Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2604 Results

Location: Sonoma x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 248))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 150,50
Array
(
)
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 141
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ... Two, Nos. 34, 36, and 43. The motions are DENIED as to all other discovery. Jacoby requested sanctions of $13,050.00 against Defendant. Sanctions are partially GRANTED for the reduced amount of $6,525.00. Procedural History Jacoby commenced this wage and hour class action against Defendant for alleged violations of various Labor Codes. (Motion to Compel Further Responses re Production Requests [“MTCFR PROD”], 3:25-27.) Jacoby served set one ...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Depositions of PMK 824
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...lowing Smashmallow to conduct limited discovery to determine whether VADO has the minimum contacts with California necessary for this court to have jurisdiction over it. VADO opposes the motion arguing that Smashmallow's discovery is not limited to the issue of jurisdiction. Smashmallow served a Notice of Deposition of Defendant VADO Beheer B.V. by and through Person or Persons Most Knowledgeable Pursuant to CCP § 2025.230. (“Depo Notice”) (...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 638
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...(Motion, 1:2-4.) The sales contract Plaintiff entered into with Bone contained an arbitration provision covering claims that arose out of the purchase or condition of the Nissan Rogue. (Id. at 1:9-13.) Plaintiff and Bone were signatories of the sales contract but not Nissan, and the contract expressly applied to Bone and its agents. (Ibid.) The relevant portions of the arbitration provisions read as follows: “You agree to the terms of this cont...
2024.02.07 Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions 245
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...regarding discovery has been made, it is irrelevant on future hearings enforcing the order whether that order was erroneous, as the appropriate relief would be to appeal the erroneous order, not to ignore the efforts to enforce it. In re Marriage of Niklas (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 28, 35-36. CCP § 2025.450(g)(1) provides that a monetary sanction “shall” be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel deposition unless the court finds “...
2024.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ... Underlying facts Plaintiff M.A. Silva Corks (“Silva”), a manufacturer of wine packaging, began leasing a warehouse in north Santa Rosa from defendant Ursus Development (“Ursus”) in 2014 with an option to buy. Ursus agreed to make improvements to the building, including modification of the roof and installation of batt insulation under the roof. Ursus hired defendant and moving party DES Architect and Engineer (“DES”) to provide the a...
2024.02.07 Motion for Summary Adjudication 614
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...2 and 2572 ½ Bodega Avenue, Petaluma, California (APN 021-041- 025) (the “Subject Property”). (Undisputed Material Fact [“UMF”], ¶ 1.) The parties dispute the size of the Subject Property. Mendonca says it is ½ acre. Linsenmeyer claims it is larger. Both agree it is improved by a main residence and accessory dwelling unit (“Unit 2572 ½”). (Ibid.) The parties inherited the Subject Property from Mendonca's father Johnnie Lear (“Le...
2024.02.07 Demurrer 883
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...iginal beneficiary of the Deed of Trust (DOT) for this property, Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Deutsche) is the current beneficiary of the DOT, Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper (Mr. Cooper) is the servicer of the loan secured by the DOT, and Defendant The Mortgage Law Firm, PLC is the Trustee of the DOT. After Plaintiff's wife passed away, Plaintiff's daughter began managing Plaintiff's financial matters. After r...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Further Production 509
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...arranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act; and 3) violation of §1793.2 under the Act. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiffs to compel further production directed at the document requests set forth in Plaintiffs' first demand for inspection (the “RPODs”). The Motion is GRANTED. I. Governing Law Regarding RPODs, a party to whom a document demand is directed must respon...
2024.01.31 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer 033
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... to take her son out of a car which Defendant was driving. Only one Plaintiff, Jeanine Grider (“Plaintiff” or “Jeanine”) is identified as a party, and she is self-represented, but the FAC appears to assert claims on behalf of minor son, William Grider (“William”). Defendant answered the FAC and later brought a special motion to strike the sixth cause of action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The court granted that ...
2024.01.31 Demurrer 338
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...mnity. The 1XC incorporates the allegations of the complaint which allege that defendants PG&E, Mountain, and Moreno Consulting Group, Inc. (“Moreno”) in 2020 owned, possessed, supervised, operated, maintained, leased, occupied, and/or otherwise controlled a worksite in Santa Rosa near 6101 Cleland Road in Santa Rosa. (Complaint ¶10.) On October 12, 2020, while Plaintiff was at the property, Defendants' alleged negligence caused a tree to fa...
