Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

294 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Stanislaus x
Judge: Freeland, John F x
2021.07.22 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 797
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.07.22
Excerpt: ...4, 95, 162-173, and 238-249 are stricken and have not been considered. The Court will also address the five “issues” for summary adjudication out of order and begins with Issues 2, 3, and 4, together. These individual “issues” do not dispose of the entire cause of action, an entire affirmative defense, or an issue of duty. (Cal. Civ. Pro. 437c(f).) As framed by the moving party, the issues explicitly seek adjudication on the issue whether...
2021.07.13 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 948
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ... for Admissions, Set Two (2); Request for Monetary Sanctions in the Amount of $1,750.00; and Request for Issue Sanctions Re Notice Against Defendant for Willfully and Fraudulently Concealing Evidence of Prior Incidents - DENIED; c) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant City of Turlock to Provide Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set Three (3); Request for Monetary Sanctions in the Amount of $1,750.00; and Request for Issue Sanctions ...
2021.06.30 Motion to Compel Further Responses 725
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.06.30
Excerpt: ...ject discovery requests were served by mail on April 30, 2021, as previously promised. However, the evidence submitted by the defense raises a significant issue with regard to the veracity of the Plaintiffs' claims in this regard. Moreover, the defense has demonstrated that the opposition herein was not served in compliance with the requirements of Code Civ. Proc. §1005(c), despite the attestation contained in the proof of service attached there...
2021.06.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 796
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.06.10
Excerpt: ...t Gardner Trucking, INC.'s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication – GRANTED, and unopposed. (a)Defendant, as the moving party, has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment against Plaintiffs as a matter of law. The Court finds that the Defendant has met its burden with regard to the each challenged cause of action herein as well as the claim for punitive damages....
2021.06.08 Demurrer 438
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.06.08
Excerpt: ...or Express Contractual Indemnity, the Court finds that the pleading fails to allege facts that give rise to express indemnity obligations arising out of this action under the relevant agreement. Therefore, the demurrer is SUSTAINED as to the First Cause of Action; however, the Court will grant leave to amend in this regard. With regard to the Second and Third Causes of Action for Implied Indemnity and Equitable Indemnity, the Court finds that the...
2021.05.20 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 725
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.05.20
Excerpt: ... 18 th, and 20 th causes of action. The Court finds that the Second Amended Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to support the stated causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc. §430.10(e).) Moreover, Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they are able to allege additional facts that would be sufficient to overcome demurrer on these claims, and the Court concludes that they are unable to do so. With regard to the 5 th, 8 th, 16 th, 17 th, and 19 th...
2021.05.19 Motion to Compel Deposition, Production of Docs of PMK and Custodians of Records 353
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.05.19
Excerpt: ...pursuant to the notice. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to an order compelling the appearance of Defendant's Person(s) Most Knowledgeable at the location chosen by Plaintiffs within the statutory mileage limitations. (Code Civ. Proc. §§2025.250, 2025.450(a).) Counsel shall meet and confer to select a mutually agreeable date to complete the deposition, which should occur no later than June 18, 2021. With regard to specific issues presented by...
2021.05.14 Motion for Attorney Fees 499
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.05.14
Excerpt: ...addition, Defendants are entitled to recover allowable costs pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §§1032 and 1033.5. Therefore, Court exercises its discretion in determining the award, as follows: Hours Reasonably Worked – Regarding the lodestar fees calculation, the Court finds on the basis of Counsel's declarations and supporting exhibits, including time records,that the hours claimed were reasonably incurred and substantially contributed to the ult...
2021.05.06 Motion for Attorney Fees 177
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.05.06
Excerpt: ...robate Code sections 859 and 21380(d) as well as Welfare & Institutions Code section 15657.5(a). Additionally, Petitioner Alexis Arsenio is awarded costs in the amount of $3,461.68. Petitioner filed a memorandum of costs on March 4, 2021 and there has been no motion to tax/strike costs filed. Therefore, the Court awards a total of $53,713.18 in fees and costs to Petitioner Alexis Arsenio in her capacity as successor trustee of the Arsenio Family ...
2021.04.29 Motion to Conduct Psychological Exam 402
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.29
Excerpt: ...mination by Dr. Strassberg, and psychological testing by Dr. Berg. The Court finds that the demand sufficiently identifies the potential tests to be administered, and Plaintiff has failed to object to any of the tests identified. Therefore, the Court incorporates the list of potential psychological tests contained in the defense's demand and finds that such tests may be included, subject to Dr. Berg's discretion at the time of the evaluation. The...
2021.04.28 Motion to Deem Truth of Matters Asserted, for Monetary Sanctions 025
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.28
Excerpt: ...et One- Employment, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Production of Documents – Set One; objections have been waived. (Code Civ. Proc. §§2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling Defendant to provide answers, without objection, to the subject discovery within 14 days. With regard to Request for Admissions, Set One, the Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an order deeming the matte...
2021.04.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 926
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.28
Excerpt: ...erial fact. (Code Civ. Proc. §437c(p)(2).) With regard to Issue 1 identified in the instant motion, Plaintiff has identified no material factual disputes and appears not to oppose the Court's finding that Defendant Modesto City Schools bears no direct liability for negligence herein. (Gov. Code §815.) However, this does not foreclose the possibility of the district's liability based on actions of its employees as provided by Gov. Code §§815.2...
2021.04.23 Motion to Quash Subpoenas 845
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.23
