Excerpt: ...worth, in his official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the Commission (the “Executive Director”), California Department of Parks and Recreation (“State Parks”), and Real Parties‐in‐Interest San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District and its Board of Directors (the “District”). Petitioner's petition challenges an emergency coastal development permit issued on March 11, 2016 (the “2016 ECDP”), and the underl...

Excerpt: ...or shall not sell a live dog, cat, or rabbit in a pet store unless the animal was obtained from a public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group that is in a cooperative agreement with at least one private or public shelter.” (Id. at subd. (a).) Violators are subject to a civil penalty of $500. (Id. at subd. (i).) At the time of its enactment, the statut...

Excerpt: ... General Act (“PAGA”). Plaintiffs and Defendants settled, and Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of the class action settlement. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.769.) The motion was not opposed, and the Court granted preliminary approval. The Court's June 2, 2021, order granting preliminary approval set a hearing for final approval of the settlement on October 27, 2021. Per that order, notice packets were to be sent to class members by Ju...

Excerpt: ...riminal threats); and (3) violation of Penal Code section 134 (fraudulent writing). The complaint alleges that the San Luis Obispo County District Attorney's office filed felony charges against Plaintiff on July 12, 2019, in connection with four “correspondences” sent to different local real estate agencies that rented properties in Plaintiff and Defendant's neighborhood. The complaint alleges the letters warned the recipient real estate agen...

Excerpt: ...nancial fraud; (6) conversion; (7) misappropriation of trade secrets, unjust enrichment; (8) false imprisonment; and (9) intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff's complaint alleges he is a resident at Ocean View Manor apartments in Morro Bay. (Compl., ¶¶ 1, 10.) Plaintiff's lawsuit relates to Defendants' installation of WiFi at the Property, which Plaintiff alleges has caused him to suffer injuries. (Compl., ¶¶ 5, 46, 129.) Th...

Excerpt: ...e alternative, summary adjudication. The motion was served on counsel for Defendant. No opposition is on file. The Court grants Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice. Plaintiff has the initial burden to make a prima facie showing that there are no triable issues of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. §437c(c); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) Plaintiff has the bur...

Excerpt: ...e action as to her. Defendant moves on the ground that there is no triable issue of fact that: 1) Defendant did not hire either Plaintiff; 2) Defendant, as the Vice President, did not have authority to determine the rate of pay of either Plaintiff and did not do so; 3) Defendant did not have the authority to pay either Plaintiff and did not do so; 4) Defendant, as Vice President of J&H Enterprises, Inc., did not have the authority to determine th...

Excerpt: ... Koontz (also a broker) worked for Cambria. After this Court's ruling on Defendants' motion for summary judgment/adjudication, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint (SAC). The SAC pleads causes of action for (1) breach of fiduciary duty, and (2) negligence. Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. Legal Authority. A defendant may move for judgment on the pleadings where the complaint...

Excerpt: ...apacity to execute the First Amendment, dated November 7, 2018. The petition is brought under Probate Code sections 850 and 17200. Currently on calendar is Clark's demurrer, which argues (1) venue is improper, and (2) the fourth cause of action is barred under Code of Civil Procedure section 366.2. For the reasons set forth below, the demurrer is overruled. (1) Venue Probate Code section 17005(a)(1) provides that venue is proper in “the county ...

Excerpt: ...�). The parties agreed that the Court would decide certain preliminary issues in Phase I of the trial, on the papers and after oral argument, which occurred on March 18, 2021. Thereafter, the parties filed final briefing and the matter was deemed submitted on March 30, 2021. On May 17, 2021, the Court issued its Ruling on Phase I of the Trial, which addressed eleven separate issues. Ten days later, Karen Tallent (“Respondent”) filed a Motion ...

Excerpt: ...tnership (the Limited Partnership); and other Defendants who are no longer a party to the lawsuit. Intervening Plaintiff Daniel Eddleman joined the lawsuit shortly before trial. A court trial commenced on October 27, 2020. On July 20, 2021, this Court issued its Statement of Decision. Plaintiffs now move for a new trial under Code of Civil Procedure section 657. Intervening Plaintiff Daniel Eddleman has filed a notice of joinder to the motion. A ...

Excerpt: ...buse; (2) fraud, intentional misrepresentation and concealment of fact; (3) breach of contract; (4) conversion; (5) accounting; (6) negligence; (7) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (8) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (9) professional negligence by an attorney; (10) breach of fiduciary duty; (11) breach of fiduciary trust duty; (12) conspiracy; and (13) declaratory relief. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for tri...

Excerpt: ...general contractor for the Project. In furtherance of the Project, Specialty hired subcontractors. At some point, for disputed reasons, payments stopped, resulting in Specialty and various subcontractors recording mechanics' liens. Those liens in turn led to this litigation and the consolidation of several related actions, all of which involve the Project. Currently on calendar is Garden Street's motion to compel amended responses to requests for...

