Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

888 Results

Location: Santa Cruz x
2019.12.19 Demurrer, Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Appointment of Receiver 329
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.19
Excerpt: ... have been futile. Therefore, the failure to comply with §800 does not appear on the face of the complaint. Demurrers for uncertainty are disfavored. A demurrer for uncertainty will only be sustained where the complaint is so bad that the defendant cannot reasonably respond. Weil and Brown, California Procedure Before Trial, TRG, §7:85. Atkins has not demonstrated that the allegations as to him are so uncertain that he cannot reasonably respond...
2019.12.18 Motion to Consolidate, for Sanctions 084
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.18
Excerpt: .... Sanctions in the amount of $2100 are awarded to CFSC against counsel for Encompass Community Services, Colin Pearce, pursuant to 2023.010(g) and 2023.030(a). Encompass is further ordered to provide a verified supplemental response which is fully compliant with this court's orders of October 1, 2019 by January 13, 2019. The court sets a hearing on January 16, 2010 to confirm full compliance, or, in the event of a failure to fully comply, to set ...
2019.12.17 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 814
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.17
Excerpt: ...ial (TRG), §§6:653, 6:639. A denial of leave to amend is appropriate where the pleading is defective as a matter of law, and the defect cannot be cured by further amendment. Id., at §6:646. However, unless the defect is fatal, the court should not consider the merits of the proposed pleading in deciding whether to grant leave to amend. Id., at §6:644. The new allegations in the proposed SAC as to indemnity, tax consequences as damages, and in...
2019.12.17 Motion to Transfer Venue, for Attorneys' Fees 276
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.17
Excerpt: ...in Los Angeles county, where they reside and their law office is located. They rely on §395(a), the general venue statute, which provides in part: “Except as otherwise provided by law and subject to the power of the court to transfer…the county where the defendants or some of them reside at the commencement of the action is the proper court for the trial of that action”. Defendants are correct in asserting that another provision of this ge...
2019.12.16 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 398
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.16
Excerpt: ...ngth and is not collusive; • An estimate of what each class member will receive in the settlement; • Plaintiff should also provide further information which allows “an understanding of the amount that is in controversy and the realistic range of outcomes of the litigation… The salient point is whether the factual record before the court is sufficiently developed to allow the LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2019 TIME: 8...
2019.12.12 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs, for Attorney's Fees 126
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.12
Excerpt: ...3.5(c)(2) Regarding Item 11 Models, illustrations, Plaintiff is to provide a further declaration related to the $21,695.00 requested to allow the Court to evaluate the reasonableness and LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE:DECEMBER 12, 2019 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 2 necessity of the illustrations by providing an itemization, date, and explanation for each illustration for which the cost is being requested. II. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES The...
2019.12.3 Motion to Strike 848
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.3
Excerpt: ...r” theory does not support the claim, as it does not apply where several joint defendants jointly commit a tort. Electrical Electronics Controls Inc v Los Angeles unified School District (2005) 126 Cal. App. 4th 601, 617. As to the claim for punitive damage: The SACC does not allege the malicious, oppressive or fraudulent conduct necessary for a punitive damage claim. The conclusory allegation that “in suppressing and concealing the true fact...
2019.12.2 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 439
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.12.2
Excerpt: ...��1969 statutes required strict and exact compliance with the statutory requirements the provisions of the new law, according to its draftsmen, 'are to be liberally construed. "The provisions of this chapter should be liberally construed to effectuate service and uphold the jurisdiction of the court if actual notice has been received by the defendant.” (Espindola v. Nunez, (1988) 199 Cal. App. 3d 1389, 1391) There is no evidence here that Defen...
2019.11.22 Demurrer 218
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.22
Excerpt: ...s uncertain are presumptively within the defendant's knowledge. (Chen v. Berenjian, (2019) 33 Cal. App. 5th 811, 822) LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: November 22, 2019 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 2 Because the date of conversion of the Property is presumptively within Defendant's knowledge, the demurrer is overruled on this basis. In addition, Plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to allege a duty on the part of Defendants to disclose that the conv...
2019.11.21 Demurrer 882
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.21
Excerpt: ...ND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: November 21, 2019 TIME: 8:30 A.M. 3 The general demurrer is sustained without leave to amend as to the 1st, 2d, 4th and 8th causes of action; and with leave to amend as to the 3rd, 5 th and 7th causes of action as follows: The 1 st, and 2d causes of action (Terrorist Death Threat, Scheme and Swindle) are not cognizable, legally recognized, causes of action. Additionally, the 2d cause of action relates to a prior ...
