Excerpt: ... Code S 1790 et seq. (the "Act") (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair (against Dealer). Plaintiff purchased a 2022 Ford F-150 (the "Vehicle") from Dealer. During the sales process Plaintiff and Dealer executed a "Retail Installment Sale Contract— Simple Finance Charge (With Arbitration Provision)" ("RISC"). See Declaration of Trina M. Clayton in Support ("Clayton Dec...

Excerpt: .... Sunbridge Healthcare, LLC (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1169.) "There are circumstances in which nonsignatories to an agreement containing an arbitration clause can be compelled to arbitrate under that agreement." (Suh v. Superior Ct. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1504, 1513.) "As one authority has stated, there are six theories by which a nonsignatory may be bound to arbitrate: '(a) incorporation by reference; (b) assumption; (c) agency; (d) veil-pier...

Excerpt: ...tce of hearing on Respondent but Respondent never appeared. This court granted the petition on January 5, 2023, and entered judgment in favor of Petitioner on February 21, 2023. The order and judgment state that Petitoner requested pre-judgment interest and attorney's fees and costs as part of the petition. They state that Petitioner may file post-judgment motions to determine an award of pre-judgment interest and pre-judgment attorney's fees and...

Excerpt: ... NEWREZ which holds a lien on the Property, and directing that the Property be sold. Defendant Eugene and Victoria Williams ("Williams") (collectively, "Cross-complainants"), filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff, complaining that they all purchased the Property together by agreement, with each one holding a 1/3 interest with a share of the loan liability, Eugene is Plaintiff's father, and Williams is Plaintiff's sister. They allege that Plai...

Excerpt: ...ve the notce of entry of this order within 5 days of entry of this order. California Rule of court ("CRC") 3.1320(g). Alleging that they are married and owned several pieces of real property (the "Property"), Plaintiffs complain that Defendants fraudulently induce them to enter into short-term loan agreements (the "Loans") with balloon payments (the "Payments") secured against the Properties, in order to cause Plaintiffs to default so that Defend...

Excerpt: ...e at 5775 Bluegate Rd., Santa Rosa ("the Property"), Defendants negligently caused a large chunk of concrete to strike Plaintiff in his back, causing injuries. He adds that this resulted from the negligent operation of a concrete pump and hose. Plaintiff initially named as Defendants only Shep Concrete Pumping and Kyle Shepherd (collectively, the "Shep Defendants") but on October 15, 2021, he filed an amendment naming as Defendants Worden Enterpr...

Excerpt: ...declaratory relief, and unfair business practices. The FAC alleges that Freeman is an auto dealership located at 2875 Corby Avenue in Santa Rosa and that hired defendant Northwest General Engineering, LLC ("Northwest") in 2018 to excavate, clear, haul away, and dispose of construction spoils. (FAC, 95.) Northwest specializes in grading, paving, and underground site work. (FAC, 96.) Plaintiff alleges that Northwest contracted with Toby's Trucking,...

Excerpt: ... amending the complaint to the operative second amended complaint ("SAC"). In the SAC, Fidelity names Defendant William R. McCarty, Jr. ("McCarty"), individually and as successor trustee to the Della Mae McCarty Revocable Trust dated December 16, 2019 ("Della 2019 Trust"), Defendant Heidi Darling ("Darling") as successor trustee to the W.R. McCarty Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2010 ("WRM Trust") and the Della Mae McCarty Revocable Trust dated Ma...

Excerpt: ...red into a written agreement (the "Agreement") to pay Plaintiff the amounts stated in the Agreement while Defendant, president of Borrower, entered into the written Guaranty as personal guarantor of Borrower to pay Borrower's debt in the event that Borrower defaulted on its payment obligations. Plaintiff alleges that it has performed or been excused from performance. It also alleges that Borrower was formally dissolved as of December 16, leaving ...

Excerpt: ...gency, but which were legally prohibited by the price-gouging statute, Penal Code ("PC") section 396; and 2) the third cause of action fails because Plaintiffs have no legal right to "recoup" rental increases which they claim to be "lost" during the declared state of emergency, but which were legally prohibited by the price-gouging statute, PC section 396. The court finds that Defendants have met their burden on both issues, as explained below, a...

Excerpt: ...rial date of February 16, 2024 is vacated. The Court will sign the proposed orders lodged with the moving papers. This matter arises out of a contract for the sale of a vehicle by Defendant Hansel Ford to Plaintiff. Defendant Ford Motor Company manufactured the vehicle. Plaintiff alleges several causes of action including, violations of Civil Code S 1793.2, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, and negligence per se. Defendants move ...

Excerpt: ...ndum of Points and Authorities in support of Motion ["Plaintiff's Motion"], 2:13-18.) On May 13, 2021, the parties participated in a mediation, during which the parties allegedly agreed to settle and produced a "Settlement Term Sheet" that set forth the terms of the parties' agreement. (Plaintiff's Motion, 3:15-23.) The Settlement Term Sheet stated that Defendants agreed to list for sale their real property located at 4401 Price Avenue, Santa Ros...

