Excerpt: ...to that cause of action. Once the defendant . . . has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff . . . to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to that cause of action or a defense thereto.” Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (f)(1), provides, in part, “A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more...

Excerpt: ...arch 21, 2015 through the date of production. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Kevin Garcia (“Garcia”) subpoena seeks documents protected by Defendant/Cross-Complainant Martin Arteaga's (“Arteaga”) right to privacy. (Fortunato v. Superior Ct. (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 475, 480-81 [financial records are protected by individual's right to privacy]; Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Ct. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 656 [individual has right to privacy in his o...

Excerpt: ... overbroad, vague and ambiguous, seeks information outside the scope of discovery, and violates the privacy rights of both ASAS and Sadruddin; (2) the subpoena is overbroad, vague and ambiguous because it refers to “any named parties or entities” without defining who those named parties or entities are; (3) the subpoena is premature because it seeks Defendants' financial information in violation of Civil Code section 3295(c) and because there...

Excerpt: ...e interrogatories to request the identity and location of those with knowledge of discoverable matters.”). The party responding to interrogatories must answer in a manner as “complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available” permits; if the interrogatory cannot be answered completely, then it must be answered to the extent possible. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.220(b). A party may file a motion to compel further responses to ...

Excerpt: ...o arbitrate the controversy, the court itself must determine whether the agreement exists and, if any defense to its enforcement is raised, whether it is enforceable. Because the existence of the agreement is a statutory prerequisite to granting the petition, the petitioner bears the burden of proving its existence by a preponderance of the evidence. If the party opposing the petition raises a defense to enforcement--either fraud in the execution...

Excerpt: ...ff, within 30 days, the sum of $1,225, which is the amount the Court finds reasonable. The Request for Judicial Notice is denied as unnecessary. (See Cal. Prac. Guide, Civil Procedure before Trial §9:53.1a (“It is not necessary to ask the court to take judicial notice of materials previously filed in the case”; all that is necessary is to call the court's attention to such papers. Such papers however, are not necessarily admissible evidence....

Excerpt: ...nd/or Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Motion No. 1: Defendant C.G. Landscape, Inc.: An answer to the complaint is required to make “A statement of any new matter constituting a defense.” (CCP 431.30 (b) (2)). “'[A]ny issue on which defendant bears the burden of proof at trial is ‘new matter' and must be specially pleaded in the answer.'” Mountain Air Enterprises, LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLC (2017) 3 Cal.5th 744, 756. On 4/30/18, Defend...

Excerpt: ... Third Cause of Action (Fraud). The demurrer to the third cause of action for fraud is sustained with leave to amend. Active concealment or suppression of facts is the equivalent of actual fraud. (Civ. Code, § 1572(3).) The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent concealment are: (i) concealment or suppression of a material fact; (ii) by a defendant with a duty to disclose the fact to the plaintiff; (iii) defendant's intent to defraud plain...

Excerpt: ...r Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c)(1) after Dismissal Section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) provides that a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c); City of Los Angeles v. Animal Defense League (2006) 135 Cal. App. 4th 606, 627. When a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the action after the SLAPP motion has been filed and before the tri...

Excerpt: ...ld Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to support the position of the party in question.” (Id. at p. 851.) A defendant moving for summary judgment satisfies his ...

Excerpt: ...ply with Corporations Code section 2105, the court sustained the demurrers of Defendants DynaPass, Inc. (“DynaPass”) and Miguel Medina (“Medina”) (together, “Defendants”) on the basis that Plaintiffs lacked capacity to maintain the instant action. (Id.) On May 13, 2019, Plaintiffs filed their Fourth Amended Complaint (“4AC”). Defendants demur to the 4AC, inter alia, on the grounds that Plaintiffs lack capacity to sue. California l...

Excerpt: ...p. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 651, 659-660.) However, the truth of statements “may be accepted when made by a party but not those of third parties or an opponent.” (C.R. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp. (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1094, 1103.) In addition, “the contents of a document may only be accepted ‘where there is not or cannot be a factual dispute concerning that which is sought to be judicially noticed.'…And the general rule is that the truthfu...

Excerpt: ...cate any intent to seek relief pursuant to this provision. Applying the 3-year statute of limitation, the Complaint makes clear Plaintiffs were entitled to a reconveyance on or about July of 2015. (See ¶14 of the Complaint). While Plaintiffs' Opposition asserts the claim did not accrue until 2019, when Plaintiffs incurred legal costs in pursuing this action, the Complaint alleges the Deed of Trust damaged Plaintiffs by impairing the “vendibili...

