Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

4084 Results

Location: Contra Costa x
2022.09.12 Petition to Compel Arbitration 405
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Devine, John P
Hearing Date: 2022.09.12
Excerpt: ...nville, California, on December 6, 2019. Petitioner Mustafa Ayubi, was driving for rideshare application Uber. Petitioner and his passengers, Chandima Fernando and Avanthi Bandarnaike, were injured in the accident. Other involved drivers include Antoinette Chavez‐Jesus (an Allstate insured) and Kathleen McElroy (a Nationwide insured). Petitioner and his passengers pursued bodily injury claims against Chavez‐Jesus, which resulted in a settleme...
2022.09.12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 857
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Devine, John P
Hearing Date: 2022.09.12
Excerpt: ...a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 438 (d); Saltarelli & Steponovich v. Douglas (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1, 5; Weil & Brown, Civ. Pro. Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2010) p. 7:292.) As such, a motion for judgment on the pleadings involves the same type of procedures that apply to a general demurrer. (Richardson‐Tunnell v. School Ins. Program for Employees (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1056, 1061; Burnett v. Chimney S...
2022.09.09 Renewed Motion for Summary Adjudication 007
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.09
Excerpt: ...aintiffs”). The MSA is opposed by the defendants/respondents, San Joaquin County Emergency Medical Services Agency and the County of San Joaquin (collectively, “Defendants”). The Court previously denied Plaintiffs' MSA in November 2021. In bringing the renewed MSA, Plaintiffs contend that City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010 (“Oxnard”), which was decided after this matter was submitted and finalized after the C...
2022.09.09 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 890
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.09
Excerpt: ...is case involves the personal injury and eventual death of Ms. Loyola Meagher (hereinafter “Loyola”), who was an elderly woman who suffered a stroke in August 2017. On September 12, 2017, after a stay at John Muir Medical Center, she was placed in the care of defendant, Manor Care of Walnut Creek, LLC (“Manor Care”) for rehabilitation and skilled nursing services. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, hereinafter “SSUMF,” ...
2022.09.09 Motion for Summary Judgment 919
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.09
Excerpt: ...m breach of a home equity line of credit originally issued by National City Bank. Defendants answered, generally denying that any debt is owed and asserting various affirmative defenses, including that the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations and Piedmont violated the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. Defendants also filed a cross‐complaint against Piedmont to redress its debt collection practices. The material facts are largely undi...
2022.09.08 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 473
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...breaks, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and cascading derivative violations. The complaint was filed March 9, 2021, initially as a class action. PAGA claims were added by a First Amended Complaint May 20, 2021, and the Court approved dismissal of the class and individual claims on June 7, 2021. The total settlement payment is $170,000. This is composed of attorney's fees of $56,666.66 (one‐third of the recovery), a ceiling on litigat...
2022.09.08 Demurrer to TAC 506
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...ful death, (2) wrongful death based on negligent supervision, training discipline and retention, (3) Bane Act, and (4) negligent infliction of emotional distress. Negligent Hiring, Supervision, Training and Retention (C/A 2) and Bane Act (C/A 3) The Court previously found that Plaintiffs had not stated a claim as to negligent hiring, supervision, training and retention and as to the Bane Act claim. The Third Amended Complaint does not change the ...
2022.09.08 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 460
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...misrepresentation, (3) intentional misrepresentation, (4) fraud, (5) negligence, (6) implied indemnity, (7) equitable indemnity, (8) comparative indemnity, (9) contribution, (10) declaratory relief, (11) violation of prompt payment act, (12) common counts—money paid, (13) quantum meruit, and (14) alter ego liability. Cross‐Defendant demurs to Cross‐Complainant's fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth causes of action pursuant to Co...
2022.09.08 Demurrer 731
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Maier, Clare
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...(2) negligent hiring, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 36 HEARING DATE: 09/08/2022 supervision & retention, and (3) elder abuse – neglect. Defendants demurrer only to the third cause of action for elder abuse – neglect. Defendant's Demurrer is sustained. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend. Allegations in the Complaint Bay Medic is a medical transport service. Since 2022, Bay Medic has reduced its fiel...
2022.09.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 999
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...nt violated the Labor Code in various ways, including unpaid overtime, unpaid minimum wage, non‐compliant meal and rest periods (all primarily based on off‐the‐clock work), and waiting time and wage statement claims. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $726,600. The class representative payment to the plaintiff would be $5,000. Counsel's attorney's fees would be $242,000 (one‐third of the settlement). Litigation costs a...
2022.09.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 831
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...nt violated the Labor Code in various ways, including unpaid overtime, unpaid minimum wage, off‐the‐clock work, non‐compliant meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses, waiting time, and wage statement claims. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $224,400. The class representative payment to the plaintiff would be $10,000. Counsel's attorney's fees would be $74,800 (one‐third of the settlement). Litigation co...
2022.09.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 044
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Maier, Clare
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ...ciated with replacing an electrical pole that was struck by a vehicle driven by defendant Sofia Mirella Madruga on June 10, 2017. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Fact, hereinafter “SSUMF,” Fact Nos. 1, 5, and response.) PG&E filed this action on October 1, 2020, alleging three causes of action against defendant: (1) negligence, (2) negligence per se, and (3) trespass. PG&E claimed it was entitled to “compensatory damages accordin...
2022.09.08 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 673
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Maier, Clare
Hearing Date: 2022.09.08
