Excerpt: ...d the parties met and conferred. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, and then on June 5, 2020, filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). The parties met and conferred further but were unable to come to a resolution. The County demurred to Plaintiff's SAC pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10(e) on the grounds that the SAC fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action. The County's demurrer was overr...

Excerpt: ...ng‐Beverly Act; (3) violation of the Song‐Beverly Act section 1793.2; and (4) fraudulent inducement – concealment. Plaintiff's lawsuit concerns FCA's disclosure and warranty obligations for a vehicle (the Subject Vehicle) Plaintiff purchased from Mullahey in December 2017. On March 26, 2020, Plaintiff accepted Defendants' Code of Civil Procedure section 998 Offer to Compromise in the amount of $159,968.94 (the 998 Offer). Plaintiff now move...

Excerpt: ...own the zip line while she was on it. Plaintiff alleges that the second rider collided with her at a high rate of speed, causing her significant injuries. Defendant moved for summary judgment and on January 30, 2019, the Court denied the motion for summary judgment, ruling amongst other issues that a triable issue of material fact existed as to whether Defendant was grossly negligent. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on July 8, 2019, and...

Excerpt: ...pt HVAC technicians. Plaintiffs' second amended complaint (SAC) alleges causes of action for (1) failure to provide rest breaks, (2) failure to provide meal periods, (3) failure to pay all wages earned for all hours worked [at] the correct rates of pay, (4) wage statement penalties, (5) waiting time penalties, (6) failure to indemnify, (7) unfair competition, and (8) civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). This action has ...

Excerpt: ...aintiff now claims that he is experiencing complications, including double vision. At the time of the surgery, Plaintiff was incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, Corcoran (“CSATF”). Plaintiff now brings a motion for appointment of counsel with good cause. Plaintiff has brought such a motion multiple times, and each time has been denied. Plaintiff argues that due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and tha...

Excerpt: ...an uninsured motorist who was in an accident with Ms. Armstrong on February 25, 2017, at 2214 Main Street in Cambria near the French Corner Bakery. (Compl., ¶¶ 5‐7.) Plaintiff alleges it paid $250,000 under Ms. Armstrong's policy, and now seeks to recover that amount from Defendant. (Compl., p. 3, ll. 15‐17.) Plaintiff filed a proof of service of the summons, complaint, and other relevant documents, purporting to show Defendant was served v...

Excerpt: ...s out of a July 17, 2017, wildfire started as a result of roadwork on the side of the road southwest of the community of Coalinga (the “Park Fire”). On November 9, 2018, another action arising out of the Park Fire was filed in Monterey County Superior Court, by Timothy J. Haley and Ethna C. McGourty as Trustees of the Haley‐McGourty Family Trust dated September 27, 1996 (the “Haley Plaintiffs”) against the County and asserting causes of...

Excerpt: ...ses of action under the Labor Code, Business and Professions Doe sections 17200, et seq., and the Private Attorneys General Act (Labor Code sections 2698, et seq.). The parties mediated this action and subsequently Plaintiff's counsel, David Spurr, and Defendants' counsel executed a Memorandum of Understanding resulting from a mediator's proposal. (Perry Decl., ¶ 4; Exh. A.) Plaintiff and Defendants thereafter executed a Class Action Settlement ...

Excerpt: ...ureds' property in Creston, California, which caused a fire and damage to Plaintiff's insureds' property. The insureds submitted an insurance claim to Plaintiff for that damage, and upon payment, Plaintiff became subrogated to its insureds' rights to pursue the responsible parties for causing the loss, up to the amount paid. Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 473(a) and 576 for leave to file a First Amended Complaint...

Excerpt: ...t granted Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendant to produce documents and things, including production of the jewelry at issue. The Court ordered Defendant to produce documents and things and pay sanctions to Plaintiff's counsel on or before March 7, 2020. Defendant apparently failed to comply with the March 7, 2020 deadline. Now before the Court is a motion from Plaintiff stylized as a “motion for discovery sanctions including entry of default...

Excerpt: ...al and enter judgment against Defendant pursuant to the terms of a written stipulation of the parties (the “Stipulation”). (Exh. 1 to Imboden Decl.) Plaintiff moves on the grounds that Defendant failed to complete the payment arrangement contained in the parties' written Agreement and thus Plaintiff is entitled to entry of judgment. The motion was served on Defendant and no opposition was filed. Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation and th...

Excerpt: ...nty YMCA as defendants. PCC now moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c. PCC moves on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to present any competent evidence creating a triable issue of material fact that Plaintiff's claims against PCC have any merit. Plaintiff's action arises out of a February 11, 2017, fall by Plaintiff when she attempted to walk up fixed bleacher...

Excerpt: ...tion 664.6 (“Section 664.6”). The Court denies the motion. According to Plaintiff, the parties “entered into a Stipulation for Judgment, the original of which was filed with the Court.” (Karayan Decl., ¶ 3.) The Court has reviewed its records and found no such document. Nor has Plaintiff submitted a file‐stamped copy of any such document in support its motion. Section 664.6 provides: If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a wri...

