Excerpt: ...C) alleging causes of action for negligence and breach of contract. Plaintiffs' lawsuit centers around their purchase of a mobile home located at 3960 South Higuera Street, Unit 178 in San Luis Obispo (the Property). (FAC, ¶ 12.) Plaintiffs allege they purchased this home from Newitt for approximately $213,741.54 on April 29, 2019. (Ibid.) Plaintiffs allege Newitt was represented by Engle of Defendant BHG. (FAC, ¶ 13.) Plaintiffs allege BHG hel...

Excerpt: ...hired subcontractors. At some point, for disputed reasons, payments stopped, resulting in Specialty and various subcontractors recording mechanics' liens. On October 4, 2019, one of those subcontractors, Sahara Construction Co., Inc. (Sahara), filed a complaint against Specialty for damages. On May 8, 2020, Specialty filed a cross‐complaint for indemnification against Garden Street. Garden Street responded by filing its own cross complaint on O...

Excerpt: ...tiff alleges that on this date, a murphy bed in her room was negligently maintained and set up so that a bar was sticking out into a pathway. Plaintiff alleges she tripped over this bar, suffering three pelvic fractures which required hospitalization. Plaintiff alleges she has constant pain, uses a cane, and has sustained medicals of more than $100,000. On May 8, 2020, a registered process server served both Defendants with the summons, complaint...

Excerpt: ... Paul A Flinn Revocable Living Trust, dated May 2, 2012 (“Trust”). Petitioners and Respondents are the children of Paul A. Flinn (“Paul”) and are the successor co‐ trustees of the Trust. However, Respondent's powers as co‐trustee were suspended by this Court on July 19, 2021. Respondent now asks the Court to dismiss the Petition based on forum non conveniens. (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10(a)(2).) As the moving party, Respondent bears th...

Excerpt: ...is Respondent's motion to dismiss the amended petition. Respondent raises three grounds for dismissal: (1) statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 366.3); (2) failure to join an indispensable party (Code Civ. Proc., § 389); and (3) failure to prosecute (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.410). Petitioners oppose the motion. Respondent reports that service of Petitioners' opposition was untimely and requests a continuance to address the merits of the op...

Excerpt: ...at on or about December 4, 2018, at approximately 7:00 p.m., Plaintiff was walking towards the elevator at Sierra Vista, when she suddenly and without warning was caused to slip where a clear liquid having the appearance of water had accumulated. As Plaintiff slipped, she fell to the ground landing on both knees and both hands as she tried to break her fall. As a result of the fall, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injury. (Comp., p. 4, ¶ GN�...

Excerpt: ... the alleged misuse of a business name. Defendants demur to each claim pursuant to Code Civil Procedure sections 430.10(e) and 430.10(f). Defendants have simultaneously filed a Motion to Strike that will be addressed herein. Defendants request judicial notice of multiple exhibits labeled 1‐12. Plaintiffs oppose both motions and the request for judicial notice. I. Background Gavin is the owner and president of Patriot Sportfishing, Inc. dba Morr...

Excerpt: ... before the Court is Defendants' demurrer or in the alternative motion to stay on the grounds that another action is currently pending and that the primary rights doctrine prohibits Kimball from splitting a cause of action and maintaining two separate lawsuits. Defendants allege that Plaintiff only filed the Second Action because the parties could not agree on allowing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint in a different pending action. Plaintif...

Excerpt: ...tiffs' injuries because their father (also named, Andrew McTaggart)1 was killed by Maneely on Defendant's premises. Both McTaggart and Maneely rented storage units at Defendant's facility. Defendant now moves for summary judgment. Defendant's motion raises a single issue, i.e., whether it owed a duty to Plaintiffs' father.2 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. I. STANDARD Summary judgment is proper when there are no triable iss...

Excerpt: ...ers filed a First Amended Petition on March 29, 2022, for (1) invalidation of trust amendment; (2) invalidation of will; (3) to suspend and remove successor trustees; (4) for constructive trust and equitable lien to recover trust property; (5) breach of trust, (6) undue influence, and (7) for an accounting. The Amended Petition seeks damages, special damages, and punitive damages.1 On March 30, 2022, Petitioners filed an Ex Parte Application for ...

