Excerpt: ...lleged loss. Plaintiff's demurrer, however, fails for several reasons. First, Plaintiff has not established that Plaintiff's counsel met and conferred in good faith. Plaintiff's counsel's declaration contains no specific information about counsel's meet and confer efforts. Second, Plaintiff's notice of motion does not identify the grounds on which the demurrer is made, in violation of CCP § 1010 and CRC § 3.1110(a). Third, Plaintiff's demurrer ...

Excerpt: ...nauthorized access to his account and theft of his personal identifying information. Plaintiff does not dispute that he and Robinhood entered a binding arbitration agreement, or that Robinhood has demanded arbitration of Plaintiff's claims. Rather, Plaintiff contends that his claims do not fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement. According to Plaintiff, his claims “involve Robinhood's security of its consumer's accounts and Robinhood...

Excerpt: ...r California law because it is based on the trivial defect doctrine. However, there appears to be a split of authority as to whether the trivial defect doctrine is an aspect of the duty of care or an affirmative defense. (See Kasparian v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 11; cf. Ursino v. Big Boy Rests. (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 394.) As such, Plaintiff has not established that Defendants may not assert the trivial defect doctrine a...

Excerpt: ...tten contract without either attaching the written contract or alleging its material terms. See Otworth v. S. Pac. Transportation Co. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 452, 459 (where breach of written contract is alleged, the agreement must either be attached and incorporated by reference, or its material terms must be set forth in the pleading); Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 299, 307 (same). Here, the Complaint alleges the parties ...

Excerpt: ...nts that they are willing to participate in ADR and are agreeable to the same ADR procedure. If so, the court may order the case referred to the court's ADR Analyst. Local Rule 3.904 further states that if a case is at issue and all counsel and self‐represented parties have indicated in their CMC statements that they are willing to participate in ADR and willing to proceed to the same ADR process, the case will be referred to the ADR department...

Excerpt: ...quests is DENIED for the reasons set forth below. At the IDC held in this matter on February 24, 2022, the parties agreed that Defendant would serve unverified responses to Plaintiffs' discovery requests, and make an application for appointment of a GAL by March 18. The parties also agreed that Defendant would serve verifications within two weeks following the appointment of the GAL. Defendant provided supplemental unverified responses to the dis...

Excerpt: ...he same rental unit, the same defendant, and same habitability issues, indicating there are similar issues of fact,” and that both matters will involve the same expert and lay witnesses. MPA, p.3‐ 4. Plaintiffs contend that, as a result, consolidation would conserve judicial resources and reduce unnecessary costs for the parties. Although the cases involve the same rental unit, the cases involve different parties and allege different events t...

Excerpt: ...25.450; 2023.030(a). The motion to compel defendant Fernandez's deposition is GRANTED. Without discounting whatever health issues defendant may be facing, defendant has not provided sufficient evidence establishing that he is unable to sit for a deposition. This case is 1½ years old. The right to depose an adverse party is a basic discovery right. The need for a translator is irrelevant; one can be provided. Breaks can be taken, if needed. Plain...

Excerpt: ...; RAHIM AMIDHOZOUR, AN INDIVIDUAL; AMIDI, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants' motion to compel compliance with subpoena to Law Office of Camelia Mahmoudi is granted as to Document Categories (j) and (k). The motion is denied as to all other categories, without prejudice to propounding a more specific subpoena. A. Objections to a Subpoena Do not Require a Privilege Log. The Code of Civil Procedure contains no ...

Excerpt: ... when Defendant “received” the invoice at issue. Defendant's objections to paragraphs 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 17, and Exhibit F and J are overruled. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice of an Order from a Santa Clara County Superior Court in Murrain v. Tesla, No. 18CV 334861 is sustained. The Court notes, however, that its ruling on this motion would be unaffected if the challenged evidence were o...

Excerpt: ...ependent claim in California for unjust enrichment. Unjust enrichment is synonymous with restitution. Levine v. Blue Shield of Calif. (2010) 189 C.A.4th 1117, 1138. The Demurrer is therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the eighth cause of action for unjust enrichment. Fraud Defendant argues that fraud is not pleaded with sufficient specificity because “Completely absent from the allegations are any affirmative statements made by Defenda...

Excerpt: ...., Plaintiff's Statement of Additional Disputed Facts (“PF”), Nos. 20, 36‐38, 59, 62, 65‐66, 83‐91, 98. Summary judgment standard. A motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 437c(c). A defendant has met its burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if th...

Excerpt: ...Orders Determining Claims of Exemption and Order to Liquidate Securities, is DENIED. Plaintiff fails to establish that the Renewed Judgment is void. Plaintiff contends that the Renewed Judgment entered on August 18, 2021 is void because it was not entered within ten years of the Judgment. Plaintiff claims Judgment was entered on August 12, 2011. As support, Plaintiff relies on a comment entered in the Court's docket on August 12, 2011 that judgme...

