Excerpt: ... on September 21, 2021. Opposition was due by September 24, 2021. Defendant did not file its opposition until September 27, 2021. Nevertheless, the Court considered the opposition. This action involves multiple accidents that occurred on September 26, 2016, on the Yolo Causeway and three actions that have been consolidated. Defendant the Estate of David Miranda's motion for summary judgment is set for October 6, 2021. Plaintiff seeks to continue ...

Excerpt: ...o pay overtime, failed to provide meal periods, failed to provide rest periods, failed to provide accurate wage statements, failed to timely pay final wages, engaged in unfair competition, failed to reimburse expenses, violated the PAGA, failed to pay prevailing wages, and failed to pay reporting time. Plaintiffs have also alleged Defendants are liable for a civil penalties under the PAGA based on these violations. Defendants have denied all of P...

Excerpt: ... paid, laid out, and expended to or for Defendant at Defendant's special instance and request. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is granted. The request for judicial notice shows that Plaintiff's request for admissions to Defendant were deemed admitted on February 28, 2020. When the moving party is the plaintiff, there is only one ground for a motion for judgment on the pleadings: “the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cau...

Excerpt: ...nsider these motions separately. Defendants' request for judicial notice is granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dept. of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 (judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings of fact are true); Steed v. Dept. of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121 (...

Excerpt: ...cal Rule 1.06. Moving counsel is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to the hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing via Zoom or by telephone. Background Plaintiff filed the underlying Complaint against Defendant and others on July 15, 2020 (ROA 1.) ...

Excerpt: ...o move for an order that the parties are bound by the expert disclosures they have served. The motion is DENIED as follows. Trial was originally set in this case for April 14, 2020 and was continued to April 19, 2021. (Finelli Decl., ¶ 2.) At that point, the discovery cutoff date was March 22, 2021. On March 1, 2021, Defendants disclosed experts Andre Jardini, Gerald Murphy, and Patrick DeLangis. (Ibid., Exh. 1.) Two days later, on March 3, 2021...

Excerpt: ...ounsel and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to the hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing via Zoom or by telephone. Background Plaintiff Arletha Mae Johnson (“Mrs. Johnson”), by and through her attorney‐in‐fact David Johnson, Jr., commenced an action in this Court by filing a c...

Excerpt: ...ainst after an investigator hired to investigate allegations of sex harassment found that he had committed sexual battery. The investigator, Ms.Lindgren, was an independent contractor hired to do the investigation District fired plaintiff over the findings of the investigation. Plaintiff alleges other facts concerning national origin harassment by a coworker but the motion does not address the claims arising from the harassment by the co‐worker...

Excerpt: ...ourt has jurisdiction to rule on the motion given the dismissal without prejudice. Defendant Sebright filed their supplemental brief and plaintiff's brief was due September 17, 2021. This motion was continued for several months to July 27, 2021 pursuant to CCP 437c (h). The court then continued the matter to August 31, 2021 for an update on the status of this case since no opposition to the motion was filed for the July 27 hearing date. Plaintiff...

Excerpt: ...fety Code section 11570. The case arose out of conditions at premises located at 1319 30th Street, Sacramento, California, then known as the "Econo Lodge." LEG Investments is the owner of the property that it leased to tenant 2002 Investors to operate the hotel business. The City's Complaint sought a permanent injunction against defendants to enjoin illegal drug activities and prostitution under the Uniform Controlled Substances Abatement Act, He...

Excerpt: ...ction 226.7 (unpaid rest premiums); (4) violation of Labor Code sections 1194 and 1197 (unpaid minimum wages); (5) violation of Labor Code sections 201 and 202 (final wages not timely paid); (6) violation of Labor Code section 226(a) (non‐compliant wage statements); (7) violation of Labor Code sections 2800 and 2802 (unreimbursed business expenses); and (8) violation of Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. (Unfair Competition L...

Excerpt: ...to Plaintiff Monrell D. Murphy within 48 hours. The litigation coordinator is directed to have Plaintiff Monrell D. Murphy available at oral argument on September 23, 2021 at 1:30 pm. Appearance will be by ZOOM. Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by phone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above for oral argument on September 22, 2021. Appearance is required. The demurr...

Excerpt: ...lando Blackwell within 48 hours. The litigation coordinator is directed to have Plaintiff Orlando Blackwell available at oral argument on September 22, 2021 at 1:30 pm. Appearance will be by ZOOM. Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by phone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above for oral argument on September 22, 2021. Appearance is required. Defendants California Sta...

Excerpt: ...ms within 48 hours. The litigation coordinator is directed to have Plaintiff Tio Dinero Sessoms available at oral argument on September 22, 2021 at 1:30 pm. Appearance will be by ZOOM. Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by phone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above for oral argument on September 22, 2021. Appearance is required. Defendant Kenneth Rosenfeld's (“Ros...

