Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2831 Results

Location: San Francisco x
2023.06.20 Motion for Entry of Dismissal of Action 076
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.20
Excerpt: ...d As Anneta Realty Group, Lp) For Entry Of Dismissal Of Action Defendant ANNETA REALTY CORP.'s motion to dismiss is denied. Defendant can file this motion since it is not in default. Plaintiff defaulted a defunct entity-"Anneta Realty Group, LP". (Luthin Decl., par. 14, Ex. 10.) Plaintiff filed this action on March 2, 2021. On June 29, 2021, plaintiff filed an amended complaint that added movant's prior iteration as a defendant. On August 25, 202...
2023.06.15 Motion for Summary Judgment 983
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.06.15
Excerpt: ...ie Declaration: Exhibit A (Plaintiff's Complaint); Exhibit B (Plaintiff's Preliminary Fact Sheet); and Exhibit C (Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint). The Court considered Exhibits D through I and Exhibits K through L in the Ketchie Declaration. The Court sustains Plaintiff's objections to Exhibit J in the Ketchie Declaration (relevant portions of the Deposition Transcripts of Richard Bergeron, Defendant's Corporate Representative) and P...
2023.06.14 Motion to Overrule Objections, Compel More Specific Answers, Disqualify Counsel, for Monetary and Preclusionary Sanctions 802
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...IVE RULING ONLY, PART 2 OF 2) Second, even if there had been more substantial meet and confer efforts, the relief that Plaintiff seeks would not be justified. Plaintiff seeks to disqualify Defendant's counsel, vacate a prior award and obtain a substantial award of sanctions. None of this extraordinary relief would be justified to sanction disagreements about the adequacy of responses to written discovery, where there has been no prior order to co...
2023.06.14 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 146
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...'s bank account, to which he complied. Both sides claim they were not hacked and point blame at the other. Defendant now asks that the motion to enforce settlement be denied because "it is not clear which party is most greatly at fault" according to the unreported case Meritdiam, Inc. v. Facets Fine Jewelry, LLC, 2015 WL 12660377 (C.D. cal. Apr. 27, 2015). However, Meritdiam is not persuasive on these facts. Defendant fails to cite any relevant c...
2023.06.14 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, to Compel Deposition, for Monetary Sanctions 158
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...rdell, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same ...
2023.06.14 Motion to Compel Deposition, for Sanctions 806
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...o serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be sig...
2023.06.13 Motion to Transfer Venue 902
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...ed an order stating: "NY Life's motion to change venue based upon the convenience of the witnesses and ends of justice is denied." (2:22-23.) NY Life points to no portion ofthat order or citation to the reporter's transcript from the oral argument where the court denied the motion "without prejudice." Therefore, NY Life is required to comply with the prerequisites of CCP 1008(b) for this renewed motion. NY Life fails to meet fts burden. First, th...
2023.06.13 Motion for Leave to File FAC 327
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...y of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial, this policy should be applied only where no prejudice is shown to the adverse party." (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2W3) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.) Prejudice exists where the amendment would result in a delay of trial along with added cost of preparation and increased burden of discovery. (Edmon & Karnow, CALIFORNIA PRACTICE GUIDE...
2023.06.13 Application for Leave to File TAC 144
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...ce defendant since there is no trial date and the amendment does not change the tenor of the case. Judicial estoppel does not prevent plaintiff from seeking to plead a claim under sec. 1510(b)(1) of the unclaimed Property Law (CCP 1500 et seq. ("UPL").) The judicial estoppel "doctrine applies when the same party has taken two positions; (2) the positions were taken in judicial or quasi-judicial administrative proceedings; (3) the party was succes...
2023.06.12 Motion to Compel Deposition 007
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ...tion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parti...
2023.06.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses 378
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ... CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulatio...
2023.06.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions, to Compel Compliance with Subpoena for Business Records 327
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ... California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Supe...
2023.06.09 Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 567
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ... complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, which is unopposed, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. The court quashes Plaintiff Scott Batchelor's service of summons and service of his original complaint. (See Code Civ. Proc., 418.10, subd. Specially-appearing Defendants request that the court "quash" its April 21, 2023 order granting leave to file the original complaint under seal is denied without prejudic...
2023.06.07 Motion to Sever Petition for Writ of Mandate 671
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.07
Excerpt: ...ETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AGAINST RICARDO LARA AS COMMISSIONER OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (PART 2 OF 2, FOR TENTATIVE RULING PURPOSES ONLY) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Mohon calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services,' navigate to "T...
2023.06.06 Special Motion to Strike 953
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...y is pled. The complaint says defendant photographed private areas of plaintiffs' home from a neighbor's property without permission from anyone. It is also pled that one of defendant's photos included a window of plaintiffs' minor children and that he "had been researching the læation of [the] children s bedroom." Defendant used one photo of plaintiffs' home in an unsuccessful "discretionary review application" he filed with the city planning c...
2023.06.05 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 026
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.05
Excerpt: ...court accepts plaintff's late-filed opposition. Defendant was not prejudiced and substantively responded to the late filing. Plaintiff alleges a sufficient relationship between plaintiff and defendant for the concealment claim. (Dhital v. Nissan N. Am. Inc. (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 828, 844 [allegations that plaintiff purchased vehicle from Nissan dealership, that Nissan issued a warranty, and dealership was agent of Nissan were suffcient to show re...