Excerpt: ... (Malcom v. Sup.Ct. (Green) (1981) 29 Cal.3d 518, 523.) It is a remedy which must be narrowly applied. (ld. at 524.) Therefore, the modern policy is to restrict lis pendens. (See Hilberg v. Sup.Ct. (Mendrin) (1989) 215 cal.App.3d 539, 542.) Only a "real property claim" can support a lis pendens. (CCP S 405.1.) A lis pendens "claimant" is "a party to an action who asserts a real property claim and records a notice of the pendency of the action." (...

Excerpt: ...lity to compete with Defendants. The Individual Plaintiffs are allegedly former employees of Defendant USI Insurance Services LLC ("USILLC"), which is allegedly owned by Defendant LISI Advantage Corp. ("USIAC"). Both USI and ABD allegedly are in the business or brokering insurance. Plaintiffs allege that the Individual Plaintiffs' employment agreements ("the Employment Agreements") with USILLC contain provisions purporting to restrict their abili...

Excerpt: ...seeks to modify these orders to allow introduction of evidence regarding litigation (San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CG-21-592997, hereinafter the "Wolfgang Acton") between Smash and Wolfgang Operations, LLC ("Wolfgang"), who manufactured Smash's products within their facility. Smash alleges in the Complaint that Tanis interfered with their contractual relations with Wolfgang. See Complaint at 953, 955-957, and 965. Tanis now moves the Cou...

Excerpt: ...This matter is on calendar for the moton by Scoble and Schaefer under California Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 1987.1 to quash production of documents under subpoenas by Plaintiff served upon non-parties Conner & Winters, LLP ("CW LLP") and JP Morgan Chase Bank ("JP Morgan") under CCP S 1985.3. Governing Law Although Code of Civil Procedure section 1985(b) states in part that "an affidavit shall be served with a subpoena duces tecum issued befo...

Excerpt: ...iff alleges that Defendant owes it money on a promissory note and security agreement (the "Note") by which Plaintiff provided funding in return for payments and a security interest in a 2004 Ford F250. It complains that Defendant has failed to pay the amount owed. On March 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed a proof of service for the summons and complaint showing substituted service on Defendant at 549 Alta Ave., Rohnert Park, CA 94928 on October 16, 2022...

Excerpt: ...f the Fair Pay Act (the "Complaint"). This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Defendant to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 1281.2. Defendant's petition to compel arbitration is GRANTED. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues Defendant's contention that Plaintiff's opposition is late under CCP S 1290.6 is inadequate to cause the Court to disregard the Plaintiff's opposition. Defendant has ...

Excerpt: ...enjoining Defendant from maintaining any building or septic violation, or conduct any activity or use upon the Property contrary to the ordinances of the County of Sonoma; and 2. the order to: A) abate the code violations ; and 8) schedule inspection with the County entity, Permit Sonoma, to confirm the abatement of those violations. Plaintiff is required to serve the order granting this Motion, and the underlying moving papers and the underlying...

Excerpt: ..."MBSR"). On June 2, 2022, defendants MBSR and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ("M8," together "Defendants") moved to compel arbitration of the matter under the parties' lease agreement. On August 17, 2022, the court granted Defendants' motion and ordered the parties to arbitration. Plaintiff filed this motion on March 13, 2023, stating that Defendants have failed to respond to Plaintiff's arbitration request. This motion is brought pursuant to CCP section...

Excerpt: ...c facts show-ng 'good cause' justifying the discovery sought by the demand." (CCP Absent a claim of privilege or attorney work product, the party who seeks to compel production has met his burden of show-ng 'good cause' simply by showing that the requested documents are relevant to the case, i.e., that it is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence under CCP S 2017.010. (See al...

Excerpt: ...dmissions ("RFAs") admitted under CCP S 2033.280. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within twenty (20) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Plaintiff's motion to deem admissions admitted is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay $860 in sanctons to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Mohon. Governing Law Regarding the Fls, a party...

Excerpt: ..."RPODs") from Defendant under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notce of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discovery to t...

Excerpt: ...nd failed to provide a single point of contact to handle Plaintiff's request for a foreclosure alternative. She seeks monetary damages, restitution, and injunctive relief. Defendant served Plaintiff with a deposition notice setting her deposition for July 20, 2022, but Plaintiff failed to appear, so Defendant re-noäced the deposition for September 6, 2022, and Plaintiff again failed to appear. Van Zandt Dec. in support of Motion to Compel Deposi...

Excerpt: ...ut that the Vehicle was defective and Defendants failed to repair or replace the Vehicle or refund the purchase price. She alleges that Defendants provided warranties ("the Warranties") for the Vehicle and knew that the Vehicle was defective and dangerous. On May 27, 2020, as Plaintiff was driving the Vehicle up her driveway, the Vehicle began to smoke so she left the vehicle, leaving her personal possessions in it, before the engine of the Vehic...