Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

309 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Santa Clara x
Judge: Chung, Frederick S x
2024.02.27 Motion for Monetary, Evidentiary, Issue Sanctions 013
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...dow during which Piazza's normally maintained its video footage, Gonzalez argues that litigation was reasonably foreseeable in this instance, and so the failure to preserve the video constituted spoliation of evidence. Although it is a much closer call than either side is willing to admit, the court finds that litigation was reasonably foreseeable before Gonzalez made a formal demand, and that Piazza's was negligent in failing to preserve the vi...
2024.02.27 Demurrer, Motion for Entry of Default, for Relief 314
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ... stated claims for: (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (3) Promissory Estoppel; (4) Fraud; (5) Unfair Business Practice; (6) Unjust Enrichment; (7) Money Paid; (8) Accounting; and (9) Conspiracy. She alleged that defendants Wu, H u, and Li were all the alter egos of We Party. We Party brought a demurrer to Ren's original complaint, as well as a motion to strike the complaint's request for pu...
2024.02.27 Motion for Attorney Fees 809
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...ntiff Travel ers Property Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”), requests a total of $60,994.50 in fees and costs, representing the amounts incurred in responding to both appeals and the petition for review. Defendant Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. (“Critchfield”) o pposes the motion on two discrete grounds, discussed below. As a threshold matter, Travelers has submitted a request for judicial notice of various court filings and orde...
2024.02.22 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 630
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...acate. 1. Backgrou nd This case arises out of Hopkins's representation of Carleen Whittelsey (“Whittelsey”) and her now -deceased husband Stuart G. Whittelsey Jr. (“Stuart”) in estate planning and estate administration over the course of numerous years, including in litigatio n regarding the estate after Stuart passed away. On June 22, 2021, Whittelsey filed this action for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against Hopkins....
2024.02.22 Motion to Compel Mental Exam 748
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...of John Doe 6. Doe 1 argues that Doe 6 has placed his mental condition at issue in this case, given his claims that he “continues to suffer from post -traumatic stress disorder, depression, repressed feelings and memories of his encounters, aggression, psychological s truggles, substance abuse, psychological trauma[,] and an inability to maintain meaningful relationships as a result of the alleged childhood sexual abuse that forms the basis of ...
2024.02.22 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 075
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...ar, make, and model as the [Subject Vehicle]”: (1) internal analyses and investigations regarding the “electrical defect” that allegedly manifested itself in the Subject Vehicle; (2) communications regarding the electrical defect; (3) electronic documents “relating to any decision to issue any notices, letters, campaigns, warranty extensions, technical service bulletins and recall concerning the [electrical defect]; (4) customer complaint...
2024.02.22 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 929
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...ah resided at t he time of commencement of the action. On April 22, 2022, Li filed the operative first amended complaint for declaratory relief (“FAC”). On September 2, 2022, Mummah concurrently filed an Answer to the FAC and a Cross- Complaint for Violation of Federal and California Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts (“FDCPA”) (“cross- complaint”). The cross-complaint named Li's attorney, Scott A. Flaxman, as a cross- defendant. ...
2024.02.20 Demurrer 506
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...In mid -2021, the Coun ty required its employees to receive vaccinations for SARS -CoV -2, the virus that causes the COVID -19 disease. (Ibid.) From mid -2021 to November 15, 2021, Salinas sought a religious exemption or accommodation from Defendants, and he submitted a Religious Exception Request Form in August 2021. (Id. at ¶ 3; see also Exh. A.) On November 4, 2021, Defendants sent a notice of denial of the religious exemption, determining th...
2024.02.20 Demurrer 345
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...2) Battery; (3) Gen der Violence in Violation of Civil Code Section 52.4; (4) Assault; (5) Violation of the Ralph Civil Rights Act (Civil Code Section 51.7); (6) Violation of the Bane Act (Civil Code Section 52.1); (7) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (8) Neg ligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. There are no exhibits attached to the complaint. Currently before the court is Gandoza's demurrer to the complaint, filed on Dece...
2024.02.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication 475
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ... & Nguyen Thi Ngoc Quy Insuran ce Trust. The original and still -operative complaint, filed on October 20, 2020, states three causes of action: (1) Fraudulent Transfer re: “Granite Bay Property,” in violation of Civil Code (“Civ. Code”) section 3439.04(a), part of the Uniform Voidable Transfer Act (“UVTA”) (Civ. Code, §§ 3439 et seq.); (2) Fraudulent Transfer re: “$1.9 Millon Granite Bay Loan,” in violation of Civ. Code section...
2024.02.15 Motion for Attorney Fees 005
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...V395005) after Respondents successfully quashed a petition to correct the arbitration award, this court (Judge Kirwan) awarded $461,250.00 out of the $745,696.49 requested. In the second motion, filed in a related case (No. 22CV399395) after Respondents (who were petitioners in that case) prevailed on a petition to confirm the arbitration award, this court (the undersigned) awarded $361,923.55 out of the $810,545.35 requested in this case. The ...
2024.02.15 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 399
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...on Agreement,” the cour t agrees with Plaintiff and grants his motion. The court denies defendants' motion. The parties settled their litigation shortly before trial, as memorialized in a one - page settlement agreement dated February 28, 2019. The parties noted in the agreement that they “anticipate a more formal settlement agreement being drafted and executed but it is their intent that this document, [sic] signed by them be a binding legal...
2024.02.15 Special Motion to Strike, for Attorney Fees 134
