Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

746 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Contra Costa x
Judge: Treat, Charles S x
2023.06.22 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 956
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.22
Excerpt: ...imes at some of those restaurants. The present Gonzalez complaint was filed on January 5, 2021, and subsequently amended. This settlement also covers two other cases asserting similar claims. Plaintiff Frank filed his complaint in SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 12 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHARLES S TREAT HEARING DATE: 06/22/2023 13 Alameda County in 2018; plaintiff Collins, in Santa Clara County in 2018. Those ...
2023.06.22 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 010
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.22
Excerpt: ...EZ, CA DEPARTMENT 12 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHARLES S TREAT HEARING DATE: 06/22/2023 10 A. Background of the Case and Terms of Settlement This a PAGA case (not a class action), alleging a variety of violations of the Labor Code concerning failure to provide rest and meal breaks, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and cascading derivative violations. Because of the preclusive effect of prior PAGA cases against defendants, this case was limited ...
2023.06.22 Demurrer 810
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.22
Excerpt: ...and other "similarly situated" employees of defendant, Dolan's of Pinole Lumber and Building Materials Co. Specifically, plaintiff alleges the action is on behalf of "[all' persons who worked for any Defendant in California as an hourly-paid or non-exempt employee at any time during the [relevant time period]." (Complaint, 8:4- 5.) The entire complaint is alleged on information and belief. (Complaint, 1:1-2.) Plaintiff alleges SUPERIOR COURT OF C...
2023.06.08 Motion for Summary Adjudication 264
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ... dba Certified Heating and Air Conditioning and dba Certified Solar, Heating & Air Conditioning ("Certified") and Brian Arlaud arises out of Plaintiffs' purchase of a heating and air conditioning system ("HVAC") from Certified. (Pl. Sep. Stmt. of Undisputed Material Facts ("LJMF"), Issue l, UMF No. 1.) They allege Certified gave them a written "18 Month Certified Trust Guarantee" when they bought the system. (UMF No. 3.) The Huslers contend they ...
2023.06.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and Representative Action 931
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ...uired Victory in January 2021, and continued its business with the same work force. Victory and Thorpe were in the business of designing and installing fire protection systems. Delamora was employed as a pipefitter from 2016 to 2021; Cardenas, as a carpenter from 2020 to 2022. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 12 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHARLES S TREAT HEARING DATE: 06/08/2023 2 Delamora's original complaint was ...
2023.06.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 113
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ...aintiff was employed there as a stylist in the summer of 2021. The original complaint was filed on October 17, 2021. A PAGA claim was added by amendment in December 2021. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $450,000. The class representative payment to the plaintiffs would be $10,000. Attorney's fees would be $150,000 (one-third of the settlement). Litigation costs would not exceed $15,000. The settlement administrator's costs ...
2023.06.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 204
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ...endant is the parent of Hand & Stone Massage and Facial Spa. Plaintiff was employed with defendant as a neuromuscular therapist in the spring of 2021, though only briefly. The original complaint was filed on October 25, 2021. A PAGA claim was added by amendment in January 2022. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $150,000. The class representative payment to the plaintiff would be $5,000. Attorney's fees would be $50,000 (one-t...
2023.06.08 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 257
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ...0 class members and 128 PAGA aggrieved employees. Two packets were returned by the post office. Follow up resulted in one new address, leaving only one non-deliverable. No objections have been received, and only one class member opted out. E. Background and Settlement Terms The original complaint was filed on June 1, 2021. It remains the operative complaint. The alleged violations are of a technical nature. Defendant is not alleged to have underp...
2023.06.01 Motion to Compel Responses 970
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ... interrogatories, stating that counsel "lost track of this discovery amongst the Wluminous sets of burdensome discovery by the numerous Defendants in this matter". However, it is plaintiff that chose to sue some 20 defendants in this case; it should have been prepared to respond to discovery from all of them. And as seen in its opposition to the trial-scheduling motion still pending, it is plaintiff that SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA...
2023.06.01 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 799
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...p on which plaintiff tripped or slipped. The Rabinovicis own the adjacent residence. They are not accused of doing anything to cause the alleged dangerous condition — only of not having remedied it. The City cites a municipal ordinance requiring adjacent property owners to maintain sidewalks in a non- dangerous condition, and to "repair and replace" such sidewalks whenever necessary to maintain them in nan-dangerous condition. SUPERIOR COURT OF...
2023.05.25 Demurrer 188
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ... to Richmond's adoption of a new business tax mulel ("Measure U" or "the Richmond Business Tax") based on business' gross receipts instead of a flat tax rate. The new system, which was originally promoted as being "based on the Berkeley Model," results in significant increased taxes on plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege their taxes have increased by a factor of more than and that their class of businesses, Class C, is disproportionately affected. (See...
2023.05.25 Demurrer to SAC 901
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...nsidering Jorgensen, she missed the deadline for filing an LWDA notice by two years. And looking to the effect of Jorgensen's notice and complaint, although the parties argue about whether Chayrez does or doesn't get to piggyback onto what Jorgensen had done, doesn't matter much because even if Chayrez steps fully into Jorgensen's LWDA notice and complaint, Jorgensen's position was that of representing employees for a PAGA period that didn't star...
2023.05.25 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 497
