Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

394 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Santa Clara x
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C x
2022.03.24 Demurrers 740
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.24
Excerpt: ...losure. According to the first amended complaint (“FAC”), plaintiffs Ron V. Ronen (“Ronen”) and Alexa Ada‐Saucedo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (self‐represented), husband and wife, reside at real property located at 121 Vista Del Lago in Los Gatos, California. (FAC at ¶¶ 2, 26.) Plaintiff Ronen purchased the subject property on January 28, 1994. (Id. at ¶ 28.) While difficult to determine, Plaintiffs allege multiple defendants,...
2022.03.24 Motion for Summary Adjudication 864
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.24
Excerpt: ...l property, and by December 2012, the bank was threatening to foreclose. (See complaint, ¶ 8.) Bridge Bank was willing to extend the loan for 12 months if BSP paid down the principal by $2.5 million. (See complaint, ¶ 9.) Lacking the funds, Defendant approached Quang V. Luong (“Luong”), and on December 21, 2012, Luong loaned BSP $2.75 million for 12 months, with repayment in December 2013. (Id.) In July 2013, Nguyen and Luong entered into a...
2022.03.22 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Recover Costs 009
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.22
Excerpt: ...ttorneys' fees incurred in actions to enforce the note or in matters related to the note. Plaintiff fell into default in payments due on the loan, and on October 30, 2020, plaintiff and defendants entered into a Forbearance Agreement that provided a delay in foreclosure proceedings, so long as plaintiff made certain payments, including amounts due under the note. The Forbearance Agreement also has a provision for recovery of attorneys' fees. Plai...
2022.03.15 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 806
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.15
Excerpt: ...ril 13, 2018, Plaintiff received a complaint of harassment and bullying from a Muslim Pakistani subordinate of his by a Sikh Indian supervisor at Micron. (See complaint, ¶ 13.) On April 18, 2018, Plaintiff forwarded his subordinate's complaint to Plaintiff's supervisor, Prakash Jayapal, a Sikh Indian, for investigation. (See complaint, ¶ 14.) By the next day, April 19, 2018, Plaintiff's subordinate apprised Plaintiff that Micron had reprimanded...
2022.03.15 Motion to Consolidate Related Cases 805
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.15
Excerpt: ... plaintiff SI 38, LLC (“plaintiff”) against defendant, in connection with the premises leased by plaintiff to defendant. On or about November 30, 2005, defendant and plaintiff's predecessor in interest, FBJ Management, Inc., entered into a lease whereby defendant leased space in a shopping center at 20640 Homestead Road in Cupertino, CA (“original lease” and “premises” depending on context). The lease was for a term of 10 years with t...
2022.03.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication 543
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.15
Excerpt: ....) The lease provided for an initial term of 10 years with 4 consecutive 5‐year renewal options. (Id.) Section 1.5.3 of the Lease states: 1.5.3 Termination for Failure of Use. If for any reason other than (a) as set forth in the Declaration, Title Commitment, Survey, or the Existing Exclusives, or (b) a cause within Tenant's control, Tenant is not able to operate for business in and from the Premises for the Authorized Use described in Section ...
2022.03.10 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 731
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.10
Excerpt: ...t, and disinherited Angelo. While it now appears uncontested that a special needs trust in which Anthony is beneficiary (“SNT”) is a beneficiary of the Trust pursuant to the Fifth Amendment, the issue in the instant motion is whether the interests of Anthony and Angelo pertaining to the Fifth Amendment are in conflict such that plaintiffs' legal counsel should be disqualified from concurrent representation of Anthony and Angelo. On October 26...
2022.03.10 Motion for Summary Judgment 354
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.10
Excerpt: ... in Mountain View, at which a number of businesses operate, including a Safeway supermarket. (See complaint, ¶ 15.) On November 21, 2018, at around 8:50 pm, plaintiff Nelly Luisa Amador (“Plaintiff”) parked her vehicle at an available handicap parking spot near the Safeway supermarket, exited her vehicle, and made her way to the supermarket; however, she tripped over a concrete parking space block that was placed within the handicap parking ...