2023.06.05 Demurrer 026
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.05
Excerpt: ... The attorney-client relationship was governed by the attorney representation agreement (ARA) attached to the complaint. Most of defendant's demurrer arguments are based on her notion that the ARA had to be modified for plaintiffs interpretation of it to prevail. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, insist no modification was needed or occurred. If, as here, a contract is attached to a complaint, plaintiffs interpretation must be accepted as correct on...
2023.06.02 Motion to Compel Arbitration 246
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.02
Excerpt: ...TED. The court orders plaintiffs individual PAGA claim to arbitration and stays his representative PAGA claim pending arbitration per Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4. The main point of dispute is the issue of a stay. The court finds the individual and representative PAGA claims both require resolution of the "aggrieved employee" question. (See Lab. C. , 2699(c).) On the issue of whether a stay is necessary, Jarboe v. Hanlees Auto Group (20...
2023.06.01 Demurrers 416
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...nt adult causes of action. (Opp. 2:S_) Therefore: the demurrer is unnecessary as to those causes of action. (Opp. 2:8_) Intentional infliction of emotional distress ("llED"): To state a claim for IIED: "a plaintiff must show. (1) outrageous conduct by the defendant; (2) the defendant' s intention of causing or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress; (3) the plaintiffs suffering severe or extreme emotional distress: an...
2023.05.31 Motion for Protective Order 460
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...ve order re Thoits Law discovery on plaintiffs' ability to pay arbitration fees and costs" is denied. Ordered to arbitrate their dispute with Thoits, plaintiffs seek to avoid arbitration by asserting indigency. Thoits doubts plaintiffs' claims and has propounded financial circumstances discovery against which plaintiffs seek the protective order. But such discovery is authorized by Aronow v. Sup. Ct. (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 865, 884, a case factual...
2023.05.31 Demurrer 021
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...e, to whom, and by what means the representations were tendered." (Stansfield v. Starkey (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 59, 73.) After that is pled, the court may be able to reach the parties' arguments. Demurrer sustained with leave to amend. 2: Negligent Misrepresentation. The same alleged representations are at issue here (Cmplt. 7:6-11), so the ruling is the same - demurrer sustained with leave to amend. 3: Breach of Contract. Unlike fraud, this claim...
2023.05.30 Demurrer 231
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ..."with adequate information and instructions to exercise his option rights." (ld. at 5:8-10.) Defendant's arguments to the contrary rely on its spin of documents of which it seeks judicial notice. However, defendant "disputes the authenticity and applicability of the unsworn documents" (Opp. 1:28.) and their contents are not subject to judicial notice in any event. (Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 114-15 [...
2023.05.25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 810
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...nes (collectively Restaurant) judgment on the pleadings as to the first amended complaint (FAC) is denied in part and granted in part. Richard Cibotti adequately pleads slander and false light against the Restaurant. The FAC alleges, inter alia, that Restaurant employees falsely "orally identif[ied]" Richard as the man who made "threats to kill a family and their young children" at the Restaurant. (ld. at 5:3-24.) Contrary to the Restaurant's arg...
2023.05.24 Demurrer 987
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ... profits from the unauthorized rental of his home by third parties also named in this action. Plaintiff first asserts a claim for conversion, alleging that Defendant failed to comply with an Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court order to the place the rental income of his home into an interest bearing account and that it acted as an agent of the other defendants to wrongfully exercise control of Plaintiff's property. (4AC, 6:27-28, 7:1; Ex. A). Plainti...
2023.05.22 Demurrer 560
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...her based on her sex. FAC 6. Payrovi alleges that the most recent act of discrimination occurred "at some date after April 26, 2018" when Dolby closed fts investigation of her complaint and refused to hire her into a permanent position. ld. at 15. Payrovi filed a pre-form inquiry with the DFEH on March 14, 2019, and her verified complaint on March 17, 2020 ld. at 37, 41. Dolby argues that the FAC is barred by the one-year statute of limitations o...
2023.05.19 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 231
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...dants*** Complete tentative ruling sent to the parties via e-mail. Granted. The stay extends only to the moving parties here. Defendants (referred to as Kaiser here) petition to send the claims against them to arbitration. Plaintiff Garza does not argue that there is no arbitration agreement, or that he is not bound because he didn't agree to it or did not sign it. He does say he dæsn't recall signing the agreement, but this is nota basis on whi...
2023.05.18 Motion to Dismiss 241
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...rvice demonstrates that it properly served Plaintiffs. As to the survival claims under Decedent's personal injury action, dismissal is mandatory under C.C.P. secton 583.360. After commencing the achon against Defendant in 2014, and accounting for tolling during appeal, Plaintiffs failed to bring the achon to trial within five years and six months under C.C.P. section 583.310 and C.R.C. emergency rule IO(a). After the filing of remittitur by the c...
