Excerpt: ...aintiff's exhibit reflects that defendant failed to send an objection in good faith under Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.410. Instead, the defendant refused to produce a PMK, refused to produce any of the documents requested and demanded that plaintiff agree to a “coordinated efficient discovery plan across all your cases.” (Ex 4 Letter date May 17, 2023.) Defendant repeated the refusal to participate in a PMK deposition in an email dat...

Excerpt: ...iate medical care], or in Title 2.1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Part 3 of the Penal Code [biomedical research], a public entity is not liable for: (1) An injury proximately caused by any prisoner. (2) An injury to any prisoner.].) Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint was filed on 9/27/2019. The first cause of action was for failure to summon medical care for a serious and obvious medical condition requiring immediate medical care. (Gov Code ...

Excerpt: ...sonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP §2017.010.) Based on the court's most recent ruling sustaining Angiola's demurrer to the TAP with leave to amend, Angiola remains a party to the action. TLCC's theory with respect to Angiola's liability under CEQA centers on whether Angiola's previous General Manager was authorized to execute the hold harmless letter on behalf Angiola, such that the repudiation of the pr...

Excerpt: ... stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice “[i]f, after service of a deposition notice, a [party-affiliated deponent] without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination.” [Emphasis added.] Section 2025.410(a) provides that a party may serve a written objection to a deposition notice, specifying the error or irregularity at least three calendar days prior to the date f...

Excerpt: ...ummons and complaint at a mailing address, “it shall be left with a person at least 18 years of age, who shall be informed of the contents thereof.” Here, Defendants present evidence in the form of sworn declarations from Defendant Kaur and her son, that the summons and complaint were left with her son, who is only sixteen years of age. This is sufficient to rebut the presumption that a registered process server's declaration is true. (Evid. ...

Excerpt: ...uments produced and thus Plaintiffs are unable to determine whether they are responsive to the subject requests. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.280, subdivision ' '[a]ny documents _ _ _ produced in response to a demand for inspection _ _ _ shall be identified with the specific request number to which the documents respond." GM does not appear to contest Plaintiffs assertions and instead asserts it has already produced, pursuant to the...

Excerpt: ... stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice ' '[i]f, after service of a deposition notice, a [party-affiliated deponent] without having served a vaitd objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination." Under the Code, a party may serve a written objection to a deposition notice, specifying the error or irregularity at least three calendar days prior to the date for which the deposition is scheduled. ...

Excerpt: ...on Angiola_ (CaL Pub. Resources 521065; Cal. Code Regs. , tit. 14, 515378, subd_ (a)_) The TAP alleges that Angiola "has engaged in sustained, direct support of and assistance to the Project, including, without limitation, the offer to Petitioner of complete indemnity, as clearly expressecl in [the hold harmless letter signed by former Angiola General Manager Mark Grewal]." (144.) However, the TAP recognizes, as did the prior iterations of the pe...

Excerpt: ... temporary restraining order evicting Defendant from the Property would not serve to preserve the status quo until a final determination of the merits could be had. (Order at 4.) The court did find, however, that the interim harm each party was likely to sustain was significant for both parties and issued the following orders, in relevant part: (1) Defendant was restrained from dumping trash/toxic waste and/or storing old tires and other items on...

Excerpt: ...he demurrer to the SAC. (801 F _ App'x 519, 521 ["[U]nder any reasonable reading of the statute, 51793.2(b) requires only that [the facility] complete any single repair attempt within 30 days."]_) Plaintiffhas made no changes from the SAC in the TAC's allegations with respect to this claim and again fails to allege a single repair facility visit lasting longer than thirty days. Instead, Plaintiff now argues that because the repair facility visits...

Excerpt: ...Civil Code section 1793.22, subdivision (e)(2), does not include a used car purchased from a retail seller unaffiliated with the manufacturer simply because there is some balance remaining on the manufacturer's warranty. To the extent Jensen can be construed as presenting conflicting authority, the court views Jensen's view in light of the particular facts surrounding the vehicle at issue in that case and the affiliation of the manufacturer with ...

Excerpt: ...lternative and cumulatively, that trenching through the canal without having first secured permits for the entire project and without having completed environmental review as required by state and local statutes [including CEQA as set forth in both California's Codes and the California Code of Regulations] is an undue burden on the easement regardless of what effect the trenching will have on Tulare Lake Canal's use of the easement and operation ...

