Excerpt: ...ntiff, a non-profit corporation. The officers are not attorneys. Defendant demurs to the complaint because a corporation is not permitted to appear in court without an attorney. (Merco Constr. Engineers, Inc. v. Mun. Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 724, 731; Gamet v. Blanchard (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1276, 1284.) Plaintiff recently retained counsel who substituted into this action on February 3, 2021. Counsel filed a response to the demurrer seeking only ...

Excerpt: ...amended complaint must be filed and served within ten (10) days of this order. (2) To Deny Defendant's Motion To Strike Punitive Damages in Plaintiff's Complaint (1) In this lemon law action, Defendant demurs to Plaintiff's 3 rd, 5 th and 6 th Causes of Action. For purposes of a demurrer all properly plead facts and those reasonably arising by implication must be accepted as true. (Couglas v. E. & J. Gallo Winery (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 103, 114.) A...

Excerpt: ...he Motion by Defendant David Wilgus to Contest the Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement. This action arises from an automobile accident occurring August 1, 2018. Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries suffered as a passenger of one of the two vehicles involved in the accident. Defendants Feinstein and Wilgus were drivers of the vehicles. Feinstein has filed a Cross-Complaint against Wilgus for indemnification and apportionment of...

Excerpt: ...to Petitioner's First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate; and (2) To Grant the Motion by Touchstone Pistachio Company to Strike Portions of the First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate, with leave to amend. Any amended petition should be filed and served within fourteen (14) days of this order. (1) Real Party in Interest (“Touchstone”) demurs to all causes of action asserted in the First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate. Touchstone as...

Excerpt: ...Ruling: (1) To Grant the motion of Defendant Marriott Visalia for Summary Judgment; (2) to Deny the motion of Defendant Elmore Sports Group, Ltd. for Summary Judgment; (3) to Deny the motion of Defendant Inland Empire 66ers for Summary Judgment and to deny the alternative motion for summary adjudication as to all issues submitted; and (4) to Deny the motion of Defendant Taylor Dunn for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff asserts she was severely injured ...

Excerpt: ...r Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 2. Plaintiff shall submit a revised proposed order with the correct department and judicial officer as well as providing for the final hearing date. The court initially heard the motion on October 21, 2019 and denied the motion outlining a number of deficiencies. The court finds Plaintiff's supplemental declarations filed on October 23, 2020 sufficiently address the court's concerns and to enable...

Excerpt: ...ed by the parties is precluded as a matter of law under Business and Professions Code 16600. B&P 16600 limits but does not totally bar non-solicitation agreements. Defendant has not shown that the agreement at issue here is precluded by the statute as a matter of law. Defendant has not shown that the agreement restricts Defendant from employment opportunities. Defendant has not shown that the agreement is unenforceable as a matter of law under Lo...

Excerpt: ... approximately 12:45 a.m. on June 20, 2017 in a courtyard of the hotel. The two runners were employed by minor league baseball teams staying at the hotel. Moving Defendant William Thornhill is also employed in a management capacity by a minor league baseball team, Defendant Lancaster Jethawks. Plaintiff asserts moving defendant was one of the organizers of the footrace. Plaintiff asserts a cause of action for negligence against Movant. Plaintiff ...

Excerpt: ...he covenant of good faith and fair dealing, slander of title, and intentional interference with prospective economic relationship. The action relates to development of real property commonly known as 2948 and 2950 East Douglas Avenue, Visalia California and 1333 Lewis Lane, Tulare, California. Defendants demur to the sixth cause of action – for slander of title and to the seventh cause of action – for intentional interference with prospective...

Excerpt: ... to discovery. Notice of the motion appears to have been adequate. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Plaintiff's action has been pending for more than a year, since December 12, 2019. Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendants' written discovery propounded in February 2020. Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendants' initial motion to compel responses to discovery filed July 17, 2020. On August 17, 2020, the court adopted its tentative rul...

Excerpt: ...liminary approval. The court reviews the motion with regard to the deficiencies previously noted by the court. Justification for installment funding Plaintiff has filed a supplemental declaration from Defendant which adequately supports the provision for installment funding of the settlement amount within 90 days. Enhancement awards to class representatives Plaintiff has not presented additional information to support the requested awards and ref...

Excerpt: ...n should be filed and served within twenty (20) days of this order. Petitioner is self-represented. Notice of both demurrers appears to have been adequate. Petitioner has not filed a response to either demurrer. Petitioner's amended petition is unclear and improperly appears an attempt to add to rather than replace her initial pleading which was captioned as a “Motion for Judicial Review.” Taken together it appears the primary relief sought b...

Excerpt: ...VE FACTS Plaintiff Elizabeth Rocha was employed by the defendant Tulare County Office of Education (TCOE) as a rehabilitation specialist. She alleges that during the time that plaintiff worked for TCOE at the Washington Intermediate School in Dinuba, she was the subject of incidents that threatened her safety and the safety of other students and staff. Plaintiff contends that TCOE ignored her requests for physical assistance (and was instructed t...

