Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

661 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Luis Obispo x
Judge: Coates, Tana L x
2023.05.03 Demurrer 215
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.05.03
Excerpt: ...g as an agent for Defendants [Gordon] and [Orchardl and was working and driving in the Trinity County area" when the accident occurred. (FAC, 4.) Jut-ila alleges she was delivering vehicles and equipment to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ("Cal Fire") for Defendants and their benefit, pursuant to a contract between Orchard and the USCA Forest Service. (FAC, 3,14, 15.) Jutla alleges that at the time of the accident she "h...
2023.04.26 Motion to Lift Stay and Vacate Order Compelling Arbitration 393
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.26
Excerpt: ...aiding and abetting; and wrongful termination. On May 4, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to compel Plaintiffs' claims to arbitration. On September 1, 2020, this Court (Hon. Ginger E. Garrett, presiding) granted the motion. On December 18, 2020, Plaintiffs submitted their demand for arbitration "solely pursuant to the order compelling arbitration and contended that Defendant's arbitration agreements were unenforceable." (Mtn., p. 2, II. 23-25.) Th...
2023.04.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 546
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.26
Excerpt: ...motion. (Declaration of Peter Pritchard, '13.) l. Legal Standard California law favors arbitration. (OTO, LLC. v. Kho (2019) 8 Cal.5th 111, 125.) Under California law, "[a] written agreement to submit to arbitration an existing controversy or a controversy thereafter is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist for the revocation of any contract." (Code Civ. Proc„ S 1281.) The right to arbitration depends on the exist...
2023.04.26 Demurrer to SAC 399
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.26
Excerpt: ...ave to amend. Plaintiff's second amended complaint (SAC) alleges the same causes of action as the FAC, namely (1) breach of partnership/joint venture agreement; (2) declaratory relief; (3) equitable contribution; and (4) promissory estoppel. Now before the Court is Defendant's demurrer to the SAC. 1 l. Legal Standard A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the allegations in a complaint. It raises issues of law, not fact, regarding the complain...
2023.04.26 Application for Writ of Possession 531
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.26
Excerpt: ...("Equipment"). Defendant promised to pay to Plaintiff the financed amount of $36,579.49. A true and correct of the Retail Installment Contract and Security Agreement ("Contract") is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. (Cmp., 6.) Defendant was personally served with the summons and complaint on August 19, 2022. Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading, and his default was entered on September 23, 2022. P...
2023.04.19 Motion for New Trial 378
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.19
Excerpt: ...dgment was entered on February 8, 2023, and notice of entry of judgment was filed and served on February 21, 2023. Hugh now timely moves the Court to vacate and set aside the decision of the Court. Theresa opposes the motion. Per his notice of motion, Hugh seeks a new trial on the following issues: 1. The Court had no authority to nullify the provisions of the trust amendment made in 2006 and find that the original trust provisions made in 2005 s...
2023.04.19 Demurrer to TAC 096
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.19
Excerpt: ...ive trust; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) civil damages under Penal Code secton 496(c); and (6) accounting. On August 3, 2022, the Court sustained Defendants' demurrer to the SAC with leave to amend. A Third Amended Complaint (TAC) was filed on August 15, 2022. Now before the Court is Defendants' demurrer to the Third Amended Complaint. l. Background The three Plaintiffs are sisters, filing this lawsuit in their individual capacities, as well as rema...
2023.04.12 Motion to Expunge Notice of Pendency of Action 009
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ...Harms, representative of the estate of David Harms and Jolene Harms (Harms) filed a creditor's claim in the total amount of $300,000. On September 21, 2022, the Public Administrator filed and served a rejection of that claim. Additionally, on August 24, 2022, and September 7, 2022, the Public Administrator filed notices of proposed action proposing to sell Decedent's real property. On December 21, 2022, Harms filed a petition for declaratory reli...
2023.04.12 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 256
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ...ed with the Court's probate department and assigned case number PR120281. Plaintiff filed an amended petition in December 2018 (the Amended Petition). 1 on September 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed a separate Petition for Instructons re Corrections, which he amended on August 24, 2020 (the 2020 Petition). In the interim, Plaintiff filed this civil complaint against Hazeltine, Glenn, Marianne Davis (Davis), Gail Edwards (Edwards), and Martin Harris (Harr...
2023.04.12 Motion for Increased Fee Allowance 411
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ...15.98, plus interest, costs and fees. San Luis Obispo County Local Rule 25.02, provides a fee schedule for the award of attorney fees. Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Local Rule 25.04 for an increase in the amount of attorney fees awarded. Local Rule 25.04 prov-des as follows: In the event that counsel has provided extraordinary services in the prosecution of litigation such that the schedules called for in this rule would not provide a fair and ...
2023.04.12 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 473
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.12
Excerpt: ...ey Harold Messick. Now before the Court is the demurrer filed by the Municipal Defendants. Plaintiff brings multiple causes of action which are premised on alleged mishandling of inspections or applications by the Municipal Defendants. Plaintiff opposes the demurrer.l Defendants have also filed a separate Motion to Strike portions of the FAC which is addressed herein. l. Background Plaintiff's FAC contains many causes of action and facts but enco...
2023.04.05 Motion for Preference 195
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.04.05
Excerpt: ...ing yard at property located at or near 550 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo on October 6, 2021, when a large tree branch fell on him. On October 19, 2022, this Court denied Plaintiff's motion for an order granting trial preference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 section 36(a). Now before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion for preference. Oppositions are on file from Agera, Bunyon, and Covelop. The City has filed a joinder to the motio...
2023.03.29 Motion for Summary Judgment 575
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.29