Excerpt: ...all or any party of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the law. (See Code Civ. Pro. § 436 (a)‐(c).) A motion to strike challenges portions of a cause of action that are substantively defective on the face of the complaint. (PH II, Inc. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1680, 1682‐83; see also Code of Civ. Proc. § 437.) More specifically, a motion to strike should be granted to remove "any irrelevant, false, or improper...

Excerpt: ...he course and scope of his employment with Defendant Reliance Intermodal, Inc. at the time of the incident. In his response to Defendants' form interrogatory 6.2 which asked Plaintiff to identify any injuries attributed to the incident, Plaintiff indicated that he suffered injuries to his mid and lower back “with radicular symptoms in his left buttock and left leg; decreased lumbar range of motion in all directions, associated with paid; decrea...

Excerpt: ...rtified documents from the Secretary of State reflecting the reinstatement no later than September 15, 2021. Plaintiff failed to file the documents. As the Court stated on the August 19, 2021, Plaintiff's suspension prevents it from prosecuting or otherwise participating in the instant lawsuit. (ROA 24) In reality, the motion to strike is therefore unopposed. Though, as seen below, even if the Court considered the opposition, it provides no basis...

Excerpt: ...Code and more. Plaintiff was formerly employed by AAA NCNU as a Sales and Service Associate and Trent was her former manager. In connection with her employment, Plaintiff signed an Arbitration Agreement in June 2011. (Radu Decl. ¶ 12, Exh. C) The Arbitration Agreement states that: “…Employee and NCNU agree that any and all disputes, claims, or causes of action, in law or equity, arising from or relating to Employee's employment… shall be r...

Excerpt: ... Standard The Court must grant a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issues as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c); Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18, 35.) Section 437c(c) imposes an affirmative duty on a court to grant a summary judgment motion in an appropriate case. (Preach v. Moister...

Excerpt: ...nt to state any cause of action against Defendants. Defendants' request for judicial notice is granted. The SAC alleges causes of action for (1) negligence, (2) concealment, (3) intentional misrepresentation, (4) total equitable indemnity, (5) implied indemnity, and (6) comparative contribution. The FAC alleged causes of action for (1) negligence, (2) concealment, and (3) fraudulent inducement. Background In August 2012, HBE Corporation (“HBE�...

Excerpt: ... state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e).) Myers LLC's request for judicial notice is granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the Court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dept. of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 (judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings are true); Steed v. Dept. of Cons...

Excerpt: ...ssional Engineers v. Dept. of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 (judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings are true); Steed v. Dept. of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121.) Defendant specifically demurs to Plaintiff's second cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) on grounds that it fails to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. (See Code Civ. Proc...

Excerpt: ...ard's Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint filed by the plaintiff, Mitchell Development Enterprises, Inc. is sustained without leave to amend for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. On March 18, 2021 the Court sustained the demurrer to the 1st Amended Complaint, with leave to amend. Second Amended Complaint A 14‐count felony complaint was filed in 2013 against two of the plaintiffs corporate officers, alleging ...

Excerpt: ...nator is directed to have Plaintiff Monrell D. Murphy available at oral argument on September 23, 2021 at 1:30 pm. Appearance will be by ZOOM. Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by phone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above for oral argument on September 22, 2021. Appearance is required. The demurrer of the California Department of Corrections ("CDCR") to the First ...

Excerpt: ... 1138.) Newberg on Class Actions (4th Ed.), the authoritative treatise on class actions, discusses the process for approving the settlement of a class action. At § 11.24, “Procedure for Submitting Class Settlement for Approval,” Newberg describes the review at the preliminary stage as the submission by the parties of the essential terms of the agreement for informal review of the settlement papers by the Court. In reviewing a request for pre...

Excerpt: ...authorities. In addition, Defendants' opposition to both applications is contained in a single memorandum. Therefore the Court addresses both in a single ruling. This action began when Plaintiff filed his complaint against Defendants alleging a plethora of causes of action ranging from fraud, violations of the Corporations Code, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, accounting and more. The action arises from Plaintiff's $500,000 investme...

Excerpt: ...t oral argument on September 22, 2021 at 1:30 pm. Appearance will be by ZOOM. Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. To appear on Zoom by phone, call (888) 475‐4499 or (877) 853‐5257 (toll‐free) and enter the Zoom ID referenced above for oral argument on September 22, 2021. Appearance is required. Defendant Kenneth Rosenfeld's (“Rosenfeld”) demurrer to self‐represented Plaintiff Tio Dinero Sessoms' second amended complaint (“SAC”...