Excerpt: ...ories (General), Form Interrogatories (Employment), and Special Interrogatories, filed 1‐27‐22, which includes a request for monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel, is GRANTED‐IN‐PART and DENIED‐IN‐PART, as set forth below. Defendant's requests for monetary sanctions is DENIED. Local Rule 3.700(f) states: Tolling of Deadline to File Motion. Pursuant to [CCP] 2016.080(c)(2), the time for bringing any motion to com...

Excerpt: ...were survivors of persons who were killed in Israel by members of Hamas. The plaintiffs alleged that Facebook was liable for “giving Hamas a forum with which to communicate and for actively bringing Hamas' message to interested parties.” Like Plaintiff Forrest, the plaintiffs in Force alleged that Facebook “does not act as a publisher,” because “it uses algorithms to suggest content to users, resulting in ‘matchmaking.'” The Court o...

Excerpt: ... 2023.030 BY DEFENDANTS HAYLEY ZEMEL AND ERIK VAN WALDEN TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants' unopposed motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, for the reasons set forth below. Defendants' motion to compel Plaintiff's attendance at an oral deposition is DENIED without prejudice to Defendants' ability to re‐notice P...

Excerpt: ...'s Second Amended Complaint on the grounds that Plaintiff has “padded the complaint with a meritless tort claim and an unjust enrichment claim based on Defendant's counsel's communications.” MPA, p.2. Defendant notes that, “From the date of October 26, 2020 forward, the [parties'] attorneys communicated exchanging their relative positions and settlement positions as to the disputed Employment Agreement and enforceability of the document and...

Excerpt: ...R REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 12, 2014 TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories is GRANTED in part pursuant to Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. § 2030.300(a). Defendants Saeed Amidi and Rahim Amidhozour are hereby ordered to produce further written, verified responses, without objections, to Special Interrogatories (Set One) number 16. Defendant Amidi, LLC is hereby ordered to produce further, written, ve...

Excerpt: ... 8.54(c) (“A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion.”). With the possible exception of the Seventh Cause of Action (alleging fraud), all asserted claims (the First Cause of Action (professional negligence), the Second Cause of Action (negligence); the Third Cause of Action (breach of fiduciary duty), the Fourth Cause of Action (conversion), the Fifth Cause of Action (IIED), the Sixth Cause of Action (...

Excerpt: ...ties on July 24, 2011 and modified October 3, 2018 to include binding arbitration of any dispute. Browning Decl., ¶6, Exh. E. The Findings and Award indicate that Respondent was properly served with the Demand to Appear at Mediation and Arbitration, Notice of Demand for Arbitration, Notice to Attend Hearing, and Claimant's Arbitration Brief. Id., at item 9. It also indicates that Respondent is liable for and shall pay to Claimant compensatory da...

Excerpt: ...on Subpoenas For Financial Records Of Plaintiff; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC And Its Attorney Jointly And Severally In The Amount Of $3640.00. Pro Tem Judge James Fleming, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to s...

Excerpt: ... Plaintiffs reached out to Cirrus to schedule the PMQ depositions at issue on October 22 and October 29, 2021. Smith Decl., ¶ 2. Plaintiffs received no response. Id. On January 12‐13, 2022, Plaintiffs served notices for the Zoom video conference depositions of Cirrus's PMQs to take place on dates between January 31 and February 21, 2022. Id., ¶ 3. Cirrus responded that, because it was preparing for a four‐week trial beginning on February 15...

Excerpt: ...fifth, ninth, and tenth affirmative defenses is overruled. Each defense (unclean hands, waiver/estoppel, equities, respectively) allege that “Plaintiff's unauthorized draws from reVIS' corporate account contributed and/or caused considerable debt to the company leading to its demise and the damages that Plaintiff alleges reVIS has sustained.” (First Am. Ans. at 3 & 4.) Each of these defenses alleges that someone other than Defendants (i. e., ...

Excerpt: ...and D, and as to the record of official legislative acts contained therein pursuant to Cal. Evidence Code § 452(c), but not as to the truth of hearsay statements contained in the documents or their legal interpretations. See, e.g., Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 113; StorMedia, Inc. v. Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th 449, 457. Respondents' Demurrer to the First Cause of Action in Petitioner's Amended V...

Excerpt: ...t alleges that in February 2021, Defendant published an internet post on GoFundMe (“post”) claiming that Plaintiff Mohamed Sameh Mahmoud (“Plaintiff”) engaged in unlawful conduct against Defendant Daria Vinogradova (“Vinogradova”), who Plaintiff is married to but currently separated. (Complaint ¶¶ 6, 8.) These statements included that Plaintiff took the car keys and left such that Plaintiff could not get to and from work, that Plain...