Excerpt: ...ile an administrative charge with the DFEH alleging any harassment by Leung, as required by Government Code § 12960. (See Medix Ambulance Service Inc. v. Superior Court (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 109, 115-118.) Although Plaintiff's DFEH charge did mention Leung by name, it neither alleged that Leung was her employer, nor that Leung had harassed her, nor that Leung was the perpetrator of the harm suffered by Plaintiff. Therefore, Plaintiff's DFEH char...

Excerpt: ...t (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) In order to state a prima facie claim for punitive damages, a complaint must set forth the elements as stated in the general punitive damages statute, Civil Code section 3294. (College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior Court (1994) 8 Cal.4th 704, 721.) These statutory elements include allegations that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud or malice. (Civ.Code, § 3294, subd. (a).) "Malice" is defined as ...

Excerpt: ... one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages . . . , or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs." (C...

Excerpt: ...any time prior to trial. See Le Francois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094, 1108. Cross-Defendant's motion is not an untimely and defective motion for reconsideration of the Court's ruling of May 27, 2020. The Court specifically granted Cross-Defendant leave to make the request when it denied its earlier motion. Based on its review of the parties' written submissions, the Court declines to grant Cross-Defendant leave to proceed with its second motio...

Excerpt: ... L-2", this claim fails as a matter of law because the City is not liable for common law negligence. (See Government Code § 815(a).) As to "Count 2 - Willful Failure to Warn" in "Prem. L- 3", this claim fails because Plaintiff does not allege or present any evidence demonstrating that she was using the subject premises for recreational purposes, as required for liability under Civil Code § 846. As to "Count Three - Dangerous Condition of Public...

Excerpt: ...s so "frivolous" as to warrant the imposition of sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. As the Court indicated in its May 31, 2021 order, Plaintiff may potentially have claims against the Banks based on the 2014 settlement of one of his six prior cases against the Banks, but those claims were not alleged in his First Amended Complaint in this case and should be brought, if at all, in the action in which the settlement was reached....

Excerpt: ...urth Floor), 1221 Oak Street Oakland. Plaintiff's counsel provide an estimate of 566.3 hours of work on this case, which seems unusually high for a relatively straightforward PAGA action, supported only by declarations conclusorily alleging that these hours were reasonably and efficiently incurred. Although hourly billing entries are not generally required in the context of a settlement motion, the Court is unwilling to approve an attorney fee aw...

Excerpt: ...ng a complaint on demurrer is long-settled: "We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noticed. [Citation.] Further, we give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, reading it as a whole and its parts in their context. [Citation.]" (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) REQUESTS FOR JUD...

Excerpt: ...ming arguendo that Puls' written lease contains such a provision, Plaintiffs allege that Manley occupied the subject premises beginning in 2014 with the knowledge and consent of the premises' prior owners. (See First Amended Complaint, paragraphs 2 and 38.) If true, those allegations may support a waiver of any alleged requirement of the prior premise owner to approve Manley's tenancy in writing. (See, e.g., Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt D...

Excerpt: ...) 231 Cal.App.3d 232, 238. ) The complaint must be "liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between the parties." (Code Civ. Proc. § 452.) The court gives the complaint a reasonable interpretation, and treats the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-67; Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) The court may consider all material facts pleaded in the...

Excerpt: ...tion on the ground that it was filed well after the initial 60-days after the initial cross-complaint was served. Cross-Complainant argues that the First Amended Cross-Complaint filed on April 22, 2021, did not contain new causes of action and is sufficiently similar to the original cross-complaint filed on Mary 21, 2018 so that the court should consider the anti-SLAPP motion as untimely. The court agrees. Typically, an anti-SLAPP motion must be ...

Excerpt: ..., the amount of $15,590. Nevertheless, Dimco still fails to establish that the total amount that it potentially owes to the other claimant parties in this lawsuit is only $56,650. Instead, each of cross- complainants Flock Freight Inc. ("Flock"), Choptank Transport, Inc. ("Choptank") and Mode Transportation LLC ("Mode") appear to have separate and distinct claims for money damages against Dimco for unpaid shipping services each of Flock, Choptank...

Excerpt: ...hem. (See Rutherford Holdings LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221, 236.) Defendants shall file and serve an Answer to the Complaint no later than Friday, August 6, 2021. IF ANY PARTY WISHES TO CONTEST THIS TENTATIVE RULING, NO LATER than 4:00 PM on Tuesday, July 20, 2021, the contesting party must email [email protected] and provide notice to all counsel of the intent to contest the tentative order. Any requested hearing w...

