Excerpt: ...urchased the vehicle. Richards's purchase was financed, creating a lien immediately upon the sale. Defendants towed the vehicle pursuant to Vehicle Code section 22651, resulting in an immediate lien "for caring for and keeping the vehicle safe." (Veh. Code S 22851, subd. (a)(l).) Plaintiff's lien is superior to Defendants' lien, having been created and having attached first. The owner of a vehicle towed pursuant to Section 22651 has a right to re...

Excerpt: ...ment Debtor VITALY GOLOMB concedes belong to him, his wife Kateryna Mamyko-Golomb, and Golomb Solet Capital. Judgment Debtor Golomb concedes that he was CEO and "owner" of TIME TRAVELLER. If that is true, then money transfers to his wife and to Golomb Solet-i Capital raise questions about their propriety, especially since at least some of the transfers occurred after this lawsuit was filed. To determine whether the transfers were fraudulent for t...

Excerpt: ...and Reply briefs, and considers them timely. Facts. This is a residential unlawful detainer (UD) case. The allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint appear to be undisputed. As alleged, on 12-6-23, Plaintiff served Defendant with a Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate. Defendant was two months behind in her rent payments at this time, having failed to pay rent for both November and December, 2023. On 12- 9-23, the Three-Day Notice expired. After the...

Excerpt: ...D as to exhibits A—B attached to the April 7, 2023 Declaration of Jason George and DE-NIED as to exhibits C—H. A hearing was held November 7, 2022, at which the Court continued the hearing to May 22, 2023, and permitted the parties to file supplemental briefing. The Court has considered the supplemental briefing and issues this modified tentative ruling. Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") demurs to the First Amended Complaint (the "FAC") o...

Excerpt: ...an Carlos, CA. Plaintiffs allege breach of contract of a February 23, 2022 written agreement between Plaintiffs Riley Russell and Tomoko Russell as sellers to Defendant Akaal LLC as buyer for a sales price of $2,100,000 with a leaseback provision, an initial deposit amount of $63,000 within 3 days of acceptance, with the balance due March 8, 2022, and a 90 day lease back. Plaintiffs also allege a cause of action for fraud against Defendants Sarbd...

Excerpt: ...d Guang Dai's Motion to Compel Defendant Mavrik Construction & Development, Inc.'s Further Responses and Requests for Sanction is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. Defendant Mavrik Construction & Development, Inc. ("Mavrik") shall provide further responses to Form Interrogatories no. 324.1, Special Interrogatories nos. 1, 3, & 5—8, and Requests for Production nos. 1, 4— 5, & 8—14 no later than thirty (30) d...

Excerpt: ...apers prove each element of the causes of action, and the opposing papers fail to raise a triable issue of material fact as to any element of either cause of action or as to any affirmative defense. l. OBJECTIONS has asserted 37 pages of 52 objections to various matters, most of which are innocuous, having no bearing on the issues. On the subject of "inconsequential written evidentiary objections, without focusing on those that are critical," the...

Excerpt: ...of Plaintiffs Opposition, filed untimely on May 1, 2023, have not been considered. While the Opposition indicates that the parties have agreed to a continuance of this hearing, no justification has been provided for the late-filed Opposition, and a continuance is not conducive to the Court's impacted calendar. Defendants' Demurrer is OVERRULED. Plaintiff's Complaint is based upon a Three-Day Notice to Quit, which states that Defendants permitted ...

Excerpt: ...e Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 8. Discussion 1. Paragraph 9 Does Not Support Granting Summary Judgment Defendant argues that Paragraph 9 is an exculpatory clause that precludes liability for breach of contract. That argument is unpersuasive. i. Paragraph 9 Is an Indemnity Clause, Not an Exculpatory Clause In the absence of any extrinsic evidence, the Court may "determine the parties' intentons as disclosed b...

Excerpt: ...N-PART. 1. Procedural Matters Defendants' October 12, 2022 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, S 452(d).). Defendants' Reply brief argues that the Court should not consider Plaintiff's Opposition brief due to alleged improper electronic service, and non- compliance with the parties' agreement regarding service. In the Court's discretion, the Court has considered Plaintiff's Opposition brief, but admonishes the parties that, going...

Excerpt: ...pursuant to cal. code of Civ. Proc. S 430.10(e). These causes of action are time barred by the applicable statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure section 337(a), and therefore fall to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The gravamen of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint arises out of alleged overcharges on Plaintiff's real estate loan from Defendant Bank of America, in which Plaintiff received a misstated HUD-statement w...

Excerpt: ...ction for Money Had and Received is GRANTED. EKA's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. On reply, the Plaintiff submitted additional evidence in support of his Motion, to which Defendant objects. The Court, in making fts ruling, has not considered any of the new evidence submitted by Plaintiff on reply. Plaintiff's Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice, made for the first time on reply to accompany the new evidence discussed above, is DENIE...

