Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2838 Results

Location: San Francisco x
2023.06.01 Demurrers 416
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...nt adult causes of action. (Opp. 2:S_) Therefore: the demurrer is unnecessary as to those causes of action. (Opp. 2:8_) Intentional infliction of emotional distress ("llED"): To state a claim for IIED: "a plaintiff must show. (1) outrageous conduct by the defendant; (2) the defendant' s intention of causing or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress; (3) the plaintiffs suffering severe or extreme emotional distress: an...
2023.05.31 Motion for Protective Order 460
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...ve order re Thoits Law discovery on plaintiffs' ability to pay arbitration fees and costs" is denied. Ordered to arbitrate their dispute with Thoits, plaintiffs seek to avoid arbitration by asserting indigency. Thoits doubts plaintiffs' claims and has propounded financial circumstances discovery against which plaintiffs seek the protective order. But such discovery is authorized by Aronow v. Sup. Ct. (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 865, 884, a case factual...
2023.05.31 Demurrer 021
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...e, to whom, and by what means the representations were tendered." (Stansfield v. Starkey (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 59, 73.) After that is pled, the court may be able to reach the parties' arguments. Demurrer sustained with leave to amend. 2: Negligent Misrepresentation. The same alleged representations are at issue here (Cmplt. 7:6-11), so the ruling is the same - demurrer sustained with leave to amend. 3: Breach of Contract. Unlike fraud, this claim...
2023.05.30 Demurrer 231
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ..."with adequate information and instructions to exercise his option rights." (ld. at 5:8-10.) Defendant's arguments to the contrary rely on its spin of documents of which it seeks judicial notice. However, defendant "disputes the authenticity and applicability of the unsworn documents" (Opp. 1:28.) and their contents are not subject to judicial notice in any event. (Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 97, 114-15 [...
2023.05.25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 810
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...nes (collectively Restaurant) judgment on the pleadings as to the first amended complaint (FAC) is denied in part and granted in part. Richard Cibotti adequately pleads slander and false light against the Restaurant. The FAC alleges, inter alia, that Restaurant employees falsely "orally identif[ied]" Richard as the man who made "threats to kill a family and their young children" at the Restaurant. (ld. at 5:3-24.) Contrary to the Restaurant's arg...
2023.05.24 Demurrer 987
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ... profits from the unauthorized rental of his home by third parties also named in this action. Plaintiff first asserts a claim for conversion, alleging that Defendant failed to comply with an Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court order to the place the rental income of his home into an interest bearing account and that it acted as an agent of the other defendants to wrongfully exercise control of Plaintiff's property. (4AC, 6:27-28, 7:1; Ex. A). Plainti...
2023.05.22 Demurrer 560
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...her based on her sex. FAC 6. Payrovi alleges that the most recent act of discrimination occurred "at some date after April 26, 2018" when Dolby closed fts investigation of her complaint and refused to hire her into a permanent position. ld. at 15. Payrovi filed a pre-form inquiry with the DFEH on March 14, 2019, and her verified complaint on March 17, 2020 ld. at 37, 41. Dolby argues that the FAC is barred by the one-year statute of limitations o...
2023.05.19 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 231
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...dants*** Complete tentative ruling sent to the parties via e-mail. Granted. The stay extends only to the moving parties here. Defendants (referred to as Kaiser here) petition to send the claims against them to arbitration. Plaintiff Garza does not argue that there is no arbitration agreement, or that he is not bound because he didn't agree to it or did not sign it. He does say he dæsn't recall signing the agreement, but this is nota basis on whi...
2023.05.18 Motion to Dismiss 241
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...rvice demonstrates that it properly served Plaintiffs. As to the survival claims under Decedent's personal injury action, dismissal is mandatory under C.C.P. secton 583.360. After commencing the achon against Defendant in 2014, and accounting for tolling during appeal, Plaintiffs failed to bring the achon to trial within five years and six months under C.C.P. section 583.310 and C.R.C. emergency rule IO(a). After the filing of remittitur by the c...
2023.05.18 Motion to Amend Expert Witness Designation 840
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...iled by Defendant. Reply filed by Plaintiff Plaintiffs have shown an exceptional circumstance of the deteriorating health of designated expert: Charles Ayz from a terminal disease for the Court to permit the motion to be made under C.C.P. section 2034.610(b) after the expert discovery cutoff date. (Morse Decl. parm 6.) All four conditions are satisfied for the Coun to grant leave to augment under CCP section 2034_620_ Pursuant to CCP section the ...
2023.05.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 056
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...A to Defendant's Index of Exhibits. The Court considered Exhibits B (Plaintiffs Responses to Standard Interrogatories) and Exhibit C (relevant portions of the Deposition Transcripts ofPlamtiff William Frayne) to Defendant's Index of Exhibits submitted in support of the motion. The Coult sustains Plaintiff s objections to Exhibits D through H (relevant portions ofthe Deposition Transcripts of George Kirk: Defendant's Corporate Representative) on l...
2023.05.18 Motion for Attorney Fees 762
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...Rules of Court, rule 3.1702(c). Government Code section 12965(b) has no application to this motion. Section 12965(c)(6), however, provides, "In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall no...
2023.05.11 Motion to Strike SAC, for Entry of Judgment 555
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...ded Complaint And For Entry Of Judgment Defendant Singer's motion to strike the second amended complaint is granted without leave to amend. The filing is "improper" within the meaning of CCP 436(a). First, plaintiffs did not comply with this court's order of January 18, 2023, and they missed the filing deadline for the amended pleading by several weeks without sufficient explanation. (CCP 438(h)(4)(A) ["If an amended complaint is filed after the ...
