Excerpt: ...a notice of express consent win this case or otherwise manifested affirmative consent, the court has not ordered electronic service on Medmark, and Medmark has not made an appearance in the action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6(a)(2)(A)(ii).) Prior to the continued hearing date, Defendant shall timely serve motion papers on Medmark in a manner authorized by statute. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1005(b), 1011‐ 1013.) In formally serving the motion, moving...

Excerpt: ...'s failure to properly and timely assert it. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2, subd. (a).) This can happen when the proponent has unreasonably delayed in undertaking the procedure. (Guess?, Inc. v. Superior Court (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 553, 557.) The determination of waiver is a question of fact for the trial court. (Ibid.) Relevant factors to finding waiver include actions inconsistent with the right to arbitrate, whether the “litigation machinery h...

Excerpt: ...ng defendants' share of liability. All requirements having been satisfied, the motion is granted. The DUDLEYS' Motion to Contest DAN PALMER's Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement TENTATIVE RULING ARNOLDO ATILIO GARAY (“GARAY”), Plaintiff in case FCS051729, moves for a determination of good faith settlement regarding settlement of his personal injury claims in that case against DAN PALMER TRUCKING, INC. (“DAN PALMER”) and...

Excerpt: ...5 Cal.4th 180, 192; A.F. Brown Elec. Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Elec. Supply, Inc. (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 1118, 1124.) Plaintiffs' conversion cause of action is based on allegations that Defendant interfered with Plaintiffs' possessory interest in “certain proprietary information” by hacking into Plaintiffs' online accounts, denying Plaintiffs access to those accounts, and deleting the information from the accounts. (Complaint, ¶¶ 16, 21‐2...

Excerpt: ...tioner to the performance of that duty. (Venice Town Council v. City of Los Angeles (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 1547, 1558.) Although the duty to screen an inmate appeal is ministerial, the decision to reject or cancel an inmate appeal is a discretionary one. (Menefield v. Foreman (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 211, 217‐ 218.) Petitioner concedes that Respondent did perform the ministerial duty of screening his appeal, before exercising the discretion to rej...

Excerpt: ...oena upon a party's motion. The court may make any order as appropriate to protect the subpoenaed entity from unreasonable demands. The court finds that Plaintiffs' subpoenas to Wells Fargo and Bank of the West are only reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence where they request copies and records of checks, deposits, withdrawals, and transfers from Defendants' accounts. (Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4t...

Excerpt: .... Malis (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 429, 440.) It clearly appears the intent of the parties for the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 and that Defendant GALL agreed separately to pay $500 as part of the negotiated settlement. (No settlement language is presented regarding default or interest as claimed in the moving papers.) The court also notes that it was counsel for the...

Excerpt: ...e. Plaintiff does not explain why Plaintiff alleged in the Complaint that Defendant was driving 70 miles per hour but now alleges in the First Amended Complaint that Defendant was driving 100 miles per hour at the time of the accident. The burden was on Plaintiff to justify this material change in factual allegations. If a pleader fails to explain the inconsistencies with prior pleadings the court may disregard the inconsistent allegations (Valle...

Excerpt: ...f the relevant information. Defendants were served with the summons and complaint on January 7, 2021. Plaintiff then served defendants, by mail to their home address, requests for admission on February 1, 2021. Defendants' attorney filed an answer on February 3, 2021 and commenced discovery. Defendants' attorney was not informed of the outstanding discovery served by plaintiff by either plaintiff's counsel or her clients and in fact, did not lear...

Excerpt: ...ke. Plaintiff does not explain why Plaintiff alleged in the Complaint that Defendant was driving 70 miles per hour but now alleges in the First Amended Complaint that Defendant was driving 100 miles per hour at the time of the accident. The burden was on Plaintiff to justify this material change in factual allegations. If a pleader fails to explain the inconsistencies with prior pleadings the court may disregard the inconsistent allegations (Vall...

Excerpt: ...cessary to avoid prejudice where she declares that she is eighty‐six years old and has metastatic cancer. (Declaration of Elaine Logan Mein at ¶¶ 4, 6.) Despite knowledge of the pendency of this motion and the apparent knowledge of the filing of a bond, Plaintiff EMERGENCY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES has not named the bond company as a DOE. Therefore all named parties are before the court. Further, Real Party In Interest is requesting the relief. W...

Excerpt: ...ndard. The function of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of the complaint as a matter of law. (Holiday Matinee, Inc. v. Rambus, Inc. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 1413, 1420.) The Court assumes the truth of the allegations in the complaint, but does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (California Logistics, Inc. v. State of California (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 242, 247.) The court does 3 not consider extrinsic facts ...

