Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

597 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Fresno x
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler x
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 730
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...ment order. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertained in Department 501 at 3:30 p.m. on February 27, 2024. Explanation: The Material Undisputed Facts The plaintiffs in this action, Stephanie Norgard and Edward Priest, are the parents of Varonica Priest ("Decedent"). On January 31, 2021, Decedent presented to the hospital emergency department for respiratory dyspnea. She was 35 years old with a history of mito...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 930
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ... others, for failure to properly maintain the lock on the door through which Mr. Roy gained entry to the building. Cosco now moves for summary judgment, relying solely on the firefighter's rule. Cosco contends that the firefighter's rule applies because Mr. D iaz was working as a law enforcement officer in his office at the time of the attack, “and the injuries arose from an activity that was anticipated or expected in the line of duty.” ...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Adjudication 368
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...timely. Additionally, a meet and confer declaration is not filed in support of the motion. Plaintiff's request to set a hearing on an order to show cause regarding contempt against LP's counsel, Jeremy Freedman, for filing untimely documents, is denied. Explanation: Evidentiary Objections and Requests for Judicial Notice The court overrules each of defendant Latchkey Pioneers, LLC's (“LP”) objections, as LP failed to comply with California ...
2024.02.22 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 247
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...s the date documents were mailed and where they were mailed from, but the section where the documents served should be listed reads “Post office on Alluvial, Fresno CA” and does not state what was served. Assuming that defendant can provide a sa tisfactory proof of service, defendant also has not met the requirements necessary to set aside a default judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), provides for relief from a jud...
2024.02.21 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 370
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.21
Excerpt: ...r co unsel of record, Brian N. Folland, jointly and severally, payable no later than 20 days from the date of this order, with time to run from the service of this minute order by the clerk. If oral argument is timely requested, such argument will be entertain ed at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, February 23, 2024. Explanation: Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010, subdivision (g), makes “[d]isobeying a court order to provide discovery” a “misuse...
2024.02.21 Motion for Prejudgment Interest 728
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.21
Excerpt: ...section 3287, subdivisions (a) and (b). Under section 3287, subdivision (a), “[a] person who is entitled to recover damages certain, or capable of being made certain by calculation, and the right to recover which is vested in the person upon a particular day, is entitled also to recover interest thereon from that day...” (Civil Code, § 3287, subd. (a).) “‘The purpose of prejudgment interest is to compensate plaintiff for loss of use of h...
2024.02.15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, for Attorney Fees 175
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ... run from the service of this minute order by the clerk. Defendant is granted 10 days' leave to amend to file an amended answer to plead facts sufficient to constitute the affirmative defenses he has already raised. To the extent defendant seeks to amend to include new defenses that were not previously raised, defendant must file his own noticed motion for leave to amend. The time to file the amended answer will run from the service by the cle...
2024.02.08 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 078
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.08
Excerpt: ...ent consistent with the court's summary judgment order. Explanation: The Material Undisputed Facts Plainti¯s are Robert Solorio, Ana Solorio, Cirenia Lozono and Ian Solorio, a minor, through his guardian ad litem (collectively "Plainti¯s"). This case arises from a tragic collision (the "Collision") between a train and Plainti¯s' passenger vehicle (the "Vehicle"), which resulted in "catastrophic and, ultimately, fatal injuries” to Decedent...
2024.02.07 Demurrer to FAC 037
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...in which the amended pleading must be Þled will run from service of the order by the clerk. Explanation: In this action, FTA seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to the e¯ect that under the Bylaws of Joint Health Management Board (“JHMB”) an annual election must be held among the Union Directors for the Union-designated Chairperson/Co-Chairperson and their alternates using the weighted voting procedure described in the JHMB Bylaws. The ...
2024.02.06 Demurrer to SAC 998
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.06
Excerpt: ...�Defendant”) demurs to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on the grounds that the second cause of action, for breach arising from a special relationship that it fails to state su¯icient facts to state a cause of action against Defendant, and that it is uncertain. On a demurrer a court's function is limited to testing the legal su¯iciency of the complaint. A demurrer is simply not the appropriate procedure for determining the truth of ...
2024.02.06 Demurrer to FAC 387
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.06
Excerpt: ...ll run from service by the clerk of the minute order. New allegations/language must be set in boldface type. Explanation: The function of a demurrer is to test the su¯iciency of a plainti¯'s pleading by raising questions of law. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 545.) The test is whether plainti¯ has succeeded in stating a cause of action; the court does not concern itself with the issue of plainti¯'s p o ss i b l e d i¯iculty...
2024.02.01 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 987
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...efendants from forcing park residents who resided at the park prior to October 10, 2022, to re-apply for tenancy, and closing the park until the City approves the closure and relocation plan under Government Code section 65863.7. To waive the requirement that plainti¯s post an undertaking to obtain the injunction. Explanation: “This court has traditionally held that trial courts should evaluate two interrelated factors when deciding whether o...
2024.02.01 Motion for Summary Judgment 888