Excerpt: ...hich Defendant has admittedly not paid for. A jury trial is set for February 23, 2021. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to bifurcate. Analysis. A motion to sever (or bifurcate1 ) asks the court to order separate trials of issues, causes of action, or parties joined in a single action in order to avoid prejudice, promote convenience, and/or permit greater expedience and economy. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1048(b), 598.) Here, Plaintiff reque...

Excerpt: ...ction for motor vehicle and general negligence. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that, on September 16, 2018, Harley Nicole McGrew Lujan (Decedent) was riding on the back of Mr. Pavine's Harley Davidson motorcycle when it collided with Mr. Terrizzi's vehicle. Plaintiffs allege the accident occurred while Mr. Pavine was traveling east on State Route 46 west of Arbor Road at an approximate speed of 65 miles per hour. Among other damages, Plaintiffs se...

Excerpt: ...public property, (3) dangerous condition caused by negligence of public employees, (4) trespass, (5) nuisance, (6) failure to discharge mandatory duty, and (7) temporary restraining order, and preliminary and permanent injunctions. Individual defendants Perez and Rovenstine are alleged to be employed with the County. (FAC, ¶¶ 3, 4.) Plaintiffs' lawsuit relates to their property located at 6295 Toro Creek Road in Atascadero (the Property). Plain...

Excerpt: ... and (3) to enjoin harassment and threatening behavior. On December 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint against the City of Atascadero (the City), alleging causes of action relating to Ms. Powell's alleged use of her property. The crux of both complaints is that Ms. Powell used her property in such a way that untreated sewage from an unpermitted septic tank has flowed from the Powell Property to Plaintiff's Property. Plaintiff also alleged that...

Excerpt: ...her share of the rent generated by the Property's three‐units. Defendant answered the complaint on May 1, 2019, and filed a cross‐complaint alleging common counts that same day. The cross‐complaint, which was filed using a Judicial Council form, does not set forth the facts on which the common counts are based. However, Defendant's discovery responses indicate the claims are based on upkeep and repairs undertaken by Defendant to maintain th...

Excerpt: ...pany of Los Angeles, LLC and EAN Holdings, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) now move for an order compelling Plaintiff to provide further responses to Defendant's Form Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 2.3, 4.1, 4.2, 17.1 (the “Interrogatories”) and Defendants' Requests for Admissions, Set Two, Nos. 1‐4 (the “RFAs”). Defendants further move for imposition of monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $22,220. (Dorenbaum Decl....

Excerpt: ...of Labor Code section 1102.5; and (6) unfair business practices in violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200. On July 22, 2019, Columbia filed a cross‐complaint against Anthony; Premier Packaging Group, LLC dba Lindamar Industries (Premier); Michael Kittredge; Peter K. Tur; Harry T. Greenhouse; Diane K. Todrin; and MK III Company, LLC. Columbia's first amended cross‐complaint (FACC) alleges causes of action for (1) breach of wr...

Excerpt: ...ring on the permanent injunction on August 10, 2017, and both the County and Defendant appeared. Defendant was sworn in and testified at the hearing. Thereafter on August 31, 2017, this Court entered a Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against Defendant (the “Order”). The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the injunction. Currently before the Court are an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) re: Contempt, which was set upon the ex parte ...

Excerpt: ...urance agreement (against Unigard), (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing – bad faith (against Unigard), (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress (against Unigard); and (4) negligence (against Relation). Plaintiffs' lawsuit centers around an “insurance agreement” they allegedly had with Unigard, which insurance covered any breakdown and repair or preplacement of Plaintiffs' winery equipment and machinery,...

Excerpt: ...Obispo County YMCA as defendants. First Assembly of God of Arroyo Grande (“Defendant”) now moves to compel Plaintiff to submit to a neuropsychological examination. The parties have extensively met and conferred, Plaintiff agrees to submit to an examination, and the parties generally agree on the terms of the examination. The examination is to be conducted by George K. Henry, Ph.D. (“Dr. Henry”), in order to ascertain the nature and extent...

Excerpt: ...ively, “Respondents”). Since that time, the matter has been continued by stipulation of the parties as they engaged in settlement discussions. On April 20, 2020, Petitioner filed an amended petition and complaint, which sets forth six causes of action: (1) inverse condemnation; (2) injunctive relief; (3) violation of the Public Records Act; (4) breach of contract; (5) breach of contract ‐ easement; and (6) declaratory relief. The basis of t...

Excerpt: ... September 13, 2019, Plaintiff names as Defendants: the County of Santa Barbara; Child Welfare Services Workers Megan Klopp and Aimee Proietty; Cottage Hospital Social Worker Stacy Peterson; Cottage Hospital Psychiatrist Danielle Lopez; Santa Barbara County Counsel Maria Novatt; Judge Jean Dandona; Public Defender Daniel Murphy; Loss and Prevention for the County of Santa Barbara Samantha Francis; Foster Agency Blanca Diaz; and Santa Barbara Coun...