2019.11.21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 122
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.21
Excerpt: ...(2) plaintiff's performance or excuse for nonperformance, (3) defendant's breach, and (4) the resulting damages to plaintiff.” (Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri‐Valley Oil & Gas Co., (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1375, 1391 note 6) Here, Allied alleges: 1) Oceanside executed a “Request to Bind” in which it requested that Applied Underwriters, through its affiliates or subsidiaries, cause workers' compensation policies to be issued to Oceanside...
2019.11.13 Petition to Compel Arbitration 204
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.13
Excerpt: ...xcept as to privilege and in a form complying with the Code of Civil Procedure, to form interrogatories, set one, Nos. 9.1 and 9.2, special interrogatories, set one, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 20 through 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, and 39, and request for production of documents, set one, Nos. 1 through 16, as explained herein. Plaintiff Cortland T. Day shall serve such further responses on or before December 2, 2019. Concu...
2019.11.13 Motion for Attorney's Fees 899
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.13
Excerpt: ...titled to be compensated for "all hours reasonably spent on the matter." (Serrano v. Priest (1982) 32 Cal.3d 621, 624.) The number of hours reasonably worked is determined by reviewing the time reasonably spent on a matter, including time spent drafting and revising pleadings, meeting with clients, and preparing for and presenting the case at trial. (Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 28‐29, n. 4.) An attorney's declaration that the work pe...
2019.11.8 Demurrer 218
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.8
Excerpt: ...laint is uncertain are presumptively within the defendant's knowledge. (Chen v. Berenjian, (2019) 33 Cal. App. 5th 811, 822) Because the date of conversion of the Property is presumptively within Defendant's knowledge, the demurrer is overruled on this basis. In addition, Plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to allege a duty on the part of Defendants to disclose that the conversion was not permitted. Therefore the demurrer to the Eleventh cau...
2019.11.8 Petition for Writ of Mandate 212
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.8
Excerpt: ...dinance by Failing to Follow the Procedures, and Make the Findings Required, by SCMC §§ 24.08.810 and 24.08.820 Before Issuing the PDP? The interpretation of Title 24 of the Zoning Ordinance, contained in the Santa Cruz Municipal Code, and specifically Parts 8 and 9 of Chapter 24.08 and Part 1 of Chapter 24.14, presents an issue of law which is subject to independent review. MHC Operating Ltd Partnership v City of San Jose (2004) 106 Cal. App. ...
2019.11.7 Motion for Summary Judgment 895
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.7
Excerpt: ...the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court, and all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence. (p) For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication: (1) A plaintiff has met his or her burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on ...
2019.11.6 Petition to Compel Arbitration 661
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.11.6
Excerpt: ...nnot be compelled to arbitrate the dispute under an agency theory. (A preexisting relationship between the nonsignatory and one of the parties to the arbitration agreement is a common factor in compelling the nonsignatory to arbitrate. County of Contra Costa v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., (1996) 47 Cal. App. 4th 237, 242) As to finding that Allied is the alter ego of Oreb/Radensky, before the alter ego doctrine will be invoked in Califor...
2019.10.30 Petition for Writ of Mandate 661
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...t the CA Building Code applies, the UPP report was prepared in support of Petitioner's permit application to correct unpermitted grading activities. The project description for Development Permit Application REV151055 says “Proposal for restorative grading”. (AR 13) Moreover, the scope of the UPP report does not include any references to any “buildings or structure or appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures as re...
2019.10.30 Motion to Compel Further Responses 029
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...he following rulings: 1.The objections are overruled. Defendant is ordered to provide a further verified response producing the requested documents. 2. The objections are overruled. Defendant is ordered to provide a further verified response producing the requested documents. 3. The objections are overruled except for the objection that it improperly seeks premature disclosure of expert opinion. Defendant is ordered to provide a further verified ...
2019.10.21 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 260
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.21
Excerpt: ...te where the pleading is defective as a matter of law, and the defect cannot be cured by further amendment. Id., at §6:646. However, unless the defect is fatal, the court should not consider the merits of the proposed pleading in deciding whether to grant leave to amend. Id., at §6:644. ...
2019.10.18 Demurrer 526
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.18
Excerpt: ...yment actions done in furtherance of a supervisor's managerial role can also have a secondary effect of communicating a hostile message. This occurs when the actions establish a widespread pattern of bias.” The Miller court therefore concluded that “official employment actions constituted the evidentiary basis of the harassment cause of action, because the supervisor used those official actions as his means of conveying his offensive message�...