Excerpt: ... contract” with FCA US LLC regarding a 2015 Chrysler 200 on February 14, 2015. (Comp. ¶ 15.) Plaintiff alleges that “[d]efects and nonconformities to warranty manifested themselves within the applicable warranty period, including but not limited to engine, transmission, and electrical.” (Id. ¶ 16.) Plaintiff alleges she delivered the vehicle to an authorized FCA US LLC repair facility for repair of the nonconformities but FCA US LLC was n...

Excerpt: ... bad faith) in connection with his claim for insurance benefits with respect to an insurance policy for his 2002 Fleetwood Truck Camper (“Camper”). Plaintiff alleges that the Camper sustained water damage from a leak in the roof and that Defendant breached the terms of his insurance policy when it denied his claim. He also alleges that Defendant acted in bad faith by unreasonably withholding payments under the policy. Defendant moves for summ...

Excerpt: ...ruction site. Plaintiff alleges a cause of action for negligence against ACP and its employee Tommy Brower. Plaintiff alleges that Mr. Brower was in the course and scope of his employment with ACP when he was operating a concrete boom pump in close proximity to Plaintiff resulting in injuries to Plaintiff. Plaintiff claims that he has suffered cognitive impairments and behavioral changes due to the injuries. At issue on this motion is a subpoena ...

Excerpt: ...therwise it was to expire on December 31, 2016. Plaintiff alleges that after Defendant terminated the Agreement in October 2016 for convenience that Defendant wrongfully retained possession of certain equipment. In the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Plaintiff alleges causes of action against Defendant for conversion, breach of contract and others. Defendant purports to move for summary adjudication as to what it contends are “separate and...

Excerpt: ...based on the new hearing date. No supplemental opposition was filed. The Court therefore analyzes the motion based on the original papers filed in connection with the May 13, 2021 hearing date. Plaintiffs Char Feagins, et al. filed the instant wrongful death and survival action alleging a single cause of action for negligence/wrongful death against Defendant. They allege that J.C. Feagins, IV (the “Decedent”) was in custody at the Sacramento ...

Excerpt: ...ersion, and trespass to chattels. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant agreed to sell a 55% interest in Metro and its permitted cannabis retail store in exchange for $800,000. Plaintiffs allege that the parties also entered a Continuity Agreement and that Baystone would receive an equal number of seats on Metro's board. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant has failed to comply with the parties' “partnership” and has been attempting to exclude Bayston...

Excerpt: ...GRANTED. Defendants Churchwell White, LLP, Barbara A. Brenner, and Robin R. Baral (“Defendants”) oppose the motion. Request for Judicial Notice Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), which attaches the pleading in this action, is unopposed and is GRANTED. Background This malicious prosecution action arises from an underlying action that was dismissed as to Plaintiffs by way of their anti‐SLAPP motion, such that this is a SLAPP...

Excerpt: ...aud, negligent misrepresentation, and unlawful business practices. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants created and deployed a fake air monitoring device affixed with a label that said “SMAQMD Air Monitoring Station,” and included the name and contact information for SCS Engineering employee Paul Schafer. Plaintiffs allege that the fake device and label were meant to deceive Plaintiffs, their employees, and their vendors by creating the false ap...

Excerpt: ...ate status with the Secretary of State is "FTB Suspended" for its failure to pay taxes, and that given this suspended status, Defendant may not oppose the instant motion or defend itself in this action during the suspension. (Declaration of Attorney Daniel K. Ohl ("OhI Decl.") ¶¶ 4‐6, RJN, 112, Ex. L.) While Defendant filed papers in opposition to the instant motion, the Court did not find it necessary to consider the substance of those paper...

Excerpt: ...�Plaintiffs”) is ruled on as follows. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. This is an insurance bad faith action. Plaintiffs were allegedly shareholders, officers and/or directors of a suspended California corporation called Sacramento A‐1 Door. Defendants were Plaintiffs' insurance brokers. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC") alleges damages resulting from the absence of insurance coverage available to defend and indemnify them from the cla...

Excerpt: ...s granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. Trial is currently set to commence on September 21, 2021. The Court notes that a further discussion of the case can be found in the ruling on Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, also on today's calendar. In this action, Plaintiffs Baystone and Metro Health Systems' (“Metro") original Complaint al...

Excerpt: ...erk entered the dismissal that same day. (Register of Actions ("ROA") 199.) On July 15, 2021, Defendants filed a Memorandum of Costs seeking total costs of $2,892.25. On August 2, 2021, Intervenors filed a Motion to Tax Costs. Legal Standard Prevailing parties are “entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1032(b).) The term “‘Prevailing party' includes the party with a net monetary r...