Excerpt: ... beyond a broken contractual promise,” in order to recover tort damages]; see also Aas v. Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627, 632 [economic loss rule bars an action in tort for purely economic losses in the absence of personal injury or damage to property other than the product itself], superseded by statute in construction defect actions as stated in Burch v. Superior Court (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1411, 1417; KB Home v. Superior Court (2003) ...

Excerpt: ...nctions pursuant to CCP § 128.7. This petition arises out of a Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”) relating to a development in Laguna Beach. The CDP has already been the subject of various challenges and litigation by Petitioner, including two prior petitions in Orange County Superior Court. Amended Petition, ¶¶ 15-30. The underlying CDP was approved, with conditions, on August 9, 2017. Amended Petition, ¶¶ 2, 10-23, 29 and 36. The condi...

Excerpt: ... Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850-51.) If a defendant does not meet this initial burden, the plaintiff need not oppose the motion and the motion must be denied. (Binder v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 832, 840.) If the defendant meets this initial burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of material fact. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c(p)(2); Aguilar, 25 Cal.4th ...

Excerpt: ...g document requests and interrogatories, and defendants ask that these motions be continued to give them a chance to review plaintiffs' supplemental responses. Plaintiffs and the moving party defendants must file declarations or other papers at least two weeks before the new hearing date advising the court if these motions are still going forward, and if so, as to what issues. The tentative ruling is to continue the hearing on plaintiffs' Applica...

Excerpt: ... bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Ibid.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to support the position of the party in question.” (Id. at p. 851.) “A court identifies the issues framed by the pleadings, determines whether the moving party's showing has established facts which negate the opponent's claim and justify a judgment i...

Excerpt: ...essary is to call the court's attention to such papers.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2018) ¶ 9.53.1a.) “[F]rom commencement to conclusion, the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “A prima ...

Excerpt: ...l notice is GRANTED. Defendant has filed evidentiary objections (ROA 73) to Plaintiff's declaration in support of her opposition (ROA 68). Objections 1 and 3 are SUSTAINED. Objections 2 and 4 are OVERRULED. GROUNDS FOR RULING This is a putative wage-and-hour class/PAGA action in which Plaintiff alleges she and other employees of Defendant were regularly forced to work off the clock and were denied meal and rest breaks. She brings substantive clai...

Excerpt: ...at p. 2.) Instead, Defendant offered to supplement responses on the condition that Plaintiff respond to a settlement offer by the next business day. (Id.) Plaintiff's decision not to accept that conditional offer does not evidence a failure to meet and confer in good faith. Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220 provides that should the responding party give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit all or part of an RFA...

Excerpt: ...n the alternative, summary adjudication of the 1st-4th c/a against Plaintiffs William and Louise Debnam on the ground that in connection with a separate case relating to the servicing of the loan which forms the basis of the claims in this action, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. YC072073, the Debnams waived all claims against Defendant. Exhibit 9 submitted in support of the motion establishes that on 11/8/17, William and Louise Debnam entered...

Excerpt: ...resentation of CTI and interests adverse to CTI. In the Mesa case Catanzarite is representing the plaintiffs in a derivative action on behalf of CTI, meaning that his representation is for the benefit of CTI. Thus, the same principles that warranted Catanzarite's disqualification in the FinCanna case apply to the Mesa case and compel disqualification here. The pending motion in the FinCanna case is to disqualify Catanzarite from representing thre...

Excerpt: ...urt assumes the parties' familiarity with the background of this long-running matter. This ruling sets forth only the facts necessary to dispose of the present motion. Through this motion, Cross-Defendants seek to recover an additional $926,000 in attorney's fees, which are broken down into three categories: “(1) attorney's fees incurred by Child and Amberhill, but not previously awarded, defending against claims concerning the SRA and claims f...

Excerpt: ...entry of judgment. CRC 3.1700; Daniels v. Robbins (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 204, 228. The memorandum must include a supporting declaration affirming that the costs were reasonable and necessarily incurred. CRC 3.1700(a)(1). If the items in the cost bill appear on their face to be proper (by comparing the cost bill to the list of recoverable costs in CCP §1033.5), the verified memorandum of costs is prima facie evidence of their propriety. The burde...