Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

3387 Results

Location: Fresno x
2024.02.29 Motion to Set Aside Default, for Sanctions 338
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...ion: “The ethical obligation to warn opposing counsel of an intent to take a default is now reinforced by a statutory policy that all parties ‘cooperate in bringing the action to trial or other disposition.' Quiet speed and unreasonable deadlines do no t qualify as ‘cooperation' and cannot be accepted by the courts.” (Lasalle v. Vogel (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 127, 137, emphasis added, citations omitted.) In addition, “[t]he law favors judg...
2024.02.29 Motion to Consolidate Unlimited Civil Action with Unlawful Detainer Actions 160
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...nation: The purpose of consolidation is to enhance trial court efficiency by avoiding unnecessary duplication of evidence and procedures, and to avoid the substantial danger of inconsistent adjudications. (Todd -Stenberg v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 976, 978.) And where the issue is consolidating an unlawful detainer action with a civil action making a claim of ownership of the subject property, the additional issue is o...
2024.02.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 274
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...ted, such argument will be entertained in Department 501 at 3:30 p.m. on February 29, 2024. Explanation: A plaintiff may request a continuance by filing a declaration explaining why further discovery is essential to opposing the motion for s ummary judgment and why additional time is needed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (h); Combs v. Skyriver Communications, Inc. (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 1242, 1270.) The declaration must show facts that establ...
2024.02.29 Motion for Summary Adjudication 390
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...n for summary adjudication is continued to May 2, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403. Defendant shall file and serve its motion for relief from the order deeming it to have admitted the matters in the requests for admission by March 14, 2024. The motion shall be calendared on April 11, 2024. Opposition and reply briefs will be filed and served per code. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertained in Department 501 ...
2024.02.29 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and Representative Action Settlement 297
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...f Court, rule 3.769, subd. (a).) The approval of the settlement also requires certification of a preliminary settlement class. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769, subd. (d).) “If the court grants preliminary approval, its order must includ e the time, date, and place of the final approval hearing; the notice to be given to the class; and any other matters deemed necessary for the proper conduct of a settlement hearing. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rul...
2024.02.29 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Strike Costs 440
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...rmony Communities' motion for its attorney's fees, in the amount of $38,002.50. To grant plaintiffs' motion to strike La Hacienda's Memorandum of Costs, item 10, in the amount of $3,512. To deny plaintiffs' motion to strike the remainder of La Hacienda's Memorandum of Costs. To deny plaintiffs' motion to strike Harmony's Memorandum of Costs, in its entirety. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertained in Department 501...
2024.02.29 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement, to Dismiss Cause of Action 112
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...on Under Labor Code section 2699, “[t]he superior court shall review and approve any settlement of any civil action filed pursuant to [PAGA]. The proposed settlement shall be submitted to the agency at the same time that it is submitted to the court.” (Lab. Code, § 2699, subd. (i)(2).) The statute does not explain what exactly the trial court should consider when reviewing a proposed PAGA settlement. However, recently the Court of Appeal in...
2024.02.29 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 802
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...ve costs to administer in the amount of $3,250.00. Plaintiff is directed to submit a new proposed order. Explanation: 1. Introduction Under Labor Code section 2699, “[t]he superior court shall review and approve any settlement of any civil action filed pursuant to [PAGA]. The proposed settlement shall be submitted to the agency at the same time that it is submitted to the court.” (Lab. Code, § 2699, subd. (i)(2).) ‘“‘A representative ...
2024.02.29 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 399
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.29
Excerpt: ...r by the clerk, defendants shall submit a proposed Judgment dismissing the action. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertained in Department 403 at 3:30 p.m. on March 7, 2024. Explanation: In the FAC filed on 8/15/23, plaintiff Stacy Hu ber alleges she was falsely accused of misconduct at a termination meeting, terminated, and not given any reason for the termination. Based on these bare allegations, plaintiff alleges...
2024.02.28 Demurrer 946
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...30.10, subd. (e), (f).) To overrule the demurrers to the first and second causes of action. The time in which the complaint may be amended will run from service of the order by the clerk. All new allegations shall be in boldface type. Explanation: This is an elder abuse action brought on behalf of Dorothy Magee (“Decedent”), through her successor -in -interest Lydell Magee. Decedent's children, Lydell Magee and Marcel Smith, also assert a wr...
2024.02.28 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 178
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...Explanation: Demurrer The function of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a plaintiff's pleading by raising questions of law. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 545.) The test is whether plaintiff has succeeded in stating a cause of action; the court does not concern itself with the issue of plaintiff's possible difficulty or inability in proving the allegations of his complaint. (Highlanders, Inc. v. Olsan (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 690,...
2024.02.28 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 362
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ... v. Woodward -Clyde & Assocs. (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, 499 (Tech -BIlt)) include “a rough approximation of plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability, the amount paid in settlement, the allocation of settlement proceeds among plaintiffs, a nd a recognition that a settlor should pay less in settlement than he would if he were found liable after a trial. Other relevant considerations include the financial condition...