Excerpt: ...r past business income, future lost income, or economic damages related to alleged delay in completing the construction of the building at 9250 Big Hom Boulevard. In response to the Request for Admissions, Plaintiffs Mahmoud Khattab and Mahmoud Khattab, MD, Inc. admitted that they were not making damages claims for past income, future income, or economic damages related to delay in construction. However, Big Horn denied the Requests for Admission...

Excerpt: ...its employee forklift operator, negligently operated a forklift, causing a forklift load of stone slabs to fall onto Plaintiff while his truck was being loaded. Requests Nos. 11 and 12 seek policies and procedures to be followed by Defendant's employees when loading or unloading trailers on Defendant's property (No. 11) and when operating equipment, including fork‐lifts while on Defendant's property. (No. 12) Requests Nos. 16‐21 seek document...

Excerpt: ...concerning the motion to amend the complaint are granted. Plaintiff in his opposition requests leave to amend if the Court is inclined to grant the motion. That request is denied as the proposed amendment does not raise a triable issue of material fact. Plaintiff's evidentiary objections are overruled and in any event the evidence objected to was not necessary to the Court's ruling. This action involves a dispute over a 1991 Buy‐Sell agreement ...

Excerpt: ... 368, n. 7. Plaintiff, a retired doctor who taught English as a second language, alleges she was injured on January 6, 2020 when an extremely loud horn blast from a gold‐line SacRT light‐rail train caused abrupt loss of hearing in her right ear when she was exiting near 24 Hour Fitness at 7th Street. She alleges she has lost her hearing and was required to undergo a hip replacement when she fell after the horn blast. She contends that the hor...

Excerpt: ...iled their cross‐ complaint against TKE alleging causes of action for equitable and express indemnity. Cross‐complaints now seek leave to file a first amended crosscomplaint to add causes of action for breach of contract and a prayer for attorneys' fees based on a claimed failure by TKE to defend and indemnify them pursuant to a hold harmless provision in a Building Services Contract. Cross‐Complainants bring the motion pursuant to CCP § 4...

Excerpt: ...he opposition provides no basis to deny the instant motion. In this real property dispute, Plaintiffs seek to have judgment entered pursuant to CCP § 664.6.in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement reached after mediation and approved by all parties and their respective counsel. Plaintiffs initially filed the instant lawsuit in February 2021 in connection with their purchase of a home from Defendants, whom Plaintiffs contend are exper...

Excerpt: ...delivery van crashed into their vehicle. Soon Express is a Delivery Service Partner (“DSP”) of Amazon providing transportation and delivery of Amazon packages. Plaintiffs allege that Amazon is vicariously liable for their injuries. Specifically Plaintiffs claims that Soon Express was acting as Amazon's agent acting within the scope of its authority at the time of the accident and/or was Amazon's employee. At issue on this motion is a single r...

Excerpt: ...d Development Center (“Case”), a state funded preschool, where Plaintiff was attending preschool. Plaintiff alleges that CDI controlled and operated the pre‐school program and that CDI negligently hired/retained Mr. Turks, despite a prior record of similar conduct at his place of prior employment and CDI's knowledge of his unfitness as an employee. The third cause of action for negligence is the only cause of action asserted against CDI. In...

Excerpt: ...arbara Mello, and Steven Mello (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Petition for Order Directing Payment Out of the Victims of Corporate Fraud Compensation Fund (“Petition”) against Defendant Dr. Shirley N. Weber in her official capacity as California Secretary of State (“Defendant”). According to Plaintiffs' Petition, Plaintiffs are individual investors who were victimized by Lee Loomis (“Loomis”) and his corporate entities in a corporate frau...

Excerpt: ...t time of the accident. Amazon was named under vicarious liability and agency theories because Plaintiffs contend Amazon's subcontractor, Soon Express, carries insufficient insurance to cover the damages sustained in the accident. This motion seeks a protective order concerning Plaintiffs' Fifth Set of Requests for Admission (Set Five) and Fourth Set of Form Interrogatories (Set Four), which were served on Amazon on May 28, 2021. (Johnson Decl., ...

Excerpt: ...uest) to Defendant on March 24, 2021. (Mov. Mot. P&A, p. 3.) On April 27, 2021, Plaintiff's counsel was emailed a proposed Stipulation and Protective Order concerning the handling of documents designated as confidential materials responsive to the Request. (Ibid.) Defendant served a response to the Request on April 28, 2021. (Ibid.) Plaintiff argues that response failed to comply with Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.280 (§ 2031.280) and the Stip...

