Excerpt: ...or Production No. 19 , however, is overbroad. Plaintiff has not set forth good cause showing the relevance of documents that are not limited to the transmission defects identified in the repair history for the Subject Vehicle. Because Plaintiff has made a showing fact- specific showing of good cause, the burden shifts to Defendant to justify any objections made to requests for production. Defendant has not filed an opposition or response to th...

Excerpt: ...y to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleadings under attack; or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) No extrinsic evidence can be considered. (Ion Equipment Corp. v. N elson (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 868, 881.) Therefore, the Court did not consider facts regarding the PPM or the Evertrust Loan Agreement that appear outside the allegations of the FAC in ruling o...

Excerpt: ...2020.010(b), 2025.280(b ); see Terry v. SLICO (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 352, 357, (citing text)] (Code Civ. Proc. § 1985 et seq. dealing with subpoenas generally also apply to deposition Page 3 of 39 subpoenas except as modified by § 2020.010 et seq.; see Code Civ. Proc. § 2020.030.] Personal service of a deposition subpoena requires a person who is a resident of California to appear, testify and produce whatever documents or things are specifi...

Excerpt: ...Cal.3d 311, 318.) A demurrer only tests the sufficiency of the pleadings (See Satyadi v. West Contra Costa Healthcare District (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 1022, 1028 [in analyzing a demurrer, the court looks o nly to the fac e of th e pleadings and to matters judi cially not iceable]). 1st cause of action for wrongful death/negligence against Travis Hadden An amendment filed after the statute of limitations has run will be deemed filed as of the dat...

Excerpt: ....” (Ladd v. Cou nty of San Mateo (1996) 12 Cal.4th 913, 917.) Plaintiff has sufficiently pled facts to constitute a cause of action for negligence. “[T]he Legislature did not require of regional centers anything like the hour -by -hour monitoring that would have been requir ed to prevent Bobby's tragic death. A regional center is required to establish a “schedule of regular periodic review and reevaluation to ascertain that planned serv...

Excerpt: ...overy pro cedures.” (Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) Errors and confusion created by “the inept pleader” are to be forgiven if the pleading contains sufficient facts entitling plaintiff to relief. (Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal. App. 3d 905, 908.) A party attacking a pleading on “uncertainty” grounds must specify how and why the pleading is uncertain, and where that uncertainty can be found in t...

Excerpt: ...nt cites to Janken v. GM Hughes Elec. (1996) 46 Cal.App.5th 55, 64 -65 as legal authority. In Opposition, Plaintiff contends that the Court previously found a viable claim could be pled based on Plaintiff's protected status if alleged; that the SAC pleads that Plaintiff went on medical leave on 4/23/2020, returned, and then Defendant Leano's conduct worsened when she returned (see SAC, ¶¶ 23 and 32); and the fact that a defendant is in a manage...

Excerpt: ...9;s stated cause of action. (Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa Rosa (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 873, 879- 880.) As to the first, second, third, fourth, and ninth affirmative defenses, Plaintiffs merely assert that they do not qualify as affirmative defenses because they are simply denials of elements of the causes of action in the Complaint. However, Plaintiffs provide no authority for the idea attacking specific elements of a cause of act...

Excerpt: ...24, Cross -Defendants timely filed and serv ed a supplemental declaration pursuant to the Court's March 7, 2024 Minute Order. Despite apparent telephonic conferences to meet and confer held on March 15, 2024, and March 26, 2024, it appears that the parties failed to reach an agreement concerning any of the 11 causes of action at issue. Standing for Dessau and M86 Cross -Defendants contend that Dessau and M86 lack standing to file a lawsuit agai...

Excerpt: ... The opposition was to include why the Court should not sustain, without leave to amend, the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint. (See ROA 60.) Initially, the Court notes that the opposition does not have a proof of service. A proof of service of the opposition must be filed with the court. (California Rules of Court, rule 1.21(b).) Nevertheless, as a reply on the merits has been filed, the Court will address the merits of the demurrer. The...

Excerpt: ...ht $2,451.64 arising from Defendants' failure to pay the HOA assessments plus related fees and costs of suit. On 11/18/20, the parties entered into a stipulated judgment against Defendants in the amount of $5,791.74 with fees/costs to be determined. The Court awar ded $13,500 in attorney fees on 2/11/21. On 4/22/21, the Court granted a motion to set aside the judgment. The Court denied Defendants' motion to disqualify counsel on 6/10/21. The Cour...

Excerpt: ...d Faith Settlement H enkel moves for an order determining that the settlement between Henkel and Plaintiff Mischa Denton (“Plaintiff”) was entered into in good faith pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. There is no precise yardstick for measuring “goo d faith” of a settlement with one of several tortfeasors. But a court must harmonize the public policy favoring settlements with the competing public policy favoring...

