Excerpt: ... trustee's sale following a foreclosure. Whether or not they actually did is the underlying issue in this motion. CATAM O U N T brought the underlying unlawful detainer (“UD”) action, MCV -262009, after serving proper notice, on May 26, 2023. ISAACS answered on June 22, alleging affirmative defenses based on violations of Civil Code §§ 2923.55 and 2923.7, two statutes that are part of the Homeowner Bill of Rig h t s (“H BO R”). On Augus...

Excerpt: ...allege that, after telling Plaintiffs that they intended only to remove a single tree that was leaning over Swallows Road, a private way, Defendants trespassed on Plaintiffs' property, excavated a cut in P la in t if f s ' h ills id e , e lim in a t e d a d r a in a g e d it c h , in s t a lle d a b u r ie d c u lv e r t d u m p in g w a t e r into a seasonal creek above Plaintiffs' home, cut down Plaintiffs' trees and vegetation, and dumped rock...

Excerpt: ...Zoe moved for summary judgment on claims brought against her in the cross -c o m p la in t . ( Id . a t 2 :2 -12.) This Court issued an order after hearing on the motion granting Zoe's motion for summary adjudication (the “Order”) because Cross -Complainants lacked essential elements to all of the causes of action as to Zoe. (See generally, Orde r Aft e r He a ring on Cross-Defendant Bethany Zoe's Motion for Summary Adjudication of the Cross ...

Excerpt: ...tices; 4. Appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for settlement purposes; 5. Appointing Plaintiffs' Counsel, Justin F. Marquez and Benjamin H. Haber of Wilshire Law Firm, PLC, as Class Counsel for settlement purposes; 6. Ap p o in t in g Sim p lu r is Cla s s Ac t io n Se t t le m e n t Ad m in is t r a t io n a s t h e Settlement Administrator; and 7. Scheduling a Final Approval Hearing. P r e lim in a r y a p p r o v a l is GRAN TED . T...

Excerpt: ...ned by BOWIE. J O H N liv e s o n t h e p r o p e r t y ; BO W IE liv e s in Au st r a lia . (Individual defendants are referred to by their first names for clarity, as they have the same surname. No disrespect is intended.) Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on July 7, 2023. On September 27, Defendants' counsel sent a pleading captioned “Answer to Complaint of the County of Sonoma,” which purported to answer for both Defendants to counsel f...

Excerpt: ...y s is : This Court previously sustained a demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint on the basis that Plaintiff had failed to allege the existence of a contract between the parties. Thus, Plaintiff's breach of contract and derivative causes of action against Defendants failed. The Complaint had included several fragmentary quotations from correspondence between the parties which purportedly contained the offer, acceptance, and terms of the alleged contr...

Excerpt: ...nd Does 1 -50 arising out of alleged misconduct in representing Plaintiffs in a real estate transaction (the “Complaint”). The Complaint contains causes of action for: 1) breach of contract; 2) negligence; 3) negligent misrepresentation; 4) fraud; 5) failure to disclose; 6) violations of Business and Professions Code § 17200 (“UCL Claim”); 7) rescission; and 8) b r e a c h o f f id u c ia r y d u t y . This matter is on calendar for Buye...

Excerpt: ...D. Cross -Co m p la in a n t Th o m a s Ke lly , III (hereafter, “Thomas”)'s objection to John's oversized opening brief is SUSTAINED. While John's opening brief is only one page over the limit of the Ru le s o f Court, there is a pattern of John filing oversized briefs without first obtaining leave of Court. Thus, the Court exercises its discretion not to consider the last page of John's opening brief. Thomas's request for judicial notice is...

Excerpt: ...��P la in t if f ”) b r o u g h t t h is a c t io n a g a in s t Defendant for violations of Sonoma County Municipal Code Chapter 13 Section 1, private nuisance, and public nuisance, after Defendant cleared a certain number of dead and dyi ng trees that had been burned during the Tubbs fire through Defendant's lands pursuant to the directions from California's Department of Forestry and local officials. (Motion, 2:15 -2 4 .) Ultimately, without...

Excerpt: ...in Napa County. Defendants have not yet answered, or appeared in this action in any way. On October 31, 2023, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion for venue change, averring that “This suit was inadvertently and erroneously filed in Sonoma County Superior Court.” II. Napa County is the appropriate venue for this lawsuit “[I]f a defendant has contracted to perform an obligation in a particular county, the superior court in the county where th...

Excerpt: ...M o t io n , 2 : 5 -10.) The jury also awarded attorney's fees plus prejudgment interest an d punitive damages. ( Id . at 2:11-1 6 .) P la in t if f n o w seeks prejudgment interest per Civil Code 3287(a) for the total amount of $666,075.01 against Defendant. ( Id . at 2:17-18.) EVID EN TIARY O BJ ECTIO N S “All written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers in support of or in opposition to the motion....

Excerpt: ...class representative; appointing Matern Law Group, PC as Class Counsel; appointing Phoenix Class Ac t io n Ad m in is t r a t io n So lu t io n s a s t h e settlement administrator; directing Defendants to furnish certain information about proposed class members; and scheduling the final approval hearing. Th e hearing is CONTINUED to May 8, 2024, at 3:00 p.m., in Department 16, to allow Plaintiff to address the issues raised below. “A trial cou...

