Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1371 Results

Location: Stanislaus x
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 249))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 125,25
Array
(
)
2023.11.21 Motion and Cost Recovery 963
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ...ugh a fee request should generally be documented in detail, a judge may properly base a fee award on the attorney's declaration, in the absence of tme records and billing statements. (Cruz v Fusion Buffet, Inc. (2020) 57 cal.5th 221, 237; Bender v county ofLosAnge/es, (2013) 217 cal.4th at 987). The court considering an attorney's fee award may require a defendant to produce records sufficient to provide a proper basis for determining how much ti...
2023.11.21 Demurrer 032
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ...6) 44 Cal.App.4th 194, the existence of a valid written contract renders invalid claims of unjust enrichment or implied-in-fact contract. Because of this, it is unclear which specific theory Plaintiff is electing. The Court finds that the pleading fails to allege conduct beyond the failure to pay the subject rebates as promised; therefore, the present allegations do not support the Cause of Action for Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith ...
2023.11.17 Motion to Compel Responses 600
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...Sur-Reply below. Rulings on Defendants' objections: 2. 3. 4. OVERRULED. This is a bare assertion. SUSTAINED. OVERRULED. OVERRULED. The Court has two motions before it: One is styled as a Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One, and the other as a Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Documents, Set One, both filed October 18, 2023 (all dates are in 2023). Neither motion ha...
2023.11.17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 549
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...efendant's motion argues that it is not liable to indemnify Cross-Defendant Nicklaus Rey Siguenza because it is not liable to Plaintiff, the fact that the Court concludes Defendant's motion should be denied — with regard to both primary and alternative relief — dispenses with any need to rule directly on issues raised by Defendant's motion as it pertains to Cross-Defendant Siguenza. The Court believes the Plaintiff's evidence of "substantiall...
2023.11.17 Motion for Reconsideration 115
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...that Defendant's provision to Plaintiff of new admission paperwork and a new arbitration agreement for execution upon each occasion of Plaintiff's readmission to Almond Vista's facility, particularly after the 2016 arbitration agreement between the parties permits an inference that any previous arbitration agreement between the parties was accordingly revoked and or terminated. Accordingly, Plaintiff's refusal to sign the 3/14/19, 6/11/19, 2/12/2...
2023.11.15 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 856
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...quest, itemize the deductions. The Court "shall" make whole Plaintiff and his counsel. The Court finds the rates cited as reasonable and notes that Plaintiff's counsel appears to have not contributed adversely to the substantial delay this case has suffered. This amount is to be paid within 30 days. The Court further issues a $750 penalty payable to the Court under Code Civ. Proc. S 473(c)(1)(A). This matter has taken more of the Court's time tha...
2023.11.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication 457
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...-8: OVERRULED. It is not entirely clear that these statements are based on direct knowledge, but the Court assumes they are. Objection 9: OVERRULED. The Court takes this as a statement of opinion. Objection 10: SUSTAINED. Plaintiff Bettencourt filed a Complaint in this action on July 6, 2021, alleging negligence by various defendants including Fletcher K and Escalera (UMF 1-2.). Plaintiff alleged that she tripped on a bush stump. (UMF 3). Fletche...
2023.11.15 Demurrer to FAC 715
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ... adjacent to Alcantar's property, and it is disputed whether Alcantar had responsibility for the sidewalk. After he was sued, it was determined that the insurance company was not paid via the accounts. As to the Third Cause of Acton for Negligence, Cenlar's strongest argument is the economic loss rule. But as noted in Southern California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal. 5th 391, the primary exception to the general rule of no-recovery for negligently...
2023.11.15 Application for Good Faith Settlement 194
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ... Court finds, upon the application of the factors listed in Tech-Bilt Inc. v Woodward-Clyde Associates, that Settling Defendants application demonstrates the good faith nature of the settlement between Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants. (Tech-Bilt Inc. v Woodward-Clyde Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, code of Civil Procedure SS 877, 877.6). The Court also finds that said settlement amount of settlement is within reasonable range of Settling Defe...