Excerpt: ...dence Pl aintiff asserts she has new evidence that justifies reopening the case. The problem with her argument is that a final judgment was entered in the case by Judge George, and it was affirmed on appeal, and the remittitur was issued in November 2022. Even if it were relevant, there is no showing that any of this information, evidence, or argument is new. If anything, much of it is a repeat of the arguments made previously, and specificall...

Excerpt: ...l is curre ntly set for May 6, 2024. The plaintiff never posted jury fees. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631, subdivision (c)(2), a party demanding a jury trial must post fees within 365 days of the filing of the initial complaint if no Case Managemen t Conference is held. None was held here; therefore, plaintiff's failure to timely post fees resulted in his waiver of a jury. Defendant never posted jury fees, but it is not requesti...

Excerpt: ...ward time ly filed. The Court heard these Motions on 3/28/24 but continued the hearing to allow for further briefing on Petitioner's new argument made for the first time at the hearing. (ROA 47) Petitioner argued that the Motion to Quash should be denied because th e "general appearance" waived any objection to jurisdiction made in Respondents' Motion to Quash. The Court now considers that briefing in addition to the original brie...

Excerpt: ...Lifeguard Operations Division The City. According to the proof of service attached to the motion, the email address used by plaintiff for the City's counsel is “[email protected]” and the correct email address appears to be “[email protected],” based o n the Court's records. With regard to the motions for reconsideration, such must be filed within 10 days of service on her of notice of entry of the order in question. (Code C...

Excerpt: ...hibits are attach ed to the operative Complaint. (See ROA 2.) Plaintiff filed a Supplement to Complaint attaching what appears to be a 3 -day notice to quit, dated November 1, 2022. (ROA 10.) According to the declaration of service, the notice was personally handed to De fendant Robert Campbell on November 1, 2022. Notably, the dates in the Supplement to Complaint do not match the dates and actions as alleged in the Complaint. II. Request for Ju...

Excerpt: ...at there i s no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of persuasion thereon. (See Evid. Code, § 500.) There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the evidence would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find the underlying fact in favor of the party opposing the motion in ac...

Excerpt: ...t p. 5:16- 18.) However, Plaintiff has not shown that she filed the instant motion in sufficient time in advance of the time limit for the completion of discovery (the 15th day before the initial trial date) to permit the deposition of any expert to whom the motion relates to be taken within that time limit. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2034.610(b); 2024.030.) Trial in this case has been continued several times. Trial was initially set for 4/10/23...

Excerpt: ...ntic Richfi eld Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) “A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (a)(1).) “Th e motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to ...

Excerpt: ...for b rea c h of implied- in-fact con tract and breach of implied -in -law contract. The Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. As to the 1st cause of action for breach of oral contract, this claim is not sufficiently pled. “An oral contract may be pleaded generally as to its effect, because it i s rarely possible to allege the exact words.” (Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) Nevertheless, “[t]he elements of...

Excerpt: ... trial court concluded that Plaintiffs were entitled to recover attorney fees, but awarded only $198,445. Plaintiffs appealed, and the court of appeal reversed the order on Plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees for three reasons. The court of appeal held: “First, the court erred by concluding that not all Plaintiffs were entitled to recover fees. Second, the court set an hourly rate for Plaintiffs' lead counsel that was far lower than the market...

Excerpt: ...Act”] aff ords certain protections to elders and dependent adults.” (Winn v. Pioneer Medical Group, Inc. (2016) 63 Cal.4th 148, 152 (Winn).) “‘The purpose of the [Act was] essentially to protect a particularly vulnerable portion of the population from gross mistre atment in the form of abuse and custodial neglect.' [Citation.]” (Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court (2004) 32 Cal.4th 771, 787 (Covenant Care).). The acts proscribed by th...

Excerpt: ...(Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “A prima facie showing is one that is sufficient to support the position of the party in question.” (Id. at p. 851.) A defendant moving for summary judgment satisfies his or her initial burden by show ing that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) A ...

Excerpt: ..., are seale d. Statement of Law “Unless confidentiality is required by law, court records are presumed to be open.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.550(c); In re Marriage of Tamir (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 1068, 1079.) “A record must not be filed under seal without a cour t order. The court must not permit a record to be filed under seal based solely on the agreement or stipulation of the parties.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.551(a).) “A p...

Excerpt: ...atter of cost s ….” (Bankes v. Lucas (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 365, 369; Carpenter v. Jack in the Box Corp. (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 454, 461, 59 Cal.Rptr.3d 839 [appeal did not divest trial court of jurisdiction to consider fees and costs].) CCP Section 998 Offers and Their Effect on Costs “ ‘ “[C]osts” of a civil action consist of the expenses of litigation .... The right to recover any such costs is determined entirely by statute.' ” (O...