Excerpt: ...ing procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact plaintiff prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing via Zoom or by telephone. In this elder abuse action, Defendant moves to file the following records under seal in support of its upcoming motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for summary adjudication: 1) Portions of the declaration of Bruce Helberg (Helberg) filed i...

Excerpt: ...ael, Inc., McGregor Home Garfield, Inc., McGregor Home Rancho, Inc., and McGregor Home Mt. Vernon, Inc. on October 30, 2018. (ROA 1.) The complaint alleged 11 causes of action, including wage and hour violations and fraud. (Ibid.) Helen Yee was added as a defendant on November 5, 2018. (ROA 9.) Defendants Yee and So filed answers on December 14 and 28, 2018, respectively. (ROA, 11, 24.) Plaintiffs requested entry of default with respect to the De...

Excerpt: ...against Plaintiff entered on May 27, 2021 (“the Judgment”) to stay enforcement of the Judgment during the pendency of Conservator's appeal. The motion is ruled on as follows. Defendant's motion is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 917.9 on grounds that the Court should exercise its discretion and require a bond or undertaking from Conservator because: (1) the judgment is large, and will almost certainly increase by a substantia...

Excerpt: ...r other amounts awarded against Plaintiff in this litigation; and requiring Plaintiff to obtain leave of court before filing any new litigant in propria persona in the courts of California, consistent with Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7. The motion is ruled on as follows. The notice of motion states ISS makes the motion on the following grounds: (1) Plaintiff has attempted to relitigate issues, without regard to procedure or merit, even af...

Excerpt: ...nd the Court's tentative ruling procedure. If counsel for moving party is unable to contact counsel for opposing party prior to the hearing, counsel for moving party shall be available at the hearing, via Zoom video or audio, in the event opposing party appears without following the procedure set forth in Local Rule 1.06(B). Plaintiff Jazmine E. Tucker ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint against FCA US LLC and Elk Grove Dodge arising from a purchase ...

Excerpt: ...ing party forthwith and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. If counsel for moving party is unable to contact counsel for opposing party prior to the hearing, counsel for moving party shall be available at the hearing, via Zoom video or audio, in the event opposing party appears without following the procedure set forth in Local Rule 1.06(B). Plaintiff is a former non‐exempt employee of Defendant Life Ge...

Excerpt: ...Defendant's and Plaintiff's requests for judicial notice are granted. Defendant's notice of motion states it “brings this motion on the grounds that AIG's claims lack support in both law and evidence.” The notice of motion does not comply with the requirements of Rule of Court 3.1350(b), which provides: “If made in the alternative, a motion for summary adjudication may make reference to and depend on the same evidence submitted in support o...

Excerpt: .... The parties reached an informal settlement in which Plaintiff agreed to dismiss the action in exchange for the statutory repurchase of the subject motorcycle, with attorneys' fees and costs to be determined by motion. Pursuant to the settlement, the parties stipulated that Plaintiff is the “prevailing party” for purposes of this motion. The Act provides that a court “shall” award a prevailing buyer a “sum equal to the aggregate amount...

Excerpt: ...nly known as Madeira East Village, constructed and sold by Taylor Morrison of California, LLC, and other related entities. Defendant seeks to stay the action and to compel compliance with SB 800 Right to Repair Act. (Civil Code 930(b) Plaintiffs and Taylor Morrison were actively engaging in the pre‐litigation process as required SB 800, which affords Taylor Morrison the absolute right to inspect and effectuate repairs to Plaintiffs' homes befor...

Excerpt: ...ir Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) violations, including sex and race harassment. Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that individual Defendant Mark Carrillo ("Carrillo") harassed her on a daily basis, that individual Defendant Brent Harwood ("Harwood") constantly made racially and sexually offensive comments and conduct to her throughout her employment, that both Carrillo and Harwood made such comments in front of other coworkers, and Plaintiff...

Excerpt: ...t in an expedited fashion. (See ROA 12) The Request for Judicial Notice by Plaintiff James V. Lacy is denied. Plaintiff asks the Court to take judicial notice of information about an ongoing murder trial as well as a news article and television news clip related to the trial. A news article and a television news clip cannot be used to establish the truth of the matters asserted. Courts should not take judicial notice where the subject matter is n...

Excerpt: ...assment, failure to prevent harassment/retaliation and retaliation. Plaintiff alleges that he interviewed with Defendant Arakji for a position at GSA as an Information Technology Specialist 1 in April 2019. (Comp. ¶ 14.) He alleges that Defendant Arakji offered him the position in May 2019 and he accepted. (Id.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Arakji began to engage in inappropriate conduct soon after he started the position. He alleges that De...

