Excerpt: ...laint alleged compliance with C.C.P. §377.32, and attached a copy of Plaintiff's declaration pursuant to C.C.P. §377.32. CRESTWOOD initially argued that Plaintiff's complaint failed to allege recovery for her decedent mother's pain and suffering within her elder abuse cause of action, based upon Quiroz v. Seventh Ave. Center (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1256. In Quiroz, like in the present case, a dependent adult died in a skilled nursing facility. H...

Excerpt: ... by Defendants to Plaintiff that was breached by Defendants' conduct. But, Defendants have failed to meet their initial burden of establishing that the element of duty cannot be established. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2); Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Prods. (2006) 38 Cal.4th 264, 274.) Defendants' own evidence establishes that they meet the definition of an automobile dismantler as a buyer or seller of the component materials of a vehicle req...

Excerpt: ...NC. are granted. Plaintiff DOUGLAS STROBEL has been diagnosed with mesothelioma. JOANN STROBEL is DOUGLAS STROBEL's wife and sues Defendants for loss of consortium based upon the same underlying theories of liability relied upon by her husband. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that Plaintiff developed mesothelioma as a result of his exposure to asbestos fibers found in cosmetic talc powder. Plaintiff frequently used Johnson's Baby Power (“JBP”) ...

Excerpt: ...pon the service of a set of requests for production of documents, the party targeted by those requests has 30 days to serve responses, and to produce responsive documents. C.C.P. §2031.260. However, that deadline can be extended by the propounding party, as long as the agreement to extend is “confirmed in a writing that specifies the extended date . . . .” C.C.P. §2031.270(a),(b). USRECH here extended in a writing BMO's deadline for respons...

Excerpt: ...S. REAL ESTATE CREDIT HOLDINGS III, LP (“USRECH”) are overruled, in their entireties. A cause of action based upon a breach of a contract accrues at the time the breach causes damage to the plaintiff. BAJI 10.85 [identifying damages caused by the breach as an element of a breach of contract action]; San Francisco Page 2 of 3 Unified School Dist. v. W.R. Grace & Co. (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1318, 1335 [“In California, no cause of action accrues...

Excerpt: ...g Co. (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 23, 32; Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Md. Casualty Co. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 1279, 1292.) “[A]n insurer cannot acquire by subrogation anything to which the insured has no rights, and may claim no rights which the insured does not have.” (Fireman's Fund, 65 Cal.App.4th at 1292.) “Thus, when an insured has released a third party, neither the insured nor the subrogated insurer has any rights to recover from the third ...

Excerpt: ...e the administrative agency”]. C.C.P. §1094.5(e) provides an exception to this rule, authorizing the court to also consider relevant evidence which was either improperly excluded from the administrative record, or that could not have been produced in the exercise of reasonable diligence, by the party now attempting to rely upon it. Where the court finds that there is relevant evidence that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not ha...

Excerpt: ...ons are uncertain. The complaint also does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause for fraud based on intentional or negligent misrepresentation or concealment. Allegations of fraud must be specific. The allegations regarding the alleged misrepresentations of an “attrition of 33 employees” are not sufficiently specific. Also, the allegations are uncertain. The court notes that co‐defendant CALIFORNIA MENTOR FAMILY HOME AGENCY, LLC,...

Excerpt: ...or this reason, discovery in a CEQA case is unusual. Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Superior Court (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 93, 102 [limited discovery Page 2 of 3 available upon a showing that it is “reasonably calculated to lead to evidence admissible under section 1094.5”]. Limited areas of discovery can be proper in a CEQA case, as acknowledged by a statute which requires setting of a CEQA hearing briefing schedule that can be exten...

Excerpt: ...g that defendant Mericle actually received actual notice of the summons and complaint, and Mericle's declaration states and/or implies that he did not receive them. Mericle further states that he continued to use his former Union City address until June 2014, then moved to Burlingame from June 2014 until June 2017, then to Fresno for about two years. Plaintiff's application for an order for published summons includes declarations of diligence sho...

Excerpt: ...s order granting preliminary approval. Having considered the unopposed motion for final approval and the supporting declarations and evidence, the Court finds that the settlement was entered into good faith, is fair, reasonable and adequate, and satisfies the standards for final approval under California law. (Civil Code §1781; Code Civ. Proc. §382; Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.769.) Good cause appearing to the satisfaction of the Court, the propo...

Excerpt: ....App.4th 481, 492 [nearby hotel had no duty to warn pedestrians of foreseeable harm from dangerous location of public road crosswalk installed by Cal Trans]; Selger v. Steven Brothers, Inc. (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1585, 1589‐ 1593 [owner or occupant of land abutting a public sidewalk owes no duty as to defects in the sidewalk not created by the owner or occupant, so abutting business owner not liable for slip and fall caused by dog poop on public...

