Excerpt: ...laint arise out of a transaction – relating to certain real property – meant to carry out, in part, the terms of the parties' divorce decree and settlement. Through the Complaint, Plaintiff asserts causes of action quieting Defendant's title in and to the subject real property, and for declaratory and injunctive relief. It appears undisputed that Plaintiff is the owner of fee title in and to the subject property and that she executed a note i...

Excerpt: ...at the first cause of action in Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed as against the moving Defendant. Defendant Wheelan Inc. doing business as Don John Landscaping (“Wheelan”) moves for summary judgment in its favor on the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Daniel Stewart (“Plaintiff”), including its three causes of action for motor vehicle, premises liability, and general negligence, on the grounds that all causes of action have no merit. Whee...

Excerpt: ...ents for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in e
¯ect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. 2 A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Defendant Kinsale Insurance Company (Kinsale) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for summ...

Excerpt: ... is not a licensed contractor as required under licensing requirements o section 7031 o the Business and Proessions Code (“Section 7031”). The demurrer to the sixth cause is also brought on the ground that it ails to allege that Plainti
¯ was detained or arrested let alone the subject o the misuse o the judicial power or process o the Court, as it also ails to allege that any act was done in the name o the court or under its authori...

Excerpt: ...es rom Plainti
¯ to Deendant's Form Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 7.1, 7.2, and 8.7, and Special Interrogatories, Set One, No. 9 (collectively, Subject Discovery) on grounds that Plainti
¯'s responses thereto are each inadequate, evasive, or incomplete.1 A. LEGAL BACKGROUND “[I] a propounding party is not satisÞed with the response served by a responding party, the propounding party may move the court to compel urther responses. (§§ 2...

Excerpt: ...ve ruling system, he failed to include, in the notice of this motion, the Tentative Ruling notice explicitly required by Local Rule 2.9. The abstract reference included in the Notice of Motion fails to include certain information contained in the mandatory statement (e.g. that tentative rulings are available after 3:00 p.m. the day before the hearing), and includes other information that is false and misleading (e.g. that “appearance by remote ...

Excerpt: ...to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in e
¯ect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. It appears that Pla...

Excerpt: ...Third A
¯irmative Deenses. Furthermore, the Motion is GRANTED as to the third portion at issue, as an improper “new” a
¯irmative deense asserted without leave o Court. Plainti
¯ Patricia Simpson moves, pursuant to Code o Civil Procedure sections 435 and 436 and Rules o Court, rule 3.1323, to strike the ollowing portions o the veriÞed answer Þled 23 on January 17, 2024 by Deendant Woolls Ranch, LLC and Progeny Winery, LLC (“Veri...

Excerpt: ...atories, Set Two (collectively the Subject Discovery) propounded by Deendant FPI Management Inc. (FPI). Plainti
¯ is urther directed to pay to FPI, care o its counsel o record in the action, no later than 10 calendar days ater notice o entry o the present ruling, monetary sanctions in the amount o $752.00. FPI moves, pursuant to Code o Civil Procedure section 2030.290, subdivision (b), or an order compelling Plainti
¯ Elisabeth Wetzel...

Excerpt: ...�� on January 31, 2024, two days before the hearing. The Court Þnds that the Seuthe Declaration neither addresses nor controverts any of the evidence presented in the Declaration of Jose L. Parra. The Court further notes that Plainti
¯s have repeatedly Þled late opposing papers, which, as the Court has previously cautioned Plainti
¯s' counsel, is not helpful to the Court's analysis of the issues. Thus, the Court advises Plainti
¯s' counsel t...

Excerpt: ...miss its REPA claims). Defendants Kastner Automotive, Inc. and Atlas Peak Equities LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 438, subds. (c)(2)(A) and (h)(3), for an order granting judgment on the pleadings as to the Complaint Þled by Plainti
¯ M5 Automotive LLC (“Plainti
¯”). The motion is brought on the following four grounds: “(A.) The (real estate) Purchase Agreement incorporated into the ...

Excerpt: ...d pursuant to Section 2023.030, subdivision (b), for an award of "issue sanctions designating that the records are to be interpreted in favor of FPI and/or that Plaintiff Todd Wetzel not be permitted to introduce evidence regarding emotional distress or mental injuries at all." (Notice of Motion at 1:26-2:4.) FPI so moves on grounds that "Todd Wetzel identified LifeStance as a medical provider through which he received care and/or treatment from ...