Excerpt: ... a record, the movin g party must file a motion for such relief, along with a memorandum and a declaration containing facts sufficient to justify the sealing. (CRC 2.551(b)(1).) The motion must be served on all parties, and unless the court orders otherwise, a complete copy of the document must be served on all other parties that already possess copies, along with the redacted version. (CRC 2.551(b)(2).) To grant a motion to seal, the court must...

Excerpt: ...rior Court Probate Case No. 2023 -01346391. The court grants the request to take judicial notice of the documents but not as to the truth of the matters stated therein. (Evid. Code § 452 (d) and (h); Richtek USA, Inc. v. UPI Semiconductor Corp. (2015) 242 Cal.App. 4th 651, 658.) Plaintiff seeks further responses to the first set of form interrogatories 15.1, 17.1, 50.1, 50.2, 50.3, 50.4, 50.5, and 50.6. If a timely motion to compel has been fi...

Excerpt: ...ses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Monetary Sanctions Plaintiff Colleen Curtin's unopposed Motion to Compel Defendant Alexandra Mendoza's Initial Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One and Special Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED. A party's failure to timely respond to interrogatories results in a waiver of any objections to the requests. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290(a).) If a party to whom interrogatories fails to s...

Excerpt: ...ecificity as to the element s of active concealment and existence of a defect. Defendants also argue that Plaintiff has not alleged when or where the alleged omitted information should or could have been revealed by Ford. Defendants further argue that the allegations fail to demonstr ate any duty to disclose because there was no transactional relationship between Plaintiff and Ford and that the claim is barred by the economic loss rule. The Cour...

Excerpt: ...er now but admonishes Defendant that the future failure to comply with all applicable rules and statutes may result in a motion being denied or taken off calendar, and sanctions, where appropriate. First Cause of Action for Inducing Breach of Contract and Second Cause of Actio n for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations Defendant argues that the first cause of action fails to plead sufficient facts showing that Plaintiff had an ong...

Excerpt: ...establishe s an affirmative defense to that cause of action. (p) For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication: (1) A plaintiff or cross -complainant has met his or her burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that par ty has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or crosscomplainant has met that burden, the burden shif...

Excerpt: ...an element of the claim, or that it has a complete defense entitling it to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850- 851 (Aguilar).) If the defendant fails to meet this initial b urden, the plaintiff need not oppose the motion and the motion must be denied. (Binder v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 832, 840.) If the defendant meets its initial bu...

Excerpt: ...a motion pursuan t to Section 391.1 is filed prior to trial the litigation is stayed, and the moving defendant need not plead, until 10 days after the motion shall have been denied, or if granted, until 10 days after the required security has been furnished and the moving defendant given written notice thereof. When a motion pursuant to Section 391.1 is made at any time thereafter, the litigation shall be stayed for such period after the denial ...

Excerpt: ...el arbitration und er Section 1281.2 must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) The parties entered into a written agreement to arbitrate; and (2) one or more of the claims at issue are covered by that agreement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2; Villacreses v. Molina ri (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 1223, 1230.) If the moving party meets this burden, the burden shifts to the resisting party to prove by a preponderance of evidence a defense to e...

Excerpt: ... The Court further granted 252 5 Main summary adjudication of Issue 9, which sought judgment on the second cause of action for disgorgement in 2525 Main's crosscomplaint as to Pacific LLC. (ROA 207.) The first cause of action of 2525 Main's cross -complaint was dismissed on 07/14/23. (RO A 300.) Thus, the only remaining claim is 2525 Main's second cause of action against Pacific INC. On 09/28/23, the Court signed an order releasing Pacific LL...

Excerpt: ...;s injuries.' [Citation.] ” (PacifiCare of California v. Bright Medical Associates, Inc. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1451, 1464 (PacifiCare.) The California Supreme Court in Tech -Bilt v. Woodward -Clyde & Assoc. (1985) 38 Cal. 3d 488 (Tech- Bilt), set forth the factors to consider. The fa ctors are: (1) a rough approximation of plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability; (2) the amount paid in settlement; (3) the allocat...

Excerpt: ...GRANTED as follows. Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 provides, in pertinent part: If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce...

Excerpt: ...lenged in post -trial proceedings on appeal.” (Motion; 4:8 -9.) Plaintiff's (Wen Yu Zheng) Opposition to Motion to Stay Enforcement of Judgment (Opposition), filed on 4 -10 - 24 under ROA No. 1164, states, “Gene's Motion is incomplete in that it provides no substantive reaso ns or evidence as to why the Court should take the extraordinary step of staying enforcement of judgment.” (Opposition; 3:1415.) Code of Civil Procedure section 918 st...

