Excerpt: ...l date sufficiently in the future to take deposition discovery and bring a motion for summary judgment. The motion is, in essence, a motion for reconsideration of the Court's September 26, 2019 decision on the motion to dismiss. The Nunns are seeking to promote waiver and/or estoppel to support further arguments regarding the deadline to bring the case to trial after the remittitur. These arguments are based on facts available to the Nunns and sh...

Excerpt: ...s about the propriety of summary adjudication must be resolved in favor of the party opposing the motion.” (See's Candy Shops, Inc. v. Super. Ct. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 889, 900.) The Court is sympathetic to Defendant's complaints regarding the burden stemming from Plaintiffs' counsel's election to submit, as evidence in opposition to the underlying motion for summary judgment, interrogatory responses, rather than preparing and filing – or at...

Excerpt: ...d code‐compliant initial responses, without objections, within 10 calendar days of service of notice of entry of order. Plaintiff's request for monetary sanctions is DENIED. The request is not codecompliant. Plaintiff did not cite in the notice of motion a specific code section authorizing sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.030‐2023.040; see Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Proc. Before Trial (Rutter Group 2018) at § 8:2000 [“T...

Excerpt: ...s CRC Luxury Motors, LLC, Soscol Auto Repair dba Midas/Speedee LLC, and Curtis Correll (collectively, defendants). (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) The People's motion to compel initial responses to form interrogatories (set one) from defendants [notice of motion numbers 4‐6] is GRANTED. (Id., § 2030.290, subd. (b.) Defendants shall serve verified code‐compliant initial responses, without objections, and documents within 20 calenda...

Excerpt: ...ative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, in person or by CourtCall, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. Defendant First American Title Insurance Compan...

Excerpt: ...er. Ct. (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1273, 1283‐84.) However, “there must be substantial prejudice to an overriding interest if the document[ ] is made available to the public.” (Ibid.) As deftly stated in Huffy, supra, 112 Cal.App.4th at p. 107: “Much of the settlement agreement is routine verbiage which appears in most settlement agreements. Further, the settlement agreement has a specific provision that if disclosure is required by a court o...

Excerpt: ... second complaint. Plaintiff added the moving defendants as individual defendants in this action. Venue is based on the allegation that the agreements were made in Napa County and plaintiff's principal place of business is in Napa County. (Second Amended Compl., ¶ 10.) There are no allegations regarding venue as to the individual defendants. The addition of the individual defendants impacts venue as it limits the wide choice of venue permitted i...

Excerpt: ...otion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A. Requests for Judicial Notice Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court takes judicial notice of the subject documents, but not for the truth of the matters asserted therein. Samrick's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court takes judicial notice of the subject documents, but not for the truth of the matters assert therein. B. Plaintiff's Objections to Evidence Objection No. 1 ...

Excerpt: ... 15, 2020. Based on that Notice of Errata, the Court accepts and considers the Amended Declaration of Paula Maietta filed January 23, 2020 (Maietta Decl.). Plaintiff's objection number 2 to the Declaration of Paula Maietta is OVERRULED. Defendant Noble House NVWT, LLC (NVWT) petitions the Court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2, and 1281.4, for an order to compel arbitration and stay the action as to Plaintiff Jonathan Vaughan. ...

Excerpt: ... to set aside default is GRANTED. The Clerk's Default Judgment entered against Defendant Myrian McIntosh on January 02, 2020, shall be set aside, and the writ of possession issued thereupon on January 02, 2020 is hereby recalled and of no further force and effect. Defendant's demurrer, attached as Exhibit C to the Declaration of Selwyn Whitehead in Support of Ex Parte Application is deemed filed as of the date of this hearing. The Court sets Defe...

Excerpt: ...thwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, in person or by CourtCall, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. Factual Background The Federal Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997 (FASFRA) bars federal funds from being used “to provide any health care item or servic...

Excerpt: ...7c, subdivision (a)(3). Defendant did not object to the hearing date, and fully briefed the substance of the motion. Therefore, if Plaintiff, either prior to or at hearing on the matter, is able to present the Court with good cause as to why the matter should be heard less than 30 days prior to the Trial Management Conference: The motion will be GRANTED; Plaintiff shall prepare and file a Proposed Order and Judgment consistent herewith, approved ...