Excerpt: ...ranted. Full and complete verified responses without objections shall be served within 30 days of service of this order. The court notes that the proper motion is a motion for order deeming requests for admission admitted. CCP §2033.280. This was not requested by plaintiff and is not granted. Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories The motion is granted. Full and complete verified responses without objections shall be served within 30...

Excerpt: ...MES R. INGLEBRIGHT to Requests for Production Set Two; and for Sanctions TENTATIVE RULING The disputes over the 17 requests for production at issue all boil down to the question of whether a responding party may produce a group of documents and put the onus on the requesting party to find any that are responsive to a specific request, or if the responding party must identify the specific documents responsive to a specific document request. C.C.P....

Excerpt: ...or some different case. Second, the motion is not properly served upon all parties to this action including defaulting defendant Si Se Puede Autos, Inc. and Hudson Insurance Company. Service by email to Westlake is not presumptively effective given that the person who may previously have served as counsel may or may no longer be counsel of record given dismissal of the case 5 months earlier. Third, as to Westlake Financial, Westlake's unopposed m...

Excerpt: ...udgment on the pleadings as to the prayer for punitive damages in the complaint. Plaintiff RAMON REYES also calendared a motion to amend the complaint to be heard weeks later. On January 5, 2021, the court directed the parties to appear to discuss scheduling of the motions given the fact that the court intended to grant the motion for judgment on the pleadings but also intended to permit plaintiff to amend his complaint. Ultimately, the parties s...

Excerpt: ...7, 1306.) A cause of action for breach of an implied warranty cannot accrue any later than one year after tender of delivery of the good, the “limited prospective existence beyond the time of delivery” provided by the Song‐Beverly Act. (Com. Code § 2725(2); Mexia, 174 Cal.App.4th at 1308‐1309.) And, while a breach of an express warranty contemplates future performance such that it does not accrue until a breach is or should have been dis...

Excerpt: ...nded Complaint. The court also sustained the demurrer of Defendant THE COCA COLA COMPANY (“COCA COLA”) based upon the failure to allege sufficient facts in the First Amended Complaint to establish a relationship of joint employment. Plaintiff was afforded 20 days to amend as to COCA COLA. On December 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint. No proof has been filed that the Second Amended Complaint was served upon the Defendants....

Excerpt: ...nges to the non‐judicial foreclosure of real property he owned located at 1336 Crowley Lane, Fairfield, CA 94533: Dayton v. Quality Loan Service Corp. as Trustee for Bank of America Home Loans Servicing LP as Beneficiary and Bank of America, Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS045278 Dayton v. Bank of America, as successor by merger, Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS052246 The instant lawsuit is the third lawsuit filed by DAYTON ag...

Excerpt: ...d fifth cause of action for negligence. A plaintiff may maintain a cause of action for equitable indemnity when there is some basis for tort liability against the defendant. (BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. v. Forcum/Mackey Constr., Inc. (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 848, 852.) While liability under the Agricultural Labor Relations Act is limited to “employers” and excludes farm labor contractors (See, Lab. Code §§ 1140.4(c) [definition of employer...

Excerpt: ...FLINT COREY ZIDE and SARKIS SERGO KARAYAN (“Attorneys”), the attorneys who drafted and filed the collection complaint in this action. SUMERS' cross‐complaint alleged against Attorneys causes of action for violation of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”). Both the FDCPA and the Rosenthal Act are designed to protect unsophisticated consumer...

Excerpt: ...r or motion to strike. Plaintiff does not explain why Plaintiff alleged in the Complaint that Defendant was driving 70 miles per hour but now alleges in the First Amended Complaint that Defendant was driving 100 miles per hour at the time of the accident. When a party attempts to avoid the defects of a prior complaint by omitting facts that made the prior complaint defective or adding inconsistent facts, the court may take 4 judicial notice of th...

Excerpt: ... in severe cellulitis and near amputation” arising out of a “missed [] step coming out” of a rental vehicle. (Response to UMF 3.) Plaintiff felt no pain or experienced other symptoms of injury on the date of the vehicle collision or the days immediately following the collision. (Id. at 4‐5.) It is undisputed that Plaintiff sustained his left ankle and foot injury “when he ‘misstepped' out of his rental vehicle from about three feet of...

Excerpt: ... 1306.) A cause of action for breach of an implied warranty cannot 2 accrue any later than one year after tender of delivery of the good, the “limited prospective existence beyond the time of delivery” provided by the Song‐Beverly Act. (Com. Code § 2725(2); Mexia, 174 Cal.App.4th at 1308‐1309.) And, while a breach of an express warranty contemplates future performance such that it does not accrue until a breach is or should have been dis...

Excerpt: ... in severe cellulitis and near amputation” arising out of a “missed [] step coming out” of a rental vehicle. (Response to UMF 3.) Plaintiff felt no pain or experienced other symptoms of injury on the date of the vehicle collision or the days immediately following the collision. (Id. at 4‐5.) It is undisputed that Plaintiff sustained his left ankle and foot injury “when he ‘misstepped' out of his rental vehicle from about three feet of...

