Excerpt: ...o. 1: There Is No Triable Issue of Fact as to Plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, as a Matter of Law. Plaintiff fails to meet its initial burden to prove all elements of the claim for breach of contract—specifically, damages. (See Paramount Petroleum Corp. v. Super. Ct. (2014) 227 Cal. App. 4th 226, 241.) Plaintiff contends the unpaid balance as of 01/01/2017 was $30,639.36, but provides no competent evidence as to how tha...

Excerpt: ... case is sufficient. (City of Grand Terrace v. Superior Court (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1251, 1261.) Defendant/Cross-Defendant Parra has satisfied this minimal burden. Together, his moving papers and supporting declaration adequately set forth the nature of the case and all pertinent facts, the settling parties' relative litigation positions, and the barebones terms of the settlement. (See Motion P&As at pp. 2-5; Leenerts Decl., ¶¶ 3-12.) Moving pa...

Excerpt: ...claratory relief reveal that an actual controversy exists between the parties.'” D. Cummins Corp. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. (2016) 246 Cal. App. 4th 1484, 1489. “[A] home loan borrower has standing to claim a nonjudicial foreclosure was wrongful because an assignment by which the foreclosing party purportedly took a beneficial interest in the deed of trust was not merely voidable but void, depriving the foreclosing party of any legiti...

Excerpt: ...n an assessment of improvements when the improvements did not exist on the lien date; (6) paid on an assessment in excess of the equalized value of the property as determined by the county board of equalization; or (7) paid on an assessment in excess of the value determined by the assessor in a mandatory audit. (Rev. & Tax Code, § 5096.) Plaintiff bases her claim on the grounds that the “AAB further proceeded in an arbitrary and capricious man...

Excerpt: ... assuming that service was improper. Substituted Service: There is a significant issue whether a proper person was served for substituted service to be effective. Service was made on Joaquin Trujillo, “caretaker.” Defendant contends that he was a neighbor. If service was improper, a reasonably prudent person would assume an Answer was not required. CCP 415.20 (b) provides that “If a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable d...

Excerpt: ...burden of demonstrating that the challenged cause of action arises from protected activity.' . . . In City of Cotati v. Cashman (2002) 29 Cal.4th 69, 78, 124 Cal.Rptr.2d 519, 52 P.3d 695 (Cotati ), the California Supreme Court explained: “[T]he statutory phrase ‘cause of action ... arising from' means simply that the defendant's act underlying the plaintiff's cause of action must itself have been an act in furtherance of the right of petition...

Excerpt: ...s entitled to the attachment order. Code Civ. Proc., §§ 485.240 & 492.050. Moving parties have not shown that the amount to be secured by the attachment should be reduced, or by what amount the attachment should be reduced. Moving Parties offered no evidence to show their likelihood of prevailing on their cross-claims or the amount of offset pursuant to the cross-claims. Moving parties have not shown that section 3.3 of the distributorship agre...

Excerpt: ...btor's substantive rights by depriving it of property. Thus, the Landstar decision is applicable and the Convention does not authorize the issuance of a Letters Rogatory to enforce the Judgment. The Landstar opinion impliedly limits the court's inherent authority on this issue. This scenario is similar to the issue of awarding costs for copies, which are not helpful at trial. “Because the Legislature has expressly stated in subdivision (a)(12) ...

Excerpt: ...enforced.” (Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc. (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 30, 37, citing Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 299, 305.) The settlement agreement here names six parties, including Lucy Garcia. Plaintiff submits no evidence Lucy Garcia executed the agreement. Defendants to give notice. ...

Excerpt: ...a proceeding has been duly assigned for hearing and determination to one department of the superior court ..., and the proceeding so assigned has not been finally disposed of therein or legally removed therefrom, it is beyond the jurisdictional authority of another department of the same court to interfere with the exercise of the power of the department to which the proceeding has been so assigned.” In re Marriage of Schenck (1991) 228 Cal.App...

Excerpt: ...in issue and the burden of proof is on the party claiming them as costs. [Citations.]” (Ladas v. California State Auto. Ass'n (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 761, 774-776 [citations omitted].) Here, Plaintiff has properly put at issue some deposition costs claimed by Defendants as being duplicative and unnecessary. Thus, the burden shifts to Defendants to show that the claimed costs were necessary to the litigation. Defendants have met their burden. No d...

Excerpt: ...within 15 days of service of the notice of ruling. Baum Vision did not meet its burden to justify its objections. Plaintiff's request for sanctions against Baum Vision, LLC is granted in the amount of $2,170.92, which shall be paid to Plaintiff within 30 days. Motion to Compel Further Responses and Production to Second Set of RFPs (Shane Baum) The unopposed Motion by Plaintiff Barton Perreira LLC to Compel Further Responses and Production to Seco...

Excerpt: ...200.00 per hour x 4 hours) + $150.00 for no-show fee + $60.00 for filing fee + $9.95 for e-filing fee] within fifteen (15) days of the date of notice of this order. Defendants to give notice. ...

Excerpt: ...potential prejudice to Defendants, trial is continued from 4/30/18 to 10/1/18 and the MSC is continued to 8/31/18. All other pretrial dates are continued consistent with the new trial date. Plaintiff to give notice. Motion to Compel Compliance with Business Records Subpoena The Motion by Defendant Fotona, LLC's (“Fotona”) to Compel Institute for Advanced Laser Dentistry's (“IALD”) compliance with business records subpoena is GRANTED in pa...

Excerpt: ...sn. v. Touchstone Ins. Servs.(1994) 27 Cal. App. 4th 1085, 1091. No party has filed Opposition to this motion. Regardless, the settlement by Cross-Defendant Lonerock, Inc. appears does not appear to be “so far 'out of the ballpark' in relation to these factors as to be inconsistent with the equitable objectives of the statute.'” Id. Liability of Lonerock, the general manager of the construction site, appears questionable. And the law concerni...

Excerpt: ...eveal that an actual controversy exists between the parties.'” D. Cummins Corp. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. (2016) 246 Cal. App. 4th 1484, 1489. “[A] home loan borrower has standing to claim a nonjudicial foreclosure was wrongful because an assignment by which the foreclosing party purportedly took a beneficial interest in the deed of trust was not merely voidable but void, depriving the foreclosing party of any legitimate authority to ...