2023.05.18 Motion to Amend Expert Witness Designation 840
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...iled by Defendant. Reply filed by Plaintiff Plaintiffs have shown an exceptional circumstance of the deteriorating health of designated expert: Charles Ayz from a terminal disease for the Court to permit the motion to be made under C.C.P. section 2034.610(b) after the expert discovery cutoff date. (Morse Decl. parm 6.) All four conditions are satisfied for the Coun to grant leave to augment under CCP section 2034_620_ Pursuant to CCP section the ...
2023.05.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 056
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...A to Defendant's Index of Exhibits. The Court considered Exhibits B (Plaintiffs Responses to Standard Interrogatories) and Exhibit C (relevant portions of the Deposition Transcripts ofPlamtiff William Frayne) to Defendant's Index of Exhibits submitted in support of the motion. The Coult sustains Plaintiff s objections to Exhibits D through H (relevant portions ofthe Deposition Transcripts of George Kirk: Defendant's Corporate Representative) on l...
2023.05.18 Motion for Attorney Fees 762
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...Rules of Court, rule 3.1702(c). Government Code section 12965(b) has no application to this motion. Section 12965(c)(6), however, provides, "In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall no...
2023.05.11 Motion to Strike SAC, for Entry of Judgment 555
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...ded Complaint And For Entry Of Judgment Defendant Singer's motion to strike the second amended complaint is granted without leave to amend. The filing is "improper" within the meaning of CCP 436(a). First, plaintiffs did not comply with this court's order of January 18, 2023, and they missed the filing deadline for the amended pleading by several weeks without sufficient explanation. (CCP 438(h)(4)(A) ["If an amended complaint is filed after the ...
2023.05.10 Motion to Compel Mental Exams 229
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.10
Excerpt: ...hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation: the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone: the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not al...
2023.05.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 343
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.08
Excerpt: ...rbitration and stay action is granted. under Gamboa v. Northeast Community Clinic (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 158, 165, Defendants have met their burden by the preponderance of the evidence to show that Plaintiff consented to its terms of service. (See Vasquez Decl.) The controlling arbitration agreement at the time ofthe incident was the 2016 Terms of use. (See Vasquez Decl., Ex. E.) The arbitration agreement within the terms of use delegates "that an...
2023.05.04 Demurrer 952
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...s "personnel management actions,' but our supreme court holds that such actons "can also have a secondary effect of communicating a hostile message" and thus support a FEHA harassment claim. (Roby v. McKesson Corp. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 586, 709.) Also, defendants concede the FAC pleads six non-personnel management actions in less than three years, disparaging plaintiffs national origin and sex. (Memo. 4:3-14.) The FAC also adequately pleads defamati...
2023.05.03 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award, for Attorney Fees, for Entry of Judgment 984
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...ts And Request For Entry Of Judgment (PART 1 OF 2) 8MlNUTENERGY US INVESTOR LLC, 8MlNUTENERGY US INVESTOR 2 LLC, AVANTUS LLC (F/K/A 8 MINUTE POWER LLC)'s motion to confirm arbitration award is granted. "Unless a statutory basis for vacating or correcting an award exists, a reviewing court 'shall confirm the award as made."' (Corona v. Amherst Partners (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 701, 705 (quoting CCP 1285). There is no basis to vacate the award and th...
2023.05.03 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment 882
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...led to relief under CCP 683.170 from renewal of the judgment. (Fidelity Creditor Serv., Inc. v. Browne (21%1) 89 CA4th 195, 199, 105.) A judge may vacate the renewal on any ground that would be a defense to an action on the judgment, including the ground that the amount of the renewed judgment is incorrect. (CCP 683.170(a)). Here, Defendant fails to raise any meritorious defense, such as providing a reason why the money is not owed to Plaintiff (...
2023.05.03 Motion for Mandatory Dismissal 386
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...r the action is commenced. (CCP sectons 583.210, 583.250; see also Edmon & Karnow, CALIFORNIA PRACTICE GUIDE: CIVIL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL 11:51 (Rutter: 2022).) Plaintiff Charles Li filed the First Amended Complaint on 02/04/2019. Plaintiff had three years to serve Defendant with the summons and complaint. On 01/25/23, the court granted Defendant's moton to quash service and set aside the default against Defendant. Plaintiff first argues that De...
2023.05.03 Demurrers 076
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...s request for judicial notice of exhibit C [title report from private insurance company] The report is neither a coun record (Evid. 452(d)) nor a fact that is not reasonably subject to dispute (Evid. 452(h)_) In any event, the lack of omvvnership of a piece of real property is not dispositive since negligence/premises liability can be based on control of the property. In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint: the court treats as true allegatio...
2023.04.27 Motion to Stay Proceedings, Joinder 932
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.27
Excerpt: ...his eponymous law firm from representing the University of San Francisco in this case. USF appealed that order; thus everyone seems to agree the order is automatically stayed. (CRS Corp. v. AtkinsonAVa1sh Joint Venture (2017) 15 872, 886-87.) USF views the disqualification as collateral and wants to continue the case with new counsel to avoid delay. CI, on the other hand: seeks a discretionary stay of the entire action until USF's appeal is decid...