Excerpt: ...9CV001491 • Oaks, et al. v. Wysinger, et al. – Case No. 19CV001503 As a preliminary matter, the Court cautions Defendant V. Sattui regarding its misrepresentation of the Court's Minute Order of December 20, 2019. That order states, in part, as follows. “[I]t appears from the holding in [Acuna v. Gunderson Chevrolet, Inc. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 1467, 1472] that the Court is without authority to consolidate the small claims matter, Case No. 19...

Excerpt: ...st. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, in person or by CourtCall, unless it is confirmed that no party req...

Excerpt: ...fendants”) to indemnify BTC. (See Notice of Motion and Motion at 2:19‐22.) The motion is DENIED. A. Evidentiary Objections IGS and IDF each, separately, object to the evidence referred to as, “Reliant's March 12, 2019 Cost Breakdown” submitted by BTC at Exhibit J to “Evidence in Support of Bruce Tucker Construction, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment.” The objections are SUSTAINED. The proffered document is not properly authenticated....

Excerpt: ...ng, in person or by CourtCall, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. Defendant Wagner & Bonsignore Consulting Civil Engineers' motion for good faith settlement under Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6, subdivision (a)(2), is DENIED. (TechBilt, Inc. v. Woodward‐Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, 499.) The proposed settlement payment of $65,999 is not proportionate to defendant's liability for damages alleged to ex...

Excerpt: ...2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, in person or by CourtCall, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. On December 16, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a document entitled, “Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration Nunc Pro Tunc, in which Plaintiffs, “request the Court enter as filed Plaintiff's Motion for Rec...

Excerpt: ...ground 1 It appears that the judicial council's reference to demands of more than $1,000 relates to Code of Civil Procedure section 431.40. That section is not, however, relevant here because Defendant's pleading is an Answer to the complaint for breach of contract. On September 10, 2019, the Court continued the matter because the parties did not comply with Local Rule 3.3 requiring courtesy copies of all documents in excess of 15 pages, which we...

Excerpt: ...y Local Rule 2.9. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to contact Defendant forthwith and advise Defendant of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. If Plaintiff's counsel is unable to contact Defendant prior to the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel shall be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event Defendant appears without following the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9. Although Plaintiff's motion is capt...

Excerpt: ...el shall be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event opposing party appears without following the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. moves to dismiss this action under the mandatory provision requiring dismissal for failure to bring the case to trial within the prescribed statutory time period. Plaintiffs Gerald L. Nunn and Judith L. Nunn oppose (collectively, the “Nunns”). A. M...

Excerpt: ...r a preliminary injunction. Thus, there is some question regarding whether the notice is proper. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 1010; Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110, subd. (a).) The body of the Memorandum section of the same document, however, discusses the propriety of an injunction under Code of Civil Procedure section 526, subdivision (a)(2), (Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application, filed June 25, 2019 (Application) at 13:9‐13.) Defendant, through its ...

Excerpt: ...Judicial Notice Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED in part. The Court takes judicial notice of the following: (A) Petition and Complaint filed January 15, 2019, in the matter of Hall Vineland, LLC et al. v. City of St. Helena, et al., in Napa County Superior Court Case No. 19CV000093, but not for the truth of the matters asserted therein; (C) Plaintiffs' Request for Dismissal of the Complaint in Napa County Superior Court Case No....

Excerpt: ...e‐trial issues. In accord with that order, defendant filed a consolidated demurrer. Plaintiffs Theodore Joseph Shushereba (successor in interest to the Estates of Jennifer Gonzales Shushereba and Cecilia Rose Shushereba and in his personal capacity), Marc Golick and Makena Golick (by and through her guardian ad litem Marc Golick), Donald Loeber and Marie Loeber, and Michael Gonzales and Kathleen Gonzales each filed separate oppositions. The var...

Excerpt: ...ide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Defendants' counsel is directed to contact Plaintiffs' counsel forthwith and advise Plaintiffs' counsel of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. If Defendants' counsel is unable to contact Plaintiffs' counsel prior to the hearing, Defendants' counsel shall be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event Plaintiffs' counsel ap...

Excerpt: ...cal Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. If defendant's counsel is unable to contact plaintiff's counsel prior to the hearing, defendant's counsel shall be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event plaintiff's counsel appears without following the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9. Defendant Leticia Perez Rodriguez's motion to compel plaintiff Jefferson De Azevedo's further deposition pursuant to Code ...