Excerpt: ... at property located at or near 650 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo on October 6, 2021, when a large tree branch fell on him. Plaintiff now moves for an order granting trial preference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 section 36(a). Oppositions are on file from Agera, Bunyon, and Covelop. The City has filed a joinder to all three oppositions; Covelop has filed a joinder to the oppositions filed by Ager and Bunyon. Legal Authority. Section 3...

Excerpt: ...for necessary expenditures or losses and unfair competition. Plaintiff seeks penalties and damages under the Labor Code, Business and Professions Code, and the Private Attorney General's Act (“PAGA”). The action was settled and on May 4, 2022 the Court preliminarily approved the settlement. Plaintiff has now filed a Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (“Motion”.) The Motion is unopposed. The settlement Class consists of �...

Excerpt: ..., and specifically a sum of $60,000 rent paid in advance. Plaintiff alleges Defendants misrepresented or concealed various conditions, including that they were subtenants and not authorized to sublease. On May 7, 2021, Plaintiff filed proofs of personal service of the summons, complaint and related documents on Dugan, Eagle Oak and Raylyn Farms. The documents were served by a registered process server on April 5, 2021. No response was filed or se...

Excerpt: ...y evidentiary hearing, on August 1, 2022, this Court (Hon. Hernaldo J. Baltodano, presiding) issued a ruling in Petitioners' favor, ordering a three‐year civil harassment order against Respondent. On August 23, 2022, Petitioners filed a cost memorandum seeking $7,660.70 in costs. Now before the Court is Respondent's motion to tax costs. Respondent first argues that Petitioners' memorandum of costs is untimely. A memorandum of costs must be serv...

Excerpt: ...tiff alleges that Jefferson is the owner of 1650 Buggy Whip Lane in Paso Robles, California (the Property) and is a member of the HROA. Plaintiff alleges that Jefferson constructed a twenty‐five foot fence on the Property (the Fence) without approval from the HROA and in violation of the HROA's Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Luis Obispo on May 25, 1972, as Document N...

Excerpt: ...Laguna Shores‐‐Tract 718 (“CC&Rs”), which was recorded on May 10, 1980, and the Association is regulated by its Articles of Incorporation (“Articles”) and its Amended and Restated Bylaws of Laguna Shores Homeowner's Association (“Bylaws”).1 On July 7, 2022, Petitioner filed a Petition to Reduce the Required Voting Percentages to Amend the CC&Rs (“Petition”), pursuant to Civil Code section 4275. On July 25, 2022, this Court iss...

Excerpt: ...sing the action under the conditions stipulated to by the parties and retaining jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (the Order). The Order provides that: The court hereby approves the settlement of the parties and orders that judgment be entered upon the application of plaintiff pursuant to stipulation in the event the defendant shall default on any of the terms of the settlement as set forth in the stipulation. Plaintiff's a...

Excerpt: ...s of record in the amount of $2,205. Ford opposes the motion. Plaintiff served his first set of requests for production (RFPs) on May 17, 2022. (Declaration of Armando Lopez (Lopez Dec.), ¶ 3; Ex. A.) On June 16, 2022, Ford served responses. (Id., ¶ 4; Ex. B.) Plaintiff contends the responses were not code‐ compliant, contained numerous objections, and failed to include a production of documents. (Ibid.) On June 27, 2022, Plaintiff initiated ...

Excerpt: ...ner in a personal injury action against the other driver (Case No. 18CVP‐0338).1 The personal injury action ultimately settled for $37,000. CCPMS and Galileo asserted liens, totaling $23,475.36, against the settlement proceeds. After payment of attorney's fees and costs, Harris currently holds $16,165.02 in her client trust account. In light of the competing claims, Harris filed this complaint in interpleader on April 20, 2022, against CCPMS, G...