2023.05.10 Motion to Compel Mental Exams 229
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.10
Excerpt: ...hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation: the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone: the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not al...
2023.05.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 343
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.08
Excerpt: ...rbitration and stay action is granted. under Gamboa v. Northeast Community Clinic (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 158, 165, Defendants have met their burden by the preponderance of the evidence to show that Plaintiff consented to its terms of service. (See Vasquez Decl.) The controlling arbitration agreement at the time ofthe incident was the 2016 Terms of use. (See Vasquez Decl., Ex. E.) The arbitration agreement within the terms of use delegates "that an...
2023.05.04 Demurrer 952
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...s "personnel management actions,' but our supreme court holds that such actons "can also have a secondary effect of communicating a hostile message" and thus support a FEHA harassment claim. (Roby v. McKesson Corp. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 586, 709.) Also, defendants concede the FAC pleads six non-personnel management actions in less than three years, disparaging plaintiffs national origin and sex. (Memo. 4:3-14.) The FAC also adequately pleads defamati...
2023.05.03 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award, for Attorney Fees, for Entry of Judgment 984
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...ts And Request For Entry Of Judgment (PART 1 OF 2) 8MlNUTENERGY US INVESTOR LLC, 8MlNUTENERGY US INVESTOR 2 LLC, AVANTUS LLC (F/K/A 8 MINUTE POWER LLC)'s motion to confirm arbitration award is granted. "Unless a statutory basis for vacating or correcting an award exists, a reviewing court 'shall confirm the award as made."' (Corona v. Amherst Partners (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 701, 705 (quoting CCP 1285). There is no basis to vacate the award and th...
2023.05.03 Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment 882
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...led to relief under CCP 683.170 from renewal of the judgment. (Fidelity Creditor Serv., Inc. v. Browne (21%1) 89 CA4th 195, 199, 105.) A judge may vacate the renewal on any ground that would be a defense to an action on the judgment, including the ground that the amount of the renewed judgment is incorrect. (CCP 683.170(a)). Here, Defendant fails to raise any meritorious defense, such as providing a reason why the money is not owed to Plaintiff (...
2023.05.03 Motion for Mandatory Dismissal 386
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...r the action is commenced. (CCP sectons 583.210, 583.250; see also Edmon & Karnow, CALIFORNIA PRACTICE GUIDE: CIVIL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL 11:51 (Rutter: 2022).) Plaintiff Charles Li filed the First Amended Complaint on 02/04/2019. Plaintiff had three years to serve Defendant with the summons and complaint. On 01/25/23, the court granted Defendant's moton to quash service and set aside the default against Defendant. Plaintiff first argues that De...
2023.05.03 Demurrers 076
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...s request for judicial notice of exhibit C [title report from private insurance company] The report is neither a coun record (Evid. 452(d)) nor a fact that is not reasonably subject to dispute (Evid. 452(h)_) In any event, the lack of omvvnership of a piece of real property is not dispositive since negligence/premises liability can be based on control of the property. In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint: the court treats as true allegatio...
2023.04.27 Motion to Stay Proceedings, Joinder 932
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.27
Excerpt: ...his eponymous law firm from representing the University of San Francisco in this case. USF appealed that order; thus everyone seems to agree the order is automatically stayed. (CRS Corp. v. AtkinsonAVa1sh Joint Venture (2017) 15 872, 886-87.) USF views the disqualification as collateral and wants to continue the case with new counsel to avoid delay. CI, on the other hand: seeks a discretionary stay of the entire action until USF's appeal is decid...
2023.04.20 Motion to Compel Answers and Production of Docs at Deposition, for Monetary Sanctions 651
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.20
Excerpt: ...lood And Imposing Monetary Sanction. Pro Tem Judge John-Paul Deol, a member of the California State aar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed bef...
2023.04.20 Motion for Sanctions, to Designate Vexatious Litigant and Enter Pre-Filing Order 042
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.20
Excerpt: ...f's motion for sanctions pursuant to CCP 128.7 is denied. A CCP 128.7 motion involves a two-step process. The moving party first serves the sanctions motion on the offending party without filing it. The opposing party then has 21 days to withdraw the improper pleading and avoid sanctions ("safe harbor" waiting period). At the end of the waiting period, if the pleading is not withdrawn, the moving party may then file the motion. (CCP 128.7(c)(1); ...
2023.04.18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 492
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.18
Excerpt: ... of action: "Violation of Proposition 65." The motion pleads one issue: statute of limitations - Karman says it is one year, plaintiff four. Both sides' briefs vex. Karman's memorandum repeatedly miscites its key case Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2CG) 107 Cal.App.4th 957 as being at 132 Cal.App.4th. (Memo. 4:28, 5:15.) Plaintiffs opposition lacks page numbers and key pin cites and is garbled (see, e.g., id. at 3:18). Shamsian arrived at a ...
2023.04.17 Motion for Clarification, Reconsideration of Order Adopting Discovery Referee's Report 714
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.04.17
Excerpt: ...ort And Recommended Order No. 9. "Plaintiffs motion for clarification and/or reconsideration of the February 10, 2023 court order adopting the discovery referee's report and recommended order no. 9" is denied. A reconsideration motion must be "based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law" and a valid reason for not presenting them earlier. (CCP Gilberd v. AC Transit (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1494, 15CL) The moving party shall state by aff...

2838 Results

Per page

Pages