2019.10.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, for Evidence Sanctions 969
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.18
Excerpt: ...hat burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. “Th...
2019.10.15 Motions for Determination of Good Faith Settlement, to Contest Good Faith Settlement 521
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.15
Excerpt: ...de a rough approximation of the plaintiff's total recovery. Additionally, the City has failed to present evidentiary support for its claim that it has no liability because it does not own or control the area on Bean Creek Road where the slide occurred. While the City refers to the declaration of Taylor Bateman as support for this claim, this declaration has not been filed. ...
2019.10.10 Motion for Summary Judgment 401
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.10
Excerpt: ...has met its threshold burden of proof that Cross‐Complainants cannot establish their claims that the grab bar was defectively designed or negligently manufactured; or that any alleged defect in the grab bar was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff to fall. Wingit has done so through the factually devoid discovery responses of these Cross‐Claimants, and by the following evidence : (1) the declaration of Sal Siston, president of Wingit, wh...
2019.10.7 Motion to Compel Arbitration 795
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.7
Excerpt: ...pation in the litigation is inconsistent with an intent to arbitrate. A waiver of the right to arbitrate may be implied from this conduct. Lewis v Fletcher Jones (2012) 205 Cal. App. 4th 436, 445‐446. ...
2019.10.7 Demurrer, Motion to Intervene 754
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.7
Excerpt: ...E The motion by to allow Bella Vista Italian Kitchen and Bar, LLC to intervene is denied. CCP §387 (c) requires a motion to intervene to include the proposed complaint in intervention. There is no complaint in intervention included in the motion. ...
2019.10.4 Motion to Recover Attorneys' Fees 452
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.4
Excerpt: ...sonable costs of a title report, with legal interest at the legal rate from time of payment, or, if before the commencement of the action, from the time the action was commenced; • Other disbursements or expenses determined by the court to have been incurred or paid for the common benefit. CCP §874.020 provides: The costs of partition include reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, necessarily incurred by a party for the common benefit...
2019.10.3 Special Motion to Strike 471
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...��; and “all reference to allegations concerning the POBRA”. (Notice of Motion, 2:3‐7). The County asserts that a February 14, 2019 letter from Thornton Kontz, as attorney for the Commission, is “the sole basis” for Petitioner's second cause of action for traditional mandamus and his claim of POBBRA violations. It asserts that this letter constitutes protected activity, because it is a communication made in connection with an official p...
2019.10.2 Motion for Summary Adjudication 475
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.2
Excerpt: ...ey's MPA as to Portola 5:15‐16, 13:18‐21). Summary adjudication must completely dispose of the cause of action to which it is directed. CCP §437c(f)(1). The prayer on the Fourth Cause of Action for Breach of Written Contract to Defend seeks compensatory damages and attorneys' fees, expert costs, and other litigation costs. The prayer on the Eleventh Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief for Duty to Defend seeks a judicial declaration as to ...
2019.10.1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 084
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.10.1
Excerpt: ... records pertaining to matters encompassed by this Agreement with the right to make copies of any or all thereof”. The court further finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated resulting prejudice if injunctive relief is not granted, as it will be unable to meet its reporting obligations and prepare its audit and tax returns. Defendant is ordered to provide the tenant files and financial records it maintained for CFSC within 20 days from this order. ...
2019.3.15 Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 803
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.3.15
Excerpt: ...clude facts or expert opinion and therefore did not raise a significant environmental effect; that the EIR was not legally required to analyze the Project's consistency with the SSCCP; that with augmentation of the Administrative Record and the lodging of a certified addendum to the Administrative Record, the Administrative Record is sufficiently LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MARCH 8, 2019 TIME: 8:30 A.M. complete; and that Petitioner's ...
2019.3.14 Motion to Enforce Settlement 495
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.3.14
Excerpt: ...ts to litigate its bad faith claims against NASIC. Plaintiff does not dispute that the 10/9/13 General Indemnity Agreement between Plaintiff and NASIC controls their rights and obligations. Nor does it appear that Plaintiff disputes that it was in breach of its obligations owing to NASIC when it failed to pay subcontractors and failed to respond to NASIC's collateral demand of 3/11/16. Accordingly, pursuant to the Assignment clause of the Indemni...