Excerpt: ... no later than 4:00 p.m. on Monday, July 12, 2021, a party to the action notifies both (1) the Court by emailing [email protected], and (2) all opposing counsel or self-represented parties, that the party is contesting this tentative ruling. The clerk shall provide the hearing date and time, and call information. If a hearing is requested, the hearing will be conducted on Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. or at a subsequent date ...

Excerpt: ...causes cancer or reproductive toxicity or that they necessarily emanate any such chemicals. Rather, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's products, if used with marijuana, produce marijuana smoke, which is a carcinogen regulated by Proposition 65. Plaintiff does not allege that the Defendant's products can only be used with marijuana, or that their use with other substances emanates any carcinogen subject to Proposition 65. Plaintiff cites no case h...

Excerpt: ... plaintiff's cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. §?437c, subd. (p)(2).) Once defendant makes this showing, the burden shifts to plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of fact regarding the cause of action or defense. (Id.) "There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the evidence would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find the underlying...

Excerpt: ...oner argues that he did not refuse to complete a chemical breath test; instead, he was simply "unable" to complete it. For the purposes of this writ, that distinction makes no difference. Vehicle Code section 13353(a) provides for a one year license suspension for any driver who either refuses to submit to a chemical test or who "fails to complete" it. It is undisputed that Petitioner failed to complete the breath test. (See Garcia v. Department ...

Excerpt: ... cleared. Mr. Beltran, offered to have Santiago Hernandez assist with trimming trees because had experience trimming trees and tools, and Mr. Tuomey agreed. (AR:0131-0132.) On May 21, 2016, Santiago Hernandez was seriously injured while working to remove the trees. (Administrative Record Pages ("AR"): 118:7-119:14; 131:21-132:4.) Mr. Hernandez was not licensed by the California Contractors State Licensing Board as a tree trimmer and Mr. Tuomey wa...

Excerpt: ...ll documents related to the company's preparation of its proposal to the City for the Residential Recycling ("RR") contract in 2015. The parties advise that the City began the process of soliciting proposals from companies interested in providing recycling and waste collection services in 2012. The objection of CWS that the request is overbroad and seeks information that is not relevant to the subject matter of this action is overruled. The infor...

Excerpt: ...4.) "California law, like federal law, favors enforcement of valid arbitration agreements." (Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 97.) The California Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration clauses. (CCP §§ 1280 et seq.) California does not have a "policy compelling persons to accept arbitration of controversies which they have not agreed to arbitrate and which no statute has made arbitra...

Excerpt: .... v. Mercury Constr. Corp. (1983) 460 U.S. 1, 24.) "California law, like federal law, favors enforcement of valid arbitration agreements." (Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 97.) The California Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration clauses. (CCP §§ 1280 et seq.) California does not have a "policy compelling persons to accept arbitration of controversies which they have not agreed to ...

Excerpt: ...intiff) and Neutron. The Court further ORDERS the present action STAYED pending completion of arbitration proceedings. This tentative ruling will automatically become the Court's final order on Tuesday, July 20, 2021 unless, by no later than 4:00 p.m. on Monday, July 19, 2021, a party to the action notifies both (1) the Court by emailing [email protected], and (2) all opposing counsel or self-represented parties, that the party is co...

Excerpt: ...ood faith has the effect of discharging the settling defendants' obligations to any remaining defendants in contribution or equitable indemnity. (See CCP § 877.6(a), (c).) The burden of proof lies with the party asserting that the settlement is not in good faith. (CCP § 877.6(d).) A settlement is in "good faith" if it is within the "reasonable range"-that is, "within the ballpark"-of the settling tortfeasor's share of liability for the plaintif...

Excerpt: ...A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations in a complaint." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The Court must determine "whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action or discloses a complete defense." (Id.) The Court assumes "the truth of the properly pleaded factual allegations, facts that reasonably can be inferred from those expressly pleaded and matters of which ju...

Excerpt: ... Plaintiff-in- Intervention Chubb filed a notice of lien related to is worker's compensation policy for amounts paid related to the same accident. On March 17, 2020, Defendants settled their claims with Plaintiff Hammond, which included a negligence cause of action. Defendants now demurrer to the First Amended Complaint-in-Invention on the grounds that since the negligence cause of action has been dismissed from the Complaint-in-Intervention, tha...