Excerpt: ...nt James R. Trumble moves the Court for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication of the causes of action asserted against him by the Complaint of Plaintiff Robert Alaniz.1 Through the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that while he was delivering mail to a business owned by Defendant Regan and Sons, Inc., a dog named Juno owned by Trumble ran out of the 1 Defendant's Notice of Motion indicates that he seeks summary adjudication of ...

Excerpt: ...g grounds: (1) the limitation‐of‐liability provision (“LOL”) in the written agreements between Blackburn/Crawford and plaintiff Spring Mountain Vineyard, Inc. is enforceable; (2) Blackburn/Crawford did not commit gross negligence and, as such, the alleged gross negligence is not a proper basis for not enforcing the LOL; and (3) whether or not Blackburn/Crawford did commit gross negligence, the LOL's prohibition on the recovery of conseque...

Excerpt: ...lic entity is liable for death or injury to person or property proximately caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of a motor vehicle by an employee of the public entity acting within the scope of his employment.” The undisputed facts establish that the injury in question arose from the negligent act of Mr. Duarte, a person who was not an employee of Defendant Merced County Office of Education. This shifts the burden ...

Excerpt: ...umber 30 seeks copies of the NCSD's policies, procedures, and training for use of force from 2009 to the present. (Podrobinok Decl., Ex. 1 at p. 8.) The NCSD opposes. A. Statement of Facts In 2018, Albert Wong entered a building at the Veteran's Home of California in Yountville armed with a loaded semi‐ automatic weapon and dressed in tactical gear. (Third Amended Compl., ¶¶ 59, 66‐67.) The combat veteran entered a room and allowed certain ...

Excerpt: ...Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, by Zoom, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. A. Background Defendants John L. Miller, Oakmont Investments LLC, the Miller Alaska Trust, Tim Wall, TKW Resort Hold...

Excerpt: ... days of notice of entry of this order, sanctions in the amount of $1,810.00. Defendant and Cross‐Complainant Peter Peletta moves the Court for an order compelling Plaintiff Francis Wang to respond to Supplemental Interrogatories, Set One, and Supplemental Requests for Production, Set One, and for monetary sanctions. Through her opposition, Plaintiff acknowledges that on or about February 19, 2020, Defendant served her with Supplemental Form In...

Excerpt: ... Autovest, L.L.C. (Autovest) and Cross‐Defendant First Investors Financial Services, Inc. (First Investors) (collectively Cross‐Defendants) move the Court, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, for an order compelling Defendants and CrossComplainants Garcia and Asuncion Garcia (collectively the Garcias) to arbitrate the claims asserted in this action on an individual non‐class basis. Cross‐Defendants further seek an order staying the a...

Excerpt: ...ocal Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, by Zoom, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. The Notice of Motion fails to state the specific grounds on which the motion is sought. (Code Civ. Proc. §1010; Rules of Ct., rule 3.1110, subd. (a).) The Notice of Motion states that “Plaintiff Merchant Cash and Capital, LLC…move[s] the court for an order setting aside the judgment of dismissal entered o...

Excerpt: ... p. 1:6.) The notice of motion also does not identify the statutory basis allowing a motion to modify a bond amount for a preliminary injunction to be brought. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1010; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110(a).) Assuming there is a basis, defendants argue the injunction bond was not sufficient to cover their damages. Defendants want the bond amount to require plaintiffs to provide for regular monthly payments to them. Defendants, how...

Excerpt: ...0 a.m. in Dept. B. Each party may serve and file, on or before September 9, 2020, a supplemental brief, no longer than 15 pages, addressing the issues identified herein below. Each party may, on or before September 16, 2020, submit a Supplemental Reply, no longer than 10 pages, addressing arguments raised by the other party. The Court reserves all other issues for subsequent proceedings. Petitioner seeks a “writ of mandate…directed to Respond...

Excerpt: ...rocedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing, by Zoom, unless it is confirmed that no party requests oral argument. Defendant and Cross‐ Complainant Laura Young moves the court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300 for an order compelling Plaintiff and Cross‐Defendant Martha Kongsgaard to provide further answers to certain form interrogatories on the grounds that the answers given ...

Excerpt: ...Maly's of Calif., Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.) A demurrer for uncertainty should only be sustained when the complaint is so bad that the defendant cannot reasonably respond. (Ibid.) Here, the pleading is certain enough to allow defendants to understand the nature of the allegations, and the theory of liability in order to fashion an appropriate response. Defendants' demurrer to the first cause of action for battery on the ground of failu...

