Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

605 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Fresno x
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler x
2023.01.19 Demurrers 751
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.19
Excerpt: ... fifth, sixth, eighth and ninth causes of action of the Complaint, without leave to amend, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).) To sustain the demurrer of defendant Jennings to the entire Complaint, without leave to amend, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).) In the event a timely request for oral arg...
2023.01.18 Demurrer 468
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ... file a Notice of Related Case in the Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number 20STCV33816 or submit proof that such has already been filed. Explanation: Misjoinder of Parties Code of Civil Procedure section 389 articulates when a nonparty must be joined to the action. A person is a necessary and indispensable party where 1) complete relief cannot be obtained in the nonparty's absence, 2) the nonparty claims an interest relating to the subject of t...
2023.01.18 Demurrer 017
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.18
Excerpt: ...st Amended Complaint are to be set in boldface type. Explanation: Demurrer to the First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract Defendant demurs to the first cause of action for breach of contract on the grounds that the Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. “A written contract may be pleaded either by its terms—set out verbatim in the complaint or a copy of the contract attached to the complaint and incorp...
2023.01.10 Motion to Require Undertaking 277
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.10
Excerpt: ...file an undertaking, in the amount of $50,000, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1030. Section 1030, subdivision (a), states, When the plaintiff in an action or special proceeding resides out of the state, or is a foreign corporation, the defendant may at any time apply to the court by noticed motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to file an undertaking to secure an award of costs and attorney's fees which may be awarded in the action o...
2023.01.10 Motion for Protective Order, to Compel Production of Docs 389
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.10
Excerpt: ...isappropriated. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2019.210.) Plaintiff is ordered to file a notice of compliance no later than 20 days from the date of this order, with time to run from the service of this minute order by the clerk. To deny plaintiff's motion for an order compelling responses to request for production of documents. (Coder Civ. Proc. § 2031.300.) Explanation: Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Defendants seek a protective order directing ...
2023.01.05 Motion to Quash Subpoenas for Medical Records 798
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...ed in time and to records for only the body parts/issues of which plaintiff complains. Plaintiff appears to have placed every conceivable form of economic recovery at issue in her Complaint. In her Complaint, page 3, at paragraph 11, every box is checked for damages and plaintiff adds: “ALL ECONOMIC AND NON‐ECONOMIC DAMAGES KNOWN AND UNKNOWN TO PLAINTIFF AT THIS TIME, BUT SUBJECT TO PROOF AT THE TIME OF TRIAL; PLUS STATUTORY INTEREST.” Both...
2023.01.05 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 767
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...fendants Carolina Transportation, Inc., Carolina Logistic, Inc., and Dispatch & Services, Inc. (collectively “Carolina defendants”) move to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction over them. The Carolina defendants are each incorporated in the State of North Carolina and each has its principal place of business in North Carolina. (Hoover Decl., ¶ 3.) Additionally, the Carolina defendants have no offices or employees in Cal...
2023.01.05 Demurrer 938
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...rvice by the clerk of the minute order. All new allegations in the pleading are to be set in boldface type. Explanation: Defendant demurs to plaintiff's Complaint, which alleges a single cause of action for medical malpractice. Defendant contends that the cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5. The function of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a plaintiff's pleading by...
2023.01.05 Demurrer 727
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2023.01.05
Excerpt: ...d, Inc., dba Re/Max Gold. (Code Civ. Proc., § 4301.10, subd. (e).) NorCal shall file its Answer to the FAC within 10 days of service of the minute order. Explanation: In this action, plaintiff sues all involved in a real estate transaction in which Ms. Lewis purchased the “Subject Property,” and intended to purchase the assisted living facility business (“Assisted Living Business”) operated on that property. It appears that Ms. Lewis suc...
2022.12.22 Demurrer to FAC 894
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.22
Excerpt: ...omplaint, i.e., whether it states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action upon which relief may be based. (Code of Civil Procedure §430.10, subd. (e); Friedland v. City of Long Beach (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 835, 841–842.) In making this determination, the court may consider all material facts pleaded in the complaint and those arising by reasonable implication therefrom; it may not consider contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact...
2022.12.22 Demurrer 607
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.22
Excerpt: ...n boldface type. Explanation: The court's tentative ruling for defendant's demurrer to the third amended complaint was to sustain the demurrer without leave to amend. Upon plaintiff counsel's vehement representations at oral argument that curative facts could be plead, the court modified its tentative ruling and granted leave to amend as to the first cause of action (breach of contract) only. In particular, at oral argument, counsel argued that a...
2022.12.21 Motion for Certification of Class Settlement 227
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.21
Excerpt: .... (Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc. (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 224, 240; see Dunk v. Ford Motor Co. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1794, 1803, fn. 9, 19.a) The trial court has a “fiduciary responsibility” as the guardian of the absentee class members' rights to decide whether to approve a settlement of a class action. (Luckey v. Superior Court (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 81, 95.) A precertification settlement may stipulate that a defined class be conditionally c...
2022.12.15 Motion for Judgment Quieting Title 008