Excerpt: ...d against Defendants on December 27, 2021. On January 12, 2022, a default judgment was entered against Defendants. An amended judgment was filed on February 1, 2022 and notice of entry of judgment was filed and served on Defendants on February 2, 2022. On March 21, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to set aside the default and default judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b), on the grounds of excusable neglect. Pl...

Excerpt: ...on for declaratory relief and quiet title. On May 2, 2019, Eureka filed a cross‐complaint against Plaintiffs and HomeFed Corporation (HomeFed), also alleging causes of action for declaratory relief and quiet title. 1. The Parties The parties' dispute centers around a lease agreement (the 1968 Lease) entered into between Luigi Marré Land and Cattle Company (LMLCC), the lessor, and Diablo Canyon Corporation (Diablo), the lessee,1 for use of the ...

Excerpt: ... (Business and Professions Code section 17200, et. seq.). Plaintiff moved for summary adjudication. The Court granted summary adjudication of the first two causes of action for civil penalties under Labor Code section 226, subdivision (f) [payroll records], and Labor Code section 1198.5, subdivision (k) [personnel records], as well as Plaintiff's claim for attorney fees and costs under Labor Code section 1198.5 pursuant to motion. The Court denie...

Excerpt: ...court places its imprimatur when submitted to the clerk for entry. [Citation.]” (Efstratis v. First Northern Bank (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 667, 672 (Efstratis).) The Confession of Judgment was accompanied by the required declaration of counsel confirming he had advised his clients, Nicola Allegretta and Carmen Escobeda (Defendants), of the waiver of their rights and defenses under the confession of judgment procedure. (Merzon Supp. Decl., ¶ 2; Co...

Excerpt: ...26, 2022 after the Court sustained, in part, Defendant Puckett's demurrer. A hearing on the Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction was held on July 12, 2022 at which time the Court denied the Plaintiff's motion. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration pursuant to Code Civil Procedure section 1008. Under that section, a party affected by a prior court order “may, within 10 days after service upon the party of writte...

Excerpt: ...ed the demurrer as to the defamation claim and granted leave to file an amended complaint against Puckett for intentional infliction of emotional distress. On April 26, 2022 Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint (FAC). The FAC outlines the escalating feud between the parties regarding noises alleged caused by roosters, dogs and explosives kept or used by Defendants. As a result of the ongoing conflict, Puckett3 and Beltran III4 both obtaine...

Excerpt: ...2022, Daniel's wife, Kristin Ciecek, filed a CHRO request against Ingham (San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 22CV‐0072). ‐ On February 22, 2022, Ingham filed a CHRO request against Daniel (San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 22CV‐0085). On April 25, 2022, after two days of hearings, the Court denied Ingham's request for a restraining order and granted Kristin's request for a restraining order. The Court issued a three‐ year restr...

Excerpt: ... Trust UDT dated 2/27/01, and Marco Specchierla on December 31, 2020 (the “Cziraki Action”). Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on March 22, 2021. They assert causes of action for: (1) wrongful interference with easement; (2) quiet title to easement; (3) trespass: (4) nuisance; (5) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (6) declaratory relief; and (7) injunctive relief. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary R...

Excerpt: ... appear at a case management conference. As a result, the Court set an OSC re Dismissal for hearing on September 14, 2021. On May 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed an ex parte Application for Writ of Possession and a request for a TRO. At a hearing conducted on July 6, 2021, the Court found that Plaintiff had established the probable validity of his claim to possession of the Jeep, and probable cause to believe it was located at Defendant's property in A...

Excerpt: ... to undergo a spinal tap. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to be “put to sleep,” and that after a second injection, he felt “like he was going to die.” Plaintiff alleges he could not move his body, could not speak, and vomited. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to stop the vomiting, but that Dr. Cruz wanted to proceed with the “surgery” without anesthesia. Plaintiff alleges he refused and postponed his s...

Excerpt: ...lileo) to undergo a spinal tap. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to be “put to sleep,” and that after a second injection, he felt “like he was going to die.” Plaintiff alleges he could not move his body, could not speak, and vomited. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to stop the vomiting, but that Dr. Cruz wanted to proceed with the “surgery” without anesthesia. Plaintiff alleges he refused and postponed...