Excerpt: ...of ruling. Plaintiff Randell Young is ORDERED to pay to Defendants Seabreeze Management Company, Inc., Estela Alday, Heidi Speare, Eric James, Fred Olsen, and Todd Hunter sanctions in the amount of $925 (5 hours x $185 per hour in reasonable attorney's fees) within 30 days of service of the notice of ruling. Defendants Seabreeze Management Company, Inc.; Estela Alday; Heidi Speare; Eric James; Fred Olsen; and Todd Hunter are ORDERED to serve all ...

Excerpt: ... Hartwick D efendants' demurrer to the first cause of action for quiet title in the initial complaint with leave to amend on 06/16/2023. Plaintiffs filed the FAC on 06/26/2023. “A quiet title action seeks to declare the rights of the parties in realty.... The object o f the action is to finally settle and determine, as between the parties, all conflicting claims to the property in controversy, and to decree to each such interest or estate t...

Excerpt: ...sert the c laims due to the Divorce Decree issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, on September 29, 2023 (Divorce Decree). Specifically, Chartwell contends the Divorce Decree awarded the entire value of the “martial interest in Chartwe ll” to Tracy, Plaintiff's now ex -wife, and awarded Plaintiff nothing regarding the Chartwell shares. (See RJN, Exh. A, pp. 14, 18, 29.) Chartwell further contends, under New Yor...

Excerpt: ...e statute of limitatio ns and Plaintiff is not entitled to the delayed discovery rule. Code of Civil Procedure section 338(d) provides that an action for fraud must be brought within three years. 6 “A plaintiff must bring a claim within the limitations period after accrual of the cause of action.” Fox v. Ethicon Endo -Surgery, Inc. (2005) 35 Cal. 4th 797, 806. “Generally speaking, a cause of action accrues at ‘the time when the cause of a...

Excerpt: ...es to strike Plaintiff 's prayer for punitive damages. Defendant first argues that the fourth cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations and Plaintiff is not entitled to the delayed discovery rule. Code of Civil Procedure section 338(d) provides that an action for fraud must be brought within three years. “A plaintiff must bring a claim within the limitations period after accrual of the cause of action.” Fox v. Ethico...

Excerpt: ...urety Complai nt is a motor vehicle surety company. (Cross- Complaint (“X-C o m p .” ) , ¶¶ 1 & 5.) Old Republic issued a motion vehicle surety bond to CrossDefendant Panda Motors, Inc., under Chapter 4, Division 5 of the Vehicle Code (X -Comp., ¶ 5.) Panda Motors is a motor ve hicle dealer, which obtained a motor vehicle bond from Old Republic. (RJN, ¶ 1.) A number of persons have made claims or will make claims to Old Republic on the bo...

Excerpt: ...al Notice in Support of Demurrer to First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Barbara Travers is GRANTED as to Exhibits 1 – 3. Defendant Mark Andrew Lockwood demurs to the 1st Cause of Action of the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by Plaintiff Barbara Travers. Standard for Demurrer A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove...

Excerpt: ...ynolds (includi ng in the opposition to this demurrer): facts demonstrating a causal link between the protected activity and an adverse employment action. Reynolds efforts to align his resignation with Plaintiff Robinson's termination (3rdAC para. 64) to create Reynolds' adverse employment action fails. And Reynolds' categorizing the types of activity that amount to adverse employment action -- short of termination or demotion continue to be inad...

Excerpt: ...rer is OVERRU LED as to the first and second causes of action and SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend as to the third through fifth causes of action. The Regents demur to all five causes of action alleged in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). I. First Cau se of Action for Violation of California Whistleblower Protection Act (Govt. Code §§ 8547, et seq.) As described in Levi v. Regents of University of California: The [Califor...

Excerpt: ... Cleland Sales Corp., Blizzard Beer Systems, James Cleland, and Adam Cleland demur to the 1st through 13th Causes of Action of the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by Plaintiff Cecilio Losoya. Standard for Demurrer A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficie ncy of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. (Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App...

Excerpt: ...aint filed by Plaintiff Angelica Espinoza. Standard for Demurrer A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. (Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1404- 05.) For this reason, the court will not decide questions of fact on demurrer. (See Berryman v. Merit Prop. Mgmt., Inc. (2007) 152 Cal.Ap...

Excerpt: ...otice. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal. 3d 311, 318; Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 968, 994. Limited to the “four corners” as such, a pleading is adequate if it contains a reasonably precise statement of the ultimate facts, in ordinary and concise language, and with sufficient detail to acquaint a defendant with the nature, source and extent of the claim. Leek v. Cooper (2011) 194 Cal. App. 4th 399, 413. On demurrer, a...