Excerpt: ...otions are granted. Plaintiff counsel's declaration establishes that the discovery requests were properly served and that no response was timely made to those requests even after an agreement to extend the time to respond by more than six months. Additionally, no opposition has been made to the motions. Defendant Agler's and Defendant Bookwalter's verified responses without objection to the Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, ...

Excerpt: ... is made as to whether the propounding party has complied with the pre-motion requirements under the Discovery Act. (Code Civ. Proc. "2016.040 [meet and confer declaration required in support of discovery motion], 2025.480 [motion to compel answers if deponent fails to answer or produce], 2030.300 [motion to compel further responses to interrogatories], 2033.290 [untimely responses to interrogatories].) Without deciding the propriety ofthese disc...

Excerpt: ...wner shall first give notice of the violation to the tenant with an opportunity to cure the violation.” (Code Civ. Pro. § 1946.2, subd. (c).) Once the violation is not cured, a three-day notice to quit without an opportunity to cure may thereafter be served to terminate the tenancy. (Ibid.) Here, the 3-day notice attached to the Complaint includes a statement that the tenants have been previously notified of an alleged breach and that the brea...

Excerpt: ...ttendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice “[i]f, after service of a deposition notice, a [party-affiliated deponent] without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination.” Section 2025.410(a) provides that a party may serve a written objection to a deposition notice, specifying th...

Excerpt: ...ion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend, a plaintiff may amend his or her complaint only as authorized by the court's order. (Harris v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1023; People ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. v. Clausen (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 770, 785.) In the order, the court specifically directed Plaintiff to amend the complaint “in order to include allegations that give rise to a theory of liability for elder abuse...

Excerpt: ...d and related torts) "in ordinary and concise language," and the test for adequacy is not absolute but whether the pleading as a whole apprises the adversary of the factual basis of the claim].) The general rule is that a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts, not evidentiary facts. (Doe v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 531, 550.) The court treats the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, dedu...

Excerpt: ...2) 5 Cal.App.4th 1480, 1486.) In particular, the Complaint fails to include adequate facts with respect to the alleged disclosure to the social worker, the perpetrator's “propensity” for the conduct which caused injury to Plaintiff and the foreseeability of the abuse, as well as the nature of the social worker's visits with Plaintiff and the alleged “chronic, unmitigated, systematic, and pervasive problem” of sexual assaults and abuse of ...

Excerpt: ...der are allowed where the failure was willful. (Weil & Brown, § 8:2147; Aghaian v. Minassian (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 603, 618-619 [“absent unusual circumstances, nonmonetary sanctions are warranted only if a party [acts] willfully”]; Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 605-606; Vallbona v. Springer (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1525, 1545.) The appellate courts have agreed with trial court determinat...

Excerpt: ...is state that amendments shall be liberally allowed.” (Weil & Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial ¶6:636; Vogel v. Thrifty Drug Co. (1954) 43 Cal.2d 184, 188; Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 939; California Cas. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 274, 278.) The policy favoring amendment is so strong that denial of leave to amend can rarely be justified: “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of...

Excerpt: ...determine with any certainty which responses to production remain outstanding as of the date of this ruling and whether there is any need for any further order by the court in regard to such matters. To aid in the parties' discussions, the court—with the exception of Request for Production of Documents No. 5—rejects Plaintiff's contention that Defendant Hanfordidence fails to provide the requisite statement of compliance. Except for Request f...

Excerpt: ...determine with any certainty which responses to production remain outstanding as of the date of this ruling and whether there is any need for any further order by the court in regard to such matters. To aid in the parties' discussions, the court—with the exception of Request for Production of Documents No. 5—rejects Plaintiff's contention that Defendant Hanfordidence fails to provide the requisite statement of compliance. Except for Request f...

Excerpt: ...e Trial ¶6:636; Vogel v. Thrifty Drug Co. (1954) 43 Cal.2d 184, 188; Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 939; California Cas. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 274, 278.) The policy favoring amendment is so strong that denial of leave to amend can rarely be justified: “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of the motion will not prejudice the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend...

Excerpt: ...er form of assistance, the FAP fails to state sufficient facts to impose CEQA-related obligations upon Angiola.” (¶12.) With respect to Angiola, the SAP alleges that Sandridge informed Petitioner that the Project was for use by Angiola. (¶8.) The SAP further alleges that Angiola board members have financial ties to John Vidovich and Sandridge and that such members have at various times communicated with Sandridge. (¶¶15, 21.) The SAP also a...