2022.03.03 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 788
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.03
Excerpt: ...iled reply. Hearing was set for February 1, 2022. The court found good cause for continuance of the hearing to consider the opposition and provide defendants opportunity to file reply. Defendants do not challenge that default and default judgment have been entered against them in this action, the latter occurring on June 13, 2016. Defendants assert that neither the individual defendant Kethineni, nor the entity defendant Neelinfo was served with ...
2022.03.03 Motion to Compel Further Responses 558
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.03
Excerpt: ...se considerations of the parties, the ruling at the hearing of March 1, 2022 addresses all motions to compel set on the three dates. Calendar lines 2‐5 concern the special interrogatories and request for production of documents served on plaintiffs Rodolfo Arevalo and Rosemarie Arteche Clemente, and the responses served by each plaintiff, identical in substance, which defendant considered deficient, resulting in the filing of the instant motion...
2022.03.03 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 755
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.03
Excerpt: ...ted by plaintiff Van Tran (“Tran”). (Complaint at ¶ 1.) As a result of the collision, plaintiff Selck suffered multiple catastrophic injuries including spinal fractures, a femoral neck fracture, a clavicle fracture, rib fracture, foot fracture, and other injuries. (Ibid.) At the time of the collision, plaintiff Tran was covered by an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant Geico Casualty Company (“GEICO”), with liability limits o...
2022.03.03 Motion for Leave to Amend SAC 275
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.03
Excerpt: ...and assault and battery civil rights violated. The action involves an incident at defendant Macy's store in Palo Alto, CA on December 23, 2015, in which plaintiff was arrested and charged by the Palo Alto police department for violation of Penal Code sections 69 resisting arrest and 1203.2 probation violation (“incident”). Plaintiff asserts that he was the victim in the incident, and was racially profiled and attacked by the responding police...
2022.03.01 Demurrer 943
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.01
Excerpt: ...plaintiff's performance of the contract and that a sum is due to plaintiff. On August 31, 2021, defendant filed the instant demurrer to plaintiff's complaint. The demurrer is a special demurrer filed on the ground that plaintiff does not have the legal capacity to sue. Subdivision (b) of Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10. Amended notice of hearing is on file. No opposition to the demurrer has been filed. Request for judicial notice Defendant...
2022.03.01 Motion to Compel Further Responses 558
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.01
Excerpt: ...' 91‐year old mother, Ressurrection “Rosie” Arevalo Arteche (“plaintiffs' mother”) entrusted defendant to hold the plaintiffs' mother's cash in five envelopes totaling $25,300 while plaintiffs' mother travelled abroad. The full amount was not returned to plaintiffs' mother after she returned from traveling. A deficiency of $16,200 forms the basis of the lawsuit. On June 23, 2021, defendant propounded identical sets of special interrogat...
2022.03.01 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 395
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.03.01
Excerpt: ...deed of trust on real property located at 505 Las Coches Ct. in Morgan Hill. (Complaint at ¶ 11, Ex. A.) Plaintiff Sandra Harmon (“Plaintiff”) signed the agreement as Director of Arttec. (Ibid.) The deed of trust named Western Resources Title as the trustee, and CFS as the beneficiary. (Ibid.) On October 11, 2018, an assignment of the deed of trust was recorded, naming Civic Holdings I Trust (“Trust”) c/o Fay Servicing, LLC (“Fay”) a...
2022.02.24 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 488
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.24
Excerpt: ... hearing, plaintiff requested that the court rule on each interrogatory, primarily for a record of rulings on general objections and objections to each request in response and amended response of defendant set forth in defendant's amended responses to plaintiff's request for production, set one. After consideration of the authority and argument of counsel set forth in the papers filed in support, opposition and reply, the court issues the followi...
2022.02.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 092
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.24
Excerpt: ...that the term “warranty repairs” is vague, ambiguous, and overbroad is OVERRULED. While defendant may answer the SI by specifying writings where the answer can be derived or ascertained, here the response lacks sufficient detail to permit the propounding party to locate and identify the answer to the SI. The motion to compel further response to the interrogatory is GRANTED. Defendant shall serve a further response to the SI, without objection...