Excerpt: ...ud and deceit; and (4) dissolution and accounting. On December 27, 2021, Defendants (hereinafter referred to as Cross‐Complainants) filed a cross‐ complaint against all three Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as Cross‐Defendants) alleging causes of action for (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) negligent misrepresentation of a material fact; (4) intentional misrepresentation of a ...

Excerpt: ...es against Ulberg only. Ulberg now moves to strike Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. (FAC, p. 3, ¶ 14; Exemplary Damages Attachment.) Ulberg contends that the allegations of Plaintiff's FAC are conclusory and that she fails to allege sufficient facts to establish malice or despicable conduct. Plaintiff opposes the motion. Counsel for Ulberg met and conferred with counsel for Plaintiff prior to filing the motion, but the parties were unable...

Excerpt: ...hn W. Jones, Jr.; Shannon Jones; Katie Jones Pascoe1 ; The Morro Bay Ranch Limited Partnership (the Limited Partnership); and other Defendants who are no longer party to the lawsuit. Intervening Plaintiff Daniel Eddleman (Dan2 ) joined the lawsuit shortly before trial, on October 26, 2020. A court trial commenced on October 27, 2020. On July 20, 2021, this Court issued its Statement of Decision, wherein the Court found in favor of the Jones Defen...

Excerpt: ...and damages under the Labor Code, Business and Professional Code, and the Private Attorney General's Act (“PAGA”). The action was settled and on May 4, 2022, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement. Plaintiff has now filed a Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Class Representative's Enhancement Payment, and Attorneys' Fees and Costs (“Motion”). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769.) The Motion is unopposed. The settl...

Excerpt: ...t yet been issued. The City of Atascadero (the City) nonetheless responded by filing a demurrer and motion to strike. Although not specifically named as a defendant, the City assumed that Plaintiff intended it as a defendant because (1) Plaintiff wrote the short title of the case as “Brasuell v. Atascadero Police” and “Brasuell v. Atascadero,” and (2) paragraph 5 of the complaint states it is against the “Atascadero Police,” which is ...

Excerpt: ...fered severe burns to her wrist and thigh when a vape device in her purse exploded. Plaintiff asserts causes of action for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty against Defendants. Vapor filed an answer on July 23, 2021. Now before the Court are two unopposed discovery motions filed by Plaintiff: (1) Motion for evidentiary sanctions based on Vapor's failure to respond to requests for admissions (RFAs); and (2) Motion to compel Vapo...

Excerpt: ...oute 41 in San Luis Obispo County. The named Defendants include Haneul Kyung Lee (Lee), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), CHG Medical Staffing, Inc. (CHG), DaVita, Inc. (DaVita), and Foundation Medical Staffing (FMS). On July 22, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint (4th AC). On August 3, 2021, Plaintiffs filed the 4th AC. On August 16, 2021, Defendants CHG, DaVita, and FMS ...

Excerpt: ...enforcement; and (2) breach of fiduciary duty against Kern Legacy Classic Choice a/k/a/ County of Kern Point of Service Employee Medical Plan a/k/a Ken Legacy Health Plan a/k/a Kern Legacy Health Plan Employee and Retiree Medical Benefit Plan a/k/a County of Kern Health Plan POS Medical Plan a/k/a POS Medical Plan a/ka/a county of Kern Health Plan a/k/a County of Kern Medical Plan; the County of Kern (collectively the County). Plaintiffs now move...

Excerpt: ...2, plus court costs (per a memorandum of costs). Plaintiff, however, agreed to hold off seeking entry of judgment provided Stroub followed a payment plan set forth in the Agreement. The parties also jointly requested that the Court retain jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (Section 664.6) to enforce the Agreement's terms. The Court agreed to such retention, ordering: The court hereby approves the settlement of the parties an...

Excerpt: ...aintiff alleges that Defendant presented a check in the amount of $2,000 to Plaintiff as a payment in an unrelated case, San Luis Obispo Superior Court case no. 14CV‐0279, and the check was returned for insufficient funds. Plaintiff's complaint seeks damages in the amount of the check ($2,000), plus treble damages pursuant to Civil Code section 1719, subdivision (a)(2), prejudgment interest, and attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1717...