Excerpt: ...inter alia, complexit y of case, skill exhibited, and results achieved. The prevailing buyer has burden of showing that fees incurred are allowable, reasonably necessary to conduct of litigation, and reasonable in amount.” (Nightingale v. Hyundai Motor America (1994) 31 Cal.App .4th 99, 104 -105.) Here, it is undisputed that Plaintiffs are the prevailing party entitled to recover fees pursuant to Civil Code §1794(d). While Defendant contends g...

Excerpt: ...01) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850-851 (Aguilar) [burden].) 24 Hour has demonstrated it was not a party to the contract at issue. (See Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman (2011) 51 Cal.4th 811, 821 [elements of breach of contract include, inter alia, existence of a contract]; Korc h e m n y v. Piterman (2021) 68 Cal.App.5th 1032, 1048 (Korchemny) [a common count used in the alternative to seek the same recovery demanded in a claim for breach of contract falls...

Excerpt: ... issued its ruling on the MTQ on 10/30/23. (ROA #212.) Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corporation (“Plaintiff”) also filed and served a Notice of Ruling on the MTQ on 10/30/23. (ROA ##208, 210.) That Notice of Ruling was served via express mail, which extends the time to file a reco nsideration motion by two-court days. (Civ. Proc. Code § 1013(c).) Thus, Defendant had until 11/11/23 to file the present Motion. Instead, Defendant did not file t...

Excerpt: ...23 Order requiring Wilshire and its former counsel, Jaime Kim, to jointly and severally pay Cross -Defendants Zenbu USA, Inc., Time Escrow, Inc., Paramount Realty and Omni Realty (collectively, “Cross -Defendants”) $5,300 in monetary sanctions related to several discovery mot ions filed by Cross- Defendants against Wilshire. As an initial matter, it is noted Wilshire did not submit an attorney affidavit of fault. Thus, relief under the manda...

Excerpt: ...hree causes of action. Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 permits a special motion to strike Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (“SLAPP”) lawsuits. A SLAPP suit is “a meritless suit filed primarily to chill the defendant's exercise of First Amendmen t rights.” (Finton Construction, Inc. v. Bidna & Keys, APLC (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 200, 208.) The purpose of the anti - SLAPP law is “not [to] insulate defendants fro...

Excerpt: ...st Calhoon, bu t both the underlying discovery requests were served on Thomas's behalf only.] Initially, the court notes Thomas timely filed a proof of service relating to both motions, but the proof is for electronic service only. Gary II is selfrepresented, and theref ore may be served electronically only if he has expressly consented to electronic service, and electronic filing does not constitute express consent to electronic service. (Code...

Excerpt: ... be true. Blakemore v. Superior Court, 129 Cal. App. 4th 36, 53 (2005). “If facts appearing in the exhibits contradict those alleged, the facts in the exhibits take precedence.” Holland v. Morse Diesel Intern., Inc., 86 Cal. App. 4th 1443, 1447 (2001). Defendant argues that the challenged allegations must be stricken because they are inconsistent and/or contradictory to the terms of the Agreement attached to the Complaint, which do not eviden...

Excerpt: ... Code of Civil Procedure § 410.30. Said section states: (a) When a court upon motion of a party or its own motion finds that in the interest of substantial justice an action should be heard in a forum outside this state, the court shall stay or dismiss the action in who le or in part on any conditions that may be just. (b) The provisions of Section 418.10 do not apply to a motion to stay or dismiss the action by a defendant who has made a gener...

Excerpt: ...Summary A djudication “Summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) In addi tion, “[a] party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or...

Excerpt: ...s required by the San Deigo County Superior Court. Plaintiffs HTL Hotel Advisors, Inc. and Yatish Natraj are ORDERED to pay to Defendants Shivam Patel and Kherva, LLC sanctions in the amount of $2,760 (6 hours x $450 per hour in reasonable attorney's fees and $60 in motion filing fees) within 60 days of service of the notice of ruling. Plaintiffs' counsel is ordered to pay sanctions of $2,360 (5 hours at $450 per hour + $60 filing fee and $50 t...

Excerpt: ... by the insp ection demand. To establish “good cause,” the burden is on the moving party to show both: (1) relevance to the subject matter (e.g., how the information in the document would tend to prove or disprove some issue in the case); and (2) specific facts justif ying discovery (e.g., why such information is necessary for trial preparation or to prevent surprise at trial). Glenfed Develop. Corp. v. Superior Court (National Union Fire In...