2023.04.20 Motion to Compel Answers and Production of Docs at Deposition, for Monetary Sanctions 651
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.20
Excerpt: ...lood And Imposing Monetary Sanction. Pro Tem Judge John-Paul Deol, a member of the California State aar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed bef...
2023.04.20 Motion for Sanctions, to Designate Vexatious Litigant and Enter Pre-Filing Order 042
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.20
Excerpt: ...f's motion for sanctions pursuant to CCP 128.7 is denied. A CCP 128.7 motion involves a two-step process. The moving party first serves the sanctions motion on the offending party without filing it. The opposing party then has 21 days to withdraw the improper pleading and avoid sanctions ("safe harbor" waiting period). At the end of the waiting period, if the pleading is not withdrawn, the moving party may then file the motion. (CCP 128.7(c)(1); ...
2023.04.18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 492
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ... of action: "Violation of Proposition 65." The motion pleads one issue: statute of limitations - Karman says it is one year, plaintiff four. Both sides' briefs vex. Karman's memorandum repeatedly miscites its key case Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2CG) 107 Cal.App.4th 957 as being at 132 Cal.App.4th. (Memo. 4:28, 5:15.) Plaintiffs opposition lacks page numbers and key pin cites and is garbled (see, e.g., id. at 3:18). Shamsian arrived at a ...
2023.04.17 Motion for Clarification, Reconsideration of Order Adopting Discovery Referee's Report 714
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.17
Excerpt: ...ort And Recommended Order No. 9. "Plaintiffs motion for clarification and/or reconsideration of the February 10, 2023 court order adopting the discovery referee's report and recommended order no. 9" is denied. A reconsideration motion must be "based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law" and a valid reason for not presenting them earlier. (CCP Gilberd v. AC Transit (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1494, 15CL) The moving party shall state by aff...
2023.04.14 Motion for Summary Judgment 950
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.04.14
Excerpt: ...dant. The Court considered Exhibits A and B to the Hopwood Declaration submitted in support of the motion. The Court also considered Exhibits B, C, and D to the Rose Declaration submitted in opposition to the motion. (See C.C.P. section 437c(c).) Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing that Plaintiffs do not possess, and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence that Decedent was exposed to asbestos-containing products attributab...
2023.04.14 Demurrer 935
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.14
Excerpt: ...accommodations." Brown v. Smith (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 757, 786-787; see also Civil Code sæ. 51 et seq. Defendants argue that plaintiff does not plead sufficient facts showing that he was discriminated against because of his race. See e.g., Reply at 2 (plaintiff fails to allege conduct was "substantially motivated by his race"). But as noted below, the amended complaint at Para. 30 alleges exactly that. In any event, the court must liberally cons...
2023.04.14 Demurrer 393
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.14
Excerpt: ... of action for "intentional tort" fail under CCP 430.10(e) and are barred because Illing failed to seek administrative remedies in California. Mat. 3:7-15. Illing argues that HSS "is not actually a functioning independent legal entity" and that the employees conduct which created an alleged hostile work environment "must be imputed to the Harvey Defendants." Opp„ 3:8-26. [The Harvey defendants were dismissed on jurisdictional grounds (Reply, 2:...
2023.04.12 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 719
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ...Defendants Requests For Production, Set One; And For Sanctions. Pro Tem Judge Peter Catalanotti, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation...
2023.04.12 Demurrer 170
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ... a legal doctrine that imposes liability on persons who, although not actually commi«ng a tort themselves, share with the immediate toržeasors a common design or plan in its perpetraŸon." (Applied Equipment Corp. v. Li©on Saudi Arabia Ltd. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 503, 510-11.) The SAC pleads a common design and plan by "All Defendants" to "commit fraud, conversion and civil theL." (Id. at 20:11-19.) Being among "All Defendants" (SAC 2:1-12), Ms...
2023.04.07 Motion to Stay Arbitration Pending Litigation 105
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.07
Excerpt: ...: which was ordered March 9 2020: until the court in a separate proceeding pending in the Orange County Superior Court adjudicates Davis's claims that Defendant Yungi Qian and others fraudulently induced Davis to stipulate to the JAMS arbitration and Defendant Qian (and others) breached the arbitration contract. Davis asserts that if she prevails in the Orange County action: she will be vested with authority to void the arbitration stipulation. D...
2023.04.06 Demurrer 604
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.06
Excerpt: ...OBERT F. HINKS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant's demurrer to the third amended complaint's (TAC) second, third and fourth causes of action is sustained in part and overruled in part; plaintiff is given leave to amend. The TAC adequately pleads a FEHA harassment claim. (ld. at 12:8-12, 10:24-11:11, 13:20-14:18.) Harassment can be based on offensive oral communications in the workplace. (Roby v. McKesson Corp. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 686, 706.) The TAC...
2023.04.05 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint 335
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.05
Excerpt: ...e the default (entered on 3/3/21) and default judgment (entered on 10/14/21) is granted. "Compliance with the statutory procedures for service of process is essential to establish personal jurisdiction. Thus, a default judgment entered against a defendant who was not served with a summons in the manner prescribed by statute is void." (Am. Express Centurion Bank v. Zara (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 383, 387.) A court may vacate a void default/default ju...