Excerpt: ...e was a minor. (Motion, 1:21-25. ) After Defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa filed for bankruptcy protection, a case management conference was set in this matter for June 1, 2023, which Plaintiff failed to appear at because Plaintiff's counsel failed to calendar the hearing. ( Id . at 1:26- 28, 2:1-2.) The Court set an Order to Show Cause hearing for July 13, 2023, for which Plaintiff's counsel filed a case management statement, but fai...

Excerpt: ...n. Th e m o t io n is D EN IED . 1. Co m p la in t Plaintiff's complaint alleges it is the owner of real property located at 23250 Maffei Road in Sonoma (“the Property”). On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff entered into a Commercial Property Purchase Agreement with Edward Benedetti to purchase the Prope rty alon g with turkey rendering equipment (“the Equipment”) from Benedetti Farms, Inc. Escrow closed on March 31, 2021. On May 7, 2021, Arthu...

Excerpt: ... Evide nt iary and Proce dural Issue s The Court notes that Defendant's reply is over length, presenting 12 pages of substantive argument, where the page limit for replies is 10 pages. Cal. Rule of Court Rule 3.1113(d). The Court, on its own motion, strikes pages 12 -1 3 fo r f a ilin g t o c o m p ly w it h the Rules of Court. II. Procedural Hist ory Plaintiff brought this action against Defendant on or about August 5, 2020, alleging she suffere...

Excerpt: ...fects and nonconformities to warranty regarding Plaintiff's 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”). (Motion, 3:2- 1 3 . ) Plaintiff served GM with a notice of deposition of its PMQ with a demand for document production. ( Id . at 3:14-22.) The topics for examination included: (1) G M 's p r e -lit ig a t io n a n a ly s is a s t o w h e t h e r t h e 2 0 1 9 Ch e v r o le t Silv e r a d o 1 5 0 0 should be repurchased; (2) all repa...

Excerpt: ...een subjected to. Plaintiff objected to these requests based upon CCP section 2017.220. CCP section 2017.220(a) provides: “In any civil action alleging conduct that constitutes sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery, any party seeking discovery concerning the plaintiff's sexual conduct with individuals other than the alleged perpetrator shall establish specific facts showing that there is good cause for t hat dis covery, and t...

Excerpt: ...Plaintiff Jim Shelton (“Plaintiff”) on October 14, 2021, alleging unlawful detainer of property located at 935 C McConnell Avenue in Santa Rosa. On March 22, 2022, Long filed a demurrer to the complaint. The hearing on the demurrer was continued from April 5, 2022, to April 12, 2022, to a llo w P la in t if f 's t h e n -counsel to obtain a copy of the demurrer. However, on April 7 , 2 0 2 2 , P la in t if f f ile d a f ir s t a m e n d e d c...

Excerpt: ...l to be entered correcting these two errors. The court in all other respects DENIES the motio n . Fact s and Hist ory Plaintiffs obtained a verdict against Defendant Martin Reilley (“Martin”) for various claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation after a trial which ended in March 2005. Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Martin. Th e surviving co urt records show a judgment in Plaintiffs' favor of $621,336.26. Se e Judgm...

Excerpt: ...ourt of the status of the Goodwin action. Unless ordered otherwise, the parties shall attend a status conference on August 27, 2024, at 3:00pm. The parties may attend the status conference remotely. Defendant shall prepare the order for the Court in compliance with CRC 3.1312. I. Governing law A. Standard on demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747....

Excerpt: ..., LLC (“CES LLC”) and the Oregon Corp. The cross- complaint alleges that CES LLC and Shimadzu entered into agreements wherein Shimadzu agreed to sell CES LLC certain scientific equipment. Shimadzu alleges that CES LLC has failed to pay all invoices. In addition, Shimadzu alleges that CES LLC transferred its personal property to the Oregon Corp., including the scientific equipment that is the subject of this case without receiving the reasonab...

Excerpt: ...n or in her counsel's declaration. Nellessen simultaneously moves to compel the deposition of Defendant's person most knowledgeable (“PMK”) and requests leave to reopen discovery. The Court GRANTS leave to reopen discovery and also the motion to compel the deposition of Defendant's PMK. Procedural History Defendant served Nellessen's counsel with the five depositions subpoena production of business records on the Subpoenaed Entities and notic...

Excerpt: ... Inc. (“Eno”) (all together “Defendants”), as well as Does 1- 40, arising out of alleged breach of contract and construction defects. Cross- complaints from Wahidi, Eno, and SR Iron have each followed. This matter is on calendar for a motion by the Plaintiff to designate the matter complex under Cal. Rule of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.400. The Court has also continued the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) from February 1, 2024, to the ...

Excerpt: ...ht surety companies and insurers, relating to breach of contract, construction defects, and negligence (the “DXC”). The Hollys have thereafter filed a cross-complaint for indemnity and breach of contract against the ten subcontractors named in the DXC, along with eleven more subcontractors not named therein (the “HXC”). This matter is on calendar for the motion by the Hollys to designate the case complex under Cal. Rules of Court (“CRC�...

Excerpt: ...tion-free verified responses to Plaintiff, and pay $60.00 in sanctions within 30 days of service of the notice of entry of order. Procedural History This Court previously entered a default judgment against Defendants. Afterwards, Plaintiff propounded written interrogatories and demands for production on Defendants, and Defendants never responded, despite Plaintiff's follow-up correspondence to meet and confer on the lack of response. Plaintiff br...