2023.11.09 Demurrer to SAC, Motion to Strike 051
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ...siness and Professions Code. Specifically, plaintiff has pled sufficient facts demonstrating a loss or deprivation of money or property sufficient to qualify as an injury in fact, i.e., economic injury, and that said economic injury was result of, i.e., caused by, the unfair business practice. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code S 17204, Prager Univ. v. Google LLC, (2022), 85 Cal. App. 5th 1022, review filed Jan. 17, 2023). Additionally, Plaintiff has allege...
2023.11.07 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Amend Judgment 308
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.07
Excerpt: ...nably entitled to $24,756 in attorney's fees, $3258.33 in costs and $760 in unpaid sanctions awarded by the Court on 3/8/23. (Nightingale v. Hyundai Motor America (1994) 31 cal.App.4th 99, 104) b) As a general rule, the Court may amend its judgment at any time so that the judgment will properly designate the real defendants. (Danko v. O'Reilly (2014) 232 Cal. App. 4th 732, Cade Civ. Proc. S 187.) Furthermore, Code of Civil Procedure S 187 which g...
2023.11.07 Demurrer to FAC 643
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.07
Excerpt: ...sk Manager to "accept, negotiate, settle and pay general liability and worker's compensation claims up to" and respectively, whereas Plaintiffs claim notice was for The Court therefore finds that said Human Resources Director and Risk Manager were not authorized to reject Plaintiff's claim. The Court accordingly finds the rejection emanating from the City of Modesto dated 5/12/22 to be invalid and ineffective. Accordingly, Defendant's demurrer to...
2023.11.03 Motion to Compel Further Responses 005
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.03
Excerpt: ..., no such statement had been filed as ordered and the Court again re-issued the order to file the joint status statement and again continued the hearing to this date in order to determine compliance. (Minute Order of 10/3/23.) As of this posting, the Court's docket does not reflect that any such joint status statement has been filed and Plaintiffs moton has not been withdrawn nor has a notice of settlement been filed with the Court. Accordingly, ...
2023.11.03 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 509
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.03
Excerpt: ...mages The Court grants the MS] on the following -ssues: Issue 5: Discrimination. Issue 6: Retaliation. PROCEDURAL ISSUES: The language and numbering of the issues is not exactly parallel in the notice of moton and the separate statement. As such, the Court has the discretion to deny the moton on that basis. The Court declines to do so. EVIDENTIARY ISSUES: Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's evidence: 1-3: Overruled. These objections go toward w...
2023.11.02 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 618
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.11.02
Excerpt: ...Viejo Emergency Medical Associates v. Beta Healthcare Group (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 1146, 1153-1154.) The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the agreement should not be enforced herein. Specifically, Plaintiff has demonstrated only a slight degree of procedural unconscionability in connection with the adhesive nature of the agreement, and that alone is insufficient to render the agreement unenforceable. Plaintiffs arguments ...
2023.10.31 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Vacate Entry of Default, for Award of Sanctions 358
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.10.31
Excerpt: ...bode" means the place defendant holds out as his or her principal residence and where he or she is most likely to receive actual notice. Zirbes u Stratton (1986) 187 cal.App.3d 1407, 1415-1417. In Zirbes v. Stratton the plaintiff left copies of the summons and complaint against Wife (i) at the restaurant she owned with estranged Husband (but she did not work there); and (ii) at her mother's home (listed as her residence on her drivers license). T...
2023.10.31 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Vacate Entry of Default, for Award of Sanctions 127
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.10.31
Excerpt: ... or usual place of abode" means the place defendant holds out as his or her principal residence and where he or she is most likely to receive actual notice. Zirbes u Stratton (1986) 187 cal.App.3d 1407, 1415-1417. In Zirbes v. Stratton the plaintiff left copies of the summons and complaint against Wife (i) at the restaurant she owned with estranged Husband (but she did not work there); and (ii) at her mother's home (listed as her residence on her...