2023.04.05 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 537
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.05
Excerpt: ... is granted. The proceedings are ordered stayed pending the outcome of arbitration. The parties agree that the arbitration provision is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. (Def.'s at 5; Pl.'s opp. at 6:16.) under the FAA, agreements to arbitrate are "valid, irrevocable and enforceable save upon such grounds as exist at law or equity for the revocation of any contract." (9 U.S.C. sec. 2.) Plaintiff Daniela L. Rivera Velasco (Velasco) argues t...
2023.03.29 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 533
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.29
Excerpt: ...rms of service agreement (Coombs Decl., 5:7-8), and in addition, she was also bound by a later January 18, 2021 terms of service agreement (See MPA, fn. 2)-with both governing her use of the Lyft application, website, and technology platform. (ld. at Ex. 2.) Plaintiff states that she did not use the Lyft to ordera ride on August 18, 2019, when the yftdriver ran over her foot. (See Mancillas Decl„ 1:22.) Defendant's reply does not refute Plainti...
2023.03.28 Motion to Compel Further Responses 641
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.28
Excerpt: ...y judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consen...
2023.03.28 Demurrers, Motions to Strike 574
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.28
Excerpt: ...n to strike is granted without leave to amend. Plaintiffs complaint describes at most, careless conduct in the collecting of trash. Such allegations are insufficient to impose punitive damages. (See Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Superior Court (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 1150, 1170 (Butte Fire Cases) ["Punitive damages are appropriate if the defendant's acts are reprehensible, fraudulent or in blatant violation of law or policy. The mere careless...
2023.03.24 Motion for Summary Adjudication 209
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.24
Excerpt: ...he defendant has been guilty of oppression: fraud: or malice. " A defendant does not need to act intentionally for punitive damages to be found; a showing of malice is sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages Pfeiferv_ John Crane: Inc. (2013) 220 CalApp_4th 1270: 1299. "Malice" is "conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carned on by the defendant with a willful and cons...
2023.03.20 Motion for Attorney Fees 007
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.20
Excerpt: ...yer, Aung lost on summary judgment. With the lavwerls withdrawal, she is pro per again. In court, Aung has appeared unsophisticated and confused. Government Code 12965(c)(6) gives a court discretion to award attorney fees to a prevailing FEHA defendant. I decline to exercise that discretion here for three reasons. First, Piteau insists he is "entitled" to $48,982.50 in attorney fees from Aung 'based on the friwlous nature" of her claims. (Memo. 5...
2023.03.15 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Protective Order, for Relief from Waiver, for Sanctions 605
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.15
Excerpt: ...) Pro Tem Judge Scott Borrowman, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will dec...
2023.03.14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Service Summons and Complaint 906
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.14
Excerpt: ... complaint, Code of Civil Procedure section 583.420(a)(1)" is denied. CCP 583.420(a)(1) gives a court discretion to "dismiss an action" if "[s]ervice is not made within two years after the action is commenced against the defendant." Both sides recognize that, for a Doe defendant (as here), the clock starts with the original complaint's filing and that plaintiff may show "excusable delay." Here, the slip-and-fall plaintiff was pro per when she sue...
2023.03.14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 457
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.14
Excerpt: ...as the Moving Party based on the same grounds in the pending motion." (Notice of Joinder, 1:24-25.) Defendant Wright is entitled to compel arbitration even though he is a nonsignatory to the terms of service. The amended complaint alleges that Wright was the employee/agent of Lyft, a party to the arbitration agreement. (Amended Complaint, pg. 4.) As an agent/employee, Wright is entitled to seek arbitration. (See Jenks v. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Ca...
2023.03.13 Motion for Summary Judgment 200
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.13
Excerpt: .... I' (UMF 19.) "The papers are to be construed strictly against the moving party and liberally in favor ofthe opposing party; any doubts regarding the propriety of summary judgment are to be resolved in fawr of the opposing party." (Kulesa v. Castleberry (1995) 47 Cal.App.4th 103, 112.) "[T]he separate statement effectively concedes the materiality of whatever facts are included." (Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 243, 252 (e...
2023.03.10 Motion for Leave to File SAC 170
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.10
Excerpt: ...2 Cal. App. 2d 527, 530 (1959). Weil & Brown, et al., California Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial 6:617, 5:653 (Rutter: 2022). The classic rule focuses on prejudice: "denying a request to amend a complaint may be appropriate when an unreasonable delay in seeking amendment prejudices the defendant." Payton, 27 Cal.App.5th at 849 (emphasis supplied). Defendant's claim of prejudice is conclusory and vague. Oppo. at 5:8-13. The essence of...
2023.03.09 Motion for Summary Judgment 800
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.09
Excerpt: ... Laabs v. City of Victorville (2008) 153 Cal.App.4th 1242, 1253 ["The pleadings delimit the issues to be considered on a motion for summary judgment."l.) Plaintiff failed to maintain his burden of production. (See CCP 437c(p)(1).) An order granting summary judgment terminates the action between the parties and results in an immediate, appealable judgment. (See CCP 437c(m)(1).) Plaintiff alleges causes of action for "preliminary injunction," "writ...