2019.3.12 Demurrer 771
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.3.12
Excerpt: ...its”. Lantzy v Centex Homes (2003) 31 Cal. 4th 363, 369. Plaintiff is therefore unable to rely on the “discovery rule” to extend the 10‐year limitations period., which expired, at the latest, by January 2014. While equitable estoppel may extend the 10‐year limitations period under Lantzy, Plaintiff has pled no facts indicating that defendants' conduct directly prevented her from filing suit. Plaintiff's allegations fall short of those a...
2019.2.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 544
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.28
Excerpt: ...ormed and believes that in or around November or December 2016, the servicing of his mortgage loan transferred to Defendant Bayview. However, Plaintiff was not notified of the servicing transfer by either SPS or Bayview prior to the date that the servicing of his loan transferred to Bayview.” (Complaint ¶ 08) However SPS provides a copy of a letter dated 11/14/16 indicating servicing of the Loan was being transferred to Bayview. (Defendant's C...
2019.2.27 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 832
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.27
Excerpt: ...nt ¶¶ 37,60,63) “Nonintentional torts may also form the basis for punitive damages when the conduct constitutes conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. ( Taylor v. Superior Court, supra, 24 Cal.3d 890; G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court (1975) 49 Cal. App. 3d 22 [122 Cal. Rptr. 218].) Nonintentional conduct comes within the definition of malicious acts punishable by the assessment of punitive damages when a party intentionall...
2019.2.27 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 555
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.27
Excerpt: ...ts have met their burden of overcoming the presumption of reasonableness of enforcing the 1954 CC&R's today. (Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn., (1994) 8 Cal. 4th 361, 380‐381): 1. Increasing housing for low to moderate residents is a public policy: (see Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc., (2009) 171 Cal. LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: FEBRUARY 27 , 2019 TIME: 8:30 A.M. App. 4th 1356,...
2019.2.26 Demurrer 510
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.26
Excerpt: ....A to Konzen Reply, Dervishian's First Amended Answer to FAC in case no. 16CV00307 p. 2:6‐13.) This allegation is inconsistent with the allegation in the FAC that “Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that the City has no easement for public utilities situated with[in] the boundaries of Doane Street or Stable Street” (FAC ¶ 9), “The general rule, is that material factual allegations in a verified pleading that are omi...
2019.2.26 Motion to Amend Judgment 430
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.26
Excerpt: ...bts (TRG 2018) §6:1564.) Here the judgment is against Defendant Marcia McClosky, an individual. (see Ex. A to Motion.) In addition, out of due process concerns, a default judgment, such as the one obtained here, is not subject to such an amendment (based on an alter ego theory). (Motores de Mexicali, S. A. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, (1958) 51 Cal. 2d 172,178) The motion to amend the judgment is denied without prejudice. ...
2019.2.21 Motion for New Trial 683
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.21
Excerpt: ...owledge and Evid. Code Sec. 1150: Sustained. Declaration of Roxanne Thompson 6. Paragraph 5 on the grounds speculative and no personal knowledge: Sustained. 7. Paragraph 6 on the grounds of hearsay, irrelevant, lack of foundation and Evid code Sect. 1150: Sustained. 8. Paragraph 7 on the grounds Evidence Code § 1150, and irrelevant: Sustained. 9. Paragraph 8 on the grounds of hearsay, Evidence Code § 1150, and irrelevant: Sustained. LAW AND MOT...
2019.2.21 Demurrer 324
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.21
Excerpt: ... alleged the necessary element of a lack of consent to Defendants' release of hazardous substances in the course of Defendants' operation of their dry‐cleaning businesses. While the judicially noticeable documents demonstrate that Plaintiff's parents consented to Defendants' use of the leased premises for the purpose of operating a dry‐cleaning business, the issue of whether this necessarily constitutes consent to the release of hazardous sub...
2019.2.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 222
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.15
Excerpt: ...back to plaintiff to establish the employer's articulated reason was a “pretext” or cover‐up for unlawful discrimination. (CA Practice Guide (TRG 2018) Employment Litigation § 7:390) To establish a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination Plaintiff must show: ‐Plaintiff was a member of a protected class; ‐Plaintiff was qualified for the position sought or was competently performing in the position held, satisfying the employer's exp...
2019.2.14 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 366
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.14
Excerpt: ...xcusable neglect.” (CA CCP§ 473.5 (c)) Here, during the time period in which Defendant failed to comply with his mandatory statutory duty to inform the the California State Bar of his address, Defendant either through intentional avoidance or inexcusable neglect, evaded Plaintiff's reasonable, diligent attempts at service on him of the summons and complaint. This occurred after Defendant had been expressly warned that Plaintiff intended to sue...