2023.10.26 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ 334
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.10.26
Excerpt: ...ategories and documents specified in Plaintiff's deposition notice. To the extent that the latter issues are raised bythe instant motion, the Court finds that the motion is premature. In addition, the papers demonstrate insufficient meet-and-confer efforts on those issues. With regard to the scheduling of the deposition itself, the Court notes that the defense has indicated a willingness to produce a qualified witness at a "mutually agreeable dat...
2023.10.25 Motion to Stay Action, Joinder 245
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...convenient Forum — a, b and c- DENIED. California favors contractual forum selection clauses so long as they are entered into freely and voluntarily, and their enforcement would not be unreasonable. (Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior Court (1976) 17 Cal.3d 491, 496.) However, a forum selection clause will not be enforced if doing so would bring about a result contrary to the public policy of this state. (Smith, supra, at pp. 496-497; C...
2023.10.25 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 856
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...ly. The Court finds that there is no excusable neglect, which is the only grounds cited in the Notice of Moton or Motion itself. Further, there was no Answer attached to the motion, which renders the Court without authority to proceed. The Court cannot rule on the motion effectively made in the reply brief without giving Plaintiff an opportunity to respond, which is one option. If Plaintiff elects to have the motion for mandatory relief heard wai...
2023.10.25 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions, for Relief from Waiver of Objections, for Judgment on the Pleadings 374
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...cial Interrogatories, Plaintiff's instant application is now moot. The Court declines to impose monetary sanctions on grounds that Defendant's Counsel's calendaring error constitutes substantial justification for failingto respond to said Special Interrogatories. (Code of Civ. Proc. section 2023.030 (a)). b) GRANTED. The Court finds that Defendant has substantially complied with Plaintiff's propounded discovery. Further, that Defendant's failure ...
2023.10.24 Motion to Reopen Discovery for IME 244
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.10.24
Excerpt: ... neurological examination." It then lists some issues the doctor will check and concludes that he will do other medically necessary tests. This is facially deficient. The Court considers the assertions raised first in the reply brief only to note that this still isn't sufficient. code Civ. Proc. SS 2032.220(c), 2032.320(d), and carpenter v. superior court (2006) 141 cal.App.4± 249, 260 outline the requirement to specify the procedures in detail,...
2023.10.19 Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Default, Judgment 849
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.10.19
Excerpt: ...Court is unpersuaded that conversations prior to the filing of the complaint about the dispute are sufficient to give actual notice of the lawsuit. As Plaintiff concedes, the request for relief under S 473.5 is timely. Defendant asserts that he was not given actual notice despite multiple mailings and efforts to contact him. The assertion of lack of knowledge is unconditional. Sanctions are only available under S 473, and not S 473.5. In this cas...
2023.10.18 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions, to Deem Truth of Matters 625
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.10.18
Excerpt: ... are waived. (Code Civ. Proc. S 2031.3W(a).) Moreover, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not complied with the requirements for relief set forth in Code Civ. Prtw S 2031.3W(a). Therefore, Defendant is entitled to an order compelling Plaintiff to provide verified responses, without objection, within 14 days. (CINIe Civ. Proc. S 2031.3w(b).) In addition, the Court finds that Defendant is entitled to an award of monetary sanctions in connection wit...
2023.10.17 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 189
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.10.17
Excerpt: ...ourt also finds the unanimous rate of participation by class members to be a strong factor in approving this settlement. The Court also finds the awards to the Class Representatives and to the Class Members to be appropriate given all relevant factors of the Settlement. The Court also finds the attorney's fees to be comparable to the award of fees generally issued by California Courts. Therefore, the Class Class Representatives, and Class Counsel...

1371 Results

Per page

Pages