Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

404 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Luis Obispo x
Judge: Hurst, Linda x
2018.5 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 030
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Hurst, Linda
Hearing Date: 2018.5
Excerpt: ..., fails to put forth any affirmative defenses and includes a personalized letter that does not deny the debt. However, the Court has no answer in its file from Defendant. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied without prejudice. ...
2018.5.15 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 260
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Hurst, Linda
Hearing Date: 2018.5.15
Excerpt: ... On January 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint1 (“FAC”) against Defendants. Plaintiffs' FAC asserts causes of action for: (1) quiet title to deeded easement; (2) quiet title to easement by prescription; (3) quiet title to easement by necessity; (4) quiet title to easement by balancing of hardships; and (5) trespass. Plaintiffs' lawsuit concerns an unimproved dirt road on Defendants' property, which Plaintiffs contend has bee...
2018.5.15 Demurrer 306
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Hurst, Linda
Hearing Date: 2018.5.15
Excerpt: ...991 a larger parcel of real property was subdivided into several parcels, including the Property, and that as a condition of the subdivision the County of San Luis Obispo required the subdivider, defendant building contractor Marc Eisemann (“Eisemann”), to agree to covenants running with the land that prohibit construction on approximately 40% of the Property (“Covenants”). (SAC, ¶ 8.) The SAC alleges that the Covenants were recorded on ...
2018.4.17 Motion to Tax Costs 073
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Hurst, Linda
Hearing Date: 2018.4.17
Excerpt: ...meanor manslaughter and reckless driving. On March 20, 2014, Plaintiff, through his guardian ad litem Jeff Radding, filed this personal injury lawsuit against the State of California, Department of Transportation (“Defendant”), alleging Defendant created a dangerous condition on Highway 1. Plaintiff specifically contended that the subject roadway should have been striped for no‐passing for 100 feet on either side of a nearby entrance/exit t...

404 Results

Per page

Pages