2023.03.07 Motion to Designate Material Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order 850
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.07
Excerpt: ...a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same auth...
2023.03.01 Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 114
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.03.01
Excerpt: ...te service by leaving the copy of the summons and complaint with the front desk clerk at the mailbox center "Postal Chase" in San Francisco on December 17, 2021. (Opp. 17-10:14.) Plaintiff also alleges the process server mailed the summons and complaint to that same address on December 18, 2021. (Id.) Defendant argues that service should be quashed because he was not served in accordance with CCP 415.20(b) because the "Postal Chase" address is no...
2023.02.28 Demurrer 714
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.28
Excerpt: ...dants - PAMF and Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group - are "[u]nder its control" and "its affiliates." (Id. at 3:4-6.) Further, the SAC pleads that the three defendants are plaintiff's joint employers, exercising "joint control over" his "wages, hours and working conditions." (Id. at 3:14-17.) Defendants argue that the SAC factually errs because they are "three separate and distinct entities" and not plaintiff's joint employers. (Memo. 5:25, 7:2-3...
2023.02.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 135
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.27
Excerpt: ...a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same auth...
2023.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 674
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.27
Excerpt: ...he motion's arguments in its prior orders. Duty. Eric argues that he "owed no duty to plaintiff." (Memo. 7:2.) However, on the Uber defendants' summary judgment motion, the court ruled: "Defendants owed Plaintiff a general duty of care in choosing where and how to offload the passengers." (5/5/22 Order 2:15-16.) Uber driver Eric was the defendant who offloaded the passengers, so this ruling obviously applies to him. Breach. Eric argues that "he d...
2023.02.27 Demurrer 286
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.27
Excerpt: ... a notion that it may demur to them. As to the two counts that are asserted against Lyft: The FAC adequately pleads a claim for negligent hiring, supervision and retention. California procedural law applies and it does not require the hyper-specific pleading Lyft advocates. Lyft cites three inapposite California demurrer cases. Aghaji v. Bank of America, N.A. (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 1110 had 222 plaintiffs and 10 defendants. That is not, as Lyft a...
2023.02.24 Motion to Recover Attorney Fees and Costs 638
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.24
Excerpt: ...the senior partner, $425 for a more junior lawyer, and $90 for the legal assistant. The hours expended appear reasonable with these exceptions: 2.4 hours to re-do a mistaken complaint to change the date is unreasonable, and I will deduct that time (2.4 x 575). It is unreasonable to charge defendant for time to prepare for and attend an OSC which was caused by plaintiff's delay. For this I deduct 2.8 hours (2.8 x 475). The rates are reasonable for...
2023.02.24 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 480
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.24
Excerpt: ...vely, summary adjudication is denied as moot as to defendant Lobre. Plaintiff dismissed Lobre on 12/13/22. Defendant Har's motion for summary judgment/adjudication is denied. As explained in connection with Allstate's companion motion, there are triable issues of fact whether plaintiff can establish the claim for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and the claim for punitive damages. (See Levin v. Gulf Ins. Group (1999) 6...
2023.02.23 Motion to Compel Production of Docs, for Monetary Sanctions 922
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.23
Excerpt: ....) Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decid...
2023.02.22 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 679
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.22
Excerpt: ...ant OPERADORA DE HOTELES LORETO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V (Operadora) is not a named party. It has no standing to bring this motion. The peculiarity of the situation is demonstrated by Operadora's argument that it is "not even licensed to do business in California" (Reply at 3:5) whereas the parties actually sued are so licensed. Opposition at 1:8 ff. 2. Even if Operadora were a party, its offer to stipulate to Mexico as a forum and to toll the statute ...
2023.02.21 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Action Pending Completion of Arbitration 506
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.21
Excerpt: ...ion to compel arbitration is denied. "The party seeking to compel arbitration bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement." (Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 840, 859.) Here, defendant fails to maintain its burden since it fails to establish the existence of the arbitration agreement (including the delegation clause). (See Malone v. Superior Court (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1551, ...
2023.02.17 Demurrer 949
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.17
Excerpt: ...emurrer. (See CCP 452; Berger v. Varum (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 1013, 1018 ["We accept as true all well-pleaded allegations in the operative complaint"].) Here, the amended complaint alleges ultimate facts that the period of time to submit a government claim was tolled during the contractual administrative process and the tolling ended on December 7, 2021. (Amended Complaint, pars. 8, 18.) The parties' agreement, which is attached to the amended com...
2023.02.17 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 301
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.17
Excerpt: ...cause Defendant's employee sexually harassed and assaulted Plaintiff in the bathroom at Westfield Centre. The complaint pleads that Defendant's employee opened the bathroom stall door, watched Plaintiff, a dependent adult with physical and mental disabilities, as he was using the toilet, then minutes later "approached Plaintiff from behind, cranked up, and slammed Plaintiff in the back using his mop as a weapon," and thereafter, Defendant release...
2023.02.17 OSC Re Preliminay Injunction 930
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.17
Excerpt: ... to be granted lightly. (See 8 Witkin, California Procedure (5th ed. 2008) p. 903; Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1471.) In particular, when a preliminary injunction is sought, the case has yet to be adjudicated, for "no trial on the merits" has been held. (Id.; SB Liberty, LLC v. Isla Verde Assn., Inc. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 272, 280.) Two "interrelated factors" are weighed "whe...