2019.2.14 Demurrer, Petition for Injunction 386
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.14
Excerpt: ...is not a bar to bringing a new action within the period of the statute of limitations. (Lewis v. Johnson, (1939) 12 Cal. 2d 558,563) “The pendency of another earlier action growing out of the same transaction and between the same parties is a ground for abatement of the second action…where the court determines there is another action pending raising substantially the same issues between the same parties, it is to enter the interlocutory judgm...
2019.2.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 127
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.14
Excerpt: ...n Plaintiff's cross‐complaint and summary adjudication of Defendants' affirmative defenses is granted. The motion for summary judgment on Defendants' cross‐complaint is denied, without prejudice, as the motion was filed prior to the filing of the First Amended Cross‐Complaint and the currently operative Second Amended Cross‐Complaint, which supersedes the prior Cross‐ Complaints. Plaintiff has met its threshold burden of proof by establ...
2019.2.8 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 222
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.8
Excerpt: ...stablished, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the evidence would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find the underlying fact in favor of the party opposing the motion in accordance with the applicable standard of proof…If there is a single such issue, the motion must be denied…On a motion for summary adjudication , the test is whether there is any “triable...
2019.2.7 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 267
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.7
Excerpt: ...bstantive law. (Lawrence v. Bank of Am.(1985), 163 Cal. App. 3d 431, 436) MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FAC Plaintiff has not alleged conduct which is despicable, i.e. so vile, base, contemptible, miserable, wretched or loathsome that it would be looked down upon and despised by ordinary decent people. (Tomaselli v. Transamerica Ins. Co., (1994) 25 Cal. App. 4th 1269, 1286‐1287) Nor has she provided support for the notion that the probable (as o...
2019.2.5 Demurrer 004
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.5
Excerpt: ...do not demonstrate that the corporate contract is unenforceable based on the statute of frauds, because (1) the contract was not impossible to be performed within one year, as a sale of Enabledware and the repayment of the loan from the sale proceeds could have happened at any time: (2) the FAC alleges that the contract was documented in writing; and (3) the FAC does not demonstrate that Plaintiff was in the business of lending, and instead only ...
2019.2.4 Motion for Summary Adjudication 303
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.4
Excerpt: ...ocedure Before Trial, Weil & Brown, 2018, 10:270‐271. Pg. 10‐130‐ 131.) The evidence here would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find that SARL IROC, through its agent Lecourt, entered the contract and therefore has standing. (see Exhibits B and Exh. C to Plaintiff's separate statement, Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 1/19/16 and emails dated Jan. 12 & 13, 2016 between Jordan and Lecourt.) As to whether Plaintiff has standing to bring ...
2019.2.1 Petition for Writ of Mandate 101
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.2.1
Excerpt: ...vironmental review pursuant to CEQA. Petitioner challenges RTC's decision to enter into an ACL rather than apply to the Surface Transportation Board for approval of the abandonment of the line, RTC's choice of St. Paul as an operator, and two particular elements of the ACL: (1) St. Paul's freight operations on the Branch Line; and (2) RTC's commitment to make FEMA funded repairs to the storm damaged Line necessary for St. Paul to operate the perm...
2019.1.29 Motion to Strike 327
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...ant's RJN Exh. 17 pg.262:27 & 263:4‐5 and Exhibit 18 pg. 266 ¶ C) (Branson v. SunDiamond Growers, (1994) 24 Cal. App. 4th 327, 340; Ghalehtak v. Fay Servicing, LLC, (2018) 304 F. Supp. 3d 877, 885; Dunkin v. Boskey, (2000) 82 Cal. App. 4th 171, 181.) In addition, pursuant to the Settlement and Release Agreement signed on 7/20/15 by the Court on behalf of Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs released all claims against Deutsche Bank and Ocwen. (Defendants' R...
2019.1.29 Motion to Quash Service of SAC, to Compel Further Responses 920
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...equired by CCP §472 to obtain leave to amend before filing the SAC which again named STCA. Since STCA had been dismissed, it was a new party for purposes of serving the SAC. Plaintiff was therefore required to serve a summons along with the SAC, and to serve the SAC in compliance CCP §415.10 et seq. CRC 2.25, authorizes electronic service under certain circumstances, but only as to documents which may be served “by mail, overnight delivery or...
2018.8.9 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...rovision set forth in Health & Safety Code § §25366(a), which is a defense to this cause of action. Since the defense appears on the face of the TAC, Plaintiff must plead around this defense by alleging the absence of the second condition for non‐retroactivity—that the acts of the Defendants were in violation of existing state or federal laws at the time they occurred. The court in Orange City Water Dist.v Sabic Plastics (2017) 14 Cal. App....