Excerpt: ...cy interest, 2) a reasonable expectation of privacy by the plaintiff under the circumstances, and 3) a serious invasion of the privacy interest. (Hill v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1, 39‐40; Strawn v. Morris, Polich & Purdy, LLP (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1087, 1098.) All that is alleged against Defendant is that it carried out the nonjudicial foreclosure of Plaintiffs' home. There was no serious invasion of any legally protect...

Excerpt: ...es, such as … unconscionability, may be applied to invalidate arbitration agreements without contravening” the FAA. (Doctor's Associates, supra, 517 U.S. at p. 687; accord, Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114 [99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 745, 6 P.3d 669] (Armendariz).)) Unconscionability consists of both procedural and substantive elements. The procedural element addresses the circumstances of contract ...

Excerpt: ...tity liability is for an injury caused by the dangerous condition of public property. Government Code §835. Thus, absent a statute prescribing a particular immunity, a public entity can be held liable if it created the dangerous condition, or had actual notice of a dangerous condition that it could have fixed or warned about. Government Code §831.4 prescribes immunity to public entities from an injury caused by an unpaved road, trail, path or s...

Excerpt: ...plaint. In addition, a number of the proposed amendments are contrary to the court's ruling on the defendants' demurrer to the original complaint (such as naming Gary Circle, LLC, as a defendant) or fail to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action (such as the cause of action for fraud). The purpose of amending a pleading it to add essential facts to a claim already alleged or to add entirely new claims distinct from the claims already ...

Excerpt: ...s or businesses. California Practice Guide (Hogoboom & King), Family Law, §§20:20 through 20:27. Plaintiff's 1st amended complaint alleged agreements, “orally and/or implied by contract”, to (1) share equally all of the property accumulated by the parties, including the real property [1st cause of action]; and (2) upon separation, to provide adequate means of support sufficient to provide for the reasonable living expenses of a party unable...

Excerpt: ...nowledging he had not made any efforts since his attorney was relieved on September 28, 2018. During the hearing, Mr. Clemons indicated he was not opposed to the dismissal of Defendant Daniel Tuning. Based upon the counsel's representation of an oral settlement agreement to dismiss Mr. Tuning, all material terms of which have been performed by Mr. Tuning, circumstantial evidence which supports such agreement, and Mr. Clemons' verbal agreement to ...

Excerpt: ...efendants. To the extent that Meyer Corporation asserts that it is a third party and not subject to the order compelling discovery matters to be resolved by the discovery referee, Meyer Corporation must establish an Page 3 of 9 agreement by Defendants to accept electronic service. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice. Motion for Reconsideration Defendants' motion for reconsideration of this Court's order denying Defendants' prior m...

Excerpt: ...ta County [Contra Costa County Case RSC16‐0264]. This action was also dismissed, in August 2016, as “Plaintiff already had a hearing on same issues in Solano County”. In November 2016, Plaintiff in propria persona (“pro per”) filed a new unlimited jurisdiction action against Defendant, as Case No. FCS048007, again based upon the same claim of legal malpractice. Back in 2017, the court sustained a demurrer to the operative complaint, in ...

Excerpt: ...service on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office (CRC rule 9.40(c)(1)), and for failure to pay the $50.00 fee to the State Bar (CRC rule 9.40(e)). Further, it appears that the applicants are intending to make repeated appearances in two (2) other California actions. 2) C.C.P. §387 authorizes a non‐party to an action to file seek to intervene. However, any such request, by way of noticed motion or ex parte application, must in...

Excerpt: ...aintiffs conclude that Defendants breached the representation agreement by failing to “market and attempt to sell [the business] with the requisite skill, care, and diligence”, but fail to allege any facts supporting this conclusion. (Complaint, ¶ 34.) Conspicuously absent from the complaint are any factual allegations concerning what Defendants did or failed to do to market and attempt to sell the business and how Defendants' conduct fell b...

Excerpt: ...s to act pursuant to this section.” (Civ. Code § 2934a(d).) “‘Conclusive evidence' cannot be contradicted by any evidence to the contrary.” (Ram v. OneWest Bank (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1, 16.) Plaintiffs cannot state a cause of action for violation of Civil Code section 2923.5(a)(2). Plaintiffs admit that they had filed a prior action against Defendant Ocwen claiming that Ocwen had breached a Trial Payment Plan by failing to offer a perma...

Excerpt: ...C. to Provide Further Responses to Amended Requests for Admissions, Set One, and for Sanctions TENTATIVE RULING When a party upon whom written discovery is propounded serves responses raising objections which are too general or without merit, instead of providing substantive responses, the propounding party may, after informal attempts to resolve the disputes, move to compel further responses. C.C.P. §2030.300(a)(3) [interrogatories]; §2031.310...

Excerpt: ....) Plaintiff has consistently alleged that Defendant Newell took the position that Plaintiff caused the damage to the vehicle after the sale and that her allegations against Defendant are limited “[t]o the extent that this Court determines that Plaintiff did in fact cause the damage on the Vehicle after the purchase”. (Complaint, ¶¶ 30, 102.) Although Plaintiff reordered her allegations to make her claims against Defendant the first and sec...