Excerpt: ...) Plaintiff argues that the arbitration agreement is both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. (See Armendariz v. Foundation Heath Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal 4th 83). Unconscionability is a contract defens e used to invalidate arbitration agreements without contravening the Federal Arbitration Act or California law. (See OTO, LLC v. Kho (2019) 8 Cal.5th 111, 125.) The evidence does reflect some level of procedural unconscio...

Excerpt: ...le 3.1354, subdivision (b). Defendants' Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence Nos. 3, 4, 11 and 15 are OVERRULED. The court declines to rule on the remaining objections on the grounds that they are not material to the disposition of the Motion. Procedural defect: Defendants' separate statement is deficient as to the alternative motion for summary adjudication. On a motion for summary adjudication, the separate statement must tie each �...

Excerpt: ...nd Robert Cayton, also known as Orange County Superior Court Case Number 30 - 2012 - 00593016 -CUOE -CJC) ("Cayton Matter"). During the pendency of the Cayton Matter, but entirely unrelated to it, Plaintiff assisted the Chief Executive Officer of Defendant, Edward Clark ("Clark"), in a case involving the State Lands Commission. As a professional courtesy, any services Plaintiff provided to Clark related to Clark's case with th...

Excerpt: ...REQUEST: Caltrans and OCTA mov e for an order permitting Reply briefs to support its Motion in Limine Nos. 1 -3. ROA 431 -433. FACTS / OVERVIEW: These consolidated actions involve inverse condemnation claims and cross -complaints for indemnification. The action was initiated by JL Kids, wh ich seeks recovery for damages caused by a landslide onto its property in San Clemente. St. Andrews cross -complained against OCTA and Caltrans for indemnifi...

Excerpt: ...t all times men tioned, each of DEFENDANTS, except as otherwise alleged or contended, are and have been the partners, joint venturers, alter egos, and/or co -conspirators of each other.” (Compl. ¶ 12.) Further, Plaintiff alleged that “DEFENDANTS were “employers” within the meaning of Government Code section 12926(d) . . . .” (Compl. ¶ 8.) Although not initially raised in the MSA, Defendants now claim that Cedar Mountain and not Madiso...

Excerpt: ...s no defense to a ca use of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff . . . has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant . . . to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant . . . shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that ...

Excerpt: ... Responding Party: Plaintiffs M. Westland, LLC; Dorothy Sublett -Miller and Walter J. Miller, as Successor Trustees of The Miller Family Trust, originally dated October 12, 1979, amended and restated February 05, 2004, for the Estate of Willis L. Miller, deceased, as to an u ndivided ½ interest; Dorothy Sublett -Miller and Walter J. Miller, Successor Trustees of The Miller Family Trust, originally dated October 12, 1979, amended and restated Feb...

Excerpt: ...oposed cla ss action and PAGA settlement. UPCOMING EVENTS: None FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is a putative wage -and -hour class action and PAGA matter. On March 3, 2023, Plaintiff Ene C. Hernandez, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated (“Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Defendant Northwest Hotel Corporation (“Defendant”). (ROA 2.) The Complaint alleged the following eight causes of action: 1. Failure to Provide Me...

Excerpt: ...“Hirson” an d crossdefendants as “Korpivaara.” Defect/misjoinder of parties. Korpivaara has not shown Niral Patel is an indispensable party. “An agent is not an indispensable party in litigation between his principal and a third party over the subject matter of the a g e n c y .” (Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc. (1969) 274 Cal.App.2d 367, 374.) 1st cause of action, declaratory judgment -partner disassociation...

Excerpt: ...oving party in fact served the instant motion and supporting papers more than 21 days prior to filing them. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 128.5, subd. (f)(1)(B), 128.7, subd. (c)(1); Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 573, 577 -578 [statements in brie fs are argument, not evidence]; Hart v. Avetoom (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 410, 413 -415 [motion initially served must be the same as the one eventually filed]; Galleria Plus, Inc. v...

Excerpt: ...gent m isrepresentation. The FAC fails to state facts sufficient to constitute these causes of action. (See Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 638, 645 [fraud elements]; Nissan Motor Acceptance Cases (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 793, 823 [negligent misrepre sentation elements].) The residential purchased agreement (RPA) attached as exhibit A to the FAC shows that at the time defendants made the subject “misrepresentations” on 6/1/22 (FAC...

Excerpt: ...ffs filed an opposition to Defendants' Request to take Judicial Notice of documents apparently related to the prelitigation complaints made by plaintiffs to defendants. (See ROAs 76, 95.) At the same time, Plaintiffs state that “judicial notice is unnecessary if the se are the documents attached to Plaintiff's SAC already filed with the court.” Copies of the same documents are in fact attached to the SAC and were previously judicially notic...