Excerpt: ...causes of action, for (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) fraud; (4) accounting and production of documents; (5) injunctive relief and constructive trust; (6) intentional interference with contractual relationship; and (7) negligent interference with contractual relationship (the “FAC”). On October 7, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Doe Amendment naming Cornerstone Residential Real Estate, Inc. as Doe 1. On October 8, 2019, Ben...

Excerpt: ...d 2/27/01, and Marco Specchierla (collectively “Defendants”) on December 31, 2020, 20CV‐0689 (the “Cziraki Action”). The Czirakis filed a First Amended Complaint on March 22, 2021. The Czirakis own and reside on property abutting Defendants' property. (Cziraki First Amended Compliant (“Cziraki FAC.”), ¶¶ 5‐6, 10‐11.) The Cziraki property is accessible only by way of a recorded private access easement across Defendants' propert...

Excerpt: ...ber 13, 2019, Sandra Natali (“Natali”) served a second set of requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) on the personal representative, Kim Mathis (“Mathis”). On December 11, 2019, Natali served a third set of RFPs (nos. 34‐101) on Mathis. Mathis served responses to both the second and third sets of RFPs on January 13, 2020. On February 18, 2020, Natali's counsel sent a meet and confer letter outlining his issues with the respon...

Excerpt: ...ocated at 783 Asilo Street, Arroyo Grande, California 93420 (the “Property”) to her and that she has invested significant money in the Property, but that Defendants did not convey title to her. Defendants now move for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication, as to each of Plaintiff's causes of action, on the grounds that Plaintiff is judicially estopped from asserting that she owns the property; therefore, there are no tr...

Excerpt: ...ublic policy; and (4) promissory estoppel. Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a Warranty Administrator from September 8, 2015, to February 9, 2018. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Fact [UMF] 1.) A Warranty Administrator submits all warranty claims to manufacturers so Defendant can be reimbursed for jobs completed under those manufacturers' warranties. (UMF 2.) There is some dispute between the parties as to whether Plaintiff was the onl...

Excerpt: ...Larry, and caused a head‐on collision with Plaintiff. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (FAC), which is opposed by Defendants. Legal Authority. “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading...” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(a)(1).) Judicial policy favors resolution of all disputed matters between the parties in the same lawsui...

Excerpt: ... filed an answer to the complaint. Coasthills thereafter moved for summary judgment as to McGinty, which was granted. Judgment was entered on July 26, 2019, in the amount of $9,373.41. Coasthills now moves the Court for a determination that Coasthills is the prevailing party and, as such, requests that its attorney's fees be recoverable as an item of costs in the sum of $10,780. Coasthills served the motion and supporting declarations on McGinty,...

Excerpt: ...��), and the California Department of Parks and Recreation (“State Parks”). Petitioner filed a First Amended Verified Petition on October 27, 2014. Petitioner brings its Petition on the grounds that the APCD, through an agreement with State Parks, substantively changed a District regulation (Rule 1001) without public notice, an opportunity for public comment, or a hearing as required by state air quality statutes; and as such, the agreement i...

Excerpt: ...he Grand View Apartments (the Property), in Paso Robles. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges causes of action for (1) tortious breach of the implied warranty of habitability; (2) breach of implied warranty of habitability; (3) specific performance of lease agreements; (4) violation of Civil Code section 1942.4; (5) bad faith retention of security deposits; (6) damages for nuisance; (7) abatement of nuisance – injunctive relief; (8) violation of Busin...

Excerpt: ... official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the Commission (the “Executive Director”), and California Department of Parks and Recreation (“State Parks”), and Real Parties‐in‐Interest San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District, its Board of Directors, and its Hearing Board (the “District”). Petitioner's Petition challenges the Executive Director's issuance of two emergency coastal development permits (“ECDPs”...

Excerpt: ...“Seaside”; collectively, “Defendants”).1 Marissa and Seaside filed answers to the complaint on July 29, 2019, and Donald filed an answer on September 3, 2019. The dispute arises out of a Property Management Agreement entered into between Plaintiff and Seaside regarding the management of Plaintiff's residential units located on Monterey Avenue in Morro Bay, California. Under the agreement, Defendants were given the right to rent, lease, op...

Excerpt: ...p. The amended petition seeks appointment of a third‐party professional fiduciary as conservator of Respondent's person,1 based on allegations that he lacks capacity to give informed consent to medical treatment. The amended petition, however, does not seek dementia powers. The amended petition also seeks to limit contact between Respondent and his niece (Virginia Garcia), as well as her husband (Allen Garcia). The amended petition alleges that...