Excerpt: ... hereby STAYED pending resolution of the arbitration proceeding. Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 1281.4. As a matter of public policy, California courts favor the enforceability of arbitration agreements. Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 1281.2 provides that upon a showing that the parties entered into a valid agreement to arbitrate, and that a party thereto has refused to arbitrate the controversy, the Court "shall" order the parties to arbitrate "unless it determin...

Excerpt: ...roc. Sect. 437c. Legal standard. A motion for summary judgment shall be granted if the papers submitted show there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 437c(c). A defendant has met its burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if defendant shows that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established, or that there is a co...

Excerpt: ...es not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code of Civ. Proc. (“C.C.P.”) § 438(c)(1)(A).) Plaintiff asserts that the Complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a breach of contract cause of action. (See Plaintiff's Memorandum, p.2:12-16.) Plaintiff claims that the Complaint establishes the existence of a contract between Plaintiff and Defendant, that Defendant breached the contract and that Defendant failed...

Excerpt: ...- Compel Duplicate Deeds. Plaintiff's claim to “compel duplicate deeds” is based on an allegation that two grant deeds relating to real property in Santa Clara County were stolen from a safe. (Complaint para. 65-69.) The Probate Court of this County fully adjudicated the issue of the deeds on the merits when it granted Defendant WALLACE's Rental Properties Petition. The Probate Court ruled that ROBERT had no valid property interest in the pro...

Excerpt: ... (30) days after written notice of entry of this order. Failure to timely file an amended pleading in compliance with this order may result in dismissal of this action. The Request for Judicial Notice of Private Defender Program Office (“PDPO”) is GRANTED. Defendant demurs to the Supplemental Complaint on the grounds that the claims are barred by res judicata, that the pleading is uncertain, and that insufficient facts are stated as to consti...

Excerpt: ...failed to (1) allege facts constituting a violation of the Homeowner's Bill of Rights (HBOR), (2) allege a timely tender of their indebtedness, or (3) establish that they were prejudiced by the alleged violations of the HBOR. Defendant contends, first, that Plaintiffs have failed to state facts constituting a violation of Civ. Code §§ 2923.7 or 2924.9. Civ. Code § 2923.7 provides that “[u]pon request from a borrower who requests a foreclosur...

Excerpt: ...of Peide An and Xiao Chen Liu is DENIED. 1. Section 1008(b) Is Inapplicable. IMUSIC asserts Code of Civ. Proc. section 1008(b) as the basis for this motion. (Notice of Motion at 2:7-8.) Section 1008, subdivision (b), however, pertains only to renewed motions. The present motion is not a renewed motion. The previous proceeding was Liu's and An's demurrer and the order sustaining demurrer. Since the present motion is not a renewal of any motion bro...

Excerpt: ...re exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record; (2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record; (3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and (5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. The clerk of the court is hereby ordered to seal the following doc...

Excerpt: ...efects from their prior motion, which the Court had denied on June 15, 2022. The present motion explains the new facts that rise the request to add Rona Maskan as a defendant and that the facts were discovered in April 2021. The present motion also includes the proposed pleading and an explanation of the new allegations. Plaintiffs promptly filed a 4th Amended Complaint on April 26, 2021. A. Plaintiffs Did not Act with Reasonable Diligence As to ...

Excerpt: ...eave to amend as to D & B. (Id. at 2:23-6:8.) As to Netwise, plaintiff pleads that its founder and CEO Dwight Gorall sexually assaulted and harassed her at a business event put on by plaintiff and her employer LiveRamp, Inc. (Cmplt. 3:6-4:9.) Civil Code 51.9 (sexual harassment): Plaintiff pleads that she helped host the LiveRamp "executive dinner for its clients and business partners" such as Gorall's Netwise at which Gorall groped and otherwise ...

Excerpt: ... pages 3 and 4, paragraphs 19, 21, 26‐29, 31, 34, 35, and items 4 and 7 of the Prayer for Relief in the SAC. Defendants maintain that these portions of the pleading are irrelevant and false. To the extent the Motion relies on the request for judicial notice, it is not well taken. If the documents were accepted as judicially noticeable, to the extent Defendants contest the factual allegations of the pleading it is an evidentiary matter that does...

Excerpt: ...ty Center, Redwood City. As to the merits, by this motion, Defendant moves for relief from its default on primarily equitable grounds. A court has inherent equitable authority to vacate a default at any time for extrinsic fraud or mistake, even when statutory relief is unavailable. (Luxury Asset Lending, LLC v. Philadelphia Television Network, Inc. (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 894, 910.) A defendant seeking relief from its default must show generally al...

Excerpt: ...ining objections are OVERRULED. A party may move for summary adjudication of as to one or more claims of damages if the party contends that there is no merit to the claim. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §437c(f)(1). A defendant has met his or her burden on summary judgment of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §437c(p). Once...