2023.02.16 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 969
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.02.16
Excerpt: ... Defendant in support of its motion. Plaintiffs lodged two objections to portions of Exhibit L, Deposition of Charles Ay from Harry Transue v. Asbestos Defendants, on hearsay, lack of foundation, personal knowledge, relevance, and speculation grounds. Plaintiffs' objections are overruled. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing that Plaintiffs' negligence cause of action has no merit on the ground that the affirmative evidence co...
2023.02.09 Motion for Summary Judgment 953
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...er Defendant's undisputed material fact No. 6 and No. 7 because they constitute argument, and the separate statement should include only material facts. (CRC 3.1350(d)(2).) The Court took judicial notice of Plaintiff's complaint enclosed as Exhibit A in Defendant's Initial Index of Exhibits. The Court considered Exhibits B through F of Defendant's Initial Index of Exhibits. The Court also considered Exhibits A through E of Defendant's Reply Index...
2023.02.07 Petition to Compel Contractual Arbitration and Stay Action Pending Completion 874
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...on Pending Completion Defendants' motion to compel arbitration and stay is denied. A party seeking to compel arbitration always bears the burden to establish the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate by a preponderance of the evidence. (See Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Sec. Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 413.) Here, defendants fail to maintain that burden. The only identified arbitration agreement pertains to an unrelated "construction agreem...
2023.02.03 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 451
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.03
Excerpt: ...uses of action two and three. Doe 2 alleges sufficient facts that SFUSD knew or should have known that defendant Chan was likely to engage in sexual abuse. (See Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 591 ["To prevail on his negligent hiring/retention claim, [plaintiff] will be required to prove [defendant] knew or had reason to believe [the perpetrator] was likely to engage in sexual abuse. [citati...
2023.02.02 Motion for Summary Adjudication 982
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...econd cause of action is denied. The "complaint for declaratory relief" regards insurance coverage. In its complaint's first cause of action ‐ as to which summary adjudication is not sought ‐ "Allied World seeks a judicial determination that there is no coverage under the Allied World Umbrella Policy." (Id. at 11:18‐20.) In the second cause of action ‐ as to which summary adjudication is sought ‐ "Allied World seeks a judicial determina...
2023.02.01 Petition to Compel Arbitration 940
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.01
Excerpt: ...sue regarding whether petitioner complied with the grievance timing requirements of the parties' Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA"). That procedural issue is a matter for the arbitrator to decide. (See Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. Mirage Casino‐Hotel, Inc., 911 F.3d 588, 596 (9th Cir. 2018) [explaining that "timeliness, waiver, and other 'gateway' procedural matters growing out of the dispute are for [the] arbitrator."]; John Wiley & Sons, Inc...
2023.02.01 Demurrer 563
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.02.01
Excerpt: ...0, 9:4‐11:3.) Defendants argue that who improperly received the information must be pled with specificity (Memo. 3:23‐24), but the opinions they cite do not so hold. Demurrer overruled. 2 (Civil Code 1798.82 violation): The complaint adequately pleads violation of Civil Code 1798.82. (Id. at 11:4‐25.) Defendants argue that when a security‐system breach occurred must be pled, but the complaint does that. (Memo. 5:8‐9; Cmplt. 8:12‐15.) ...
2023.01.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration 687
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.26
Excerpt: ...Exhibit 5, 17(a).) The court overrules plaintiff's objections to that declaration. Defendant, however, waived the right to arbitrate and waived the delegation clause too. Plaintiff filed this case on November 23, 2021, and defendant answered the complaint on January 28, 2022. The Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") applies to the parties' agreement and the issue of waiver is a matter of federal law. (See Davis v. Shiekh Shoes, LLC (2022) 84 Cal.App.5...
2023.01.24 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 548
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.24
Excerpt: ...is granted. Plaintiff alleges he was injured by stepping on a vault lid that gave way. At least six parties (including plaintiff) have potential culpability. (Memo. 5:20‐6:2.) One of them, Harrigan Weidenmuller Co., filed an opposition to the good faith motion. Harrigan focuses on its notion that not enough discovery has been done to allow a good faith settlement. (Opp. 2:26‐3:19, 3:28‐4:17, 4:23‐5:4.) However, CCP 877 motions are often g...
2023.01.24 Demurrer 857
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.24
Excerpt: ...he representation regarding the number of cups that could be made from the can. At all times, Plaintiff believed and had a reasonable expectation that the labeling on the Class Products was truthful and accurate." (Id. at 15:3‐6.) This suffices to plead reliance under the Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. In this context, expectation and reliance are synonymous ‐ "a distinction without a difference." (Hale v. Sharp H...
2023.01.23 Motion for Leave to Submit Tardy Expert Witness Information 129
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.23
Excerpt: ...C.'s Motion Of Defendants For Leave To Submit Tardy Expert Witness Information. Pro Tem Judge John-Paul Deol, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign th...