Excerpt: ... 20, 2017 in a courtyard of the hotel. The two runners were employed by minor league baseball teams staying at the hotel. Moving Defendant Lancaster Jethawks is the baseball team with whom one of the alleged race organizers was employed. (Defendant Will Thornhill.) One of the runners was also employed by Movant. (Defendant Dunn.) Plaintiff asserts a cause of action for negligence against Movant. Plaintiff was also employed in minor league basebal...

Excerpt: ...ather Pietroforte and Law Offices of Heather Pietroforte, A Professional Corporation's demurrer to plaintiff's first amended complaint (2) To grant defendants' motion to strike portions of plaintiff's first amended complaint without leave to amend. Defendants shall have 30 days from the date of notice of this ruling to answer the plaintiff's complaint DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE The court notes that a more detailed ruling on defendant...

Excerpt: ...of a motor vehicle versus pedestrian accident where the terms of a settlement were agreed to by the parties at a mandatory settlement conference on November 29, 2018. Plaintiff's counsel dictated the terms of this settlement “on the record” in open court during the November 29, 2018 mandatory settlement conference. A first draft of the settlement was ordered on December 11, 2018 and defendant's counsel e-mailed the terms of the settlement to ...

Excerpt: ...et three) and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,375 The court notes that it has already approved the definition of “class members” as previously suggested by the plaintiff (“All non‐exempt employees who, at any time from January 29, 2015 through the date Notice is mailed to the class, was employed as a bus driver for Classic Charter”) But in plaintiff's third inspection demand plaintiff defines “class members” as “All emp...

Excerpt: ...The Court has not received any response to this MSJ. Judicial Notice is granted as to defendants' request for judicial notice under Evidence Code 452(d) This MSJ arises out of a wrongful termination cause of action and related claims brought by plaintiffs David Gonzalez and Jose Adolfo Villagomez against their previous employer defendant Agri- Care. Defendant Tate Sandborg was the plaintiffs' direct supervisor and Farm Supervisor who reported to ...

Excerpt: ...To Grant Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint related to claims for punitive damages, with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of this ruling. (1) Plaintiff asserts a number of causes of action arising from alleged wrongful termination of his employment. Defendant demurs to the First Cause of Action – for Discrimination; the Second Cause of Action – for Failure to Acco...

Excerpt: ...t, by order of October 2, 2020, has resolved the identical issues raised by Plaintiff in this action. Plaintiff disputes Defendant's assertions. Plaintiff contends the October 2 order was limited to costs of a completed feasibility study and does not include Plaintiff's liability for ongoing or future cleanup costs. The court finds Plaintiff's contention unpersuasive. Considered in its entirety, it is clear to the court that the federal district ...

Excerpt: .... The Court finds that moving party attorney George J Vasquez of the has complied with the provisions of California Rule of Court 3.1362(d) as to the service of the moving papers for this motion on the plaintiffs. The Court has not received any response to this motion. The supporting declaration of George J Vasquez establishes that the plaintiff Jose Lopez has refused to cooperate with his counsel in the prosecution of his case and that the attor...

Excerpt: ...Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal. App. 4th 116, 129. 1. Sufficiency of Amount of Settlement Plaintiffs assert there are 103 members of the proposed class, representing employees who worked for Defendant for the period covered by the complaint. The proposed gross settlement amount is $500,000.00. Plaintiffs have shown, based on information obtained through discovery, their calculations of maximum amounts recoverable in the event Plaintiffs were to obta...

Excerpt: ...r 29, 2020. The hearing was continued at the request of the parties until after a second round of mediation could be held on November 19, 2020. No documents have been filed in this action since September 24, 2020. Defendant's motion was filed on August 5, 2020. Plaintiff filed opposition on September 16, 2020. Defendant's reply was filed on September 16, 2020. Nothing having been filed as to the status of the parties' mediation efforts, the court...

Excerpt: ...; 3) Negligent Hiring/Retention; 4) Sexual Battery; and 5) Sexual Harassment. Defendant moves for summary judgment/adjudication as to all causes of action. Defendant asks the court to take judicial notice of three documents. The court grants the request as to the March 9, 2019 ruling on Defendant's Motion to Strike and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Exhibit RJN-A.) The request is denied as to the other documents which are not court record...

Excerpt: ...int. Defendant shall file its answer to the First Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of this ruling. (1) In this action, Plaintiff asserts causes of action for breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, and fraudulent inducement – concealment related to his purchase in October 2017 of a new 2017 Cadillac Escalade vehicle. Plaintiff has named as Defendant only the vehicle manufacturer, General Motors, LLC. Plaintiff has not asse...