Excerpt: ...l LLC") and the Oregon Corp. The cross-complaint alleges that Cal LLC and Shimadzu entered into agreements wherein Shimadzu agreed to sell Cal LLC certain scientific equipment. Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC has failed to pay all invoices. In addition, Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC transferred personal property to the Oregon Corp. without receiving the reasonable value of the assets. Shimadzu alleges that the Oregon Corp. now carries on the former...

Excerpt: ...ount. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance...

Excerpt: ...e, "Cabinet Vision." Plaintiffs allege that the software was defective, crashed constantly, and did not cut the cabinet pieces at the specifications stated by the software. Forum non conveniens is an equitable doctrine, codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 410.30, under which a trial court has discretion to stay or dismiss a transitory cause of acton that it believes may be more appropriately and justly tried elsewhere. (Anima/ Film, LLC v...

Excerpt: ...n the second motion. The motions are DENIED. 1. Request for Admissions, Set One Defendants' counsel states that on August 15, 2022, Plaintiff was served by and through his attorney of record with Defendants' Request for Admissions, Set One. (Peebles decl., 93.) However, Plaintiff has been self-represented throughout this entire action. In addition, while the proof of service of Defendants' Requests for Admissions has an attached "Service List" wh...

Excerpt: ...ndant's objections to the Declaration of Jaimee Modica are OVERRULED. Plaintiffs' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentatve ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Defendant Gudgel Roofing, Inc.'s opposition requests that the Court consider his Motion for Protective Order as his opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Defendant's motion for protective order is not scheduled to be heard until April. Defendant did no...

Excerpt: ...d to compel production of documents ("RPODs") from Defendants under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the...

Excerpt: ...r for the motion by Defendants for summary judgment or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c) as to the Complaint. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues A. Procedural History The Court notes that Defendants have already filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication in this case on July 20, 2019 (hereinafter "MSJ-I"). The Court issued a ruling on MSJ-I on October 24, 2019, granting the motion as to all ...

Excerpt: ...s Brian Williams, Jamie Williams, and Brian Tiewater (collectively, the "Individual Defendants") but fail to allege how they are involved. Motion Defendants move for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication of Plaintiffs' claims. For summary adjudication, they present five issues: 1) Plaintiffs expressly assumed the risks inherent in wrestling; 2) Plaintiffs impliedly assumed the risks inherent in wrestling; 3) Defendants are immu...

Excerpt: ...alleges that at all relevant
Ÿmes, a wri
©en contract existed between Shep and Cra
L wherein Cra
L agreed to hold Shep harmless and indemnify them for its costs, fees, expenses, and liabili
Ÿes it incurs as a result of this ac
Ÿon. 1. Objec
Ÿons in Reply The court declines to rule on the objec
Ÿons as they are not material to the disposi
Ÿon of this mo
Ÿon. (CCP sec
Ÿon 437c(q). 2. Labor Code sec
Ÿon 3864 Cra
L argues that Labor Code s...

Excerpt: ...vil cases. Analysis: Government Code S 53069.4(b)(1) states, Notwithstanding Section 1094.5 or 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure [regarding Writs of Mandate] ...a person contesting that final administrative order or decision may seek review by filing an appeal to be heard by the superior court, where the same shall be heard de novo, except that the contents of the local agency's file in the case shall be received in evidence. A proceeding und...

Excerpt: ...e for either opposition. Furthermore, the oppositions do not respond substantively to the arguments made by Defendants in their opening brief; they do not provide any law for the Court's consideration; and they do not explain how the defects in the pleading can be cured by amendment. Analysis: Standards on Demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of acton. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) C...

Excerpt: ...cedure ("CCP") S 418.10(a)(1) on the grounds that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over Laird because the summons and complaint were never properly served. Governing Law The Code of Civil Procedure states that "[a] defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion [tlo quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jur...

Excerpt: ...iling Party Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement, the parties have agreed that Plaintiff is the prevailing party under Civil Code 1794 and that Defendant will pay reasonable attorney's fees and costs in an amount to be determined by the Court upon noticed motion if the parties could not agree on the amount. Plaintiff has duly served this motion upon Defendants and Defendants have not filed an opposition. Lodestar The standard for calcula...

Excerpt: ...th 556, 604; CCP S 2023.030.) As pertinent here, "misuse of the discovery process" includes "failing to respond to or to submit to an authorized method of discovery," and "disobeying a court order to provide discovery." (CCP S 2023.010(d) & When confronted with such misuse, a court may impose (1) monetary sanctions; (2) sanctions that deem specified issues to be 'established' or that 'prohibit' the non-compliant party from raising 'opposing claim...