2018.8.6 Petition to Compel Arbitration 897
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.6
Excerpt: ...existence of a valid arbitration agreement. (see copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Brokerage's Petition to Compel Arbitration as Exh. A and also attached as Plaintiff's exhibit A in support of motion for leave to file FACf.). Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a possibility of conflicting rulings on a common issue of law or fact. Therefore arbitration is ordered among the ...
2018.8.3 Motion to Strike 133
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.3
Excerpt: ...hase of the 17 year old truck. The letter demanded the return of the purchase price and unspecified costs incurred to repair the truck. The demand threatened to file an attached administrative complaint with the DMV, which contained several false statements: that a Carfax report demonstrated that there were six previous owners, when it reported five owners prior to Mr. Piccuta's purchase in January 2014; and that it had been stolen in 2005 and re...
2018.8.2 Petition to Compel Arbitration 128
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.2
Excerpt: ...ement, the choice of law provision in the Agreement governs the procedural aspects of the arbitration, not whether the Agreement is enforceable. (See, Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp., (1996) 14 Cal. 4th 394, 409). As to whether the arbitration agreement is a contract of adhesion or unconscionable, much of the contract here complies with Civ. Proc § 1295 and Cal Health & Safety Code § 1599.81, and therefore most of the arbitrati...
2018.8.2 Motion to Compel Responses 327
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.2
Excerpt: ...esponses to Special Interrogatories from Neidin Henard • To Compel Responses to Requests for Production from Neidin Henard The motions to compel responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories and Requests for Production from Plaintiffs Joseph and Neidin Henard, and the motion to deem Requests for Admission propounded on Plaintiff Joseph Henard admitted, are GRANTED. Although Plaintiffs served responses to this discovery after this m...
2018.8.1 Motion to Strike 133
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.1
Excerpt: ...ruck. The letter demanded the return of the purchase price and unspecified costs incurred to repair the truck. The demand threatened to file an attached administrative complaint with the DMV, which contained several false statements: that a Carfax report demonstrated that there were six previous owners, when it reported five owners prior to Mr. Piccuta's purchase in January 2014; and that it had been stolen in 2005 and recovered by the police in ...
2018.8.1 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 264
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.8.1
Excerpt: ... burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. (Cal Code Civ Proc § 437c(p)(2)) There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the evidence would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find the underlying fact in favor of the party opposing the motion in accordance with the applicable standard of proof…If there is a single su...
2018.7.31 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 683
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.31
Excerpt: ...hed by presenting undisputed facts that prove the contrary of Plaintiff's allegations, as a matter of law. See Weil & Brown, California Procedure Before Trial (TRG), §10:241. In support of their motion Defendants have relied on the testimony of Jared Mitchell as to his conduct before the accident in engaging his left turn signal and checking for traffic before making the left turn into the North driveway of Doc Auto [SSUF 47 ‐67]; the testimon...
2018.7.26 Motion to Set Aside Terminating Sanctions 622
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.26
Excerpt: ...not patiently listen to flimsy excuses and the claim of ignorance of the law.” (Gillingham v. Lawrence (1909) 11 Cal.App. 231, 234.) Defendant's claim that he did not receive notice of the motions to compel and motion for terminating sanctions is disingenuous given his appearance, and argument in opposition, at all court hearings herein. Defendant had many opportunities to comply with the court's orders and repeatedly chose not to despite havin...
2018.7.24 Motion for Summary Adjudication 302
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.24
Excerpt: ...ummary adjudication as the Fifth cause of action for violation of CA Business and Professions Code § 17200 is granted. First of all, defendant has not filed an opposition separate statement complying with CCP section 437 c (b)(3), therefore opposition separate statement is stricken for that reason. Moreover even if the Opposition were considered, CA Bus & Prof Code § 10130 states that it is unlawful for any person to act as a real estate broker...
2018.7.19 Motion to Set Aside Terminating Sanctions 622
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.19
Excerpt: ...not patiently listen to flimsy excuses and the claim of ignorance of the law.” (Gillingham v. Lawrence (1909) 11 Cal.App. 231, 234.) Defendant's claim that he did not receive notice of the motions to compel and motion for terminating sanctions is disingenuous given his appearance, and argument in opposition, at all court hearings herein. Defendant had many opportunities to comply with the court's orders and repeatedly chose not to despite havin...
