Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2838 Results

Location: San Francisco x
2023.09.15 Motion to Compel Responses 663
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.15
Excerpt: ... a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same aut...
2023.09.14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 540
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.14
Excerpt: ... Amended Complaint [C.C.P. 438, Et Seq.]. Defendant California College of the Arts' (CCA) "motion for judgment on the pleadings as to causes of action number one through seven in plaintiff's second amended complaint" (SAC) is granted with leave to amend. CCA hired pro per plaintiff June Beltran in 2017. Part of her job was to direct CCAls Center for Art & Public Life, later renamed the Center for Impact (the Center). Beltran was fired in November...
2023.09.13 Motion to Temporarily LIft Stay 287
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...fs "motion to temporarily lift stay to declare that Lyft, Inc.'s arbitration agreement controls the parties' dispute" is denied. On March 22, 2023, Stripe, Inc.'s motion to compel plaintiff to arbitration was granted based on multiple arbitration agreements. This court's order stayed the litigation "pending the outcome of arbitration." Plaintiff now seeks to "temporarily lift stay" based on CCP 1281.4's provision that a court shall "stay the acti...
2023.09.13 Demurrer 909
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...stock options. The noton was that plaintiffs would eventually get their money back and split any gain with defendant 50-50. The employer went public and its stock price rose, but plaintiffs have gotten no money. The demurrer's first argument is that the entre FAC is precluded by a New York court's dismissal ofa "nearly identical" case. Plaintiffs respond that the New York case regarded their supposed right to compel defendant to sell her stock (w...
2023.09.12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 469
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.12
Excerpt: ...And 2 In Plaintiff'S Complaint Defendants Epic Sightseeing, LLC and Extranomical Tours, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Re Causes Of Action 1 and 2 in Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is treated the same as a demurrer. It is limited to the "four corners" of the pleading (including exhibits) and matters that are judicially noticeable. The complaint is read as a whole, and material facts properly pl...
2023.09.12 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Strike Costs 944
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.12
Excerpt: ... IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Petitioner has demonstrated a right to recover attorney's fees and costs from Respondent San Francisco Housing Authority. This is a Public Records Act matter. The Act mandates a fees and costs award in petitioner's favor payable by the public agency, if the petitioner "prevails in litigation." (Gov. Code, 7923.115, subd, (a).) Petitioner made PRA requests on October 6 and 13, 2022. Respondent did not substantially com...
2023.09.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 931
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.08
Excerpt: ... Univ. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 427, 432 n.3 ["Generally, a party moving for summary judgment may not rely on new evidence filed with its reply papers."]; San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank (2W2) 102 Cal.App.4th 308, 316 [noting due process issue when considering reply evidence].) "The papers are to be construed strictly against the moving party and liberally in favor of the opposing party; any doubts regarding the propriety of summary...
2023.09.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 151
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...dgment is denied. Defendant's alternative motion for summary adjudication is granted and denied as follows: The motion for summary adjudication is denied as to issue 1 (ability to perform essential job functions), issue 2 (legitimate reason) and issue 3 (failure to engage in interactive process). Defendant does not deny that it previously modified plaintiffs work structure because of plaintiffs disabilities. (Amended Complaint, par. 21; Pfeilschi...
2023.09.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 069
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...notice of Exhibit 1 (Plaintiff's Complaint) in the Weglarz Declaration. The Court considered Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's Special Interrogatories, Set One), Exhibit 3 (Plaintiff's Responses to Standard Asbestos Case Interrogatories), Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff's Deposition, June 7, 2023), Exhibit 5 (Plaintiff's Deposition, Aug. 30, 2017, Taken in Case No. CGC-15-276397), and Exhibit 6 (Plaintiff's Deposition, Nov. 7, 1996, Taken in C...
2023.09.01 Application for Writ of Possession 320
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.01
Excerpt: ...validity of fts claim. (CCP 512.060(a)(1).) Defendant's hearsay objection to the Motosko declaration is sustained. (Opposition 8:15-25.) That is the only evidence that supports this application. The declaration is based on 'company records," but there is no showing that they are business records excepted from the hearsay rule. (Evidence Code sec. 1271 ["Evidence of a wrting made as a record of an act, condition, or event is not made inadmissible ...
2023.09.01 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 651
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.01
Excerpt: ...fendant Comcast to address the noise emanating from a vault cover near plaintiffs residence. Plaintiff alleges that when a vehicle runs over the vault cover, it make an extremely loud noise. 1. Comcast asserts that plaintiff is a vexatious litigant and has not posted the required security. If this is so, the court questions why a motion based on that failure has not been made. See CCP 391.4 (dismissal for failure to furnish security). This does n...
2023.09.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 104
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.01
Excerpt: .... The court has nevertheless reviewed the moving papers and the opposition filed July 5, 2023 which includes documents plaintiff apparently contends supports his allegations. In particular, the court has reviewed the July opposition for evidence that Protacio was operating within the course and scope of his employment with the defendant Regents. His employment consisted of working as an HR employment lead at USFC Health, and his duties consisted ...
