Excerpt: ...ents for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in e
¯ect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. 2 A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company (Kinsale) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for summ...

Excerpt: ...t on the Second Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff Robert Espinosa in the consolidated action bearing Case No. 21CV000226 on grounds that each Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts in their respective complaints to state a cause of action against Cal-Fire under Vehicle Code section 17001 for the negligent driving of its employee. (See Support Memo at 3:6-12.) Cal-Fire's Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as to the Court's tentative...

Excerpt: ...cture allegedly encroaching on Plaintiffs' property and Mr. Wagner is the owner and manager of Defendant The Original Thomas ("TOT"), the current owner of the allegedly encroaching structure. The Court notes that these are defendant parties to this action. As an initial matter, by Minute Order dated November 1, 2023, in which the Court granted Defendants TOT's, Michael L. Holcomb's, and Maria C. Holcomb's (collectively, "Defendants") motions to a...

Excerpt: ...record, sanctions in the amount of $2,557.50 no later than 10 calendar days after service of notce of entry of order. The request for an order finding Plaintiff in contempt is DENIED. Defendants Sharon Coleman and Daniel Davis, individually and as trustees of the Cary M. Tozer and Doris V. Tozer Family Trust; Michael Taylor Ford and Edward Roy Moody, as trustees of the 2020 Michael Taylor Ford and Edward Roy Moody Rewcable Trust; Robert l. Clark;...

Excerpt: ...other action pending between the same parties on the same cause of action and (2) fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. "The party against whom a complaint ... has been filed may object, by demurrer ... to the pleading on any one or more of the following grounds [including] [t]here is another action pending between the same parties on the same cause of action." (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (c).) This special demurr...

Excerpt: ...Misrepresentation, Third Cause of Action for Negligent Misrepresentation, Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of Business & Professions Code section 7151 (California Home Improvement Statutes ("HIS")), and Fifth Cause of Action for Violation of Business & Profession Code section 17200 fail to state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against Defendant. A complaint must contain "facts constituting the cause of action." (Code Civ. Proc...

Excerpt: ...ef. Finally, the motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's prayer for prejudgment interest. l. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Cross-Defendant Sutter Home Winery, Inc. (Sutter Home or Defendant) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c, for summary judgement against Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Says Siri. "The motion will be made on the grounds that the undisputed material facts establish that Siri's sole remaining...

Excerpt: ...nting leave to intervene in the instant case. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests fo...

Excerpt: ...of Costs filed by Defendant and Cross-complainant Jeffrey Hammond (Hammond), or in the alternative, for an order tax-ng the requested costs set forth therein.l "Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding." (S 1032, subd. (b).) A "prevailing party" is defined to include "the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismi...

Excerpt: ... allow for adequate notce of the rescheduled deposition date to Mr. Fultz. The request for sanctions is GRANTED IN PART. Mr. Fultz is ordered to pay to Plaintiffs, care of their attorney of record, within 15 calendar days of notice of entry of this order, sanctons in the amount of $3,902. Plaintiffs shall provide notce of entry of order. Plaintiffs Robert and Carole Roszkowski (collectively, "Plaintiffs") move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure...

Excerpt: ... criminal liability and what other events would eliminate such liability in advance of the expiration of any such statute. Defendant State of California by and through Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal-Fire) moves for an order vacating the trial date and setting a status conference to reset trial on the grounds that the criminal prosecution of Cal-Fire driver Chief William White, which is based on the same events at issue here, rema...

Excerpt: ...rial facts confirm that Plaintiff cannot maintain her causes of achon against Simon as follows: (A) Simon did not have a duty to protect Plaintiff from the unforeseeable criminal acts of Maximo Perez. Accordingly, Plaintiff's first cause of action for Negligence and second cause of action for Premises Liability fail as a matter of aw. (8) Simon's alleged conduct was not a substantial factor in bringing about Plaintiff's injuries. Accordingly, Pla...

Excerpt: ...rder compelling Defendant Estate of Pamela Anne Ramos ("Defendant") to provide answer to written discovery and for an order granting the moving party the reasonable attorney's fees and costs associated with filing the motion in the amount of $3,550 as sanctions against Defendant and Defendant's counsel. (Notice at 1-2.) The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required ...