2018.7.19 Petition to Compel Arbitration 963
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.19
Excerpt: ...ons as arbitrator: Hon. Christopher Cottle (ret.); Hon. Irwin Joseph (ret.); David Hamerslough, Esq.; Hon. Robert Baines (ret); and Hon. James Emerson (ret.). However, the Court invites Defendants to provide five names of proposed arbitrators for consideration by the Court at the time of the hearing of this Petition. The Court will then develop a final list of nominees from the names submitted by both parties. Pursuant to CCP § 1281.6, the parti...
2018.7.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration, for Sanctions 304
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.18
Excerpt: ...ed pursuant to CCP §1281.6 only if the arbitration agreement fails to provide for an agreed method to appoint an arbitrator or if the agreed method fails or for any reason cannot be followed. Here, the parties' arbitration clause in the Attorney‐Client Bankruptcy Retainer Agreement at ¶11 provides: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration pursuant to the Rule...
2018.7.17 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 665
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ......
2018.7.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 379
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ... loan modification submitted 5/28/17. Therefore her cause of action could not have been listed as an asset when BK4 was filed on 7/23/14. The motion on the ground of lack of standing is denied. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel because she has taken inconsistent positions in the bankruptcy action and the subject lawsuit. Again, giving Plaintiff's allegations liberal construction, no cause of...
2018.7.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 541
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.17
Excerpt: ...2018. CCP Sec. 340.5 requires that such lawsuits be filed within one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered the injury and its relationship to the defendant's conduct. Plaintiff's alleged injury is the loss of his driver's license in January 2016. His lawsuit was filed more than one year after he knew or should have known that Dr. Brunelli's report to the DMV caused the DMV to suspend...
2018.7.12 Motion to Enforce Stipulated Judgment 837
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.12
Excerpt: ...ement of abandonment of use of a fictitious business name, documents reflecting disposition of Granny Purps' assets, documents evidencing termination of any internet presence by Granny Purps in any form, and sworn declarations explaining the presence of grannypurpsonlinestore.com and the alleged solicitation of business via Facebook). If Petitioners are able to establish to the satisfaction of the Court that they have fully complied with the term...
2018.7.12 Demurrer 208
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.12
Excerpt: ...LINGS DATE: JULY 12, 2018, TIME: 8:30 A.M. (SAC ¶ 26) Although Bank correctly points out that the First cause of action in the SAC has not been amended, upon further consideration, the declaration of compliance attached to the Notice of Default does not comply with the requirements of Civil Code § 2924b(b)(1). (It is not the ordinary function of a demurrer to test the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy with which he descri...
2018.7.11 Motion to Compel Responses 590
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.11
Excerpt: ...s, their attorneys and their experts, solely as needed for this litigation. Upon completion of this litigation, counsel for the prevailing party is ordered to see that all copies of the plans distributed as a result of this litigation are destroyed. ...
2018.7.11 Motion to Amend Order, for New Trial 035
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.11
Excerpt: ...12. ...
2018.7.10 Demurrer 908
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.10
Excerpt: ...Court declines to consider the arguments advanced by Plaintiffs in their untimely filed papers. The demurrers are sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff's SAC is uncertain and unintelligible. It cannot be determined from the allegations made by Plaintiffs what the claimed basis is for the imposition of liability against the State of California. Further, Plaintiffs do not identify any statutory basis for their claim (see Harshbarger v. City o...
2018.7.10 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 111
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.10
Excerpt: ...405.22. He has also failed to file a proof of service showing service in compliance with CCP §405.22. Therefore, pursuant to CCP §405.23, the lis pendens is void and invalid and must be removed. The Conservatorship Estate of Carl Lindow is awarded $5,670.00 in attorneys' fees and costs. ...
2018.7.10 Petition to Compel Arbitration 128
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.10
Excerpt: ...overns the Agreement, the choice of law provision in the Agreement governs the procedural aspects of the arbitration, not whether the Agreement is enforceable. (See, Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp., (1996) 14 Cal. 4th 394, 409). Finally, as to whether the arbitration agreement is a contract of adhesion or unconscionable, the contract here complies with Civ. Proc § 1295 and Cal Health & Safety Code § 1599.81; therefore, it is no...
2018.7.6 Motion to Compel Responses 270
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.6
Excerpt: ......
2018.7.5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, to Strike 327
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.5
Excerpt: ...ERS II, LLC The motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Leave to amend is denied in the exercise of the Court's discretion and pursuant to CCP §430.41(e). A bona fide purchaser (“BFP”) for value who acquires its interest in real property without notice of another's asserted rights in the property takes the property free of such unknown rights. A party's status as a BFP renders the foreclosure sa...