Excerpt: ...der FEHA for age discrimination, harassment based on age, and retaliation. He also alleges a cause of action for constructive discharge Prior to the instant motion to strike, Defendant demurred on three occasions to the previous iterations of the complaint. Defendant moves to strike paragraph 10 of the 5AC which alleges that prior to the 2016 school year, Defendant “notified Plaintiff that he would be involuntarily removed from teaching high sc...

Excerpt: ...nimum wages, provide meal and rest breaks, and more in violation of the Labor Code. By way of the instant motion Plaintiff seeks leave to file a first amended complaint to allege that the Defendants are personally liable under Labor Code § 558.1. Plaintiff also seeks to make other minor changes including removing a defendant. Plaintiff also seeks to reopen discovery on the basis that a significant period of time has passed since the initial tria...

Excerpt: ...est Service Co. Inc. (Plaintiff) filed the underlying complaint on November 25, 2020 against Defendant Lisa Wiley (Defendant), alleging common counts. (ROA 1.) Defendant failed to respond to the summons and complaint. Plaintiff requested Entry of Default against Defendant on March 17, 2021, which the Court entered on that same date. (ROA 7, 8.) Defendant now moves to set aside the entry of default and Plaintiff opposes the motion on the merits. A...

Excerpt: ...laint alleged negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress and the following violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act: (1) discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, national original, or color; (2) disability discrimination; (3) retaliation; (4) hostile work environment based on race, ancestry, national origin or color; (5) hostile work environment based on disability; (6) hostile work environment based on Plaintiff's ...

Excerpt: ...2012. Kohl filed a lawsuit against the Truongs in July 2012, claiming the Truongs breached their contract (Construction Action). The Truongs hired Larry Ring, Esq., who filed a cross‐complaint against Kohl in August 2013. Larry Ring withdrew from representation of the Truongs in May 2014. The Truongs then retained the law firm Nageley, Meredith, & Miller, Inc., where attorneys Jim Keowen and Andrew Weil (Keowen and Weil, respectively) handled m...

Excerpt: ...mended Class and Representative Action Complaint (SAC), Defendant Roofline, Inc. (Defendant) is a roofing and building material supplier and delivery company. (SAC, ¶ 14.) Plaintiffs and other non‐exempt employees were required to load heavy building materials from Defendant's warehouse to flatbed trucks, and then deliver the orders to Defendant's customers or job sites. (SAC, ¶ 15.) On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff Gary Sifuentes filed a clas...

Excerpt: ...smissing Plaintiff's putative class/representative action claims in accordance with the class/representative action waiver contained in the DRP; and staying this action until an arbitration was conducted and concluded. Plaintiff opposes the motion, arguing his PAGA claim cannot be compelled to individual arbitration because (1) Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, bars individual arbitration of PAGA claims as against pu...

Excerpt: ...udgment or summary adjudication if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issues as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c); Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18, 35.) Section 437c(c) imposes an affirmative duty on a court to grant a summary judgment motion in an appropriate case. (Preach v. Moister Rainbow (1993) 12 Cal.App.4th 1441, 1450.) The Court...

Excerpt: ... and Plaintiff fails to show that any classification adopted by the Tiered Registry Law is not rationally related to any conceivable state objective. The demurrer is ruled on as follows. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06(D). Counsel for moving party is directed to contact opposing party forthwith and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling...

Excerpt: ...mine whether a proposed settlement in a class action is fair. (Rebney v. Wells Fargo Bank (1990) 220 Cal. App.3rd 1117, 1138.) The law favors settlement, particularly in class actions and other complex cases where substantial resources can be conserved by avoiding the time, cost, and rigors of formal litigation. (See Newberg on Class Actions 4th (4th ed. 2002) § 11.41 (and cases cited therein); Class Plaintiffs v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 1992)...

Excerpt: ...essed and used his medical records in connection with their divorce and child custody proceedings. This Court previously granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment but that order was reversed by the Third District Court of Appeal as to the causes of action for invasion of privacy and IIED. Plaintiff is not claiming any bodily injury in this action though he does allege that experienced significant emotional distress as a result of the use of...

Excerpt: ...r and race and in retaliation for making an internal complaint of discrimination/harassment against her supervisor. At issue on the instant motion are Plaintiff's responses to SMUD's requests for admissions (set one) and the accompanying form interrogatory 17.1 (which asks for facts/witnesses/documents supporting any denial of the request for admissions). The subject discovery relates to Plaintiff's allegations that she suffered severe emotional ...

Excerpt: ...leging causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, “deceit,” “concealment,” based on allegations that Plaintiff charges credit card interest in excess of allowable rates. Cross‐complaint seeks leave to amend his cross‐complaint which he originally filed in March 2019 to delete two causes of action for deceit and fraud to “streamline[] his action into two causes of action which will...