Excerpt: ...e extent it seeks to compel the production of documents requested with the deposition notice, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant is ordered to produce Scott Silveira, Ulises Figueroa, and Mike Brooks for depositions within 30 calendar days of notice of entry of order. The parties are directed to meet and confer on a mutually agreeable date and time for these depositions. Plaintiffs' request for sanctions is DENIED. A. Preliminary Matters Plai...

Excerpt: ...ay bench trial. Defendants' Objections to the Declaration of John Tudal are ruled on as follows: No 7 is overruled. The evidence asserted in Nos. 1-6 and 8— 13 was not relied upon by the Court and therefore the Court does not rule on these objections. Defendants' Objections to the Declaration of Robert Knox are ruled on as follows: Nos. 14 and 15 are overruled. The evidence asserted in Nos. 15-27 was not relied upon by the Court and therefore t...

Excerpt: ...t on the Second Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff Robert Espinosa in the consolidated action bearing Case No. 21CV000226 on grounds that each Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts in their respective complaints to state a cause of action against Cal-Fire under Vehicle Code section 17001 for the negligent driving of its employee. (See Support Memo at 3:6-12.) Cal-Fire's Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as to the Court's tentative...

Excerpt: ...rance. However, she has never made an uninsured motorist claim against State Farm nor has she engaged in any litigation with State Farm. She can be fair and impartial in this matter. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Gwal Rule 2.9. The moving party is therefore directed to immediately prov-de, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposin...

Excerpt: ... Code of Civil Procedure, section 430.010, to the First Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 51.9 (Section 51.9 Claim) and Seventh Cause of Action for Negligent Misrepresentation (Negligent Misrepresentation Claim) asserted against DNVR by Plaintiff through her First Amended Complaint (FAC) in the action.l DNVR so-demurs on grounds that Plaintiff fails to allege facts to state either of the subject claims "as [DNVRI is not vicariou...

Excerpt: ... Second Amended Complaint ("Complaint") be tried in a bench trial first, and after the bench trial the Court can address whatever issues, if any, remain to be tried in the Second Amended Cross-complaint ("Cross- Complaint") filed by Hoopes Family Winery Partners, LP, and Hoopes Vineyard, LLC (collectively, "Hoopes"). The Motion is made on the grounds that bifurcation will promote judicial efficiency and will be conducive to expedition and economy...

Excerpt: ...s to the subject discovery that "substantially comply" with the Civil Discovery Act, and that his failure to timely serve such responses was the result of inadvertence and excusable neglect. 1 Where a party, by failing to timely respond, has waived objections to inspection demands, "[tlhe court, on motion, may relieve that party from this waiver on its determination that both of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The party has subsequent...

Excerpt: ...hments to other filings to be deemed operative pleadings. For this reason, Plaintiff is required to file the proposed amendment.) A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Plaintiff Charleen Wignall-Ewing moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 473 and 576, for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint on grounds that the amendment is related to the subject matter of the existing controversy and will not result in prejudice to the Defendants. The motion o...

Excerpt: ...intiff") fourth cause of action for easement termination. Separately, the Puentes Defendants and Charreria Arete y Cultura Napa Valley Foundation CACNV SPC (collectively, "Defendants") move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 438, subdivision (c)(1)(8)(ii), for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff's twelfth cause of action for declaratory relief. A defendant may move for judgment on the pleadings and the court may grant such a motio...

Excerpt: ...ate to allow for sufficient tme for the statement of decision and entry of judgment on the Complaint. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in ...

Excerpt: ...Doe 11. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hear...

Excerpt: ...ter Randall Callahan (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). The motion is "made on the grounds that the Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate Plaintiffs' sole cause of action for alleged constitutional and statutory violations, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, because that claim is moot." (Notice at 2.) The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Mo...

Excerpt: ...C at '1 31); 2. "The Winery's willful violation of law and disregard for cross-complainants' rights constitute oppression, fraud, and malice, entitling cross-complainants to an award of exemplary damages" (ld. at 39, 47, and 52); 3. Paragraph 62 in its entirety; and 4. The phrase "and exemplary damages" from paragraph 3 of the prayer for relief at page 15, lines 9-11. Cross-complainants are granted ten calendar days' leave to file another cross-c...