Excerpt: ...determine the nature of the subpoenaed records from that document. In addition, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections to the subject discovery were arguably waived by Plaintiff's failure to object to previous subpoenas which resulted in the disclosure of similar information from some of the same providers at issue here. (See, e.g. Jones v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 534.) In any case, the Court finds that Defendant has sufficientl...
2021.04.20 Motion for Issue Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions 255
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.20
Excerpt: ...e Court declines to award issue sanctions at this time; however, this determination is made without prejudice to consideration of the propriety of such sanctions in the event of future failures to comply with the Court's orders. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to monetary sanctions in connection with the defense's above- described misuse of the discovery process, which necessitated the instant motion. Sanctions are awarded a...
2021.04.14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 090
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.14
Excerpt: ...not explicitly set forth in the administrative charge if they are like or reasonably related to the other charges set forth and could reasonably be expected to grow out of the administrative investigation. (Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4 th 243.) Here, the Court finds that the allegations in the EEOC Complaint, when liberally construed, sufficiently raise the issue of discrimination based on sex, such that a reasonable invest...
2021.04.09 Motion for Protective Order 255
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.09
Excerpt: ...elated to alleged defects, problems, complaints, symptoms, and/or features of the subject vehicles that are not at issue in this action, as defined by Plaintiff's pleadings and responses to discovery to date. Such requests are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence herein. However, the moving papers do not afford sufficient information for the Court to determine which specific requests should be covered by the c...
2021.04.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses 353
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.07
Excerpt: ...hat the subject requests are worded broadly enough to potentially call for the production of privileged materials, Plaintiffs are nevertheless entitled to Code-compliant responses which provide sufficient factual information to allow Plaintiffs to evaluate the merits of the claims of privilege, including provision of a privilege log where necessary. The Court further finds that all responsive documents not subject to a claim of privilege should b...
2021.04.06 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 335
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.04.06
Excerpt: ...elief under Code Civ. Proc. §473(b). In addition, the Court finds that Defendants failed to seek relief within a reasonable time and have failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay. (Code Civ. Proc. §473(b); Huh v. Wang (2007) 158 Cal.App.4 th 1406; Ludka v.Memory Magnetics, Int'l. (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 316.) The moving party bears the burden of demonstrating that relief was sought within a reasonable time, whether or not the other party ...
2021.03.25 Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony 238
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.25
Excerpt: ...ipient witness identified as “Fabiola.” The defense has demonstrated entitlement to discovery on these issues, and the Court finds that Plaintiff's asserted privacy concerns do not outweigh the right to discovery in this instance. The Court finds that the questions regarding counsel's referral of Plaintiff to certain health care providers qualify as prima facie confidential communications pursuant to Evidence Code §952, and Defendants have n...
2021.03.23 Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Default 438
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.23
Excerpt: ...demonstrates that Cross-Defendant Staffing Solutions Inc.'s failure to respond to the amended cross-complaint was the result of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect” as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Furthermore, contrary to opposing counsel's arguments in opposition, the discretionary provisions of Section 473(b) are available under these circumstances. “Discretionary relief may be granted for excusab...
2021.03.23 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 779
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.23
Excerpt: ...s matter. Therefore, the Court presumes that the motion is directed against its order dismissing the action on 6-5- 2020. Plaintiffs have failed to set forth any facts or admissible evidence in support of their request for relief herein. Therefore, they have failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for the relief requested and the motion is DENIED. (b) The motion is moot in view of the Court's above denial of the concurrent motion to set aside th...
2021.03.19 Motion to Dismiss for Delay in Prosecution 293
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.19
Excerpt: ...ourt does not have discretion to dismiss an action where the events specified by the statute have not occurred. (See, e.g. Roman v. Usary Tire & Service Center (1994) 29 Cal.App.4 th 1422.) Even if the Court has discretion here, the Court finds that the reasons for the delay outweigh any detriment to Defendants. ...
2021.03.19 Motion to Compel Depositions of PMQ 129
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.19
Excerpt: ...ion appears to acknowledge that notices were served for PMK depositions on all 3 subjects described in the papers herein. With regard to the depositions described as #s 1 and 2 (PMK depositions with regard to (1) Defendant Gurney's training of Defendant Mendoza, and (2) Defendant Gurney Trucking's safety training, safe driving protocols, safety meetings, and disciplinary protocols regarding unsafe driving), defense counsel's declaration demonstra...
2021.03.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 926
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.18
Excerpt: ...subject materials. However, the scope of the production should be limited in time from the start of the previous academic year (fall 2017) through November 28, 2018. In addition, any such documents should be treated as confidential and dissemination outside the purposes of this litigation is prohibited. Lastly, the Court has concerns about the identification of additional non-party students in the documents to be produced and instructs that the s...
2021.03.17 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena 438
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2021.03.17
Excerpt: ...egard to other factors, including the strength of the interest, the seriousness of the invasion, and the availability of alternatives and protective measures. (Id., at 558.) Here, while Cross-Defendant's employees have a recognized privacy interest in their personal information, contact information has not been found to be particularly sensitive. (Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal.4 th 360, 372.) In addition, the pro...

294 Results

Per page

Pages