Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

894 Results

Location: Santa Cruz x
2023.08.16 Motion for Attorney Fees 369
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.16
Excerpt: ...e Receiver William Rahal is hereby discharged and the case shall be dismissed. However, the Court shall retain any jurisdiction to hear claims related to this Receivership pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Procedure S 664. As to the issue of attorneys' fees and costs, Special Counsel seeks $159,496.62 in reimbursement since May 1, 2020. ($156,496 in unpaid attorneys' fees and $2,801.62 in costs.) According to the 224 pages of billing records, this am...
2023.08.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 948
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.14
Excerpt: ...ed. l. FACTUAL BACKGROUND At the time he was fired in 2021, Plaintiff David Ball was a police sergeant and had worked at the Scotts Valley Police Department ("SVPD") in various positions and assignments for 26 years. His termination was based upon the following violations of City policy: discrimination; sexual harassment; supervisor responsibilities; ethics; relationships; performance; and conduct. City alleged and was successful in demonstrating...
2023.08.07 Motions for Statutory Penalties, to Tax Costs, for Attorney Fees 970
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.07
Excerpt: ...Ramos and Damus Rodriguez. Plaintiff's Complaint alleged 13 separate causes of action, but proceeded to trial on seven: six related to failure to pay wages (counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 13) and one for personal injury (count 8). The verdict found for Plaintiff in the amount of $14,860 in unpaid wages, $15,600 for lost earnings related to her personal injury claim, $25,000 for past noneconomic harm and $0 for future noneconomic harm. The Court accept...
2023.08.04 Motion to File Under Seal 149
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.04
Excerpt: ...AW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: AUGUST 4, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 13 of 24 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT As explained below, Defendants Central California Alliance for Health ("Alliance"), Brenda Hill, Linda Forbes, and Heather Perko's motion for summary judgment as to liability is granted. Plaintiff has failed to meet her burden of production of admissible evidence setting forth specific facts showing a triable issue of materia...
2023.08.04 Motion for Summary Judgment 232
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.04
Excerpt: ...es (hereinafter "Cazareses" own land where an acc:ident occurred involving Plaintiff. On July 1, 2017, the Cazareses leased a portion of their land to Faith and Family Farms ("FFF"). (UMF #14) This land included three greenhouses, one of which is the location of the subject accident. (UMF #14-15). FFF entered -nto a written consulting agreement with Long's Peak Ag, dated August 1, 2019. Longs Peak was perm-tted to occupy Greenhouse #2 and half of...
2023.08.03 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 921
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.08.03
Excerpt: ... by the evidence. For example, most of the requests for admission that were deemed admitted on emotional distress establish that Plaintiff's distress is primarily due to events of the litigation. (SMF Nos. 15, 26-38, 45-52.) Plaintiff is not entitled to relief for emotional distress caused by the litigation process. Civil Code 547(2); Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP (2015) 236 cal.App.4th 793, 814; Silberg v. Anderson (1990) 50 cal.3d ...
2023.07.31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 004
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.31
Excerpt: ...s accepts as true the factual allegations that the plaintiff makes. In addition, it gives them a liberal construction. Eckler v. Neutragena Corp. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 433, 439; Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons (2000) 24 cal.4th 468, 515-515. Although Code Civ. Proc. S 438 does not state that the failure to join an indispensable party may be a basis for a motion for judgment on the pleadings, "the objection that an indispensable party has been omi...
2023.07.27 Motion for Leave to Amend FAP for Writ of Mandate 443
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.27
Excerpt: ...ng on Petitioner's prior motions, the Court gave her clear instructions on what was necessary in order to comply with these Rules and conditioned any future motion on "full" compliance. In its January 24, 2023 Order denying Petitioner's last motion for leave to amend, the Court warned Petitioner that because of the delay caused by her continued failure to adhere to procedural rules, "any future non-conforming amendment will result in a denial of ...
2023.07.25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 099
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...r conditional release in 2019 by the State Department of State Hospitals. Santa Cruz County was determined to be Cheek's domicile of residence. (People v. sup. ct. (Cheek) (2023) 87 cal. App. 5th 373, 376-377.) Plaintiffs in this case are twenty-two homeowners in Bonny Doon, California who brought this action on December 30, 2020 against Kassandra Hinton Ross who owns the property located at 310 Wild Iris Lane, where it was proposed Cheek be plac...
2023.07.25 Demurrers 834
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.25
Excerpt: ...ge. (FAC '1 7) Further, without authority establishing that Plaintiffs need allege that their claims have not been litigated to finality, District's final argument is unpersuasive. Plaintiffs' initial complaint was filed on 12/29/22 within the operative limitations period. SANTA CRUZ CITY SCHOOLS' DEMURRER The demurrer is overruled. A. General overview of revival statute AB 218 amended CCP S 340.1 to create a three-year "lookback window," which r...
2023.07.24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 004
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.24
Excerpt: ...s accepts as true the factual allegations that the plaintiff makes. In addition, it gives them a liberal construction. Eckler v. Neutragena Corp. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 433, 439; Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons (2000) 24 cal.4th 468, 515-515. Although Code Civ. Proc. S 438 does not state that the failure to join an indispensable party may be a basis for a motion for judgment on the pleadings, "the objection that an indispensable party has been omi...
2023.07.21 Motion to Enforce Charging Order 489
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.21
Excerpt: ..., and declaratory relief. Specifically, the allegations were that Defendant executed and delivered to Plaintiff a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $150,000. Defendant was to pay the amount on or before October 2, 2018. The amount was not paid. On October 15, 2019, default judgment was entered against Judgment Debtor Mejorado by the court in the amount of $256,755. On November 4, 2021 Judgment Creditor filed a motion for orderto charge M...
2023.07.21 Motion to Enforce Settlement 193
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.21