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...h Retention of a Se curity Deposit. According to the complaint, Plaintiffs resided at 95 South 33rd Street in San Jose, California (the “Property”) from November 2020 to September 2021. (Complaint, ¶ 12.) Plaintiffs signed a written agreement with Esmeralda Real Gonzales , who represented herself as the owner of the Property.1 (Id. at ¶ 13.) After learning that Gonzales was not the owner, Plaintiffs asked her who was, prompting Gonzales to ...
2024.02.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration 103
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...answered questions. This brief was also tardy.4 The court would like the parties to address the following questions at the hearing: 1. Plainti¯s argue that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not apply in this case, because “[t]here is no indication . . . that AXIOM engaged in any interstate commerce or that the agreement is intended to encompass such activity at all.” (Opposition at pp. 3:28-4:2.) If the court ultimately agrees an...
2024.02.13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 923
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ... did not Þle her memorandum o points and authorities until January 22, 2024, which is only 15 court days beore a February 13, 2024 hearing date. Code o Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), requires moving papers to be served at least 16 court days beore a hearing. Unsurprisingly, given the lack o notice (much less, timely notice) the court has received no response to the motion rom Nordstrom. Second, even i notice were proper, t...
2024.02.13 Motion for Attorney Fees 567
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ... attorney's fees provisions in two di¯erent agreements that apply to this case. Having reviewed these provisions closely, as well as the cited case law, the court disagrees and now denies the motion. 1. The MOU First, defendants rely on a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) between plainti¯ Brett Weisel and defendant David Lichtenger that was “attached and incorporated into the LLC Operating Agreement” for Integrity Homes, LLC, which ...
2024.02.13 Demurrer to FAC 048
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...elief from the government claim Þling requirements (Government Code section 945.4), Doe Þled the operative Þrst amended complaint (“FAC”) on July 21, 2023. The FAC states causes of action for: (1) Gender Violence (Civ. Code, § 52.4); (2) Sexual Harassment (Civ. Code, §§ 51.9, 52); (3) Sexual Assault (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.16); (4) Sexual Battery (Civ. Code, § 1708.5); (5) Intentional Inßiction of Emotional Distress (Code Civ. Proc.,...
2024.02.01 Motion for Summary Adjudication 252
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...ing the relevant time period. Peters is alleged to have been BAPD's vice president during the relevant time period. The original and still-operative complaint, Þled on July 15, 2019, states six causes of action: (1) Fraud (concealment); (2) Fraud (intentional misrepresentation); (3) Fraud (false promise); (4) Breach of Contract (breach of the assignment agreement); (5) Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (alleging that BAPD “...
2024.02.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 988
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...ve complaint “or statutory violations,” Þled on May 30, 2023, states Þve causes o action: (1) Violation o Civil Code section 1793.2(d); (2) Violation o Civil Code section 1793.2(b); (3) Violation o Civil Code section 1793.2(a)(3); (4) Breach o the Implied Warranty o Merchantability; and (5) Fraud (i.e., alleging that Kia committed raud by allowing the subject vehicle to be sold “without disclosing that the Subject Vehicle and its ...
2024.02.01 Demurrer 130
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...s sixteen years old. (See Complaint at ¶¶ 4 and 7.) This occurred during the 1982-1983 school year. (See id. at ¶ 16.) The complaint alleged that the action was “brought pursuant to C.C.P § 340.1(q) as amended by Assembly Bill 218, e¯ective January 1, 2020, reviving the statute of limitations within a three-year window for civil claims of childhood sexual assault.” (Complaint at ¶ 2.) The Complaint also alleged that P.L.s lawsuit was ...
2024.01.30 Motions to Enforce Settlement Agreements 194
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...�consolidate” the cases or the limited purpose o hearing these motions. Deendants Þled a single opposition brie on January 17, 2024, and Valley Water Þled a single reply brie on January 23, 2024. The court GRANTS Valley Water's motions to enorce the settlement agreements. There is no dispute that the parties entered into settlement agreements in 2022. There is no dispute that the parties agreed that the court would retain jurisdiction o...
2024.01.30 Motion to Compel Depositions of Witnesses 066
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...positions will be taken in person. In addition, the court GRANTS IN PART defendants request for monetary sanctions, in the amount of $5,734.20; the court DENIES GDKs request for sanctions. The court has reviewed the meet-and-confer correspondence submitted by the parties. It appears that the parties spent a signiÞcant amount of time negotiating and then agreeing to a schedule by which all of the party depositions would take place in March and ...
2024.01.30 Motion for Attorney Fees 855
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...¯icient for the court to make a speciÞc award. The court therefore CONTINUES the hearing on this motion to April 30, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. Guerrero shall Þle additional billing records (attached to one or more declarations) to support the motion by no later than March 26, 2024; Arch Vet may Þle a supplemental opposition by April 15, 2024; and Guerrero may Þle a supplemental reply brief by April 22, 2024. First, the court is well aware that deta...
2024.01.30 Demurrer 030
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...Services (“786”), and Irfan Pathan (“Pathan”) (collectively, “Cross- Defendants”) on December 22, 2022. On July 11, 2023, the court sustained in part and overruled in part Kurnss demurrer to the cross-complaint, with leave to amend. Mahameed and Omari then Þled a Þrst amended cross-complaint (“FACC”) on July 20, 2023. In the FACC, Mahameed and Omari allege ownership of the property at 2110 Maykirk Rd., San Jose, CA (the “Subj...
2024.01.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses 397
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...hecking the box for a "Limited" civil case, and indicating that the amount demanded was "$10,000 or less." Marowitz represents himself in this action. Marowitz propounded 153 discovery requests on Lisi (115 form interrogatories, 13 special interrogatories, 14 requests for admissions, and 11 requests for production of documents), even though each side is entitled to propound a maximum of 35 discovery requests on an opposing party in a limited civi...

309 Results

Per page

Pages