Excerpt: ...the Declaration of James C. Bastian in Opposition to Defendant Bank of America, NA's Motion for Plaintiffs to Post Bond as Vexatious Litigants filed February 15, 2022 (Bastian Decl.). Plaintiffs may refile the declaration, in whole or in part, in support of any opposition. The Clerk is directed to provide notice of the continued hearing date to the parties. Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) failed to include in the notice of this moton prope...

Excerpt: ...cture allegedly encroaching on Plaintiffs' property and Mr. Wagner is the owner and manager of Defendant The Original Thomas ("TOT"), the current owner of the allegedly encroaching structure. The Court notes that these are defendant parties to this action. As an initial matter, by Minute Order dated November 1, 2023, in which the Court granted Defendants TOT's, Michael L. Holcomb's, and Maria C. Holcomb's (collectively, "Defendants") motions to a...

Excerpt: ...nd the People of the State of California and for Cross-Defendants David Morrison and Akenya Robinson-Webb (collectively, "County") — and excluding evidence improperly obtained in this matter. The motion to disqualify and exclude evidence is based on the premise that RPLG violated Rule 4.2. Therefore, the Court begins there. 8. Violation of Rule 4.2 1. Text of Rule 4.2 Rule 4.2 provides, in relevant part: (a) In representing a client, a lawyer s...

Excerpt: ...record, sanctions in the amount of $2,557.50 no later than 10 calendar days after service of notce of entry of order. The request for an order finding Plaintiff in contempt is DENIED. Defendants Sharon Coleman and Daniel Davis, individually and as trustees of the Cary M. Tozer and Doris V. Tozer Family Trust; Michael Taylor Ford and Edward Roy Moody, as trustees of the 2020 Michael Taylor Ford and Edward Roy Moody Rewcable Trust; Robert l. Clark;...

Excerpt: ...other action pending between the same parties on the same cause of action and (2) fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. "The party against whom a complaint ... has been filed may object, by demurrer ... to the pleading on any one or more of the following grounds [including] [t]here is another action pending between the same parties on the same cause of action." (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (c).) This special demurr...

Excerpt: ...Misrepresentation, Third Cause of Action for Negligent Misrepresentation, Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of Business & Professions Code section 7151 (California Home Improvement Statutes ("HIS")), and Fifth Cause of Action for Violation of Business & Profession Code section 17200 fail to state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against Defendant. A complaint must contain "facts constituting the cause of action." (Code Civ. Proc...

Excerpt: ...roduction Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Plaintiff") moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1987.1, 1985.3, 2017.020, and 2017.220, for an order quashing or modifying a deposition subpoena for production of business records issued by Defendant Napa Valley Unified School District ("Defendant") on November 7, 2023 to Kaiser Permanente ("Subpoena"). In the alternative, Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure secton 2025.420, for a pr...

Excerpt: ...ef. Finally, the motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's prayer for prejudgment interest. l. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Cross-Defendant Sutter Home Winery, Inc. (Sutter Home or Defendant) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c, for summary judgement against Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Says Siri. "The motion will be made on the grounds that the undisputed material facts establish that Siri's sole remaining...

Excerpt: ...nting leave to intervene in the instant case. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests fo...

Excerpt: ...of Costs filed by Defendant and Cross-complainant Jeffrey Hammond (Hammond), or in the alternative, for an order tax-ng the requested costs set forth therein.l "Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding." (S 1032, subd. (b).) A "prevailing party" is defined to include "the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismi...

Excerpt: ... allow for adequate notce of the rescheduled deposition date to Mr. Fultz. The request for sanctions is GRANTED IN PART. Mr. Fultz is ordered to pay to Plaintiffs, care of their attorney of record, within 15 calendar days of notice of entry of this order, sanctons in the amount of $3,902. Plaintiffs shall provide notce of entry of order. Plaintiffs Robert and Carole Roszkowski (collectively, "Plaintiffs") move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure...

Excerpt: ...form of (1) terminating sanctions dismissing Plaintiff Napa County's nuisance per se claim related to unpermitted structures on Defendants' property and (2) an award of attorneys' fees and costs in the sum of $4,095 against both Plaintiffs Napa County and the People of the State of California (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and their counsel. "This motion is made on the grounds that Plaintiff and its counsel filed nuisance allegations for an imprope...