Excerpt: ...n violation of the Benicia Municipal Code; (2) operating a commercial cannabis operation without the appropriate state and local permits and/or licensure authorizing such business activities to be conducted; (3) occupying and/or utilizing the premises of 2995 Bayshore Road which have been altered in violation of the Building Code without the appropriate permits and inspections. The court also finds the evidence supports judgment for declaratory r...

Excerpt: ... it is not alleged in the complaint, Defendant Farmers asserts in its motion that it is merely the insurer for Defendant Khodaverdi. Plaintiff cannot bring a direct action against an insurer and may not join an insurer in an action against the insured to establish liability. (Rose v. Royal Ins. Co. (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 709, 718; Zahn v. Canadian Indem. Co. (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 509, 514.) In any case, having failed to file any opposition to the mo...

Excerpt: ...y and Bank of America, Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS045278 Dayton v. Bank of America, as successor by merger, Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS052246 The instant lawsuit appears to be the third lawsuit filed by DAYTON against BANK OF AMERICA related to the foreclosure of the Crowley Lane property. FCS045278 was dismissed by DAYTON without prejudice. In FCS052246, a tentative ruling granting BANK OF AMERICA's motion for summary...

Excerpt: ...settlement must be submitted to the Labor and Workforce Development Agency simultaneously with the court. Plaintiff has shown that the settlement was simultaneously presented to the Labor and Workforce Development Agency. (Declaration of Scott L. Gordon, Exhibit 2.) The court finds the proposed distribution of the total settlement amount reasonable, including payment of $33,333 (one third of the $100,000 total amount) to counsel for attorneys' fe...

Excerpt: ...rts have been made to meet and confer to try to informally resolve the disputes. C.C.P. §2025.450(b)(2). The trial court has discretion in determining whether adequate meet and confer efforts preceded the filing of the motion. Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 424 [factors to be considered include the complexity of the discovery issues, the past history of the counsel on prior disputes, and to a certain extent, the judge's gut feel...

Excerpt: ...intiff shows he properly presented a written administrative claim. Defendants acknowledge that Plaintiff met his claim presentation requirements. However, Defendants argue that Plaintiff failed to timely file this state suit. This argument fails to address the tolling of the state claim due to the pendency of the federal action. (See Addison v. State of California (1978) 21 Cal.3d 313, 319‐320; Harris v. Grimes (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 180, 189.)...

Excerpt: ...lure to pay overtime wages, (10) unlawful business practices, (11) quantum meruit, (12) money had and received, and (13) unjust enrichment, filed on November 13, 2020. The core of the complaint is a dispute over an agreement between the parties for SHARMA to purchase real property (the “Property”) from Plaintiff and then sell it back to him. Defendants present a number of attachments and declarations to the court in support of their demurrer....

Excerpt: ...24, 32, 40), Plaintiff specifically alleged that Defendant Kaufman performed a lumbar puncture, without obtaining informed consent, that caused her injuries. (FAC, ¶¶ 26, 33.) A demurrer may be sustained when specific allegations inconsistent with general allegations render the complaint defective. (Perez v. Golden Empire Transit Dist. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1236.) Plaintiff concedes that Dr. Geller is not an emergency medicine physician ...

Excerpt: ...e costs of “Transcripts of court proceedings not ordered by the court.” As Item 11 in the memorandum of costs, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. (“KAISER”) claimed $29,707.68 in court reporter fees for daily trial transcripts. Of this amount, by time of reply Plaintiff had withdrawn its challenge to the Realtime component of those costs, which the court from the table provided in KAISER's opposition computes to be $2,338.74. Those other costs c...

Excerpt: ...tion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (o)(1).) A summary judgment motion is properly granted where the evidence in support of the moving party would be sufficient to sustain a judgment in his favor and his opponent does not show facts sufficient to present a triable issue of fact. (Parker v. Twentieth Century‐Fox Film Corp. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 176, 181 (Parker).) The motion is not to be granted where any triable issue of material fact exists. (Ibi...

Excerpt: ...issues of duty and causation vis‐à‐vis each cause of action therein. Summarized, the complaint alleges that Defendants' negligence caused the death of Plaintiffs' family member Julian Hawkins (“Decedent”) at the hands of a gunman when both were in GENTLEMAN JIM'S, a bar. Legal Standard. A defendant may move for summary judgment on the basis that the plaintiff cannot establish an element of his cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, ...

Excerpt: ...meritorious and cause for its denial. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(a).) In addition, Defendant has not established the existence of a legally protected privacy interest, an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances, and threatened serious invasions of the interest. (Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 552‐553.) A court need not balance asserted privacy interests with any countervailing interests ser...

