Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2654 Results

Location: Sonoma x
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 248))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 100,100
Array
(
)
2024.04.17 Motion for Summary Adjudication 585
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...rling commenced this action to obtain money owed by Arrowtown for roofing work done and for materials provided by Sterling in connection to a construction project on a residential remodeling in Sonoma for Heather Jordan and Joseph Beare (the “Owners”). Arrowtown, as the general contractor, sought a contract with Sterling for roofing work. Arrowtown disputes any additional amounts claimed by Sterling. Sterling submitted a bid proposal for $82,...
2024.04.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 161
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...nting judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the Complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action in this matter. The motion is DENIED. I. Governing Law A. Judgment on the Pleadings A motion for judgment on the pleadings may only be made on the grounds specified in the statute. CCP section 438(c)(1). If the moving party is a defendant, the motion may be made on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts suff...
2024.04.17 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ll as the motion for attorney's fees and class representative enhancements. The Court issued a tentative ruling on the motion on April 4, 2024, and ordered the parties to appear for oral argument the next day. At the hearing, the Court allowed arguments by Plaintiff's counsel which focused on the Court's modification to the attorn ey's fees allocation in the settlement. Plaintiff argued the original attorney's fee request was justified but re...
2024.04.17 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 163
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff's complaint alleges that in or around January 2016, Defendant hired Plaintiff to work as a full -time, non- exempt ceiling and acoustical foreman. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated on or about August 12, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that, previously, on April 1, 2022, he injured his right arm while performing job duties. The injury impaired major life activities and constituted a disability. The injury required surgery whic...
2024.04.17 Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 212
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...) for settlement. Plaintiffs had sued Defendants for motor vehicle property damage and personal injury. ANALYSIS Legal Standard C.C.P. section 877.6 allows a plaintiff to settle with one or more joint tortfeasors without releasing others as long as the settlement is in “good faith.” A good-faith settlement discharges the settling defendant from liability to other parties for equit able contribution or comparative indemnity. ( City of Grand Te...
2024.04.17 Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike 977
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...pliance with Rule 3.1312. I. Background This complaint arises out of an ongoing dispute between the parties who are a HOA President (Plaintiff) and a resident of the Association (Defendant). Defendant is alleged to have sent sent several letters and emails to Plaintiff personally (that are large ly not the subject of this motion) and letters, emails, and flyers to board members and residents with his concerns regarding Plaintiff's fitness to serv...
2024.04.17 Motion for Leave to Amend FAC 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: .... (“CCP”) § 473 for leave to amend the FAC. The motion is DENIED. I. Legal Standards The California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a court “may in the furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper” allow a party to amend any pleading to correct a mistake. CCP § 473(a)(1). Likewise, the court may “in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading ...
2024.04.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 139
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...a n a g e r if s h e r e lo c a t e d f r o m H a w a ii t o Ca lif o r n ia . P la in t if f w a s liv in g in Hawaii after retiring after working for Defendants for many years, and taking care o f h e r ill husband who requires kidney dialysis. Plaintiff claims she agreed to relocate based on the oral promise that she would be appointed as Store Manager and Defendants would cover her relocation costs. After she had relocated, Defendants offered...
2024.04.10 Demurrer 469
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...ffs”). The demurre r is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. Plaintiffs' FAC alleges that on August 20, 2020, defendant Vanessa Ann Bardella (“Vanessa”) left her home and crossed the street to where Decedent was residing in her recreational vehicle. Vanessa shot Decedent in the face which caused severe i njuries resulting in her death. Plaintiffs allege that Barbara, Vanessa's mother, and Vanessa's brother, Matthew Bardella, knew that Vanessa ...
2024.04.10 Demurrer to SAC 312
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... its discretion to consider the late - filed opposition since Defendant was still able to file a substantive reply. Analysis: I. St andard on De murre r A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; see also, St evens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 ...
2024.04.10 Demurrer to TAC, Motion to Strike 997
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... ura l Ma t eria ls Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604 -605. Defendant's counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: I. St andards on De murre r A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985...
2024.04.10 Motion for Leave to File TACC, or for Reconsideration 872
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...an amended cross -c o m p la in t is GRAN TED . This motion is based upon Cross -Co m p la in a n t s ' r e c e ip t o f d is c o ve r y responses that indicate that Plaintiff Dorian Guerrero was not an employee of Craft Contract ing dba Craft Ge ne ral Const ruct ion (“Craft ”). It is Cross - Complainants' position that Craft cannot therefore avail itself of the protections of Labor Code section 3864, which formed the basis of this court's r...
2024.04.10 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 578
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ....50(c) provides: “The court, after notice to the adverse party, shall grant, upon such terms as may be just to the parties, leave to amend the pleading, or t o file the cross -complaint, to assert such cause if the party who failed to plead the caus e acted in good faith. This subdivision shall be liberally construed to avoid forfe it ure of cause s of act ion.” If t he propose d cross -c o m p la in t is p e r m is s iv e , leave of court ma...
2024.04.10 Motion to Compel Deposition, Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 719
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...��), special interrogatories (“SIs”), and requests for produc tion of documents (“RPODs”), and for monetary sanctions. Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Relevant Law A. Motions to Compel Responses Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and “[i]f an interrogatory cannot be answere...
2024.04.10 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ... located at 4723 Muirfield Court, Santa Rosa, (the “Property”). Defendants were uncertain whether Plaintiff got a permit to install this first. The parties entered into the Settlement Agreement on November 1, 2023. Paragraph 9 of the Settlement Agreement required Plaintiff to provide support that he obtained a permit for the installation of the propane tank. (Declaration of Pavone, Ex hibit A.) Plaintiff had to send this support to Defendant ...
2024.04.10 Motions to Enforce Settlement 181
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...efendant Bethany Zoe (“Zoe”) stipulated to a settlement agreement in open court. The parties exchanged multiple versions to memorialize this settlement agreement in writing, but Defendants did not agree to the terms because they did not include the requirement for escrow, a title report, and a transfer disclosure statement re garding re al prope rt y at issue . Anabi's posit ion is t hat t he se t e rms we re a part of the general category po...
2024.04.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 326
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...� 4 1 8 .1 0 (a)(1 ) o n t he gro und s t hat t he Co urt lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendant because the summons and complaint we re ne ve r prope rly se rve d . I . Governing La w The Co de o f Civil Pro ce d ure st at e s t hat “[a] de fe ndant , o n o r b e fo re t he last day o f his o r he r t ime t o p le ad o r wit hin any furt he r t ime t hat t he co urt may fo r go o d cause allo w , may se rve and file a no t ice o f mo t io...
2024.04.10 Motion to Stay 389
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...c o n sidered for, coordination.” Section 404.5 contemplates a stay of proceedings when the coordination of two actions is being considered. No such action is being considered for c o o r d in a t io n w it h t h is c a s e . Th e r e f o r e , s e c t io n 4 0 4 .5 is in a p p lic a b le . Re g a r d le s s , as pre vio usly d etermined by this court, and as acknowledged in defendant's moving papers, Dorothy Langley transferred the subject rea...
2024.04.10 Motion to Strike Unverified Answer 308
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...for ju d ic ia l n o t ic e a r e GRAN TED . Defendants shall file and serve their proposed amended answer within 10 days of service of the notice of entry of this order. P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiffs brought this action to seek damages from Defendants for breach of contract and property damage arising out of a commercial lease. Defendants filed an unverified answer with a general denial to the verified complaint to avoid an entry of default...
2024.04.05 Demurrer 916
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...s sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAIN ED w it h leave to amend. I. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP § 430.30(a). In the event a demurrer is sustained, leave to amend should be granted where the complaint's defect can be cured by amendment. Th e Swahn Group, I...
2024.04.05 Demurrer to FAC 522
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...second amended complaint. West of Temperance is a winery. John King (“King”) and Brian Ojalvo (“Ojalvo”) are managers and/ or members of Plaintiff. King mainly manages the finances and Ojalvo mainly operates the winemaking process. Plaintiffs allege that they purchased wine corks from Defendant which contained “cork taint,” a fungus which can be present in natural cork that ruins the wine. The FAC alleges causes of action for breach o...
2024.04.05 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...�E+>GXji N--b + JÄf] S' + NSÄéMj f x JäT JäT S' J NJii lßÄXMiA ä Aixrwotj ß ß JÄäz f ä f XP6äT ß J zXiäTöGöTJä JzX* N•eiTÄz JÄf] Jii%txr GZJBfgä Oi IlJi±Oi 2JMi SgTXJäT#SiÄXi JäT , iqZGiAäi SGTXY*' Jfgäi JigSäT j' gß iXöJäTäXf éX*TiPtäTä fä *CéJCß TSiÄz JäT JÄf] A NJii Nf'Nfqä JäT XNJÄi 13MXMixr TJä Jzx CS Jä A XSJä &XÉJiJfgä TAB JO äNGiJi0&i Jäj a A cze xnÅäXi JäT Jö 7' JÄf]j J' TArV...
2024.04.05 Motion for Entry of Default 873
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...least March 24, 2010. As of the date of the motion, $54,733.82 has been incurred in costs, fees, and penalties. Th e m o t io n is D EN IED . The court hereby sets this matter for a default pro ve -up hearing for Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., in Department 16. Counsel, the parties, and the witnesses are required to appear in person. On August 4, 2023, County filed a Complaint to Abate Public Nuisance; to Enforce Septic and Zoning Code Vi...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Further Production of Docs, for Sanctions 739
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ake the deposition of an entity by examining an officer or agent designated by the entity to testify on its behalf. In such a case, the notice of deposition must “describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which e xa m in a t io n is r e q u e sted” and the entity must “designate and produce at the deposition those of its officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or agents who are most qualified to testify on its behalf as...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Responses 225
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ode of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code -c o m p lia n t responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of ...
2024.04.05 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 703
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...f action for alleged violations of the Song -Be ve rly Consume r Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et se q. (the “Act”). This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is G RAN TED . I. Governing Authorities A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum...
2024.03.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 469
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...g forth plainly and concisely a ll m a t e r ia l f a c t s that the moving party contends are undisputed.” (Emphasis added.) “The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the court's discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.” ( Ib id .) Defendants' separate statement makes no mention of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between Brendon Barraclough and the Iron Workers Union ...
2024.03.27 Motion for Discovery of Financial Condition 825
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...cted with malice, fraud, or oppression. I. P la in t if f 's r e q u e s t s f o r ju d ic ia l n o t ic e Plaintiff's request for judicial notice of the IRS “Ministers' Compensation & Housing Allowance” web page is granted pursuant to Evid. Code § 452(c). Plaintiff's request for judicial notice of the transcript of John Bucher's interview on January 9, 2020 (mistakenly designated “January 9, 2022”) is denied. P la in t if f 's statement...
2024.03.27 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 508
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...“Defendant”) request for judicial notice is GRAN TED , per Evidence Code section 452(d). FACTS & P RO CED URE Plaintiff claims discrimination, retaliation, and violations by Defendant under the Fa ir Em p lo y m e n t a n d H o u s in g Ac t (“FEH A”) in t h e c o m p la in t . D u r in g P la in t if f 's deposition, Plaintiff's counsel noticed the word “age” was inadvertently left out of the complaint regarding the cause of action f...
2024.03.27 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 839
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...tember 30, 2022. She alleges that David caused the accident b y in t e n t io n a lly and knowingly operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs and crossing over a double yellow line into oncoming traffic and into the path of Plaintiff's vehicle. She further alleges that David was at the time acting within the scope of hi s employment with, and as agent of, Defendants D a v e S o ila n d C o m p a n y (“D S C ”) a n d N o r c...
2024.03.27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 302
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...quently repossessed by defendant. The complaint alleges that defendant w r o n g f u lly r e p o s sessed the vehicle and failed to comply with vehicle repossession la w s . The complaint further alleges that defendant has unlawfully refused to release the vehicle back to plaintiff. The complaint requests a preliminary injunction ordering defendant to: (1) not engage in any further attempts to repossess the vehicle; (2) release the vehicle to pla...
2024.03.27 Petition to Compel Arbitration 794
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ... a r b it r a t io n . P RO CED URAL H ISTO RY Plaintiff Robert Kourik brought this action against Kaiser and other defendants for medical malpractice after he ended up having severe functional issues, nerve damage, and chronic following a shoulder surgery. Plaintiff was enrolled as a “Senior Advantage ” member of Kaiser for Medicare healthcare benefits. The agreement for Senior Advantage membership included an arbitration provision. The prov...
2024.03.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 818
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...nst DOE defendants. The complaint alleges causes of action for general negligence and strict liability pursuant to Civil Code section 3342(a). The complaint alleges that on September 11, 2019, Garretson was employed at PetSmart, Inc. as a pet groomer. Garretson alleges that she was bitten by a dog owned by DOE defendants. On August 24, 2021, Garretson substituted Murillo as DOE 1. Murillo owns a Husky named Ta h o e . 1. Assumption of the Risk Se...
2024.03.27 Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens 638
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...A”) and violations of the Song -Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”). This matter is on cale ndar for Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is DENIED. I. Go ve r n in g Au t h o r it ie s A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum. CCP § 418....
2024.03.27 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 842
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...ves. Defendant argues this even though the request for dismissal specifically states, “The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, to enforce the Settlement Agreement until performance in full of the terms therein. Any and all terms of the Settlement Agreement may be e nforce d pursuant to a motion brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, and the Court may retain jurisdict...
2024.03.27 Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Dismissal, for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 397
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...'s fees for this motion. As e xp la in e d b e lo w , because Plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees for this motion pursuant to the Stipulation, and because Plaintiff clearly requested them in the moving papers, the court wi ll award such fees to Plaintiff absent an objection or explanation persuading the court why it should not do so. However, because Plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence whatsoever for the much larger amount claimed, ...
2024.03.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses 479
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...�SIs”) and requests for admission (“RFAs”) pursuant to CCP §2033.290(d) (relating to requests for admission) and CCP § 2030.300(d) (relating to interrogatories) and for monetary sanctions. The motion is GRANTED. I. Legal Authority Regarding the FIs and SIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and...
2024.03.20 Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Stipulated Judgment 445
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...3. Judgment was entered that day. Plaintiff argues that he agreed to the stipulated judgment without having be en given correct information from the Defendant. Defendant's owner, Jorge Fernandez (“Fernandez”), disclosed that he had a $500,000 insurance policy with Mercury and stated that he did not know of any other in s u r a n c e p o lic y t h a t m ig h t p o t e n t ia lly c o v e r t h e incident in this case. However, Defendant actuall...
2024.03.13 Motion for Protective Order 648
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...t cont ains cause s of action for: 1) bre ach of e xpre ss warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Ac t ”) (a g a in s t M a n u f a c t u r e r ); 2 ) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair (against Dealer). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Manufacturer for a protective order under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) 2031.060. I. Governi...
2024.03.13 Demurrer 357
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...0(f) for uncertainty and pursuant to CCP § 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a caus e of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. I. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP § 430.30(a). In the event a demurrer is sustained, leave to amend should be grante...
2024.03.13 Demurrer to TAC 909
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...'s p le a d in g . P la in t if f h a s n o w sufficiently alleged each of the causes of action herein demurred to, adequately addressing each of the Court's concerns. Standard on Demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; see also, S...
2024.03.13 Demurrers 886
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...H LEAVE TO AM EN D . Counsel for either defendant shall submit a written order consistent with this ruling and compliant w it h Ca lif o r n ia Ru le s o f Co u rt, rule 3.1312. I. Gove rning law A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of a c t io n . ( Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read as a whole, in context, and are liberally construed. ( Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 31...
2024.03.13 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 409
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...idually and as Trustee of the 1998 Trust. The amendment would also add and delete various parag r a p h s , in c lu d in g a lle g a t io n s that Collision Center is an alter ego and successor in interest to defendant Auto Bo d y. The motion is GRANTED as to Fischers Collision Center, LLC and the new causes of action against it, and is DENIED as to Gertrude Reynaud and Simone Reynaud. Plaintiff seeks to include the landlord in this action due to...
2024.03.13 Motion for Undertaking Pending Appeal 721
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...s e l shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. As an initial matter, the Court notes that this matter previously came on for hearing in Department 19 and the Court issued a tentative ruling prior to the hearing which required the parties to submit further briefing on the applicability of CCP § 917.4. H owe ve r, prior t o t he he aring, t he Honorable Oscar A. Pardo recused from the m...
2024.03.13 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 245
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...Once an order regarding discovery has been made, it is irrelevant on future hearings enforcing the order whether that order was erroneous, as the appropriate relief would be to appeal the erroneous order, not to ignore the e ffort s t o e nforce it . In re Ma rria ge of Nikla s (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 28, 35- 36. A. Sa n c t io n s CCP § 2030.300(d), §2031.310(h); §2033.280(c) provides monetary sanction “shall” be imposed against the party l...
2024.03.13 Motion to Compel Answers to Post-Judgment Discovery 226
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...pecial interrogatories (“SIs”) against Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed M o t io n is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code -compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions ...
2024.03.13 Motion to Compel Further Responses 240
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...15 days of this order and to pay sanctions in the amount of $3,500 within 30 days of this order. 1. Form Interrogatory 17.1 and Requests for Admissions Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to FROG No. 17.1 as to RFA Nos. 2 -5 , 9, 11 -12, 14, 17- 18, 26, 29-35, 46, 51, 53- 54, 62-65, 72, 74 -75, 77, 79 -81, 89 - 90, 94- 100, and 102 -104, and to Special Interrogatory Nos. 3, 6 -7, and 65. Th is m o t io n is b a s e d la r g e ly o n P la ...
2024.03.13 Motion to Vacate 424
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...t, and another and different judgment entered, for e it h e r o f t h e f o llo w in g c a u s e s , m a t e r ia lly a f f e c t in g t h e s u b s t a n t ia l r ig h t s o f t h e party and entitling the party to a different judgment: “1. Incorrect or erroneous legal basis for the decision, not consistent with or not supported by the facts; and in such case when the judgment is set aside, the statement of decision shall be amended and correc...
2024.03.13 Petition for Writ of Mandate, Demurrer 798
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...ges in the Petition that he owns a timber harvest site in Sonoma County that burned in the Walbridge Fire. (Memorandum of Points and Au t h o r it ie s [“M P A”], 3 :2-5.) Bareilles filed a notice of Emergency Timber O p e r a t io n s w it h t h e Ca lif o r n ia D e p a rtment of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”) and got approved to harvest timber in accordance with the “Categorical Waiver” and water control plan of the regi...
2024.03.06 Demurrer to TAC 513
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...rder consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Scope of the Court's Leave to Amend the SAC Defendants argue that several of the causes of action alleged in the Third Amended Complaint exceed the scope of the leave to amend granted by the Court when the Court sustained the demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint. The Court does not agree. Though the Court sustained the demurrer to a number of the causes of action i...
2024.03.06 Motion for Summary Judgment 120
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...rs and its customers' backpacks made it so that Razzak N a ji could not avoid the curb cut -out, which caused him to fall when he attempted to enter his legally parked vehicle in the parking lot of defendants' premises. The complaint alleges one cause of action for negligence and one cause o f a c t io n f o r p r e m is e s lia b ilit y . Plaintiff Razzak Naji passed away since the inception of this lawsuit. His widow, Maria Naji, is now the Pla...
2024.03.06 Motion for Interlocutory Judgment for Partition of Real Property 389
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...already h a v e t it le and their common title is divided among them. Partition does not create or convey new or additional interests. However, it does result in the common interest becoming separate individual rights of exclusive possession of some portion of the property or sal es proceeds. Partition is a matter of absolute right and in the absence of waiver or estoppel or other equitable defenses, each co -tenant in ownership has the right to ...
2024.03.06 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 585
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...remodel and renovation of property owned by Owners, for which project ACI was hired as the general contractor. (Motion, 2:2 -5 . ) AC I s o lic it e d r o o f in g w o r k f r o m P la in t if f St e r lin g Ro o f in g In c . (“St e r lin g ”) a n d O w n e r s selected and a pproved roofing materials to be installed at their home for the remodeling and renovation. ( Id . at 2:4-9.) After the completion of work, Sterling demanded additional ...
2024.03.06 Motion to Strike, Demurrer 320
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...ainst Plaintiff, Todd M. Roloff (“Roloff”), Scott A. Norgren (“Norgren”), and Suretec Insurance Company (“Suretec”, tog e t h e r w it h P la in t if f , Ro lo f f , a n d N o r g r e n , “Vanquish”). This matter is on calendar for Vanquish's motion to strike punitive damages and their demurrer to the second cause of action for fraud within the Cross -Co m p la in t pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) §§ 430.10(e) for f...
2024.03.06 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 151
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...NIED as to all other causes of action and issues. Defendants' request for judicial notice is GRAN TED . All o b je c t io n s a r e OVERRULED. Counsel for Defendant shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Un d e r ly in g Fa c t s : Defendant, North Bay Animal Shelter (“NBAS”), is a non- p r o f it a n im a l s h e lt e r under contract with the City of Petaluma to provide animal ...
2024.03.06 Motion to Quash Summons and Dismiss Case 184
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...le 3.1312. I. Background Plaintiff contracted with Defendant on July 26, 2022 to perform $111,450 worth of modifications on her 2022 Mercedes Sprinter van. Plaintiff brings the instant case alleging that Defendant breached the contract by failing to perform several agreed-upon se rvices and performing others unacceptably. Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant defrauded her when Defendant “made [her] sign a release that she inspected the work be...
2024.03.06 Motion to Require Security be Furnished as Vexatious Litigant 627
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...f e n d a n t s ”) and Does 1 -100. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Ledwith, Ishmael, Ch ild , SRAS, a n d SSM C (“ Moving Defendants”) to require Plaintiff to furnish security as a vexatious litigant under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 391.1. The m o t io n is GRAN TED in p a r t . I. Underlying Procedural Facts On June 17, 2021, Plaintiff filed the original complaint in this action, along with a Request to File New L...
2024.03.06 Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Entered Judgment 622
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...ction against Morales to collect payment on credit card debt he owed. The parties entered into a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Settlement and Release and Dismissal (the “Stipulation”), according to which Morales agreed to pay Wells Fargo $10,774.29 to satisfy the debt. (Declaration of Mulhorn, Exhibit 1.) He agreed to make an initial payment of $1,114.29, followed by monthly payments of $420.00 until he satisfied the debt. (Motion, 3:...
2024.03.06 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 259
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...en the weather was rainy and muddy. (Motion, 3:3 -5 .) Th e h o rs e , Rush, bucked while Plaintiff was mounted upon him. Plaintiff argues Defendant Fricke, Plaintiff's trainer, ran up behind him which caused him to react and P la in t if f t o f a ll, w h ile D e f e n d a n t s c la im P la in t if f a lr e a d y f e ll o f f t h e h o r s e b e f o r e Defendant Fricke ran up to her. Be f o r e c o m m e n c in g r id in g le s s o n s , P la ...
2024.02.28 Motion for Summary Judgment 200
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...otion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The applicatio n to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the da...
2024.02.28 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 658
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ilding, grading, and zoning code violations related to unpermitted greenhouses, solar arrays and cannabis cultivation on their property. (See Complaint, 1:19- 27.) In the Defendants' amended answer, they plead various affirmative defenses and they denied or admitted each allegation in the complaint or otherwise stated they did not have enough information to admit or deny it, so denied it. (See g enerally, Amended Answer.) Finding issue with the A...
2024.02.28 Motion for Summary Adjudication 023
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...of action. Th e m o t io n is GRAN TED . 1. Co m p la in t P la in t if f 's c o m p la in t a lle g e s it is t h e o w n e r o f r e a l p r o p e r t y lo c a t e d a t 2 3 2 5 0 Maffei Road in Sonoma (“the Property”). On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff entered into a Commercial Property Purchase Agreement with Edward Benedetti to purchase the Property alon g with turkey rendering equipment (“the Equipment”) from Benedetti Farms, Inc. Escr...
2024.02.28 Motion for Summary Judgment 104
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...Afterwards she filed her complaint in this matter seeking damages from Walmart for negligence and p r e m is e s lia b ilit y. ( Ib id .) Walmart has moved for summary judgment as to these causes of action and Plaintiff has opposed. AN ALYSIS Legal Standard Motion for Summary Judgment Summary judgment “shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled t...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Further Production 648
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ess warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”) (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair(against Dealer). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiffs to compel further production directed at the document requests set forth in Plaintiffs' first demand for inspection served to Manufacturer (the “RPODs”). Th...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 896
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...terrogatory Number 87 is DENIED. The City's motion as to Special Interrogatory Numbers 88 and 89 are GRANTED. Sanctions are denied. The City's motion to compel further responses to its Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, Request Numbers 44 through 46, and 48 through 50 is DENIED. Sanctions are granted against the City in the amount of $1,000. 1. Sp e c ia l In t e r r o g a t o r ie s On May 9, 2023, Defendant served its Form Interrogat...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 077
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...warded only as to the $60.00 filing fee. Defendants shall provide complete, objection -free verified responses to Plaintiff, and pay $60.00 in sanctions within 30 days of service of the notice of e nt ry of orde r. Proce dural Hist ory Plaintiff propounded post -judgment written interrogatories and demands for production on Defendants and Defendants never responded, despite Plaintiff's efforts to meet and confer on the lack of response. Plaintiff...
2024.02.28 Motion to Consolidate 940
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...o lid a t e t h is c a s e w it h Scot t sda le insura nce Compa ny v. Nort h Ba y Pressure Wa shing, Inc. , SCV-273302, also pending in Department 19 (the “Associated Action”) pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) §1048, for all purposes. The M o t io n is GRAN TED . The Associated Action is filed by plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Consolidation Plaintiff”) against Defendant. Thereafter, in the Associated Action, ST Hosp...
2024.02.28 Motion to Enter Judgment 969
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ment in the case in the amount of $10,471.00, as Defendant has defaulted on the agreement. There is no opposition t o the motion. The Motion is GRAN TED . CCP § 6 6 4 .6 (a ) p r o v id e s : “If p a r t ie s t o p e n d in g lit ig a t io n s t ip u la t e , in a w r it in g signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judg...
2024.02.23 Motion for Summary Judgment 883
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ... trustee's sale following a foreclosure. Whether or not they actually did is the underlying issue in this motion. CATAM O U N T brought the underlying unlawful detainer (“UD”) action, MCV -262009, after serving proper notice, on May 26, 2023. ISAACS answered on June 22, alleging affirmative defenses based on violations of Civil Code §§ 2923.55 and 2923.7, two statutes that are part of the Homeowner Bill of Rig h t s (“H BO R”). On Augus...
2024.02.23 Demurrer 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...y s is : This Court previously sustained a demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint on the basis that Plaintiff had failed to allege the existence of a contract between the parties. Thus, Plaintiff's breach of contract and derivative causes of action against Defendants failed. The Complaint had included several fragmentary quotations from correspondence between the parties which purportedly contained the offer, acceptance, and terms of the alleged contr...
2024.02.23 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 657
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ned by BOWIE. J O H N liv e s o n t h e p r o p e r t y ; BO W IE liv e s in Au st r a lia . (Individual defendants are referred to by their first names for clarity, as they have the same surname. No disrespect is intended.) Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on July 7, 2023. On September 27, Defendants' counsel sent a pleading captioned “Answer to Complaint of the County of Sonoma,” which purported to answer for both Defendants to counsel f...
2024.02.23 Motion for Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlements 148
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...tices; 4. Appointing Plaintiffs as Class Representatives for settlement purposes; 5. Appointing Plaintiffs' Counsel, Justin F. Marquez and Benjamin H. Haber of Wilshire Law Firm, PLC, as Class Counsel for settlement purposes; 6. Ap p o in t in g Sim p lu r is Cla s s Ac t io n Se t t le m e n t Ad m in is t r a t io n a s t h e Settlement Administrator; and 7. Scheduling a Final Approval Hearing. P r e lim in a r y a p p r o v a l is GRAN TED . T...
2024.02.23 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 239
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...allege that, after telling Plaintiffs that they intended only to remove a single tree that was leaning over Swallows Road, a private way, Defendants trespassed on Plaintiffs' property, excavated a cut in P la in t if f s ' h ills id e , e lim in a t e d a d r a in a g e d it c h , in s t a lle d a b u r ie d c u lv e r t d u m p in g w a t e r into a seasonal creek above Plaintiffs' home, cut down Plaintiffs' trees and vegetation, and dumped rock...
2024.02.23 Motion for Entry of Judgment 181
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...Zoe moved for summary judgment on claims brought against her in the cross -c o m p la in t . ( Id . a t 2 :2 -12.) This Court issued an order after hearing on the motion granting Zoe's motion for summary adjudication (the “Order”) because Cross -Complainants lacked essential elements to all of the causes of action as to Zoe. (See generally, Orde r Aft e r He a ring on Cross-Defendant Bethany Zoe's Motion for Summary Adjudication of the Cross ...
2024.02.23 Motion for Summary Judgment 916
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...'s Medi -Ca l P r o v id e r Ag r e e m e n t (M P A), in c lu d in g amounts owed in accordance with applicable federal and California statutes and regulations, and rules and policies of DHCS governing the California Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi -Ca l (P RIM E) P r o g r a m . Th e m o t io n is GRAN TED . In this action, DHCS challenges Defendants' receipt of federal PRIME Program funds for Demonstration Mid -Year 14 (January...
2024.02.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, for Attorney Fees 871
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ted Material Fact “UMF,” 1.) On January 1, 2023, Defendant defaulted on the terms and conditions of the Contract by failing to make all of the required installment payments when due. Following the default of the Defendant in making the required payments, Plaintiff declared the entire unpaid principal balance immediately due and payable, pursuant to its option to do so as set for th in the Contract. (UMF, 2.) As a result of the default describ...
2024.02.23 Motion to Compel Further Responses 884
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ... p p o s it io n Plaintiff's opposition to this motion was filed three court days late. Nonetheless, the Court exercises its discretion to consider the late -filed opposition because the hearing on this motion was advanced by the Court and because Defendant would not be pre judiced by the Court considering the opposition since Defendant was a b le t o f ile a t im e ly r e p ly . An a ly s is : I. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Special Inter...
2024.02.23 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 667
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...d motor vehicle negligence after she was injured in a motor vehicle collision between her vehicle/ trailer and another vehicle. (Motion, 1:26 -28, 2:1- 3.) Sonoma propounded set one of form int errogatories and requests for production on Jones, but she has failed to ever respond despite Sonoma's meet and confer efforts regarding the discovery requests. ( Id . at 3:7-28, 4:1- 11.) Jones' counsel was relieved as counsel because there was a breakdow...
2024.02.23 Motion to Enforce Alleged Oral Agreement 054
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: .... P la in t if f s h a ll f ile the First Amended Complaint attached to counsel's declaration within five days of entry of the order on this motion. P la in t if f s h a ll s u b m it a w r it t e n o r d e r t o t h e Court consistent with this ruling in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312. I. Background In March 1997, Plaintiff agreed to assist Defendant in purchasing a house on 21st Avenue in San Francisco (the “21st Avenue Property”) whe...
2024.02.23 Special Motion to Strike 887
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...s action arose from a contract for purchase and sale of real property between the Wights and the Richardsons. (Cross -Co m p la in t , ¶ 1 0 .) The Wights claim the Richardsons misrepresented the details of the metes and bounds of the property sold. ( Ib id .) The Richardsons claim that they advised the Wights of errors in the legal description after the sale and applied to the Sonoma County Permit & Resource Management Department to correct the...
2024.02.23 Special Motion to Strike, Demurrer 155
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ny (“Amerihome”), BW Re a l Es t a t e (“BW ”), W e s t e r n Allia n c e Bank (“Western”, together with Amerihome and BW, “Additional Cross-Defendants”) and Roes 1 -10. Thereafter, Plaintiff dismissed the FAC. There are two matters on calendar covered in this ruling. First, is Plaintiff's special motion to strike (“Anti -SLAPP motion”) brought pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 425.16 to strike the First, Second,...
2024.02.16 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 060
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...nd Does 1 -50 arising out of alleged misconduct in representing Plaintiffs in a real estate transaction (the “Complaint”). The Complaint contains causes of action for: 1) breach of contract; 2) negligence; 3) negligent misrepresentation; 4) fraud; 5) failure to disclose; 6) violations of Business and Professions Code § 17200 (“UCL Claim”); 7) rescission; and 8) b r e a c h o f f id u c ia r y d u t y . This matter is on calendar for Buye...
2024.02.16 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...D. Cross -Co m p la in a n t Th o m a s Ke lly , III (hereafter, “Thomas”)'s objection to John's oversized opening brief is SUSTAINED. While John's opening brief is only one page over the limit of the Ru le s o f Court, there is a pattern of John filing oversized briefs without first obtaining leave of Court. Thus, the Court exercises its discretion not to consider the last page of John's opening brief. Thomas's request for judicial notice is...
2024.02.16 Motion for Attorney Fees 325
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...��P la in t if f ”) b r o u g h t t h is a c t io n a g a in s t Defendant for violations of Sonoma County Municipal Code Chapter 13 Section 1, private nuisance, and public nuisance, after Defendant cleared a certain number of dead and dyi ng trees that had been burned during the Tubbs fire through Defendant's lands pursuant to the directions from California's Department of Forestry and local officials. (Motion, 2:15 -2 4 .) Ultimately, without...
2024.02.16 Motion for Change of Venue 782
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...in Napa County. Defendants have not yet answered, or appeared in this action in any way. On October 31, 2023, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion for venue change, averring that “This suit was inadvertently and erroneously filed in Sonoma County Superior Court.” II. Napa County is the appropriate venue for this lawsuit “[I]f a defendant has contracted to perform an obligation in a particular county, the superior court in the county where th...
2024.02.16 Motion for Prejudgment Interest 840
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...M o t io n , 2 : 5 -10.) The jury also awarded attorney's fees plus prejudgment interest an d punitive damages. ( Id . at 2:11-1 6 .) P la in t if f n o w seeks prejudgment interest per Civil Code 3287(a) for the total amount of $666,075.01 against Defendant. ( Id . at 2:17-18.) EVID EN TIARY O BJ ECTIO N S “All written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers in support of or in opposition to the motion....
2024.02.16 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Joint Stipulation of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 089
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...class representative; appointing Matern Law Group, PC as Class Counsel; appointing Phoenix Class Ac t io n Ad m in is t r a t io n So lu t io n s a s t h e settlement administrator; directing Defendants to furnish certain information about proposed class members; and scheduling the final approval hearing. Th e hearing is CONTINUED to May 8, 2024, at 3:00 p.m., in Department 16, to allow Plaintiff to address the issues raised below. “A trial cou...
2024.02.16 Motion for Relief from Dismissal 317
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...e was a minor. (Motion, 1:21-25. ) After Defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa filed for bankruptcy protection, a case management conference was set in this matter for June 1, 2023, which Plaintiff failed to appear at because Plaintiff's counsel failed to calendar the hearing. ( Id . at 1:26- 28, 2:1-2.) The Court set an Order to Show Cause hearing for July 13, 2023, for which Plaintiff's counsel filed a case management statement, but fai...
2024.02.16 Motion for Summary Adjudication 023
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...n. Th e m o t io n is D EN IED . 1. Co m p la in t Plaintiff's complaint alleges it is the owner of real property located at 23250 Maffei Road in Sonoma (“the Property”). On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff entered into a Commercial Property Purchase Agreement with Edward Benedetti to purchase the Prope rty alon g with turkey rendering equipment (“the Equipment”) from Benedetti Farms, Inc. Escrow closed on March 31, 2021. On May 7, 2021, Arthu...
2024.02.16 Motion to Allow Discovery of Psychiatric Records 838
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ... Evide nt iary and Proce dural Issue s The Court notes that Defendant's reply is over length, presenting 12 pages of substantive argument, where the page limit for replies is 10 pages. Cal. Rule of Court Rule 3.1113(d). The Court, on its own motion, strikes pages 12 -1 3 fo r f a ilin g t o c o m p ly w it h the Rules of Court. II. Procedural Hist ory Plaintiff brought this action against Defendant on or about August 5, 2020, alleging she suffere...
2024.02.16 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ and Custodian of Records 072
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...fects and nonconformities to warranty regarding Plaintiff's 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”). (Motion, 3:2- 1 3 . ) Plaintiff served GM with a notice of deposition of its PMQ with a demand for document production. ( Id . at 3:14-22.) The topics for examination included: (1) G M 's p r e -lit ig a t io n a n a ly s is a s t o w h e t h e r t h e 2 0 1 9 Ch e v r o le t Silv e r a d o 1 5 0 0 should be repurchased; (2) all repa...
2024.02.16 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 180
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...een subjected to. Plaintiff objected to these requests based upon CCP section 2017.220. CCP section 2017.220(a) provides: “In any civil action alleging conduct that constitutes sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery, any party seeking discovery concerning the plaintiff's sexual conduct with individuals other than the alleged perpetrator shall establish specific facts showing that there is good cause for t hat dis covery, and t...
2024.02.16 Motion to Vacate Default Judgment 963
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff Jim Shelton (“Plaintiff”) on October 14, 2021, alleging unlawful detainer of property located at 935 C McConnell Avenue in Santa Rosa. On March 22, 2022, Long filed a demurrer to the complaint. The hearing on the demurrer was continued from April 5, 2022, to April 12, 2022, to a llo w P la in t if f 's t h e n -counsel to obtain a copy of the demurrer. However, on April 7 , 2 0 2 2 , P la in t if f f ile d a f ir s t a m e n d e d c...
2024.02.16 Motion to Vacate Judgment 091
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...l to be entered correcting these two errors. The court in all other respects DENIES the motio n . Fact s and Hist ory Plaintiffs obtained a verdict against Defendant Martin Reilley (“Martin”) for various claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation after a trial which ended in March 2005. Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Martin. Th e surviving co urt records show a judgment in Plaintiffs' favor of $621,336.26. Se e Judgm...
2024.02.07 Special Demurrer 662
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...ourt of the status of the Goodwin action. Unless ordered otherwise, the parties shall attend a status conference on August 27, 2024, at 3:00pm. The parties may attend the status conference remotely. Defendant shall prepare the order for the Court in compliance with CRC 3.1312. I. Governing law A. Standard on demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of action. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747....
2024.02.07 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 907
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ..., LLC (“CES LLC”) and the Oregon Corp. The cross- complaint alleges that CES LLC and Shimadzu entered into agreements wherein Shimadzu agreed to sell CES LLC certain scientific equipment. Shimadzu alleges that CES LLC has failed to pay all invoices. In addition, Shimadzu alleges that CES LLC transferred its personal property to the Oregon Corp., including the scientific equipment that is the subject of this case without receiving the reasonab...
2024.02.07 Motion to Quash Records Subpoenas, to Compel Deposition of PMK 370
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...n or in her counsel's declaration. Nellessen simultaneously moves to compel the deposition of Defendant's person most knowledgeable (“PMK”) and requests leave to reopen discovery. The Court GRANTS leave to reopen discovery and also the motion to compel the deposition of Defendant's PMK. Procedural History Defendant served Nellessen's counsel with the five depositions subpoena production of business records on the Subpoenaed Entities and notic...
2024.02.07 Motion to Designate Matter as Complex 299
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ... Inc. (“Eno”) (all together “Defendants”), as well as Does 1- 40, arising out of alleged breach of contract and construction defects. Cross- complaints from Wahidi, Eno, and SR Iron have each followed. This matter is on calendar for a motion by the Plaintiff to designate the matter complex under Cal. Rule of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.400. The Court has also continued the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) from February 1, 2024, to the ...
2024.02.07 Motion to Designate Case as Complex 287
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...ht surety companies and insurers, relating to breach of contract, construction defects, and negligence (the “DXC”). The Hollys have thereafter filed a cross-complaint for indemnity and breach of contract against the ten subcontractors named in the DXC, along with eleven more subcontractors not named therein (the “HXC”). This matter is on calendar for the motion by the Hollys to designate the case complex under Cal. Rules of Court (“CRC�...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 538
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...tion-free verified responses to Plaintiff, and pay $60.00 in sanctions within 30 days of service of the notice of entry of order. Procedural History This Court previously entered a default judgment against Defendants. Afterwards, Plaintiff propounded written interrogatories and demands for production on Defendants, and Defendants never responded, despite Plaintiff's follow-up correspondence to meet and confer on the lack of response. Plaintiff br...

2654 Results

Per page

Pages