2023.09.01 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 034
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.01
Excerpt: ...To Requests For Production Of Dcmaments And Tangible Things, Production Of Documents And Request For Monetary Sanctions. Pro Tem Judge Aaron Minnis, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judg...
2023.09.01 Motion to Dismiss Invalid Appeal of Labor Commissioner's Order, Decision, or Award Based on Failure to Post Bond or Undertaking 930
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.09.01
Excerpt: ...Award Based On Failure To Post Bond Or Undertaking Respondent Gerona's moŸon to dismiss is granted. As this court already ruled in its order of July 21, 2023, the bond requirement is mandatory and jurisdicŸonal. (Palagin v. Paniagua ConstrucŸon Inc. (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 124, 140.) Gerona is therefore enŸtled to a dismissal. (Id.; Labor Code sec. 98.2(b); Burkes v. Robertson (2018) 26 Cal.App.5th 334, 347, fn 10 ["a necessary consequence...
2023.08.31 Motion to Compel Responses 006
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...et forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this moton. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the ...
2023.08.31 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 978
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...r Declaration. The Court sustains Plaintiffs' objections to Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Htnver Declaration on hearsay grounds. As such, the Court did not consider Undisputed Material Facts Nos. 6 and 7 in Defendant's Separate Statement of undisputed Material Facts, which rely on Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Hoover Declaration as evidentiary support. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing that Plaintiff does not possess, and cannot re...
2023.08.31 Demurrer 101
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...o not suffice." (Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 645; Hamilton v. Greenwich Investors XXVI, LLC (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1602, 1614.) To satisfy '"[t]his particularity requirement,"' a plaintiff must plead facts that show "how, when, where, to whom, and by what means the representations were tendered." (Lazar, supra, 12 Cal.4th at 645.) Here, plaintiff does not meet the heightened pleading requirement. For example, Paragraph 19 does ...
2023.08.31 Application to File Under Seal, to Disqualify Counsel 949
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...Cal. Rule Of Court 2.551; (2) Plaintiffs' Application Pursuant To Code Provision 2031.285, and (3) Defendant Glydways, Inc.'s Cross-Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Counsel. Plaintiff's rule 2.551 application, which is unopposed, is GRANTED. On Plaintiff's application under section 2031.285 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court finds the subject document is privileged. The court finds that Plaintiffs did not establish a waiver of the privileg...
2023.08.31 Application to Amend Abstract of Judgment 623
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...ff's Application To Amend Abstract Of Judgment With Defendant's Alias (CCP Sec 680.135), for which no opposition has been filed, is DENIED. Plaintiff seeks to amend the abstract of judgment to add "Light Mary J Trust," which plaintiff identifies as a revocable trust. Section 680.135 is limited to adding to judgments "aliases" of known debtors. In this context, an alias is a name by which the natural person who is the debtor is or has been known a...
2023.08.30 Motion for Relief Under Code of Civil Procedure 858
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...dba Rightworks Insurance Services's moŸon for relief under Code of Civil Procedure secŸon 473, which is unopposed in substance, is GRANTED. Good cause appearing, moving party is relieved from the sŸpulated deadline to Þle a MoŸon to Compel Community Loans to Supplement Its Responses to Requests for ProducŸon of Documents, Set One, and any such moŸon Þled before August 31, 2023, shall be deemed Ÿmely. The court is aware of the disp...
2023.08.24 Motion to Sever Claim for Writ of Mandate 387
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.24
Excerpt: ...tiffs Claim For Writ Of Mandate Against The Commissioner Of The California Department Of Insurance The "motion to sever plaintiff's claim for writ of mandate against the Commissioner of the California Department of Insurance" is granted. Joining a writ action against the insurance commissioner to a bad faith case against an insurer is a recurring tactic by this plaintiffs' counsel. (Memo. 3:3-5:15.) The tactic has been rejected by severance four ...
2023.08.24 Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses, for Sanctions 917
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.24
Excerpt: ...s. Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this moŸon. Prior to the hearing all parŸes to the moŸon will be asked to sign a sŸpulaŸon agreeing that the moŸon may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parŸes to the moŸon sign the sŸpulaŸon, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who ...
2023.08.24 Motion for Summary Judgment 886
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.08.24
Excerpt: ...Motion: Exhibit A (Decedent's Personal Injury Complaint); Exhibit B (Plaintiffs' Wrongful Death Complaint); and Exhibit C (Amendment to First Amended Wrongful Death Complaint to Substitute Defendant's True Name for Does 2 and 254). The Court considered Exhibits D through K in Defendant's Index of Evidence in Support of the Motion. The Court declines to rule on Defendant's objections to Decedent's deposition submitted in Plaintiffs' opposing evide...
2023.08.23 Motion to Compel Further Responses 144
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.23
Excerpt: ...ce Highman, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with t...
2023.08.23 Motion for Permission to Conduct Early Discovery 545
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.23
Excerpt: ...hman, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this moŸon. Prior to the hearing all parŸes to the moŸon will be asked to sign a sŸpulaŸon agreeing that the moŸon may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parŸes to the moŸon sign the sŸpulaŸon, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the moŸon w...

2838 Results

Per page

Pages