Excerpt: ...21, by the Hon. Cecily Bond (ret.) in Respondent's favor. The arbitration arose from Petitioners' claims for intentional misrepresentation, breach of contract and the breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with Respondent's sale of Insight Computing, LLC and Shedlight Technology, LLC to them. Petitioners claimed that Respondent provided inaccurate and misleading information regarding the financial condition of the compani...

Excerpt: ...eks to seal the entirety of Kathryn Hoops' deposition transcripts which are exhibits C‐E in support of the motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends that the transcripts contain proprietary, confidential and private information. Defendant also seeks to seal portions of its memorandum of points and authorities, and portions of its separate statement in support of its upcoming motion for summary judgment that reference Helberg's declaration...

Excerpt: ...ENIED IN PART as follows. Background This litigation arises from a business dispute in which Plaintiffs Ericson Real Estate LLC, Chris MacPhail, and Dorothy MacPhail (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendants 3 Point Real Estate & Construction, Inc. (“3 Point”) and Chris MacPhail (“Chris”) took profits belonging to the partnership. According to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Scott Ericson (“Scott”) met Chris and his wif...

Excerpt: ...Defendant then filed an Answer. Attached to the Declaration of Hanna Kerfan (“Kerfan Decl.”) as Exhibit "2" are Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions (“RFAs”). Plaintiff asserts that “In response to the Request for Admissions, Defendant implicitly admitted they were issued the Credit Card in question and directly admitted that they were the only person to use the credit card in question. Furthermore, Defendant admi...

Excerpt: ... investment property. Now that they are no longer in a relationship, each disputes the other's interest(s) in that investment property. (Compare Compl. with Cross‐Compl.) Plaintiff Christopher Steele initiated this action when he filed his verified complaint on September 27, 2019, alleging a cause of action for partition by sale of real property and a cause of action for accounting. According to Plaintiff's Complaint, the real property at issue...

Excerpt: ...(Plaintiff) and various Defendants with respect to a purchase and sales agreement for the purchase of real property known as the Howe Manor Apartments (the Property) for $15,800,000. Plaintiff filed its original complaint on September 13, 2019 (ROA #1), a First Amended Complaint on October 24, 2019 (ROA #9), a Second Amended Complaint on July 16, 2020 (ROA #137), and a Third Amended Complaint on June 5. 2019. (ROA #165.) According to the Third Am...

Excerpt: ...twelfth cause of action for fraudulent concealment in Plaintiffs' operative complaint. The motion is ruled on as follows. Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice is granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the Court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dept. of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 (judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings are ...

Excerpt: ...eers v. Dept. of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 (judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings are true); Steed v. Dept. of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121.) Plaintiff David Ben Vanenger purchased a 2014 Jeep Wrangler (“the Vehicle”) manufactured by Defendant FCA. (Compl. ¶ 7.) The purchase was memorialized in the sales contract titled Retail Installment Sale Contract ‐ Simple Finance Char...

Excerpt: ...efendant's request for judicial notice is granted. Defendant alleges Plaintiff's first cause of action for implied‐in‐fact contract, second cause of action for open book account, third cause of action for quantum meruit, and fourth cause of action for quantum meruit each fail because Plaintiff was required to accept as payment in full the Medi‐Cal fee schedule amounts set by state and federal law. Defendant also claims the first cause of ac...

Excerpt: ...s") Motion for a Protective Order to Prevent the Deposition of the Person Most Knowledgeable ("PMK") from Plum Healthcare Group, LLC Regarding the Management Agreement Between GI Partners and Plum Healthcare Group LLC is denied. Plaintiffs Gerard Follettie, by and through his successor‐in‐ interest, Gerard Joseph Follettie; Gerard Joseph Follettie, individually, Gary E. Follettie, individually, Cindy Lehr, individually; and Kimberly G. Phipps...

Excerpt: ...allege, among other things, that Defendant Land Home Financial Services, Inc. ("Defendant") failed to compensate them for all hours worked, including minimum wage and overtime, among other things. Plaintiffs bring the action individually, on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and on behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys' General Act ("PAGA"). (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) at 1.) The ...

Excerpt: ...ecorded land documents, not contracts, are the subject of judicial notice on demurrer].) The court, however, does not accept the truth of any facts within the judicially noticed documents except to the extent such facts are beyond reasonable dispute. (See Poseidon Devel., 152 Cal.App.4th at 1117‐18.) see also Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 265 (“[A] court may take judicial notice of the fact of a document's rec...

Excerpt: ...rising out of damage to their home caused by water intrusion. The Complaint was filed February 4, 2021. Plaintiffs filed several claims under their policy with Nationwide concerning water damage to their residence. Bullseye was hired by Nationwide in January and February of 2017 to conduct an investigation of the water damage. Nationwide and Bullseye informed Plaintiffs after the first claim that the cause of the leak was wear, tear and cracks in...