2024.01.31 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 873
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... Nathaniel Engquist is OVERRULED. The motion to strike is MOOT. 1. Note regarding combined motions The County has filed three motions as one. The County should note that it is the practice in this court for demurrers and motions to strike to be filed as separate motions. 2. Complaint This action involves property owned by the Howard Jay Engquist 2010 Revocable Trust. On March 24, 2010, Howard recorded a deed granting real property located at 250 ...
2024.01.31 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 322
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... TRVFD, “Defendants”), arising initially out alleged violations of the Court's orders in another case, SCV- 266225. This matter is on calendar for demurrers to all causes of action within the SAC by TRVFD, the County and Thompson pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that there is another action proceeding between the same parties, and for misjoinder of...
2024.01.31 Motion for Consolidation 883
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: CCP § 1048 states that “[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.” (CCP § 1048(a).) “The court...
2024.01.31 Motion for Summary Judgment 720
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...lying Facts: Carmen Marinsik (hereafter, “Marinsik”) was the owner of 1928 Camino Del Prado, Santa Rosa, California. (Undisputed Material Fact “UMF”, 1.) This residence was destroyed in the October 2017 Tubbs Fire. (UMF, 2.) Marinsik intended to rebuild the residence on the Camino Del Prado property and hired Defendant Gregory Mitchell dba Mitchell and Company as her general contractor to handle all aspects of rebuilding the residence. (U...
2024.01.31 Motion for Protective Order 677
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... pay Plaintiff the full amount owed after Plaintiff suffered a loss (the “Loss”) to the Property. Motion Defendant moves the court for a protective order shielding it from the burden and expense of responding to Plaintiff First Set of Requests for Admission (“RFAs”), First Set of Requests for Production (“RFPs”), and First Set of Special Interrogatories (collectively, the “Discovery”). Alternatively, it asks the court to extend th...
2024.01.31 Motion to Compel Answers to Post Judgment Discovery, for Monetary Sanctions 285
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...verages but that although Youngs performed, Defendants breached the contract by failing to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this action to collect the debt, allegedly $6,381.54, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained their default on November 16, 2021, and obtained a default judgment against them on January 12, 2022 for $9,249.34. Post-Judgment Discovery Plaintiff served Defendants by mail wit...
2024.01.31 Motion to Compel Answers to Post Judgment Discovery, for Monetary Sanctions 484
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...ng to pay the amount owed. Plaintiff filed this action to collect the debt, allegedly $15,795.66, plus costs, legal fees, and interest. Defendants failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained their default on May 25, 2023, and obtained a default judgment against them on June 23, 2023 for $20,425.41. Post-Judgment Discovery Plaintiff served Defendants by mail with post-judgment discovery on July 25, 2023; the discovery included one set of production de...
2024.01.31 Motion to Compel Arbitration 380
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... any time determines that there has been a change of law that warrants it to reconsider a prior order it entered, it may do so on its own motion and enter a different order.” Plaintiff argues that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration was granted based upon the ruling in Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486 compelling arbitration based upon principles of equitable estoppel. Plaintiff argues that the Third District Court of Appea...
2024.01.31 Motion to Transfer Venue 692
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...Sonoma County but does have an office in San Francisco and that, according to Revenue and Taxation Code (“RTC”) section 6933, venue is proper only in a county where the Attorney General maintains an office. There is no opposition to the motion. When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a pro...
2024.01.24 Demurrer 415
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ... issuing water well permits for groundwater extraction; and adopt and implement policies and procedures to ensure consideration of the impacts of water well permits on public trust resources and uses and also to prevent harm from the impacts of such permits. Petitoners set forth two identified causes of action, both seeking a writ of mandate: 1) Violation of CECA, and 2) Failure to Comply With Mandatory Duties Under the Public Trust Doctrine. In ...
2024.01.24 Demurrer to TAC 765
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...: Standards on Demurrer A demurrer tests whether the complaint sufficiently states a valid cause of achon. (Hahn v. Merda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Complaints are read asa whole, in context and are liberally construed. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318; see also, stevens v. superior court (1999) 75 cal.App.4th 594, 601.) In reviewing the suffciency of a complaint, courts accept as true all material facts properly pleaded, but not...
2024.01.24 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 601
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...pports recovery for a stale mechanics lien claim under a nuisance cause of action. The demurrer based upon standing and the economic loss rule is OVERRULED. The demurrer to the second cause of action for nuisance is SUSTAINED. On September 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed his complaint against Defendants alleging that they failed to use a professional level of skill when they performed certain land surveying services. Plaintiff alleges that in depositio...