Excerpt: ...ought a Complaint for damages as against defendants Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc., Santa Rosa Memorial, moving defendant Vishal Patel, M.D., and Does One through One Hundred. (Defendant's undisputed Material Fact "UMF," 1.) The First Amended Complaint alleges a single cause of action for Medical Negligence as to moving defendant Patel. Plaintiffs allege that decedent Joseph Bouckaert (hereafter "Mr. Bouckaert") presen...

Excerpt: .... ("Garton") through an installment sales contract (the "Contract") requiring Defendant to make periodic installment payments and giving Garton a security interest in the Tractor. Garton then allegedly assigned and transferred its interest in the Contract and Tractor to Plaintiff. Plaintiff complains that Defendant has failed to maintain required insurance on the Tractor or make required installment payments, allowing Plaintiff to take possession...

Excerpt: ...san Rogue (the "Car"), which a Defendant had manufactured, the Car is defective, and Defendants have breached the Warranty Contract and failed to comply with warranties for the Car. He attaches a copy of the Warranty Contract as Exhibit A to the complaint, and this shows that it includes a set of warranties from Defendant Nissan North America, lnc ("Nissan"). He alleges that Nissan designs, manufactures, and distributes automobiles while Defendan...

Excerpt: ...quired to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or officer, the case shall be heard by the court sitting without a jury. "The inquiry in such a case shall extend to the questions whether the respondent has proceeded without, or in excess of, jurisdiction; whether there was a fair trial; and whether there was any prejudicial abuse of discreti...

Excerpt: ...1312. Analysis: Pursuant to CCP 128.5(a), A trial court may order a party, the party's attorney, or both, to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by another party as a result of actions or tactics, made in bad faith, that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay„. Pursuant to subdivision (b), "'Actions or tactics' include, but are not limited to, the making or opposing of motions or the filing and ...

Excerpt: ...ff complains that he leased and then bought a new 2019 Kia Niro (the "Car"), with included warranties, but the Car was defective and subject to safety recalls and Defendants failed to repair or replace or repurchase the Car, and have in fact taken possession of it, preventing Plaintiff from obtaining it or his other personal property in it. He alleges that he leased and purchased the Car from Defendant Jim Bone Kia of Santa Rosa ("Bone"), the aut...

Excerpt: ...ng. The motion is DENIED. The construction contract that forms the basis of Plaintiffs' complaint is between Plaintiffs and defendant CR Consulting Group ("CRCG"). (FAC, Exhibit A.) The construction license number listed for CRCG is 836482. (Ibid.) It is signed by Cesar Rodriguez ("Rodriguez") on behalf of CRCG. (Ibid.) While there is a space for Paul J. Aguirre, dba, Aguirre Construction Co. to sign, no signature was affixed. (Ibid.) The agreeme...

Excerpt: ...laintiffs' non- opposition in which Defendants argue that the Court should consider Plaintiffs' failure to file an opposition as a concession of the merits of the Demurrer. Plaintiffs filed an objection to Defendants' response to the non-opposition, citing Rule 8.54(c) which says "A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting ofthe motion." (Italics added .) Plaintiffs state that they do not consent to the granting of the m...

Excerpt: ...oner is awarded $7,691.50 for bringing this matterfrom arbitration to Judgment. 1. Plaintiff is Entitled to Attorneys' Fees. The Court notes that Petitioner has provided no authorities in their memorandum making clear to the Court on what basis the Court may award them post-petition fees. The Court presumes, given that this arises out of an arbitration petition, which itself depends on the underlying contract signed by the parties, that Petitoner...

Excerpt: ... except Defendants Douglas Oakes and Margert E. Oakes (the "Oakeses"), specifically, Johnathan Scott Kerson; Jana Harrison; Gregory J. Conklin and Michiko Y. Conklin, in their capacities as trustees of the Conklin Living Trust dated September 4, 1998; John Merline; Sophie Phelps; Dennis J. Pistone; Nancy Pistone; Patrick Boniface Pinney, Sr. and Patric:ia Lou Pinney, in their capacities as trustees of the Troy and Ricky Trust dated July 2 1 , 201...

Excerpt: ...dez had previously sexually assaulted another female patient, Jane Doe ("Doe"), and that Hospital knew or should have known of this conduct yet took no measures regarding it. Plaintiff claims that the wrongdoing occurred when she was in the care of Defendants for hip-replacement surgery. Plaintiff filed this action on September 12, 2022, and, after Defendants answered, entered into a stipulation to file the FAC in order to correct the name of Def...