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...ator has mailed notices to 859 class members. 114 packets were returned by the post office. Follow up resulted in 73 new addresses, leaving 39 nondeliverable. No objections or requests to opt out have been received. The motion is granted. A. Background and Settlement Terms The original complaint was filed on March 9, 2020. There are a number of claims in the complaint, but they all arise generally from the allegation that defendant made a practic...
2023.05.25 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 804
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...ployed by some of the defendants during the relevant time period. A. Background of the Case and Terms of Settlement This a PAGA case (not a class action), alleging a variety of violations of the Labor Code concerning failure to provide rest and meal breaks, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and cascading derivative violations. In particular, plaintiffs assert alleged violations for off-the-clock work, meal and rest breaks, reporting time...
2023.05.25 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and PAGA Action Settlement 874
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...y products in agriculture and structural pest control. Plaintiffs were employed (Desantis formerly, and Barnes currently) as workers in a warehouse facility in California. The original complaint was filed by Desantis on September 8, 2021 as a class action and PAGA case. Barnes filed a parallel class action complaint on February 18, 2022. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $372,500. The class representative payments to the name...
2023.05.25 Motion for Summary Judgment 603
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...about which causes of achon include Ralph Padilla (as opposed to Padilla Construction Company). Perhaps out of an excess of caution, Ralph Padilla sought summary adjudication as to causes of action one, two and three. In the opposition, however, plaintiffs confirmed that they are suing Ralph Padilla only for negligence (cause of action one). The Court's review of the fourth amended complaint also shows that plaintiffs are not suing Ralph Padilla ...
2023.05.18 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 868
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...ffice position. The original complaint was filed on August 31, 2021 as a class action. PAGA claims were added by amendment in December 2022, and additional claims added in March 2023. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $750,000. The class representative payment to the plaintiff would be $10,000. Attorney's fees would be $250,000 (one-third of the settlement). Litigation costs would not exceed $15,000. The settlement administra...
2023.05.18 Demurrer to FAC 693
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...n complaint against John Muir Health (JMH). The Court previously sustained in part a demurrer to their original complaint. Plaintiffs allege that each of them is a Facebook user which gives them a unique Facebook ID associated with their Facebook profile and account. (FAC 55, 91, 95, 101, 106.) They further SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 12 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHARLES S TREAT HEARING DATE: 05/18/2023 2 all...
2023.05.11 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, Attorney Fees 999
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...ted, the administrator has mailed notces to 951 class members. Fourteen packets were returned by the post office. Follow up resulted in 10 new addresses, leaving 4 non- deliverable. No objections or requests to opt out have been received. 12 Both motions are granted. A. Background and Settlement Terms The original complaint was filed on September 28, 2020, raising claims under PAGA and a class action on behalf of non-exempt employees, alleging th...
2023.05.11 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 073
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...ator has mailed notices to 533 class members. One packet was returned by the post offce. Follow up resulted in a new address, leaving none non-deliverable. No objections have been received, and only three class members have requested exclusion from the class settlement. The Court notes some confusion as to the amount of the settlement administration cost. The estimate at the time of preliminary approval was $11,857.70. Now the body of the motion ...
2023.05.11 Motion for Class Certification 513
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...ourt ...." "The party advocating class treatment must demonstrate the existence of [1] an ascertainable and sufficiently numerous class, [2] a well-defined community of interest, and substantial benefits from certification that render proceeding as a class superior to the alternatives. [Citations.]" (Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1021; see also Code of Civil Procedure S 382.) Plaintiff has the burden of showin...
2023.05.11 Motion for Class Certification 155
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: ...present are current or previous Operators that worked at Chevron's oil refinery in Richmond, California. The Operators belonged to a union (United Steelworkers Local 5), which was the sole bargaining representative of Chevron's employees. The union and Chevron had a collective bargaining agreement which covered the Operators throughout the period of November 25, 2019 through May 30, 2022. (Mohon at 9:22-28.) The collective bargaining agreement co...
2023.05.04 OSC Re Contempt 129
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...y that award of attorney fees has not been paid, and defendants seek to enforce it by contempt order. Left unspoken, however, is exactly what defendants mean by a "contempt order". What exactly do they contemplate the Court is supposed to do as a response to a contempt of court consisting of nonpayment of a judgment? Issue another order that Lewis pay up? Put him in jail? Give him a criminal conviction? Or what? It doesn't appear that defendants ...
2023.05.04 Motion to Compel Arbitration 735
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...reement between the parties that cover this actions' claims. The motion is denied, because in the Court's view defendant has waived the right to seek arbitration. The Agreement to Arbitrate Whether the arbitration agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. SS 1 et seq., or by the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure SS 1280 et seq., the threshold issue of whether a valid and enforceable agreement to arbitrate ex...
2023.05.04 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 134
Location: Contra Costa
Judge: Treat, Charles S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.04
Excerpt: ...ENT 12 JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHARLES S TREAT HEARING DATE: 05/04/2023 7 Facts ["UMF"] No. 1; Neeno Decl. par. 3; Defs.' Additional undisputed Material Fact ["AUMF"] No. 1.) The Neeno Property is located near the top of the Martinez Ridge in or adjacent to the Muir Oaks subdivision of Martinez and was undeveloped when plaintiff purchased it. (AUMF No. 3.) The only paved access to the Neeno property is from Alhambra Avenue, a public road, is by using f...

746 Results

Per page

Pages