Excerpt: ...ELIMINARY MATTERS Defendants Covidien Holding Inc. and Medtronic USA Inc., and Specially Appearing Entities Covidien LP, Covidien, Inc., Covidien, LLC, Medtronic PLC, United States Surgical Corp., a division of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, and Sofradim Production SAS (collectively, "Covidien Defendants") demur, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10, subdivision (e) and 430.30, to Plaintiff Jon Carsten's Complaint for Damages (Complaint...

Excerpt: ...ision (a), and 576, for an order allowing Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint ("SAC"). The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect...

Excerpt: ...g oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. Defendants Home Care Assistance, Inc., Home Care Assistance, LLC, and The Key Management, LLC move, pursuantto Code of Civil Procedure, sections 1281 et se...

Excerpt: ...g claims against Compass to arbitrate those claims on grounds that Compass, Plaintiff Steven Mavromihalis, and Cross- Complainant Damian Archbold, are parties to an arbitration agreement that encompasses the claims asserted against Compass in this action. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Gwal Rule 2.9. The moving party is therefore directed to immedi...

Excerpt: ...Interrogatories nos. 15.1 and 17.1; and (3) special Interrogatories nos. 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 38, 39, 41, 72, and 75. The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to: (1) Construction Form Interrogatories no. 303.3 as to Silver Rose GP, LLC; (2) Special Interrogatories nos. 8, 36, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 57, 59, 50, 62, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71, 74, 77, 78, 80, 82, 86, 90, 92 as to Silver Rose...

Excerpt: ...ss-Defendant Vesta Pacific Development, Inc. ("Vesta Pacific") and Nos. 1-10, 12-19, 22-30, 32, 35-38, 40-42 and 44 as to Defendant Third Street Napa Development, LLC ("Third Street"); and (2) the request to compel further responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 12.1, 16.1, and 17.1 with respect to Request for Admission No. 1 and *cial Interrogatory Nos. 1, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19 and 22. The motion is DENIED as to Request for Production Nos. 21, 2...

Excerpt: ... produced all responsive documents in his possession, custody, and control; (2) produce all documents in accordance with his statement of compliance; (3) serve amended verified responses to the Form and Special Interrogatories which are as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits; and (4) pay to Defendant, care of his attorney of record, sanctions in the amount of $4,680. A. Introduction...

Excerpt: ...s filed July 20, 2023, in this action. The Court finds that the motion was timely filed. "Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding." (Code Civ. Proc. S 1032, subd. (b).)l In order to recover costs, the prevailing party is required to file and serve a memorandum of costs. (Rules of Court, rule 3.1700, subd. (a).) "Any notice of motion to stri...

Excerpt: ...ND (2) SECOND, THIRD, AND THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO CROSS-COMPLAINT [3] MOTION OF CROSS-COMPLAINANT THIRD STREET NAPA DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AS TO FOURTH, FIFTH, AND SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION OF CROSS-COMPLAINT AGA NST CROSS-DEFENDANT RLM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. [4] RENEWED MOTION OF CROSS-COMPLAINANT THIRD STREET NAPA DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AS TO FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD CAUSES OF ACTION OF CROSS-C...

Excerpt: ...wer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint." (S 438, subd. The Answer raises the affrmatve defense of failure of consideration. Plaintiff does not address the issue through the moving papers. As such, Plaintiff fails to establish that the answer does not state facts suffcient to constitute a defense to the Complaint. Moreover, it appears that Plaintiff seeks relief that is not available through a motion for judgm...

Excerpt: ...objection in response to the Foundation's Request for Production of Documents, Set One and failure to prov-de Code-compliant responses to the Foundation's Special Interrogatories Set One and Dr. White's Special Interrogatories Set One, in violation of this Court's Order granting in part Defendants' Motion to Compel Responses." (Notice of Motion at 2:6-11.) Defendants further move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, sectons 2031.300, subdivision...

Excerpt: ... of action for breach of fiduciary duty (twelfth) asserted against them through Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint on grounds that, (1) the claim is barred by collateral estoppel, and (2) Defendants are immune from liability. (Notice of Motion at 1:24-2:6.) The subject claim appears to be the only one asserted by Plaintiff against these moving defendants through the Fourth Amended Complaint (FAC). Moving Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice ...