Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1363 Results

Location: Stanislaus x
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 249))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 100,25
Array
(
)
2023.12.07 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 593
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ...ave not yet received the Bills of Sale. Without the Bills of Sale, performance cannot occur, and the cause of action for breach of contract has not yet accrued. Defendants therefore have defeated their own sham pleading argument because their admissions demonstrate that the correct cause of action here is anticipatory breach, not actual breach. The cause of action is not barred by the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations on a cause ...
2023.12.07 Demurrer 247
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ... to contain contract specifics inclusive of the date renders the complaint fatally vague. Second, the failure to allege a contractor's license causes the complaint to fail as currently pled. (See Phoenix Mechanical Pipeline, Inc. v. Space Exploration Technologies (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 842.) The Court is skeptical that expert testimony is necessary. Plaintiff's contenton that the contractor's license is necessary is not supported by the Space X ca...
2023.12.06 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas, for Protective Order, to Modify Subpoenas, for Sanctions 866
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...dly injured in the accident and the timeframe for the medical records to 15 years before the date of the accident. The request for a protective order is DENIED, as the specifics of a protective order were not addressed in the motion. If counsel wish to agree on a protective order, the Court is likely to enter one. The Court views the limitation at 15 years and the body parts involved as sufficient given the facts of the case. The initial request ...
2023.12.06 Motion to Lodge and File Records Under Seal 378
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...ubstantial probability exists that the overriding -nterest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and (5) No less restri ctive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. The overriding interest here is the "highly confidential" and "commercially sensitive" information contained in the declarations filed by Mr. Hughes and Mr. Retsloff in support ofthe settlement negotiations between Plai...
2023.12.06 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 179
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...ff's Motion for Orders Compelling Responses to Requests for Admission Set One and Awarding Sanctons of $2,600.00 Against Defendants and Their Attorney of Record Michael Warda —GRANTED, unopposed. a) The Court finds that Defendant failed to timely respond to the requested discovery or at all. Accordingly, Plaintiffs unopposed motion to compel defendant to prov-de full and complete responses, without objections, to plaintiffs second set of form i...
2023.12.06 Motion to Bifurcate Trial and Sequence Discovery 109
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...rified that when — as is the case here - a petition challenges the disinheritance of a beneficiary from a trust, the petitioner has "limited stand-ng" to challenge the validity of the trust instrument which disinherited him. Therefore, the Court must first decide the "threshold issue" of the validity of the trust instrument which disinherited Petitioner here the Second Amendment to the Trust. If the trust amendment pursuant to which the benefic...
2023.12.06 Motion for New Trial, for Costs of Proof, for Sanctions 704
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Speiller, Stacy P
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...12/29/23 at 8:30 am in Department 22 is ADVANCED and CONTINUED to 1/12/24 at 8:30 am in Department 22, to be heard concurrently with the motion to award costs. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL: The Court will hear arguments on the following issues: 2. Special Verdict Form Responses re Vicarious Liability: The Court notes that Plaintiff failed to address this argument in his opposition. The Court would like to hear from the parties on this Issue. Damages Awar...
2023.12.05 Motion for Discovery Sanctions, to Continue Trial and Settlement Conference Dates 818
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ... in its previous order of 10/4/23 warned Defendant that further failure to comply with the Court's orders could result in the imposition of more stringent sanctions up to and including terminating sanction. (Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare Reit, Inc., (2020), 56 Cal. App. 5th 771). Accordingly, Plaintiff's application for issue sanctions to be imposed against Defendant is hereby granted. The allegations of Plaintiffs complai...
2023.12.01 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 527
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.12.01
Excerpt: ... for Admissions Set No. Admitted and Request for Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant— GRANTED, unopposed. a) The Court finds that Defendant failed to timely respond to the requested discovery or at all. Accordingly, Plaintiffs unopposed motion to compel defendant to prov-de full and complete responses, without objections, to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Set One, is granted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ...
2023.12.01 Motion to Compel Answers, for Sanctions 863
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.01
Excerpt: ...Production of Documents; Request for Sanctons— GRANTED, and a) The Court finds that Plaintiff entirely failed to to the subject discovery and all objections are waived. (Code Civ. Proc. S 2030.290(a).) Therefore, Defendants are entitled to an order compelling Plaintiff to provide verified responses, without objection, within 14 days. (Code Civ. Proc. S 2030.290(b).) The Court further finds that Defendants are entitled to an award of monetary sa...
2023.11.30 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 193
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ... the arbitration proceedings. The representative claims in the class action complaint are dismissed. Both the individual and representative portions of the PAGA complaint are stayed pending arbitration. a) Defendant contends that California law is pre-empted in these complaints by the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). Plaintiff does not dispute Defendant's contention that it is engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the FAA and thus ...
2023.11.29 Motion for Attorney Fees 702
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...p.4th 118). The Court finds that Plaintiff, as the prevailing buyer under Code of Civil Procedure 51794 (d), is entitled to the award of reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution of Plaintiff's Song Beverly Act Claim herein. The Court also finds that the pre-engagement activity undertaken by Plaintiff's Counsel prior to signing Plaintiff on as a client is compensable. (Hogar Dulce Hogar v. Cmty. Dev. Com. of City of Escondido, (2007)...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions, for Monetary Sanctions 044
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...dant Fulmer Pursuant to California EVIDENCE Code Section 1043 - GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. a) Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' motion to compel responsesto the three questions set forth in the notice of motion and motion is GRANTED. Any issues, questions, or "matters of first impression" arising during the meet and confer process which occurred after the Court initially heard the Plaintiffs' motion an...
2023.11.28 Motion to Compel Further Responses 909
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...pt sanctions. As to the discovery dispute, the Court intends to grant Plaintiff's remaining requests in full. Plaintiff's requests for the search terms seems entirely reasonable, and the other requests for responsive documents appears to have been met with non-responsive additions. The Court does not issue discovery sanctons in this case, as meet and confer efforts prior to the initial hearing date were insuffcient. Importantly, Defendant argues ...
2023.11.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 428
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...ffs Eliseo Rivera, by and through his guardian ad litem Elvia Rivera and Elvia Rivera's First Cause of Action for Medical Malpractice fails because the care provided to Ms. Rivera by Memorial's nursing staff met the applicable standard of care include the following: Whether Defendant's nurses operated below the appropriate standard of care in failing to obtain an estimated fetal weight (E W) upon Plaintiff's admission to Defendant's hospital. (Pl...
2023.11.28 Motion for Summary Judgment 034
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...tion of the application of the immunity provided in Civ. Code S 846 (UMFs 21, 24, 25 and Plaintiff's Additional Facts 33-38, 40, 43, 44), she has failed to meet her burden as to Defendant's actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition and causation (UMF 9, 26-30). Therefore, the Court finds that Defendant is entitled to judgment in its favor on the grounds that Plaintiff cannot establish these elements of her cause of action...
2023.11.21 Motion to Compel Arbitration of Individual PAGA Claims and Stay Non-Individual PAGA Claims 561
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ... towards a finding of procedural unconscionability, may not by itself lead to a finding of procedural unconscionability. (Lane v. Francis Cap. Mgmt. LLC, (2014) 224 cal. App. 4th 676, citing Peng v. First Republic Bank (2013) 219 cal.App.4th 1452, 1472). The Court therefore finds, in combination with the voluntary nature of Plaintiff's signing of said arbitration agreement, and the prominent notice at the top of said arbitration agreement requiri...
2023.11.21 Motion and Cost Recovery 963
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ...ugh a fee request should generally be documented in detail, a judge may properly base a fee award on the attorney's declaration, in the absence of tme records and billing statements. (Cruz v Fusion Buffet, Inc. (2020) 57 cal.5th 221, 237; Bender v county ofLosAnge/es, (2013) 217 cal.4th at 987). The court considering an attorney's fee award may require a defendant to produce records sufficient to provide a proper basis for determining how much ti...
2023.11.21 Demurrer 032
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ...6) 44 Cal.App.4th 194, the existence of a valid written contract renders invalid claims of unjust enrichment or implied-in-fact contract. Because of this, it is unclear which specific theory Plaintiff is electing. The Court finds that the pleading fails to allege conduct beyond the failure to pay the subject rebates as promised; therefore, the present allegations do not support the Cause of Action for Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith ...
2023.11.17 Motion to Compel Responses 600
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...Sur-Reply below. Rulings on Defendants' objections: 2. 3. 4. OVERRULED. This is a bare assertion. SUSTAINED. OVERRULED. OVERRULED. The Court has two motions before it: One is styled as a Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One, and the other as a Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Documents, Set One, both filed October 18, 2023 (all dates are in 2023). Neither motion ha...
2023.11.17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 549
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Freeland, John F
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...efendant's motion argues that it is not liable to indemnify Cross-Defendant Nicklaus Rey Siguenza because it is not liable to Plaintiff, the fact that the Court concludes Defendant's motion should be denied — with regard to both primary and alternative relief — dispenses with any need to rule directly on issues raised by Defendant's motion as it pertains to Cross-Defendant Siguenza. The Court believes the Plaintiff's evidence of "substantiall...
2023.11.17 Motion for Reconsideration 115
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Sandhu, Sonny
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...that Defendant's provision to Plaintiff of new admission paperwork and a new arbitration agreement for execution upon each occasion of Plaintiff's readmission to Almond Vista's facility, particularly after the 2016 arbitration agreement between the parties permits an inference that any previous arbitration agreement between the parties was accordingly revoked and or terminated. Accordingly, Plaintiff's refusal to sign the 3/14/19, 6/11/19, 2/12/2...
2023.11.15 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 856
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...quest, itemize the deductions. The Court "shall" make whole Plaintiff and his counsel. The Court finds the rates cited as reasonable and notes that Plaintiff's counsel appears to have not contributed adversely to the substantial delay this case has suffered. This amount is to be paid within 30 days. The Court further issues a $750 penalty payable to the Court under Code Civ. Proc. S 473(c)(1)(A). This matter has taken more of the Court's time tha...
2023.11.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication 457
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...-8: OVERRULED. It is not entirely clear that these statements are based on direct knowledge, but the Court assumes they are. Objection 9: OVERRULED. The Court takes this as a statement of opinion. Objection 10: SUSTAINED. Plaintiff Bettencourt filed a Complaint in this action on July 6, 2021, alleging negligence by various defendants including Fletcher K and Escalera (UMF 1-2.). Plaintiff alleged that she tripped on a bush stump. (UMF 3). Fletche...
2023.11.15 Demurrer to FAC 715
Location: Stanislaus
Judge: Mayne, John R
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ... adjacent to Alcantar's property, and it is disputed whether Alcantar had responsibility for the sidewalk. After he was sued, it was determined that the insurance company was not paid via the accounts. As to the Third Cause of Acton for Negligence, Cenlar's strongest argument is the economic loss rule. But as noted in Southern California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal. 5th 391, the primary exception to the general rule of no-recovery for negligently...

1363 Results

Per page

Pages