Excerpt: ...wned by Henry Pangelinan ("Pangelinan") and leased by the Hickeys (the "Condo".) Allegedly, the fire began when the Grays, who were social guests of the Hickeys, negligently used the oven in the Condo. The Condo is part of the BaycliffVillage Homeowner's Association, which is insured through Traveler's. Now before the Court is the Grays' motion for summary judgment. The Grays have raised the issue of whether a social guest should be treated as a ...
2023.03.22 Motion to Disqualify Supplemental Expert Witness 201
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.22
Excerpt: ...endants' motion to disqualify Plaintiff's supplemental expert witness Mark Apodaca. Under [Code of Civil Procedurel ] section 2034.210, subdivision (a), a party may demand a mutual and simultaneous exchange of each expert witness that any party 'expects to offer in evidence at trial.' And section 2034.260, subdivision (b)(l), requires an expert witness disclosure to list every expert 'that the party expects to offer' in evidence at trial... The s...
2023.03.22 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 330
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.22
Excerpt: ...nswer on June 22, 2022. Wells Fargo now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473c. Wells Fargo moves on the ground that there is no triable issue of fact as to each of its six causes of action. Its motion is supported by its separate statement, a declaration from counsel, Defendant's responses to Wells Fargo's Requests for Admission, and the declaration of Plaintiff's Qualified Witness Margaret Schulze, Loan Work...
2023.03.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 661
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.22
Excerpt: ...ownership of real property at 118 Clydell Court in Pismo Beach, California (the Property). Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of an undivided 90% interest in the Property and Defendant is an owner of an undivided 10% interest in the Property. (Comp., "1 3, 4.) Plaintiff alleges that he and Defendant entered into a written agreement providing that he would convey Plaintiff a 10% undivided interest in the Property, and that the parties would li...
2023.03.22 Motion for Attorney Fees 490
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.22
Excerpt: ...ustained with leave to amend. On October 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (SAC). On May 16, 2022, the Court sustained Knudson's demurrer to the SAC without leave to amend. 1 Knudson now seeks attorney's fees of $58,772 pursuant to section 6.8 of the parties' Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA), which provides in relevant part: Attorney's Fees. If any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement is brought ...
2023.03.15 Motion to Quash Service 044
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.15
Excerpt: ...motion to quash service. Respondent argues that at all times relevant to the Trust, he did not live in California and currently res-des in the State ofVirginia. (Declaration of Gregory Bernhard ("Bernhard Decl.") '1 5.) Respondent states that he does not own property or do business in California. (Ibid.) According to Respondent, in 2016, the Surviving Settlor of the Trust, Donald R. Bernhard ("Donaldl sold his California residence and moved to Vi...
2023.03.15 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 479
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.15
Excerpt: ...monthly payments of $679.60. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has defaulted on the loan and refused to surrender possession of the Vehicle. Now before the Court are Plaintiff's unopposed motions to compel and request for sanctions. On April 8, 2022, Plaintiff served upon Defendant the following discovery requests: 1) Form Interrogatories, Set One; 2) Special Interrogatories, Set One; 3) Demand for Production of Documents, Set One; and 4) Requests...
2023.03.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 275
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.15
Excerpt: ...lief (Code Civ. Proc„ SS 760.020, 761.020); verified petitions for administrative writ (Code Civ. Proc„ S 1094.5), and/or writ of traditional mandate (Code Civ. Proc., S 1085) on May 11, 2021. The achon is filed against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks), County of San Luis Obispo (the County), California Department of General Services (DGS), State of California, San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control Distri...
2023.03.01 Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Reinstate Hearing Dates 170
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.01
Excerpt: ...ction and response to the Petition. On August 9, 2022, Petitioner dismissed the action. On August 18, 2022, Respondent filed a motion to vacate the dismissal. Petitioner opposes the motion. No reply is on file. Respondent filed her motion pursuant to Probate Code section 17202, which provides that the court may dismiss a petition if it appears that the proceeding is not reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the trustee or beneficiary, ...
2023.03.01 Motion for Summary Judgment 605
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.01
Excerpt: ... judgment on those causes of action. No opposition has been filed. Wells Fargo, as the moving party, bears the burden to produce admissible evidence on each element of each cause of action entitling it to judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1); see also Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) If Wells Fargo makes a prima facie showing, then the burden shifts to Taber to show the existence of a triable issue of ma...
2023.03.01 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 458
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.01
Excerpt: ...l wages due, including minimum, regular, and overtime wages as a result of Defendant's policy of improperly paying its non-exempt hourly employees; (2) failure to provide meal periods; (3) failure to provide rest periods; (4) failure to provide accurate wage statements; and (5) failure to pay wages upon ending employment of terminated or resigned employees. (Compl., ¶ 2.) Plaintiff alleges that she was employed by the Defendant from on or about ...
2023.03.01 Demurrer 198
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.03.01
Excerpt: ... the FAC alleges that Plaintiffs were forced to do work for Defendant as mechanics and personal attendants and as such, are entitled to compensation as employees. Defendant now demurs to the entire FAC pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10, subds. (e) and (f) on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action and is uncertain.1 Plaintiff opposes the demurrer. No reply is on file. Defendant's counsel submitted a declaration chec...
2023.02.22 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 043
Location: San Luis Obispo
Judge: Coates, Tana L
Hearing Date: 2023.02.22
Excerpt: ...ed. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel the County's further responses to requests for production of documents, set one (the RFPs), and request for sanctions in the amount of $1,560.00. As of the date of this ruling, the County has provided supplemental responses to the subject RFPs, Nos. 1 through 11 and 15. The supplemental responses do not comply with the Code of Civil Procedure. A party has three options in responding to requ...

661 Results

Per page

Pages