Excerpt: ...ker Boat Co. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1297, 1306.) A cause of action for negligence must be commenced within two years of accrual of the cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1.) A cause of action for breach of an implied warranty cannot accrue any later than one year after tender of delivery of the good, the “limited prospective existence beyond the time of delivery” provided by the Song ‐Beverly Act. (Com. Code § 2725(2); Mexia, 174 Cal...

Excerpt: ...CYNTHIA PIKE's complaint for negligence. Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6 provides the procedure by which one settling defendant among many may apply to the court for a determination that his settlement is in good faith. Factors the court should consider when evaluating good faith include a rough approximation of the plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability, the amount paid in settlement, the allocation of settlem...

Excerpt: ...fying what new facts or law support the renewed motion. On January 29, 2021, BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. (“BMO”) submitted a declaration which satisfies this jurisdictional requirement. During the pendency of this motion, the court raised two issues: (1) the independent authority of the insolvent corporate entities to appear through counsel and litigate issues related to assets and the existence and scope of debt given the appointment of a Receiver ...

Excerpt: ...of Receiver Pendente Lite; Preliminary Injunction (filed December 6, 2018); (3) Stipulation and Order Supplementing the Authority Granted to the Receiver Pursuant to the December 6, 2018 Order for Appointment of Receiver Pendente Lite; Preliminary Injunction (filed March 28, 2019); (4) Stipulation and Order Approving Voluntary Termination Agreement (filed May 28, 2019); (5) Complaint (filed November 8, 2018); and (6) April 17, 2019 Minute Order A...

Excerpt: ...d engaging in illegal activities.” (Complaint, ¶ 25.) A false and unprivileged publication that charges a person with crime or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime constitutes slander per se and there is no need to plead or prove actual damages. (Civ. Code § 46(1); Regalia v. The Nethercutt Collection (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 361, 367.) Similarly, when the defamatory meaning of a publication appears within the language it...

Excerpt: ...intiff shows he properly presented a written administrative claim. Defendants acknowledge that Plaintiff met his claim presentation requirements. However, Defendants argue that Plaintiff failed to timely file this state suit. This argument fails to address the tolling of the state claim due to the pendency of the federal action. (See Addison v. State of California (1978) 21 Cal.3d 313, 319‐320; Harris v. Grimes (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 180, 189.)...

Excerpt: ...vidence in support of the moving party would be sufficient to sustain a judgment in his favor and his opponent does not show facts sufficient to present a triable issue of fact. (Parker v. Twentieth Century‐Fox Film Corp. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 176, 181 (Parker).) The motion is not to be granted where any triable issue of material fact exists. (Ibid.) Affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters judicially...

Excerpt: ...e mistake or inadvertence. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Further Responses Plaintiff's motions to compel further responses to interrogatories and to their requests for production of documents are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's meet and confer declarations do not “state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal resolution of each issue presented” (Code Civ. Proc. §...

Excerpt: ...on from Plaintiff CHANG WANG. Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”). The court takes judicial notice of all of Defendant's proffered documents as records of courts of this state. (Ev. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Anti‐ SLAPP Analysis. There are two prongs to the analysis of a special motion to strike made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. (Argentieri v. Zuckerberg (2017) 8 Cal.App.5th 768, 780.) First the defendant must make a ...

Excerpt: ...Memoranda of Costs. California Rules of Court, rule 3.1700(a)(1) provides that a prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file its memorandum of costs within fifteen days of service of notice of entry of judgment or dismissal or within 180 days of entry of judgment, whichever is first. Claimant Defendants are prevailing parties in this Solano County action and entitled to claim costs. A dismissal was entered in their favor; it is immateri...

Excerpt: ...hat the conduct was likely to be harmful to the elder. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30(b); Bounds v. Superior Court (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 468, 478.) A person takes or secretes real or personal property when the person deprives the elder of any property right, “including by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest, regardless of whether the property is held directly or by a representative of an elder or dependent adult....

Excerpt: ...e accident. Now, the Guzman defendants seek court approval of their joint settlement offer for the policy limits of Miguelina's automobile insurance policy, which was accepted by Plaintiffs. Defendant County of Solano opposes each of the motions for good faith settlement. Nothing in defendant County's several unfounded allegations, speculative assertions and misrepresentations of evidence can turn straw into gold. There is no evidentiary basis fo...

Excerpt: ...e of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (o)(1).) A summary judgment motion is properly granted where the evidence in support of the moving party would be sufficient to sustain a judgment in his favor and his opponent does not show facts sufficient to present a triable issue of fact. (Parker v. Twentieth Century‐Fox Film Corp. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 176, 181 (Parker).) The motion is not to be granted where any triable issue of material fact exist...