Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

362 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J x
2024.03.25 Demurrer 543
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...ns in Redlands, California.” (¶1 of SAC.) The Complaint asserts Plaintiff has standing to sue as an unincorporated association pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 369.5. (¶1 of SAC.) Pursuant to this provision, “[a] partnership or other unincorporated association, whether organized for profit or not, may sue and be sued in the name it has assumed or by which it is known.” Code Civ. Proc., §369.5, subd. (a). As discussed in Tenan...
2024.03.25 Application for Right to Attach Order, Writ of Attachment 162
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...cation, the court shall issue a right to attac h order if it finds all of the following: (1) The claim upon which the attachment is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued; (2) The plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based; (3) The attac hment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon which the attachment is based; and (4) The amount to be secured by th...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 253
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... by Plaintiff Yenely Lopez are MOOT in part and GRANTED in part. (1) Plai ntiff seeks an order from the Court compelling Defendant Home Express Delivery Service, LLC to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories -General, Set One. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks monetary sanctions against Defendant and its attorneys of reco rd, Shannon Finley, esq., Greg Feldman, Esq. and PETTIT KOHN jointly and severally in the sum of $2,060.00. (ROA No. 47...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration 379
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...th Edon who is a “Manager, HR Operations” for ELEVANCE “(f/k/ a Anthem, Inc.)” who attests as follows: --In her role as Manager, HR Operations, she is responsible for managing technology processes for all new hire activities from the verbal and written offer through their start date; --Throughout he employment and i ncluding 2022 to the present, ELEVANCE has utilized an online applicant tracking system called “Taleo” to facilitate emp...
2024.03.18 Application for Right to Attach Order, Writ of Attachment 329
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...Defendant Smith Investment Group, LLC. (¶4 of Yun Declaration and E xhibit 2 thereto.) The Commercial Guarantee is a written contract which provides that “Guarantor absolutely and unconditionally guarantees full and punctual payment and satisfaction of the Indebtedness of Borrower [Smith Investment Group, LLC] to Lender [F irst Bank].” (Id.) Based on the above, the relevant claim is a “claim for money based on a contract,” as required. C...
2024.03.11 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 635
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...heir agents, assigns, partners, employees, employers, and any individual or entity acting in concert with them from engaging acting in concert with them from engaging in the following is GRANTED: 23 1. Withdrawing, transferring, disposing, concealing and/or otherwise accessing any money in any bank or financial acco unt where any Plaintiff is identified as an account holder including checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, C...
2024.03.11 Motion for Anti-SLAPP 111
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...1600873201) (“Underlying Case”); appellate opinions in Case Nos. G059087 and G05 9753; and the complaint in the related case (Case No. 2022 -01284907) is granted. 5 Movants move to strike Cross -Complainant Jennifer Loeffler's sole claim against them in her Cross- Complaint – the second cause of action for violations of the Fair Debt C ollection Practices Act (FDCPA). Legal Standard Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal....
2024.03.04 Motion to Compel Arbitration 959
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ... Instruments, Declaratory Relief, and Accou nting. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Defendants move pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. section 2. The FAA provides: “A written provision in . . . a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to sett le by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, ...
2024.03.04 Motion to Compel Answers 995
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...bjection. Plaintiff argues he answered the question, implying the obj ections are irrelevant. But the responses are not complete. This interrogatory is straightforward and seeks how much income Plaintiff claims to have lost as of result of Defendant's actions. This response does not require an expert opinion. Plaintiff all eges he was not paid for overtime, meal or rest periods, etc. Plaintiff should know how many days he worked, how many hours p...
2024.03.04 Motion for Sanctions 831
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.04
Excerpt: ...n the basis the attached exhibits are not file -stamped. As these documents give no indication they were filed, it is unclear whether they constitute “court records” for purposes of Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d). The remainder of the request is granted. Previously the Court sustaine d Defendants' Demurrer to the Complaint, without leave to amend. Therefore, Defendants' request for an order dismissing this action is MOOT. (ROA N...
2024.02.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 614
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999 [“A “presentation o f extrinsic evidence is...not proper on a motion for judgment on the pleadings.”] As to the 12th cause of action for Unfair Business Practices, the Court finds the cause of action is not sufficiently pled. Here, Plaintiff alleges that as a result of Defendant's discrimination and retaliation toward Plaintiff and his wrongful termination, which constitutes unfair a...
2024.02.26 Motion for Sanctions 380
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...ffected party, person, or attorney, and after opportunity for hearing, may impose the following sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process…” the court may impose monetary, issue or evidentiary sanctions. CCP § 2030.290(c) provides: The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes ...
2024.02.26 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 240
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ... extent Cross -Complainant moves for summary adjudication, the Notice of Motion fai ls to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1350, subdivision (b) which provides in pertinent part: “If summary adjudication is sought, whether separately or as an alternative to the motion for summary judgment, the specific cause of action, affir mative defense, claims for damages, or issues of duty must be stated specifically in the notice of motion ...