Excerpt: ... undergo a spinal tap. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to be “put to sleep,” and that after a second injection, he felt “like he was going to die.” Plaintiff alleges he could not move his body, could not speak, and vomited. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to stop the vomiting, but that Dr. Cruz wanted to proceed with the “surgery” without anesthesia. Plaintiff alleges he refused and postponed his surg...

Excerpt: ...eo) to undergo a spinal tap. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to be “put to sleep,” and that after a second injection, he felt “like he was going to die.” Plaintiff alleges he could not move his body, could not speak, and vomited. Plaintiff alleges he was injected with something to stop the vomiting, but that Dr. Cruz wanted to proceed with the “surgery” without anesthesia. Plaintiff alleges he refused and postponed hi...

Excerpt: ...inst Successor Trustee, Kristen R. Barba (“Respondent”). On April 3, 2021, the parties entered into settlement agreement pursuant to which they agreed to the Court's retention of jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (“Section 664.6”) (“Agreement”.) On January 24, 2022, the parties appeared before the Court for an Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal hearing. At that time, all the terms of the Agreement had been comple...

Excerpt: ..., or in the alternative summary adjudication (MSJ). On July 19, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the County's MSJ pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(h).1 The County opposed the motion. Prior to the initial hearing on the motion, the Court posted a tentative ruling that anticipated denying the motion on the grounds that Plaintiff had not made the requisite showing. At the hearing, counsel provided further information, and t...

Excerpt: ...n subpoenas that were personally served on two non‐party witnesses: Kevin De La Cruz (De La Cruz) and Jimmy Cervantes (Cervantes) (the Deponents). The Deponents both failed to appear at their depositions, and Defendant's counsel made a record of the non‐appearances and now seeks monetary sanctions against the deponents, as well as an order compelling them to comply. When the motions initially came on calendar, they had not been served on the ...

Excerpt: ...adero (the City) nonetheless responded by filing a demurrer and motion to strike. Although not specifically named as a defendant, the City assumed that Plaintiff intended it as a defendant because (1) Plaintiff wrote the short title of the case as “Brasuell v. Atascadero Police” and “Brasuell v. Atascadero,” and (2) paragraph 5 of the complaint states it is against the “Atascadero Police,” which is “a public entity.” Despite two c...

Excerpt: ...r part of a tree when the lift came into contact with an electrical wire. (FAC, ¶¶ 1, 10.) The contact caused electric current to pass through his body causing him injury. (FAC, ¶ 1.) The incident took place on November 23, 2019. (FAC, ¶ 10.) The FAC names PG&E as a defendant in the fourth (strict liability), fifth (loss of consortium), and sixth (negligence) causes of action. Before the Court is PG&E's demurrer to the fourth cause of action....

Excerpt: ...��) is attached to the Petition. “[I]n the absence of the administrative record, the sufficiency of the evidence is not an issue open to question. Rather, we must presume that the findings were supported by substantial evidence.” (Caveness v. State Personnel Bd. (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 617, 630.) I. BACKGROUND On March 31, 2021, the District sent a Notice of Intended Disciplinary Action – Termination to Crawford, which included an investigati...

Excerpt: ...xecuted a Stipulation for Settlement (“Stipulation”) and the matter was dismissed. Plaintiff now seeks to enforce the parties' Stipulation and have judgment entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (“Section 664.6”). Specifically, Plaintiff seeks judgment of $7,956.36, which represents the amount still owing under the Stipulation, plus court costs of $265. The Court entered a dismissal on October 25, 2021. Currently befor...

Excerpt: ... the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel Williams to appear at second deposition and request for monetary sanctions in the amount of $4,500.00. Legal Authority “Once any party has taken the deposition of any natural person, including that of a party to the action, neither the party who gave, nor any other party who has been served with a deposition notice pursuant to Section 2025.240 may take a subsequent deposition of that deponent.” (Code...