2024.02.28 Motion for Sanctions 951
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...s from the date of service of the order by the clerk, to counsel for defendants Hope Benites Serna and Fernando Serna. Explanation: On September 6, 2023, defendants Hope Benites Serna and Fernando Serna (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Request for Pr etrial Discovery Conference, consistent with Fresno Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.1.17 regarding disputes between the parties on discovery. On September 25, 2023, noting that plaintiff A...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 434
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...submitted on reply in the Reply Declaration of Gary Revis. All supplemental briefing will be per Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), treating March 26, 2024 as the original hearing date. Explanation: Defendant Future Clovis, Inc. d ba Future Ford of Clovis (“Defendant”) moves for an order compelling Plaintiffs SS Pro Flooring & Construction, Inc. and Saul Sanchez Medina (collectively “Plaintiffs”) to arbitration. A tri...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 959
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ovisi on is deemed severed from the Retail Installment Sale Contract. To stay this action and the remaining claims against defendant PRCO, Inc. and American Contractors Indemnity Company pending the completion of arbitration. Explanation: Plaintiff contracte d to purchase a vehicle from Car Palace, Inc., doing business as Auto Depot, on credit. (Shahnematollah Decl., ¶ 9, Exh. A; Second Amended Complaint, ¶¶ 2, 5.) The dealership then assigned...
2024.02.28 Motion to Quash Three Subpoenas Duces Tecum 223
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ..., to allow time for: (1) ESIS, Inc. to serve all appearing parties to the action with the moving papers and to file a corrected proof of service; and (2) the proposed successor in interest to substitute as a party to this action for the deceased plaint iff. The proposed successor in interest may file an ex parte application and reserve an ex parte hearing date for the substitution. The proposed successor in interest may re -file her opposition...
2024.02.27 Motions for Relief from Deemed Admissions 552
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ... for relief.” However, this misstates the holding of Gribin Von Dyl & Associates, Inc. v. Kovalsky (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 653. There, the court said a party seeking relief “under a court's equity power must make a stronger showing than is necessary to obtain relief under section 473.” (Id. at p. 660, emphasis added.) It did not find that the showing for a request for relief based on “mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect” unde...
2024.02.27 Motion to Set Aside Default 985
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...dure section 473.5 in their arguments. Cross- Complainant JD Properties, Inc. addressed both grounds. Accordingly, the court proceeds on both grounds. Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) provides, in pertinent part: The court may, upon any te rms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertenc...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 730
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...ment order. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertained in Department 501 at 3:30 p.m. on February 27, 2024. Explanation: The Material Undisputed Facts The plaintiffs in this action, Stephanie Norgard and Edward Priest, are the parents of Varonica Priest ("Decedent"). On January 31, 2021, Decedent presented to the hospital emergency department for respiratory dyspnea. She was 35 years old with a history of mito...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 930
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ... others, for failure to properly maintain the lock on the door through which Mr. Roy gained entry to the building. Cosco now moves for summary judgment, relying solely on the firefighter's rule. Cosco contends that the firefighter's rule applies because Mr. D iaz was working as a law enforcement officer in his office at the time of the attack, “and the injuries arose from an activity that was anticipated or expected in the line of duty.” ...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Adjudication 368
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...timely. Additionally, a meet and confer declaration is not filed in support of the motion. Plaintiff's request to set a hearing on an order to show cause regarding contempt against LP's counsel, Jeremy Freedman, for filing untimely documents, is denied. Explanation: Evidentiary Objections and Requests for Judicial Notice The court overrules each of defendant Latchkey Pioneers, LLC's (“LP”) objections, as LP failed to comply with California ...
2024.02.27 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 745
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ... Center (“Villagio”) and Manco Abbott, Inc., collectively “Settling Defendants,” have agreed to settle with plaintiffs for a total of $5,000,000.00, with offsets taken for settlements reached with defendants Cirks Construction, Inc. in the amount of $125,000 and Miller Clark Landscape and Nursery in the amount of $130,000. The final amount of the settlement is $4,745,000 with Lazy Dog contributing $949,000.00, Villagio contributing $2,37...
2024.02.22 Motion to Strike 394
Location: Fresno
Judge: Kapetan, Kristi C
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...Civil Procedure section 425.16, "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person 's rightof petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the ...
2024.02.22 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 247
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...s the date documents were mailed and where they were mailed from, but the section where the documents served should be listed reads “Post office on Alluvial, Fresno CA” and does not state what was served. Assuming that defendant can provide a sa tisfactory proof of service, defendant also has not met the requirements necessary to set aside a default judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), provides for relief from a jud...
2024.02.22 Motion to Compel Initial Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 742
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ... the special interrogatories. However, the court will grant sanctions against HTV for its unjustified failure to serve timely responses to the discovery, in the amount of $585. HTV shall pay sanctions to Varo within 30 days of the date of ser vice of this order. HTV's request for sanctions against Varo is denied. Explanation: The court intends to deny Varo's motion to compel initial responses to special interrogatories, as HTV has now served ver...

3387 Results

Per page

Pages