2024.02.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 253
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...overy responses. (See Oppositions: 4:2 -12 [ROA Nos. 73, 75 and 79] a nd ¶6 of Reynolds Declarations [ROA Nos. 85, 86 and 87].) Indeed, Plaintiff concedes Defendant's new counsel has “worked diligently in providing code compliant Responses.” (See Replies 2:6 -8 and 5:20 -21 [ROA Nos. 89, 91 and 93].) Nonetheless, dueling req uests for sanctions remain. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300, subdivision (d), “[t]he court shal...
2024.02.26 Motion to Dismiss 566
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.26
Excerpt: ...cial Council.” Id., § 583.410, subd. (b). A court may not dismiss an a ction under section 583.410, subdivision (a), unless the defendant was not served within two years after the action was commenced or the action was not brought to trial, or conditionally settled, within two years after commenced against the defendant. Cod e Civ. 6 Proc., § 583.240, subd. (a), California Rules of Court, rule 3.1340(a). The computation of time for the aforem...
2024.02.05 Motion to Strike 111
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.05
Excerpt: ...lying Case”) is granted. The HOA moves to strike Cross- Complainant Jennier Loe¯ler's Þrst cause o action or breach o CC&Rs, third cause o action or violations o Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and ourth cause o action or violations o the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act in her Cross-Complaint (CC). Legal Standard Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 67, holds: 5 “[W]e may summari...
2024.02.05 Motion for Summary Adjudication 087
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.05
Excerpt: ... granted if “it completely disposes of a cause of action, an a¯irmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.” Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(f)(1).) As used in this section, a “cause of action” means the invasion of a primary right, i.e., an injury, rather than a theory of liability. Lilienthal & Fowler v. Superior Court (1993) 12 Cal.App.4th 1848, 1854. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Emerson Maintenance Corporation (the “...
2024.02.05 Motion for SLAPP 907
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.02.05
Excerpt: ...strike Plainti¯ Jennier Loe¯ler's Þrst cause o action or breach o CC&Rs and third cause o action or violations o Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in the First Amended Complaint (FAC). 12 Legal Standard Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 67, holds: “[W]e may summarize a court's task in ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion to strike as ollows. Section 425.16, subdivision (b)(1) requires the court ...
2024.01.29 Motion to Compel Answers 763
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...ve a timely response, the following rules apply: [¶] (a) The party to whom the interrogatories are directed waives any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010)…[¶] (b) The party propounding the interrogatories may move for an order compelling ...
2024.01.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 803
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...he basic elements of a negligence action are: (1) The defendant had a legal duty to conform to a standard of conduct to protect the plainti¯, (2) the defendant failed to meet this standard of conduct, (3) the defendant's failure was the proximate or legal cause of the resulting injury, and (4) the plainti¯ was damaged as a result of the breach. Ladd v. County of San Mateo (1996) 12 Cal.4th 913, 917; CACI 400. “Premises liability is a form o...
2024.01.29 Demurrer 831
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...aint) the Request is denied, on the basis the attached exhibits are not Þle-stamped. As these documents give no indication they were Þled, it is unclear whether they constitute “court records” for purposes of Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (d). The remainder of the request is granted. The doctrine of res judicata has two aspects: claim preclusion and collateral estoppel. People v. Barragan (2004) 32 Cal.4th 236, 252. “The prerequi...
2024.01.29 Demurrer 714
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...822, 830. “An oral contract may be pleaded generally as to its e¯ect, because it is rarely possible to allege the exact words.” Khoury v. Maly's of California (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616. However, the burden of establishing an oral contract exists is on the party alleging breach. Sully v. Kern Drilling Corp. (1954) 126 Cal.App.2d 651, 654. Moreover, there cannot be both an express (written or oral) contract AND an implied contract that c...
2024.01.22 Motion to Compel Production 694
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.22
Excerpt: ...ohon to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admission, Set One from Defendant Moulton Parkway Residents' Association No. One and Request for Sanctons is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Nikki Brunetti, Mireya Briseno, Yunue Sotelo, and Santiago Sotelo's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set One from Defendant Moulton Parkway Residents' Association No. One and Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiff Nikki Brunetti's Motion...
2024.01.22 Motion for Discretionary Undertaking 280
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.22
Excerpt: ... 10-20-2023, which is attached as Exhibit A. Request for Judicial Notice as to Nos. 24 is also GRANTED. Appeals and Scope of Stay INC has appealed three rulings: 1) motion to compel satisfaction of judgment; 2) motion to assign interest in Inc's Florida judgment; and 3) motion to compel production of documents. Code of Civil Procedure S 915(a) creates an automatic stay when an appeal is filed. It provides in pertinent part: (a) [T] he perfecting ...
2024.01.08 Motion to Tax Costs 236
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...-2022. California Rules of Court, rule 3.1700(b)(1).) The Court finds this motion to be timely based on Defendant Elizabeth Torres' refiling of the Memorandum of Costs on 05-03-2023. CCP S 998 Reasonableness: Plaintiff contends Defendant's 998 offer was not reasonable because it was made only two months after Defendant answered the Complaint and before any discovery had commenced. "It is the general rule that where a party shows a prima facie ent...

362 Results

Per page

Pages