2023.01.20 Demurrer, Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 984
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.20
Excerpt: ...) Plaintiff alleges that defendant is liable to him pursuant to Labor Code sec. 558.1. "[T]o be held liable under section 558.1, an 'owner' ... must either have been personally involved in the purported violation of one or more of the enumerated provisions; or, absent such personal involvement, had sufficient participation in the activities of the employer, including, for example, over those responsible for the alleged wage and hour violations, s...
2023.01.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 866
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.19
Excerpt: ...aining Confirmation Of Award. Respondent's "motion for attorneys' fees incurred in defeating petition to vacate or, in the alternative, correct arbitration award and obtaining confirmation of award" is denied. The parties agree that the relevant provision of their arbitration agreement is: "The arbitrator may award one of the parties all or part of its costs and expenses of arbitrating (including attorneys' fees and disbursements) if he or she co...
2023.01.19 Demurrer 384
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.19
Excerpt: ...d documents since there is no evidence to authenticate them. (See Linda Vista Village San Diego Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Tecolote Investors, LLC (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 166, 184 ["Judicial notice may be taken of 'the fact of a document's recordation, the date the document was recorded and executed, the parties to the transaction reflected in a recorded document, and the document's legally operative language, assuming there is no genuine dispute r...
2023.01.18 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena, for Production of Docs, for Sanctions 663
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ...oena For Personal Appearance And Production Of Documents And Things And Deposition Subpoena For Production Of Business Records Request For Sanctions In The Amount Of 2688. Pro Tem Judge Scott Borrowman, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agr...
2023.01.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 392
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ...gligence claims against TRITON are premised on vicarious liability for the alleged negligence and intentional torts of Mr. Markeith White ("WHITE")." (Points & Authorities, 1:27‐ 2:1.) Such a ruling does not completely dispose of the case against defendant and therefore, summary judgment would be improper. Moreover, the unsworn incident report that defendant relies upon shows that its admitted employee (Mr. Shaikh) worked in concert with Mr. Wh...
2023.01.18 Motion for Costs, for Writ of Mandate 898
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ... using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests....
2023.01.18 Demurrer 632
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ...lity. (Id. at 9:1‐24; CACI 2500.) Defendants cite no authority for their notion that plaintiff must elect one of her three bases as "the substantial motivating reason" for discrimination. (Memo. 9:10‐ 22.) 2 (harassment [Gov. Code 12940(j)]): The complaint adequately pleads harassment based on age, gender and disability. (Id. at 10:1‐11:2; CACI 2521A.) Defendants cite no authority for their notions that plaintiff must elect one of her three...
2023.01.17 Demurrer 502
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.17
Excerpt: ...al obligations and breach. (Not. 1:15‐18; FAC 6:5‐8, 31:1‐22.) Barclays' notion that a contract claim must be pled with specificity is mistaken. (See Not. 1:15‐18.) Demurrer overruled. 2 (fraud [concealment]), 3 (intentional misrepresentation), 7 (Business & Professions Code 17200): The FAC pleads fraud with insufficient specificity as to Barclays. (Not. 1:19‐2:2; Stansfield v. Starkey (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 59, 73 ["how, when, where, to...
2023.01.13 Motion to Strike, Demurrer 694
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.13
Excerpt: ...and 34. As explained in the demurrer, plaintiff pleads a cognizable claim to recover the bonus and funds from the profit‐sharing plan. Granted without leave to amend as to the punitive damages allegations (FAC 40, 43 (second par. 43), 50, and Prayer (D). A party cannot recover punitive damages for a contractual breach. (See Civil Code sec. 3294(a).) A party also may not recover punitive damages for a Labor Code violation. (See Brewer v. Premier...
2023.01.11 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 334
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.11
Excerpt: ...e facts of which are disputed. Plaintiff Tracy Yu has agreed to settle for $5,001 with the driver (Marini) and owner (Poppel) of one of the other two vehicles. The third vehicle's driver, Peter Giordano, opposes a good faith determination with three points. First, he says his vehicle was pushed into the Yu vehicle by the Marini/Poppel vehicle, so he has limited liability compared to them. (Opp. 1:25‐2:3.) Second, Giordano reports that, two week...
2023.01.11 Demurrer 433
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.11
Excerpt: ...haust administrative remedies." (Id. at 1:5‐2:15.) This is premised on the notion that statutes of limitations were triggered in October 2018. (Memo. 3:23‐4:2, 5:17‐23.) However, the SAC pleads that, in 2019 and 2020, plaintiff "attempted to work with" defendants "to place him in another position" ‐ efforts ultimately "rebuffed." (Id. at 4:14‐25.) At the pleading stage ‐ where pled facts must be accepted as true ‐ this suffices to d...
2023.01.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 788
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.01.10
Excerpt: ...uppressed material facts. (Cmplt. 1:7-22:4.) Second, the complaint adequately pleads that Honda had a duty to disclose the facts regarding sensing defects to plaintiff, as Honda had knowledge of material facts not known to him. (See Stickrath v. Globalstar, Inc. (ND. Cal. 2007) 527 F.Supp.2d 992, 1000-01.) This duty was based on Honda's advertising and other promotional efforts to buyers such as plaintiff, including through Honda's agent-dealers....

2831 Results

Per page

Pages