Excerpt: ...er v. AT&T Mobilit y, LLC (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1545, 1556 [elements] The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Negligent Repair See Berkley v. Dowds (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 518, 527 [Negligence may be alleged in general terms].) The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Violation of the UCC (Defendants failed to identify any defects with the pleading of this cause of action). The omission of the allegati...

Excerpt: ...imite d insurance coverage to protect against uninsured drivers or driver's whose insurance is insufficient to pay for the injuries or damage caused. Ins. Code, § 11580.2 Insurance protecting against a vehicle with no liability insurance is called “uninsured mot orist” (UM) coverage, and insurance protecting against a vehicle with limited liability insurance coverage is called “underinsured motorist” (UIM) coverage. Recovery under UM...

Excerpt: ...rder and orde r for issuance of a Writ of Attachment (“Application”) against defendant Arunpal Sehgal, M.D. (“Defendant”) are GRANTED in the following amounts: Reliant Management Group, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $100,000; and Riverside Postac ute Care, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $103,132.88. Plaintiff is ordered to post an undertaking of $10,000. “Under Code of Civil Procedure secti...

Excerpt: ... an orde r compelling Plaintiff to submit his individual claims to arbitration, striking or dismissing Plaintiff's class allegations, dismissing any non- individual PAGA claims, and staying further proceedings pending completion of the arbitration. UPCOMING EVENTS: None FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is a putative wage -and -hour class action. On July 6, 2022, Plaintiff Pablo Calvillo, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaint...

Excerpt: ...ion: 1) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage; 2) Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation; 3) Failure to Provide Lawful Meal Periods; 4) Failure to Provide Lawful Rest Periods; 8) Failure to Pay All Wages Upon Separation; 6) Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; 7) Fai lure to Indemnify Employees for Expenditures; and 8) Unfair Business Practices. ANALYSIS: The parties' sole dispute is whether or not Plaintiff qualifies for an exemption under...

Excerpt: ...3310(E)) pro vides in relevant part, (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person* in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's* interests are materially adverse to the interests o f the former client unless the former client gives informed written consent. (b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in whi...

Excerpt: ...2024 at 9:0 0 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual claims asserted b y plaintiff in his Tenth Cause of Action for Violation of California Business & Professions Code §§17200, et seq. and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP...

Excerpt: ... the subject incident g iving rise to this complaint.” (FAC, EX-2 of Exemplary Damages Attachment.) Defendant was so impaired that he had “red/watery eyes, dilated pupils, slow lethargic speech, and difficulty concentrating” when being interviewed by the investigating Officer and failed the sobriety test. (Id.) “Defendant Topps knew from the onset that he must and would subsequently operate or control his vehicle on the public roads and t...

Excerpt: ...nspection of the judgment -roll, i.e., the face of the record as opposed to extrinsic evidence. (Trackman v. Kenney (2010) 187 Cal. App. 4th 175, 181.) This distinction may impact the procedural mechanism available to attack the judgment or order, when the judgment or order may be attacked, and how the party challenging the judgment or order proves that the judgment is void. (Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd. (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 1009, 1020...

Excerpt: ...oanCare's Evidence should be OVERRULED. DMI moves on the grounds that during the Phase 1 of trial “LoanCare testified that it has no accounting records and for that reason, Judge Schwarm did not order LoanCare to account.” (Notice, 2:5 -7.) Specifically, during the Phase 1 of trial, DMI sought to compel an accounting against LoanCare based on its second cause of action for Accounting alleged in it Cross -Complaint filed on 2 -25 -21. (Penn...

Excerpt: ...e motion is GRANTE D as to the request to vacate the current preliminary injunction. The motion is DENIED as to the request for a new preliminary injunction. As discussed below, this matter involves members of the Rhee family: decedent Henry Rhee, his wife Grace Rhee, their sons Thomas and Brian Rhee, and Thomas's wife Judy Ren. The Court refers to these persons by their first names for clarity. No disrespect is intended. EVIDENTIARY MATTERS I. ...

Excerpt: ...arty may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, Plaintiffs waived “any r ight to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protectio...

Excerpt: ... sustained. Evidentiary object ions nos. 4 through 6 are overruled. Evidence Submitted With Reply The court exercises its discretion to consider the evidence submitted with Plaintiffs' reply. Andry may address the evidence during the hearing. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537 -1538.) Merits Plaintiffs served Andry with a notice of taking a remote deposition and requests for production of documents at deposition. The notice li...

Excerpt: ...nterroga tories 42-45, 58 -61, 74 -77, and 89, which generally seek (1) the contact information of three students who allegedly assaulted Plaintiff and (2) the names and contact information of “Students E -M,” who were thirdparty witnesses to the alleged incident(s). The Court grants the motion as to the first category of information but denies the motion without prejudice as to the second category. Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010 s...