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ... that plainti¯ failed to allege the existence of a duty. The basis of plainti¯'s negligence cause of action, as she alleges in the SAC, is as follows: On December 3, 2018, an intoxicated driver (Baeza), insured by FSIC, caused an accident by hitting a third-party (Garza). Garza called FSIC to verify Baeza's insurance and asked if she should call the police. The FSIC representative told Garza she did not need to call the police and that they (...
2024.02.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 057
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...t Gerald Johnson, Sr. (“decedent”) by o¯icers of the Fresno Police Department. Defendants identiÞed Þve issues in their Notice of Motion as the basis for their motion, as follows: 1. Defendants are entitled to judgment on plainti¯s' Þrst cause of action for battery because defendants Padilla, Bell, and Palomino's use of force (deadly Þrearm force) was objectively reasonable as a matter of law under the totality of the circumstances. 2...
2024.01.31 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, to Compel Responses 338
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ..., Set One, Admitted; 2) to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One; 3) to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; and 4) to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One Tentative Ruling: To grant all motions as to plainti¯ Barandalla. Within 20 days of service of the order by the clerk, plainti¯ Barandalla shall serve objection-free responses to the items speciÞed in the document Þled by defendant...
2024.01.31 Motion to Compel Initial Responses, to Deem RFAs Admitted 228
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...onses, without objections, to the Þrst set of form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents. To deem defendant to have admitted the truth of the matters in the requests for admissions, set one. To grant monetary sanctions against defendant R&S in the amount of $890. To deny the request for sanctions against defendant's attorney. Defendant shall pay sanctions within 30 days of the date of service of this ...
2024.01.31 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 670
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...damages, with leave to amend. Plainti¯s may Þle and serve a Second Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order. All new allegations shall be in boldface. Explanation: Demurrer Defendant General Motors, LLC (“Defendant”) demurs to the fourth cause of action for fraudulent concealment set forth in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). On a demurrer a court's function is limited to testing the legal su¯ici...
2024.01.30 Motion to Strike Complaint 987
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...rt also intends to grant the motion to strike plainti¯s' sixth cause of action, paragraph 205, lines 21 thru 24, which alleges that “Defendants further interfered with Plainti¯'s m e m b e r s ' contracts by unlawfully and non-consensually terminating the tenancies of all Plainti¯'s members, including Kim Sands, by serving them with a ‘Five Day Notice to Vacate' on or around April 12, 2023, and by Þling unlawful detainers against sever...
2024.01.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 179
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: .... Davis as Trustee of the Brent A. Davis 2012 Revocable Trust, Davis & Davis Distributors, Davis Equipment, Inc., Davis & Davis Distributors No. 2, Inc. and VRAD Products, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment of the Third Amended Complaint against them. Defendants shall submit a Judgment consistent with the terms of this ruling within 10 days of service of the order. Explanation: Summary judgment is properly granted when no triable issue exists as ...
2024.01.25 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and Representative Action Settlement 297
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...preliminary settlement class. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769(d).) "If the court grants preliminary approval, its order must include the time, date, and place of the final approval hearing; the notce to be given to the class; and any other matters deemed necessary for the proper conduct of a settlement hearing. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769(e).) "If the court has certified the action as a class action, notce of the final approval hearing must...
2024.01.25 Demurrer 328
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ... leave to file a Petition for Relief to File Late Claim pursuant to Government Code section 946.6. The Petition shall be filed in Fresno Superior Court Case Number 23CECG02328. Explanation: The function of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a plaintiff's pleading by raising questions of law. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 545.) The test is whether plaintiff has succeeded in stating a cause of action; the court does not concern ...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Initial Responses, to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 228
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...nses, without objections, to the first set of form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents. To deem defendant to have admitted the truth of the matters in the requests for admissions, set one. To grant monetary sanctions against defendant Stine in the amount of $890. To deny the request for sanctions against defendant's attorney. Explanation: Plaintiffs have shown that they are entitled to orders compell...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Deposition 837
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ... pursuant to the rules and exceptions for psychotherapist-patent communications. (Evid. Code, S 1010 et seq.) Evidence Code section 1012 protects communications between a psychotherapist and a patient, including communications during the scope of treatment and diagnoses made by the therapist. A psychotherapist shall claim the privilege whenever disclosure of such communications is sought. (Evid. Code, S 1015.) The holder of such privilege is the ...
2024.01.23 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 648
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.23
Excerpt: ... proposed judgment dismissing the achon. The trial date set for August 19, 2024, is vacated, as are the related dates for Mandatory Settlement Conference and Trial Readiness. If a timely request for oral argument is made, such argument will be entertained on Wednesday, January 24, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. Explanation: Once a moton to compel a party to comply with a discovery request is granted, continued failure to comply may support a request for more...
2024.01.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 098
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...proof to show that plaintiff cannot establish one or more elements of their causes of action or to show that there is a complete defense. (Code Civ. Proc„ S 437c, subd. (p)(2).) Only after the moving party has carried this burden of proof does the burden of proof shift to the other party to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists — and this must be shown via specific facts and not mere allegations. (ld.) "California cou...

597 Results

Per page

Pages