2022.02.24 Motion to Compel Deposition 578
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.24
Excerpt: ... for plaintiff's deposition at the office of attorneys for defendant or be permitted to appear remotely via Skype or other platform. Subdivision (a) of Section 2025.310 permits the deposition officer/reporter to appear at the deposition remotely at the election of either the deponent or deposing party, and expressly provides that the deponent is not required to be physically present at the same location with the deposition officer/reporter. While...
2022.02.24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 339
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.24
Excerpt: ...ue, in Sunnyvale, California (the “Property”) which is Plaintiff's primary residence. (Complaint at ¶ 11.) In May 2007, Plaintiff obtained a loan in the amount of $330,000 from Washington Mutual Bank, FA (“WAMU”), secured by a Deed of Trust against the Property. (Ibid.) The subject loan was assigned multiple times resulting in a constant revolving door of loan beneficiaries and servicers. (Complaint at ¶ 14.) Within a few years of Plain...
2022.02.24 Demurrer 705
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.24
Excerpt: ...uary 9, 2016, La Encina and Group One entered into an agreement in which Group One would perform certain construction work on La Encina's property in exchange for $3,900,000. (See La Encina cross‐complaint, ¶¶ 10‐11.) Group One breached the contract, failing to pay subcontractors, suppliers and laborers within 7 days after receipt of payment from La Encina, failing to hold payments received from La Encina for the benefit of subcontractors, ...
2022.02.22 Motion to Strike 011
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: .... (Id.) In October 2020, Decedent developed signs and symptoms of infection, including chills, a fever, increasing confusion and other symptoms. (Id.) Plaintiff Alice Mohorko‐Lotter (“Plaintiff”) spoke with Decedent on the telephone and noted her increased confusion to staff; however, there is no documentation or evidence that the staff took any steps to follow up on these signs and symptoms, or reported them to her physician. (Id.) Deceden...
2022.02.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 668
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: ...�) entered into a written lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”). (Complaint at ¶ 7.) Under the Lease Agreement, defendant Mosaic agreed to lease certain premises located at 3595 Stevens Creek Blvd. in Santa Clara, California, for a term of approximately two (2) years and two (2) months, beginning on or about November 1, 2019, and ending on or about December 31, 2021. (Ibid.) In connection with the Lease Agreement, defendant Eyekick Visual,...
2022.02.22 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 143
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: ...or the services. Defendant breached the contract by failing to pay for services. It is further alleged that on January 14, 2014, defendant executed a written guaranty and addendum to the contract. The complaint alleges three causes of action for breach of the written engagement agreement, breach of the written guaranty agreement and for successor in interest. Trial is set for March 21, 2022. On December 21, 2021, plaintiff filed the instant motio...
2022.02.22 Demurrer, Motion to Strike SAC 489
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: ...e attending physician, Dr. Ngai Nguyen (“Dr. Nguyen”). (Ibid.) Dr. Nguyen determined that Huynh needed to be placed in a facility with skilled nursing care for his rehabilitation. (Ibid.) Dr. Nguyen recommended Mission De La Casa Nursing Center (“Mission”) to Huynh of which Dr. Nguyen wholly owns and controls. (Ibid.) Dr. Nguyen stated Huynh would be discharged from the nursing facility when he was stronger. (Ibid.) Dr. Nguyen told Huynh ...
2022.02.17 Motion to Tax or Strike Costs 417
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2022.02.17
Excerpt: ..., 2019, defendants filed a memorandum of costs. Plaintiffs appealed the anti‐SLAPP order, and on July 7, 2021, the Court of Appeal issued its opinion affirming the order (modified on August 11, 2021). Defendants are awarded their costs on appeal. On September 30, 2021 the Court of Appeal issued a remittitur which was amended on October 5, 2021. On October 28, 2021, defendants filed a second memorandum of costs on trial, and a memorandum of cost...

394 Results

Per page

Pages