Excerpt: ...tober 24 , 2024 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual clai ms asserted by plaintiff and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP §1281.2. Defendant has shown the existence of a signed arbitration agreement dated November ...

Excerpt: ...d system” conducted by local bar associations (as opposed to private alternative dispute resolution providers) and has its own rules and limitations. (See Aguilar v. Lerner (2004) 32 Cal.4th 974, 984; Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP v. Rosenson (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 688, 693 [Legislature created MFAA as “separate and distinct arbitration scheme applicable to disputes between clients and attorneys over legal fees, costs, or b...

Excerpt: ...sponded 7/26/2023. Pl aintiff filed Page 7 of 21 this Motion to Compel Further Responses to RPDS on 8/23/2023. The Court notes that in recent years, an astounding number of cases have been filed against Defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. in OCSC. These cases involve a tremendous amount of time and resources for the Court, its staff, and research attorneys. For example, in this case, Plaintiff's motion includes a 195 page separate state...

Excerpt: ...int that con tinues to include these two causes of action. It again alleges these causes are against “all” defendants. The striking of these causes of action may not be the most efficient remedy here. The motion to strike is DENIED without prejudice. Demurrer to Se cond Amended Complaint (Champion) Defendant Champion Construction Services, Inc., filed a demurrer to the second amended complaint. The demurrer is SUSTAINED without leave as to t...

Excerpt: ...ntiff's Motion to Compel further Deposition of HMA's Person Most Knowledgeable: a. Paragraph 4 – 1:19, 20 – 3:6 b. Paragraph 5 – 3:7 -8 c. Paragraph 6 – 3:9 -10 d. Exhibit P e. Exhibit Q 3. ROA# 488, Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Terminating Sanctions or Alternatively, f or Issue and/or Evidentiary Sanctions a. Page 1:15 -16, 19 -27 b. Page 2:2 -8 c. Page 2, fn. 3 d. Page 6, 13 -14, 16 -24, 26 -28 e. Page 7: 1 -2 4. ROA# 486, Amended Dec...

Excerpt: ...re, the motion is d enied, without prejudice, for the same reasons as set forth in the Court's March 7, 2024 and March 28, 2024 Minute Orders on Defendants' motion to deem the truth of the matters in Request for Admissions, Set One, admitted and motion to compel responses to Demand for Production of Documents, Set One. (See ROAs 90 and 94.) On June 21, 2023, Defendants served written discovery by mail on Plaintiff, including the instant Form Inte...

Excerpt: ...party desiri ng to obtain discovery by a second physical examination or mental examination must obtain leave of court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.310(a).) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.310(b).) The Court “shal l” grant the motion only upon a showing of good cause. (Code Civ. Proc. §2032.320(a).) The within action arises from an auto accident that occurred on 8/20/20. The complaint w...

Excerpt: ...tiary objections to the De claration of Robert Dale Beaver are OVERRULED. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice of Orange County Ordinance 2183 and the Court's 04 -0722 minute order is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452(b), (d).) Steven and Robert purchased the Pine Place property in 1 988 as joint tenants. Steven subsequently moved out in 1989 or 1990. Robert claims that in 1992, he and Steven agreed that Steven would grant Robert his entire interes...

Excerpt: ...ust be such that the mo ving party could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered or produced it at the trial.” (New York Times Co. v. Sup.Ct. (Wall St. Network, Ltd.) (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 206, 212 -213.) The party seeking reconsideration must also provide a satisfactory explanation for failing to present the information at the first hearing; i.e., a showing of reasonable diligence. (Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 690; C...

Excerpt: ...ly found tha t defendant Cutler is subject to the Page 5 of 21 Court's personal jurisdiction in its November 17, 2023 Minute Order and that Defendant has not met his burden for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration must be filed within 10 days of service of n otice of entry of the order in question. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008(a).) However, “the trial court retains the inherent authority to change its decision at any time prior to the en...

Excerpt: ... forms part of the defendants' back yard wall. The plaintiffs recently purchased the house and obtained a survey whereupon they discovered that the three -foot area in plaintiff's back yard is actually their property. Plaintiffs submit evidence that their detached garage has experienced repeated water intrusion as a result of dirt being up against the side of their garage to a level approximately 1.5 feet above their garage floor. Plaintiffs all...

Excerpt: ... the weight and credibility of these matters, and rules as follows: Plaintiff Pure Dermatology's motion for preliminary injunction is denied. “A trial court may grant a preliminary injunction upon a showing that (1) the party seeking the injunction is likely to preva il on the merits at trial, and (2) the ‘interim harm' to that party if an injunction is denied is greater than ‘the [interim] harm the [opposing party] is likely to suffer if t...