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.15
Excerpt: ...xtinguishment of the deed of trust because they have now paid off the loan in full, they have not presented any admissible evidence to support their asserted facts. The only evidence submitted in support of the application is the declaration of plaintiffs' counsel, who does not appear to have personal knowledge of the facts to which he testifies. (See declaration of Ian Brady filed on March 14, 2022.) Therefore, his statements regarding the owner...
2022.12.14 Motion for Protective Order, to Compel Deposition 027
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.14
Excerpt: ...alescent Hospital v. Sup. Ct. (Sims) (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1558, 1562‐63.) Defendant's motion for protective order prohibiting Ms. Hare's deposition or, in the alternative, limiting the scope of Ms. Hare's deposition is rendered moot. Explanation: Defendant seeks a protective order prohibiting the deposition of Ms. Hare or, in the alternative, limiting the scope of Ms. Hare's deposition to identifying the sources of information contained in he...
2022.12.14 Demurrer to FAC 417
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.12.14
Excerpt: ... the clerk's service of this order. New or different allegations in the second amended complaint are to be set in boldface type. Explanation: General Demurrer A party may file a general demurrer on claims that “[t]he pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e); Estate of Moss (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 521, 535 [“‘A demurrer can be utilized where the complaint itself is inc...
2022.11.30 Motion to Quash Subpoenas 080
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.30
Excerpt: ...ing, grief, anxiety, humiliation and/or emotional distress. To exclude from the description of the subpoenas issued to each of Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center and Clovis Community Medical Center employment documents pertaining to manager/supervisor files, performance evaluations and reviews, and disciplinary actions related to plaintiff. Explanation: Plaintiff seeks to quash subpoenas seeking certain records from Kaiser Fresno Medical Center,...
2022.11.30 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 637
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.30
Excerpt: ... the motion to strike the “but not limited to” language. Plaintiffs are to file a Second Amended Complaint consistent with this ruling. Such pleading shall be filed within 10 days from the date of service of the minute order. Caltrans shall file its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint no later than 10 days after service of the Second Amended Complaint on it. Explanation: There are differences in the named plaintiffs from the original Compl...
2022.11.29 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 679
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.29
Excerpt: ...g or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer. The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceeding in other particulars...” “‘Code of Civil Procedure section 473, whi...
2022.11.29 Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement, Enhancement Payment, Attorney Fees 418
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.29
Excerpt: ... Code of Civil Procedure section 384, subdivision (b), so that the judgment can be amended and the distribution of any cy pres funds can be ordered. The parties are ordered to file a declaration from the administrator as to the payout and amount of uncashed checks no later than October 17, 2023. As required by California Rules of Court, rule 3.771(b), notice of the judgment is to be given to the class. Notice may be given by an insert with the se...
2022.11.29 Demurrer 957
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.29
Excerpt: ...order. Explanation: Defendants Zisha Lipschutz and Esti Lipschutz demur generally and specially to the tenth through fifteenth causes of action1 , contending that there are no facts alleged to show these individual defendants are the alter egos of entity defendants Eminence Healthcare Services, LLC (EHS) and Centuri Health Ventures, LLC (Centuri) and that these causes of action are uncertain because they are pled against “all defendants” but ...
2022.11.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses 167
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.09
Excerpt: ...sponses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, as to Requests Nos. 14, 40‐45, and 53. To order GM to provide further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, as to Requests Nos. 1, 6‐9, 15, 16, 24, 25, and 27. To deny the motion as to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, as to Requests Nos. 3, 17, 31 and 33. GM shall serve verified supplemental responses without objections within 20 days of the date of the service of ...
2022.11.09 Motion for Attorney Fees 977
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.09
Excerpt: ...�[i]n any action on a contract, where the contract specifically provides that attorney's fees and costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded either to one of the parties or to the prevailing party, then the party who is determined to be the party prevailing on the contract, whether he or she is the party specified in the contract or not, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addition to other costs.” (Civ....
2022.11.08 Motion to Consolidate 737
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.08
Excerpt: ...ctions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.” The purpose for consolidation is to promote trial convenience and economy by avoiding duplication of procedure particularly in t...
2022.11.08 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Tax Costs 887
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.08
Excerpt: ...t al. for Attorneys' Fees and Costs by Plaintiff Westlands to Tax Memorandum of Costs Filed by Defendant North Coast River Alliance Tentative Ruling: To grant the motion of defendants County of San Joaquin and County of Trinity for an award of attorneys' fees against plaintiff Westlands Water District (Westlands) in the amount of $197,163.75. To grant the motion of defendants California Water Impact Network (CWIN) et al. for an award of attorneys...
2022.11.03 Motion to Compel Further Responses 284
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2022.11.03
Excerpt: ...nd 20 of plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, set one within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. To grant the request for monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,560, payable no later than twenty (20) court days from the date of this order, with the time to run from the service of this minute order by the clerk. Explanation: Discovery requests are generally afforded liberal construction. (See Code of Civ. Proc., § 2017.010; ...

605 Results

Per page

Pages