Excerpt: ... (1) Plaintiff was never employed by Shannon B. Jones Law, Inc.; (2) Based on after‐acquired evidence, Plaintiff cannot establish her constructive discharge claim; (3) Plaintiff cannot sustain her constructive discharge claim, independent of after‐acquired evidence; and (4) Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is subject to the exclusivity remedy of the Workers' Compensation Act. Defendants Shannon B. Jones Law Group...
2022.09.02 Motion to Strike 650
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.02
Excerpt: ...filed by October 15, 2022. Background On December 6, 2021, Defendants Jeremy D. Williams, Raymond Landry, and Synthia Jones‐Clark ("Cross‐Complainants") filed a cross‐complaint naming as cross‐defendants plaintiffs Vickey Pippins, Sandria Husband, Myrtle Jones, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Moses Jones, who is now deceased, and William Simpich, who is counsel for the Plaintiffs and other named CrossDefendants. On January 11,...
2022.09.02 Motion to Consolidate 669
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.02
Excerpt: ... documents and witnesses. Defendant Karen Moroz objects to the motion to consolidate arguing that “Plaintiffs' 2019 Action is not pending before the Court.” (Objection at 1:28‐2:1.) Factual Background: Plaintiffs filed the instant case in December 2019. A First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was filed on May 4, 2022. The FAC alleges five causes of action: (1) strict liability; (2) negligence; (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress;...
2022.09.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 559
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.02
Excerpt: ...) nuisance. (The caption of the Complaint references a cause of action for private nuisance but there is no such cause of action in the body of the Complaint.) Defendant moves on the grounds that the HOA is entitled to make decisions SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 07 HEARING DATE: 09/02/2022 15 regarding landscaping under the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) of the HOA, that the HOA's dec...
2022.09.02 Demurrer to FAC 650
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.02
Excerpt: ...round Plaintiff Todd Alden Whitacre was a pump man aboard the tanker ship SLNC PAX for just under four months. (First Amended Complaint, also referred to herein as “FAC,” 2:19‐22.) Over two days, November 26‐27, 2018, plaintiff dried out the pumproom. The next day he called the medic and complained of irregular heartbeats. (FAC, 5:19‐23.) Plaintiff wrote an official ship statement after the cleaning operation, stating he "felt wobbily [...
2022.09.02 Demurrer 330
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Baskin, Barry
Hearing Date: 2022.09.02
Excerpt: ... First Cause of Action, and is otherwise overruled. Defendants shall file an answer to the Third Amended Complaint on or before September 22, 2022. The basis for this ruling is as follows. A. Plaintiffs' Evidentiary Objections. Plaintiffs' evidentiary objections, filed with plaintiffs' opposition memorandum on August 22, 2022, are overruled. The Court may take judicial notice of court filings and orders that are pertinent to defendants' res judic...
2022.09.01 Motion to Transfer Venue 881
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ...of 5 Mile Road, which is located in El Dorado County. The accident occurred when Defendants vehicle made a left turn across US‐50, in front of Plaintiff's vehicle, resulting in a collision. Emergency medical attention was performed on location and at a local hospital in El Dorado County, and one of the Plaintiff was airlifted to a hospital in Placer County. Both Defendants are residents of Contra Costa County. All five Plaintiffs are residents ...
2022.09.01 Motion to Strike, Demurrer 374
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Maier, Clare
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ...evant, false or improper matter" or any portion of a pleading "not drawn . . . in conformity with the laws of this state." (Code Civ. Proc. § 436(a) and (b).) Like a demurrer, the grounds for a motion to strike must appear on the face of the pleading or be based on a matter subject to judicial notice under Evidence Code sections 450‐453. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437(a) and (b).) "A motion to strike, like a demurrer, challenges the legal sufficiency...
2022.09.01 Motion to Amend Answer, to Compel Arbitration 659
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: .... (Compl. ¶ 2.) She filed her complaint initiating this action on April 7, 2021, alleging a single cause of action under the Private Attorney General Act, Labor Code section 2699 et seq. ("PAGA") for violation of Labor Code section 2751(a). The complaint alleges that Broker violated Labor Code section 2751(a) by its failure to include or disclose its "lean in" policy affecting the employees' commissions. Defendant Broker filed its answer to the ...
2022.09.01 Motion for Summary Judgment 213
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Maier, Clare
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ...mation. As the Assembly Committee on Health stated in describing section 1280.15: CMIA prohibits, with exceptions, health‐care providers . . . from disclosing medical information . . .. CMIA does not address “access” which could involve an individual “snooping” at a patient's records without a healthcare related or other legally authorized purpose, but who does not disclose or otherwise use the medical information. In Regents of Univers...
2022.09.01 Motion for Fees and Costs 280
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ... a motion for summary judgment. ProWest then made a Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer for $159,000. Ultimately, the offer was accepted. Elite was a subcontractor of ProWest. Elite demanded payment, including from the surety, and was not paid. Elite filed a mechanics lien and subsequent suit. It filed a motion for summary adjudication. In addition, the property owner (San Ramon Owner) filed an action against ProWest, which resulted in ProW...
2022.09.01 Motion for Entry of Judgment 972
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ...the submission of the motion, the parties submitted a declaration pursuant to Rule of Court 3.770 There are two claims against the State defendants in the Third Amended Complaint. The First cause of action is for violations of Education Code section 56000 (right to a Free and Appropriate Education), and alleges that the plaintiffs “suffer, will suffer, or have suffered, irreparable harm, including substantial losses of educational opportunities...
2022.09.01 Motion for Attorney Fees 971
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Weil, Edward G
Hearing Date: 2022.09.01
Excerpt: ...rest; (3) the party conferred a significant benefit, whether pecuniary or nonpecuniary, on the public; and (4) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement makes an award appropriate. (1) Prevailing Party The Real Party in Interest prevailed in the case. A Real Party in Interest is eligible for fees as a prevailing party, if it meets the other statutory criteria. (Early v. Becerra (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 726, 736.) (2) Public Interest ...

4084 Results

Per page

Pages