts of this state"].) The relevant criteria for the Court to consider vary with the reason for the stay and the scope of the stay sought. (Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1519, 1534 (stay based on forum non conveniens); Morris v. AGFA Corp. (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 1452, 1463-1468 (stay based on forum no...
2021.01.14 Demurrer 813
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.14
Excerpt: ...er) was pregnant with Camden Gutierrez (Child). On 6/15/19, defendants were negligent in the delivery. Mother suffered a partially ruptured placenta. (1AC 14.) Child suffered brain injuries. (1AC, para 7.) Mother observed both the injury to herself and to Child. (1AC 10, 21, 22.) The complaint alleges (1) Child's claim for medical negligence; (2) Mother's claim for medical negligence; (3) Mother's claim for bystander emotional distress from watch...
2021.01.07 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 607
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.07
Excerpt: ... from those expressly pleaded and matters of which judicial notice has been taken." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) Amgen sponsored a clinical trial for "Romosozumab" an experimental biologic. Diablo Clinical Research and Mark Christiansen (collectively "Diablo") administered a clinical trial of the drug, including preparing an Informed Consent document. The Informed Consent included, among other things, a list of s...
2021.01.07 Demurrer 042
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.07
Excerpt: ... supervised by the national organization. (Para 18.) The individual defendants are members of the Chapter. (Paras 19, 20, 21.) Plaintiff was a pledge at the Chapter. The Fraternity, acting through the Chapter, gave plaintiff a tour of the Chapter residence building, showing plaintiff how to get to the roof and a bench on the roof. The bench was surrounded by cans and bottles, indicating frequent use by members of the Chapter. On 4/17/18, the Chap...
2021.01.05 Motion for Summary Judgment 406
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2021.01.05
Excerpt: .... (SSUF 63, 64.) The traffic signal pole is a Type 1B, which is a 4-inch pole that is designed as a breakaway pole. (Schlaefli Dec., para 10.) The traffic pole is consistent with CalTrans standard plans. (SSUF 60; (Schlaefli Dec., para 12.) The traffic signal pole is not separated from the pick-up lane by concrete bollards. The City installed concrete bollards elsewhere that separate the sidewalk from the pick-up lane. On 3/27/18, Plaintiffs were...
2020.12.15 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages and Treble Damages 442
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.15
Excerpt: ...ment was unsuccessful. In June 2019, plaintiff reported the bed bugs to Defendants. On June 5, 2019, the City of Berkeley Inspected the unit, and Defendants excluded Plaintiffs. On 6/13/19, plaintiff's private mold contractor inspected the unit. On July 8, 2029, the City issued a notice of violation for mold. On an undisclosed date, Plaintiff vacated the unit. On August 18, 2019, plaintiff was admitted to the ER for insect bites. While Plaintiff ...
2020.12.15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 011
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.15
Excerpt: ...tock, nominate and elect directors to the board, and wage battles for corporate control. This case involves the application of the statutes and settled principles, complicated somewhat because the Company is a "Manager-Managed LLC" rather than a regular corporation. BACKGROUND On 1/1/17 Brendel and Sade founded Freeli Foods, LLC. The Company is a "Manager-Managed LLC" as defined under Corp Code 17702(b)(5). (Brendel Dec, Exh 5 [letter from Freeli...
2020.12.03 Motion to Compel Arbitration 322
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.03
Excerpt: ...don Dec., para 6.) It is specific to Gordon, as evidenced by its terms, the footer, and Gordon Dec para 7. It has an integration clause. When DPC terminated Gordon's employment it did so under para 7(a) of the Gordon agreement. (Godon Dec. Exh 3.) It has no arbitration clause. When Gordon showed up at work, he signed the DPC form employment agreement. The DPC form employment agreement is dated 9/1/17. It is a form agreement. (Gordon Dec., para 9....
2020.12.03 Motion for Summary Judgment 841
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.03
Excerpt: ...aylor to crash and suffer personal injuries (PUF 60). The City of Alameda designed and maintained the bike path, which is a Class I bikeway. Alameda Municipal Power, which is a department of the City of Alameda, installed and maintained the utility cover, which is located in the bike path (DUF 11, 12; PUF 41). Alameda Municipal Power maintains electrical boxes and covers as part of its responsibility as an electrical utility/ (PUF 48, 49, 50, 51,...
2020.12.03 Demurrer 149
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.03
Excerpt: ...12/4/01 Roy Jones induced his father to transfer the property to himself and his father as joint tenants (para 21), that on 12/5/01 the deed was recorded (exhibit), that on 2/8/02 the father died (exhibit - death certificate), and that as a result Roy interfered with the right of the four children to the property through intestate succession. The complaint assets claims for (1) undue influence, (2) declaratory relief, and (3) cancellation of reco...
2020.12.01 Motion for Reconsideration 005
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.01
Excerpt: ...ian Plummer (Father). Christian Plummer did not appeal this Court's judgment. On 7/18/16 the court granted summary judgment against Edward Plummer (Grandfather). Edward Plummer did appeal this Court's judgment, and the court of Appeal reversed. On 8/21/20, defendant Kaiser filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings asserting that under CCP 377.60 the Grandfather did not have standing to sue for wrongful death. The Order of 9/22/20 granted that ...
2020.12.01 Motion for Attorney Fees 062
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.12.01
Excerpt: ...date of this offer pursuant to a fee motion or by agreement." On 6/12/20 plaintiff accepted the offer. Plaintiff seeks fees of $18,048.50, which represents the 36.5 hours worked through the filing of the motion at rates of $525/hour and $395/hour. The hours worked are limited to those "as of the date of" the CCP 998 offer. Plaintiff assets that the limitation is unconscionable. The limitation is not procedurally or substantively unconscionable. T...
2020.11.19 Motion for Reconsideration 042
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.11.19
Excerpt: ...motion for reconsideration must be "based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law." (CCP 1008(a).) The motion is not based on new law. The motion is not supported by new facts. Regarding new facts, "the moving party must provide a satisfactory explanation for the failure to produce that evidence at an earlier time." (Shiffer v. CBS Corp (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 246, 255.) A motion for reconsideration must be based on evidence "that the m...
2020.11.17 Motion for Trial Preference 921
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.11.17
Excerpt: ...he party's interest in the litigation. Fox v. Superior Court (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 529, 533-536, makes clear that if the court makes three findings, then the court must grant the motion. The first finding is whether the moving party is over 70 years of age. The requirement reflects a legislatively acknowledged risk of death or incapacity due to age. (Kline v. Superior Court (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 512, 515.) The second finding is whether the moving...
2020.11.12 Motion to Stay Case 431
Location: Alameda
Judge: Brand, Jeffrey
Hearing Date: 2020.11.12
Excerpt: ...ley v. Fosca Oil Co., (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 813, 817 ["the power of a court to stay proceedings ... was inherent at common law and is now vested in the superior courts of this state"].) The relevant criteria for the Court to consider vary with the reason for the stay and the scope of the stay sought. (Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1519, 1534 (stay based on forum non conveniens); Morris v. AGFA Corp. (2006) 14...

221 Results

Per page

Pages