Excerpt: ... pay to Plaintiff, care of its counsel of record in the action, no later than 10 calendar days after notice of entry of the present ruling, monetary sanctions in the additional amount of $1,100. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Gwal Rule 2.9. The moving party is therefore directed to immediately prov-de, by telephone call AND email, the missing notic...

Excerpt: ... criminal liability and what other events would eliminate such liability in advance of the expiration of any such statute. Defendant State of California by and through Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal-Fire) moves for an order vacating the trial date and setting a status conference to reset trial on the grounds that the criminal prosecution of Cal-Fire driver Chief William White, which is based on the same events at issue here, rema...

Excerpt: ...rial facts confirm that Plaintiff cannot maintain her causes of achon against Simon as follows: (A) Simon did not have a duty to protect Plaintiff from the unforeseeable criminal acts of Maximo Perez. Accordingly, Plaintiff's first cause of action for Negligence and second cause of action for Premises Liability fail as a matter of aw. (8) Simon's alleged conduct was not a substantial factor in bringing about Plaintiff's injuries. Accordingly, Pla...

Excerpt: ...rder compelling Defendant Estate of Pamela Anne Ramos ("Defendant") to provide answer to written discovery and for an order granting the moving party the reasonable attorney's fees and costs associated with filing the motion in the amount of $3,550 as sanctions against Defendant and Defendant's counsel. (Notice at 1-2.) The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required ...

Excerpt: ...the time of his complaints to PG&E, were being violated. The demurrer is OVERRULED in all other respects. A. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) demurs, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 430.10, subdivisions (e) and (f), to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by Daniel Novella. The FAC alleges three causes of action against PG&E. PG&E demurs to each on grounds that each is uncertain and that the FAC ...

Excerpt: ...ELIMINARY MATTERS Defendants Covidien Holding Inc. and Medtronic USA Inc., and Specially Appearing Entities Covidien LP, Covidien, Inc., Covidien, LLC, Medtronic PLC, United States Surgical Corp., a division of Tyco Healthcare Group LP, and Sofradim Production SAS (collectively, "Covidien Defendants") demur, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10, subdivision (e) and 430.30, to Plaintiff Jon Carsten's Complaint for Damages (Complaint...

Excerpt: ...dar days after notice of the present ruling. The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs are directed to remit to Towpath, care of their attorney of record in the action and no later than 14 calendar days after notice of the present ruling, monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,000. Towpath moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300, et seq. and 2031.310 et seq. for an order compelling Plaintiffs Elisabeth ...

Excerpt: ...or October 31, 2023, which Defendants refused to allow and "Defendant's actions have made it clear that they will not voluntarily allow the property inspection and testing without a court order." (ld. at 2:6-13.) As an initial matter, neither of the subjects of Defendant FPI Management, Inc.'s Objection to the Declaration of Bryan Seuthe are relevant to the Court's determination of the issues raised by the motion, rendering said objections MOOT. ...

Excerpt: ...ision (a), and 576, for an order allowing Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint ("SAC"). The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect...

Excerpt: ...The motion is made on the grounds that the Defendant failed to complete the payment arrangement contained in the parties' written Stipulation and Plaintiff is thus entitled to entry of judgment. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notce of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party...

Excerpt: ...cks jurisdiction to rule on a motion that has not been properly noticed for hearing on the date in question." (Diaz v. Prof. Community Management, Inc. (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 1190, 1204-05.) As Defendants note, there is no proof of service of the moving papers on Defendants. However, "[i]t is well settled that the appearance of a party at the hearing of a motion and his or her opposition to the motion on its merits is a waiver of any defects or ir...

Excerpt: ... However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. Plaintiff Capital One, N.A moves for judgment on the pleadings against Defendant on grounds that, "defendant's Answer fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a defense and the Order Deeming Plaintiff's R...

Excerpt: ... Plaintiffs are directed to provide notice of the order. Plaintiffs JG Masonry, LLC and Jorge Gonzalez move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 et seq. and 2031.300 et seq„ for an order compelling Defendant Silveira Chevrolet to serve verified responses, without objections, to Plaintiffs' request for production of documents, set one, and special interrogatories, set one, served on September 12, 2023. Plaintiffs further move, ...