2018.7.5 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict 814
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.7.5
Excerpt: ...ff failure to properly serve the 30 day notice. While Plaintiff asserts that the court ignored “inherently ‘incredible' (sic) evidence”, and denied Plaintiff's motion to strike irrelevant evidence, the court does not consider evidence in ruling on a demurrer, and may only look to the four corners of the complaint. The court's ruling was based on the 30 day notice, attached as an exhibit to the FAC, which demonstrated on its face that servic...
2018.6.29 Motion to Compel 031
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.29
Excerpt: ...ot contest the authenticity of, or anything about or related to the U4, U5 and the amendments it produced. Responding party is bound by this stated position in future proceedings in this case. RFP 9: Granted in part, denied in part, documents must be produced subject to protective order. Only social security numbers or other highly personal information (e.g. driver's license numbers) may be redacted. Names, addresses, substantive information, etc...
2018.6.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 004
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.29
Excerpt: ...& Brown, California Procedure Before Trial (TRG), §§10:51.1, 10:257. Plaintiff's unverified FAC challenges the validity of the March 2017 election of officers of CUTA. Only a director, a member, or a person who has a right to vote has standing to challenge an election of corporate officers. Corps. Code §7616. In November 2016 the Executive Committee of CUTA removed Plaintiff from his office as President, and suspended his membership in CUTA fo...
2018.6.27 Motion for Fiinal Approval of Class Action Settlement 753
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.27
Excerpt: ..., and the skill displayed in presenting them; (2) the extent to which the nature of the litigation precluded other employment by the attorneys; (3) the contingent nature of the fee award; (4) the fact that an award would ultimately fall upon the taxpayers; (5) the results obtained; (6) the public interest value of the case; and (7) delay in payment. Serrano v. Priest, 20 Cal. 3d 25 (Cal. Oct. 4, 1977). The court will continue the matter to allow ...
2018.6.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 379
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...ent on the pleadings. Plaintiff is instructed to appear at the hearing prepared to (1) provide the court with the status of any stay issued by the Bankruptcy Court; and (2) explain why the Bankruptcy Trustee is not the proper party to pursue this action. ...
2018.6.25 Petition to Compel Arbitration 897
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.25
Excerpt: ...e of the contract containing the arbitration clause, the petition must be denied for other reasons. Code of Civil Procedure § 1292.4 provides: “If a controversy referable to arbitration under an alleged agreement is involved in an action or proceeding pending in a superior court, a petition for an order to arbitrate shall be filed in such action or proceeding.” Another action concerning the same facts was pending when the present petition wa...
2018.6.25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 082
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.25
Excerpt: ...xecution of a public statute by officers of the law for the public benefit. (6) To prevent the exercise of a public or private office, in a lawful manner, by the person in possession (7) To prevent a legislative act by a municipal corporation.” The court finds that the Ordinances are public statutes for the benefit of the public; and that they were validly adopted by a legislative act of the City, based on the on following: The Ordinances were ...
2018.6.25 Application for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 358
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.25
Excerpt: ... of the date selected. Plaintiff's supplemental briefing shall be filed at least five court days before the continued hearing. ...
2018.6.21 Petition to Compel Arbitration 128
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.21
Excerpt: ...erns the Agreement, the choice of law provision in the Agreement governs the procedural aspects of the arbitration, not whether the Agreement is enforceable. (See, Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp., (1996) 14 Cal. 4th 394, 409). Finally, as to whether the arbitration agreement is a contract of adhesion or unconscionable, the contract here complies with Civ. Proc § 1295 and Cal Health & Safety Code § 1599.81, therefore it is not a...
2018.6.20 Application for Good Faith Settlement 016
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.20
Excerpt: ...nity, based on comparative negligence or comparative fault are barred. (Cal Code Civ Proc § 877.6) ...
2018.6.19 Motion to Compel Further Responses 552
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.19
Excerpt: ...s motion may have been avoided if defense counsel had met and conferred with Plaintiff's counsel after discovering the emails concerning a collection action against American Solar Direct in documents produced by Plaintiff. Plaintiff's failure to refer to the collection action against ASD in its discovery responses, while producing documents that disclosed the collection action, suggests that Plaintiff was not attempting to hide this action from D...
2018.6.15 Motion for Inadvertent Trial Waiver 890
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2018.6.15
Excerpt: ... jury and Plaintiff is granted a trial by jury ...

888 Results

Per page

Pages