Excerpt: ...at determinaŸon, 'the trial court acts as the trier of fact, determining whether the parŸes entered into a valid and binding se©lement. [CitaŸon.] . . .'" Osumi v. Su©on (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1360; In re Marriage of Assemi (1994) 7 Cal.4th 896, 905 [trial court must "resolve [the] disputed issues and ulŸmately determine whether the parŸes reached a binding mutual accord as to the material terms"]. "The trial court's factual �...
2023.07.20 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, to Tax Costs 153
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ...$690ßn Alyssa Gill $460,cm Stephen Whitmire $1,684,167.82 Torrey Whitmire $230ßn LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 20, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 5 Defendant Caltrans seeks relief from this Court in the form of a motion for judgment notwthstanding the verdict and Defendant Hildebrand and Sons Trucking seeks to tax costs presented by the Gill Plaintiffs. In ruling on these motions, the Court heard the evidence presented at trial, r...
2023.07.19 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 668
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ND FOR SANCTIONS LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 19, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 3 PLAINTIFF KHOREV'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANT WELLS TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND FOR SANCTIONS Khorev's motions against these four defendants are denied. Based on the hundreds of requests and the hundreds of pages of moving and oppositions papers (over 440 pages in Separate Statements alone, not counting the opposing Separate Statements...
2023.07.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 907
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.14
Excerpt: ...ndisputed facts and Plaintiffs offer no contrary evidence to establish any disputed material fact. This is an action for personal injuries susta-ned by Plaintiffs after Defendant's employee allegedly intentionally kicked Plaintiff Robert Arias while he and his wife were shopping. Plaintiffs brought claims for premises liability, general negligence, loss of consortium, and injuries pursuant to Dillon v. Legg. Plaintiff Sheila Arias claims to have ...
2023.07.13 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 126
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.13
Excerpt: ...e allegations liberally and in context. (Taylor v. City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power (2006) 144 Cal. App. 4th 1215, 1228.) "A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, st...
2023.07.13 Demurrer 434
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.13
Excerpt: ...ncertainty can be sustained. Weil & Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 13, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 6 of 8 "A demurrer for uncertainty will be susta-ned only where the complaint is so bad that defendant cannot reasonably respond, i.e„ he or she cannot reasonably determine what issues must be admitted or denied, or what counts or claims are directed against him or her." Weil &...
2023.07.11 Motion to Fix Amount of Undertaking to Stay Enforcement on Appeal 502
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.11
Excerpt: ...er or judgment, as defined in the statutes and develo#d by the case law.. " City of Gardena v. Rikuo Corp. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 595, 601, quoting Lavine v. Jessup (1957) 43 Cal.2d 511,513). Under section CCP section 940.1 (a)(l), with some exceptions, an ap#al may be taken from "a judgment, except (A) an interlocutory judgment... ." This is the "one final judgment rule," under which an appeal may ordinarily be taken only from a final judgment. ...
2023.07.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 564
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.10
Excerpt: ...foreclosure. On 12/10/04 there was a real estate transacton involving the subject property which Plaintiff alleges resulted in him losing his community property interest in the property. Or-ginally, when they purchased the property in 1998, the property's grant deed was in the name of his wife but he alleges it was a community asset and paid for with community funds. Defendant ZBS alleges that the deed was executed by Plaintiff's wife, Kimberly C...
2023.07.06 Motion to Compel Further Responses 844
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.06
Excerpt: ...d, Defendant was granted a further extension and responses were due on November 7, 2022. Plaintiff served unverified responses on November 7, 2022. Additional extensions were requested and granted. (Exs. A, B Declaration of Martino) April 14, 2023 was the date of the last extension granted to Plaintiff. (Dec. of Martino at 6.) CSAA then filed this motion on May 11, 2023 when no supplemental responses were served. On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff serve...
2023.07.06 Motion for Stay 234
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.07.06
Excerpt: ... 5, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 3 of 6 discretion but not the obligaton to stay the state court action . In exercising its discretion, the court should consider the importance of discouraging multiple litigation designed solely to harass an adverse party, and of avoiding unseemly conflicts with the courts of other jurisdictions. It should also consider whether the rights of the parties can best be determined by the court of the other jurisdiction b...
2023.06.30 Motion for Reconsideration Re Motion to Reduce Mechanics Lien 281
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.06.30
Excerpt: ...plication to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order." The Notice of Entry of Order on the underlying motion was served by regular and electronic mail on Angeles Contractor on 12/9/23. Therefore, any motion by Angeles Contractor to reconsider the Court's order must have been filed by 12/19/22. The motion was untimely filed on 12/28/22. Even when a motion for reconsideratio...
2023.06.27 Demurrer to FACC 907
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.06.27
Excerpt: ...ff Ferguson's initial complaint, served on Arborworks on 3/18/22, included claims for premises liability, peculiar risk, dangerous condition of public property, and negligence, and articulated all the facts related to his personal injuries against the State, County and Arborworks. While Ferguson agreed to amend his complaint to allege more specific statutory violations against State at State's urging (see Ferguson's Memorandum in Support of Mohon...
2023.06.21 Demurrer 788
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.06.21
Excerpt: ...(2009) 45 Cal.4th 992, 998; Cundiff v. GTE Cal. , Inc. 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1405. Ifthe complaint states a cause of action under any theory, regardless of the title under which the factual basis for relief is stated, that aspect of the complaint is good against a demurrer. "[Wle are not limited to plaintiffs' theory of recovery in testing the sufficiency of their complaint against a demurrer, but instead must determine if the factual allegations...

894 Results

Per page

Pages