Excerpt: ...e violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. (See Ruling on Motion for Summary Adjudication, ROA 283) In its motion for summary adjudication, Bank contended Kronick could not enforce the written contract because Kronick violated the Rules of Professional responsibility by not disclosing and obtaining waiver of a conflict. " Bank asserts the law firm's failure to obtain a written conflict waiver from a client rendered the fee agreement with t...

Excerpt: ...ied. Plaintiff's motion is made upon the grounds that (1) Defendant improperly asserted boilerplate objections without justification, and (2) Defendant refuses to provide Codecompliant supplemental responses. Defendant opposes the motion arguing that its objections based upon the privacy of its employees encompassed by the two requests are valid and meritorious, and that Plaintiff has not satisfied its burden to overcome the privacy protections o...

Excerpt: ...tability defects including mold and mildew growth, water leaks, no heat, defective heater, rodent infestation, cockroach infestation, and inadequate weather stripping, among other defects. Plaintiff alleges causes of action for Breach of the Warranty of Habitability (Civil Code 1941) Violation of Civil Code 1942.4, Breach of Contract Civil Code 3300, Breach of Quiet Enjoyment Civil Code 1927, Private Nuisance Civil Code 3501, Premises Liability, ...

Excerpt: ... with the issues presented by this motion is in dispute. “Taking judicial notice of a document is not the same as accepting the truth of its contents or accepting a particular interpretation of its meaning.” (citation omitted) While courts take judicial notice of public records, they do not take notice of the truth of matters stated therein. (citation omitted) ‘When judicial notice is taken of a document, … the truthfulness and proper int...

Excerpt: ...es in pertinent part: "The reference is pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 639 and is solely for purposes of hearing all current and future discovery motions. Motions concerning procedural issues (i.e., motions to reopen discovery, motion to change the discovery cutoff, etc.) are not within the scope of the reference." (ROA 784). This elder abuse case has a trial preference date of October 12, 2021. Plaintiff Helen Williams was a residen...

Excerpt: ...015, (2) a single sentence of the Medical Board of California's Expert Reviewer Guidelines, that was not attached to the copy of the request that was served on Petitioner, and (3) the dissent in an unrelated and irrelevant case. “Taking judicial notice of a document is not the same as accepting the truth of its contents or accepting a particular interpretation of its meaning.” ) While courts take judicial notice of public records, they do not...

Excerpt: ...on based on physical disability/medical condition, retaliation, failure to accommodate, failure to prevent discrimination/retaliation, sexual and racial harassment and a cause of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Plaintiff, who is an African‐American female worked for Defendant as a leasing agent for three years. She alleges that her superiors discussed their sex life around her, made derogatory racial comments and ...

Excerpt: ...�SJUSD”) and Defendant Bryan Irwin, the vice‐principal of Bella Vista High School for negligence. The action arises out an incident on April 13, 2018 when Plaintiffs were allegedly assaulted by non‐moving Defendants Austin Shanks, Jaden Koenig and Hadi Mischal on the Bella Vista campus. Plaintiffs have alleged causes of action against the non‐moving Defendants which are not the subject of the instant motion. Plaintiffs allege that moving ...

Excerpt: ...ion, the Court found that Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that Defendant's cross‐complaint arose from protected activity. Defendant now seeks fees pursuant to CCP § 425.16(c)(1) on the basis that Plaintiff's anti‐SLAPP motion was frivolous. Defendant seeks $14,542 in fees representing $10,775 in fees for opposing the anti‐SLAPP motion and $3,767 in fees for the instant fees motion. The Court considered Plaintiff's untimely reply which was ...

Excerpt: ...gs in this action and in the Winkey action, are unopposed and are granted. In taking judicial notice of these documents, the Court accepts the fact of their existence, not the truth of their contents. (See Professional Engineers v. Dep't of Transp. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 543, 590 [judicial notice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings of fact are true]; Steed v. Department of Consumer Affairs (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 112, 120‐121.) This...

Excerpt: ...f default and default judgment, the Court's electronic docket does not reflect that default judgment has actually been entered against her. The Court cannot set aside a default judgment that has not actually been entered. Accordingly, the Court construes this motion as a motion to set aside the entry default as against Defendant on June 7, 2021 (Register of Actions (“ROA”) 14‐15). Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section § 473(b) and (d...

Excerpt: ...of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06. Moving counsel is directed to contact Plaintiff's counsel and advise counsel of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact Plaintiff's counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing via Zoom or by telephone. Background Pla...