Excerpt: ...ant did enter into the contract, Plaintiff must allege whether the contract was oral or written and all of its material terms. As to the second cause of action for fraud, it fails similar to the first cause of action, in that no facts are set forth against Defendant Ireton. Additionally, a fraud claim must be specifically pled. The cause of action fails because it is not pled with specificity: how, when, where, to whom, and by what means. Stansfi...

Excerpt: ...ections 1281.2, and 1281.4, and the Federal Arbitration Act, for an order compelling BASS to submit its claims to binding arbitration and to dismiss the Cross‐Complaint pending the outcome of said arbitration. (See Notice of Motion at 2:5‐12.) A. Factual and Procedural History The following facts appear to be undisputed. In or about February or March of 2017, BASS employed Dr. Marquez, pursuant to the terms of a written employment agreement. ...

Excerpt: ...in part. � �[Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6] created a summary, expedited procedure to enforce settlement agreements when certain requirements that decrease the likelihood of misunderstandings are met.� � Elyaoudayan v. Hoffman (2003) 104 Cal.App.4th 1421, 1429. When enforcing a settlement agreement under section 664.6, the court has the authority to resolve factual disputes relating to the agreement, to interpret the terms of the ...

Excerpt: ...f notice of entry of the present order. Clerk is to provide said notice. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in Local Rule 2.9, the moving party/counsel shall appear at the hearing...

Excerpt: ...and form interrogatories (employment law) (set one) numbers 200.1‐200.6, 201.1‐201.7, 207.1‐207.2, 208.1‐208.2, 209.2, 211.1‐ 211.3, 215.1‐ 215.2, and 216.1. Craig acknowledges the motion as to these requests is moot after defendant A Wine Valley Experience Limousine Ind. (dba Napa Valley Tours and Transport) served amended responses to each of the requests to the motion. (Keister Decl., ¶ 12; Reply at p. 3:10‐16.) Craig's motion t...

Excerpt: ...the terms of the signed settlement agreement, and awarding sanctions sufficient to reimburse Nicholsen for his reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the within motion.” (Notice of Motion at 1:24‐2:2.) In opposing the motion, Plaintiff argues that “there was not a meeting of the minds with respect to agreeing on a location of the amended easement before submitting the lot line application to Napa County.” (Opposi...

Excerpt: ...ees. Jury Trial is set for December 14, 2020, 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is set for November 5, 2020, 8:30 a.m. in either the Settlement Conference Room, or by Zoom. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rule 2.9 and the Court's tentative ruling...

Excerpt: ...9 (SPO), from “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY” to “CONFIDENTIAL” of those portions of the Contribution and Equity Purchase Agreement between Defendants V2 Wine Group, LLC and Delicato Vineyards, and the national distribution agreement between Defendant Delicato and third party Southern Glazers Wine & Spirits, that are identified in Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Motion. The motion is DENIED as to all other matters. “Unless other...

Excerpt: ... acts of third parties.” (Castaneda v. Olsher (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1205, 1213.) “[T]he existence and scope of a property owner's duty to protect against third party crime is a question of law for the court to resolve.” (Ibid.) Plaintiff Bobby Carlson alleges Starbucks had a duty to protect him from defendant Nicholas Zazzarino's criminal conduct because heightened foreseeability existed based on various shootings that have taken place at other...

Excerpt: ... to the first amended complaint. Default judgment was entered on June 18, 2020. Defendants' motion focuses entirely on events leading up to the People seeking default judgment on June 15, 2020. Defendants present no argument or evidence as to why default should be set aside based on any purported mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or surprise. The motion as to the setting aside of default, therefore, necessarily fails. Turning to the entry...

Excerpt: ...nding Form Interrogatory 17.1 “on the grounds that the discovery requests are relevant to the subject matter of this action, and not subject to any applicable privileges.” Plaintiff also moves for an order that Defendant pay a monetary sanction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010, et seq., for abuse of the discovery process. Through its opposition, Defendant likewise requests monetary sanctions against Plaintiff. The notice o...

Excerpt: ...to Code of Civil Procedure section 36 and the Court's inherent powers, for an order (1) granting trial‐setting preference to the matter, and (2) setting the trial for a date no later than 120 days after entry of order on the motion. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party/counsel is directed to contact the opposing party/ies forthwith and advise of Local Rul...

Excerpt: ...ross‐Complaint (OCC) filed by Defendant and Cross‐Complainant JKT Associates, Inc. (JKT), on the grounds that each purported claim fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and each is uncertain ambiguous and unintelligible. The Glavins' request for judicial notice is GRANTED. The Court takes judicial notice of the Complaint filed by plaintiffs, and the Cross‐Complaint filed by Defendant JKT Associates in this matter. ...