2024.01.24 Motion for Attorney Fees 818
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ... costs be stricken. The motion is GRANTED as to expert fees and attorney fees. The motion is otherwise DENIED. 1. Lee is a prevailing party pursuant to CCP section 1032 A "Prevailing party" includes the party with a net monetary recovery, a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered, a defendant where neither plaintiff nor defendant obtains any relief, and a defendant as against those plaintiffs who do not recover any relief against that def...
2024.01.24 Motion for Consolidation 883
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...earing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to awid unnecessary costs or delay." (CCP S 1048(a).) "The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any cause of action, including a cause of action ass...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Authorization for Release of Home Surveillance Footage 896
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ....050, Defendant requests monetary sanctions in the amount of $2,700 and the amount of attorney fees and costs incurred to bring this motion. As Plaintiff has now provided a signed authorization to release the footage, the discovery issue is MOOT. Sanctions are granted in the amount of $1,435 for Cloverdale having to bring this motion. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that she was injured due to a dangerous condition of public property located near M...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Initial Responses 167
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...rder on this motion. Defendants' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling. Due to the lack of opposition, compliance with Rule 3.1312 is excused. Analysis: Requests for Production of Documents A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. (CCP S 2031.210(a).) If only part of an item or ca...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 776
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the moton by Corporate Defendant seeking to compel further responses to requests for production of documents set one ("RPODs"), Nos. 4, 24, 27, 36, 48, and 58, and request for sanctions in the amount of $5,510.00, from Plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored info...
2024.01.24 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas 322
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...Dave Leuschner and James Leuschner. As for the subpoena served on the LLP, this court directs the LLP to submit responsive documents to Department 16's chambers within 15 days of this order for in camera review. On November 15, 2023, Defendants issued deposition subpoenas for business records to Dave Leuschner; James Leuschner; and Plaintiffs' attorneys, the law firm Perry, Johnson, Anderson, Miller, & Moskowitz, LLP. (O'Rourke decl., 94, Exhibit...
2024.01.24 Motion to Set Aside or Vacate Entry of Default 268
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...y premiums, but Defendant failed to pay premiums owed. It seeks to collect the unpaid premiums. Plaintiff filed this action on June 26, 2023. It later filed a proof of service for the summons and complaint on September 6, 2023, purporting to show service on Defendant personally on August 2, 2023, at 3:39 p.m.at 689 Benicia Drive, santa Rosa, CA 95409. Defendant failed to appear, so Plaintiff obtained Defendant's default on September 26, 2023. Pla...
2024.01.24 Motion to Strike Particular Claims 027
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ez, "Defendants"), and Does 1-100. The Complaint alleges a variety of causes of action derived from work contracted to be performed by Defendants. Grape Land has filed a cross- complaint alleging further contract actions ("Cross-complaint"). This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs' motion to strike particular claims from the Cross-complaint, or in the alternative, to require a bill of particulars under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP"), S 454. Pl...
2024.01.24 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 331
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...his matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion to strike pun-tive damages. The motion to strike is DENIED. Governing Law A. Motion to Strike Punitive Damages A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading its...
2024.01.24 Motions to Compel Answers 767
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...tions to compel answers to special interrogatories ("Sl") against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2030.300, and to compel compliance with Plaintiff's request for production of documents ("RPOD") under CCP S 2031.310. The motions are GRANTED. Governing Law A. Special interrogatories A party may propound up to 35 special interrogatories to another party. (CCP S 2030.030(a).) If the party propounds more than 35, it must attach to e...
2024.01.24 OSC Re Contempt 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...a (the "Property"). Defendant has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appr...
2024.01.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 107
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...efendants have trespassed on Plaintiff's Property. Plaintiff subsequently obtained a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and then a preliminary injunction (the "Injunction") against Defendant Mona Verducci ("Mona") in February 2023. The Injunction orders Mona and her agents or others not to enter upon Plaintiff's Property as defined by the survey (the "Survey") attached as Exhibit A to the Injunction. Plaintiff then brought an application for ord...
2024.01.19 Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 483
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...etaluma ("the Property"). Prior to the parties taking title to the Property, it had been held in the Peter Dana Smith Revocable Living Trust. Peter D. Smith passed away on or about March 17, 2020. On April 11, 2023, this Court issued an Interlocutory Judgment for Partition of Real Property and Appointment of Referee. The order appointed Ethan A. Glaubiger as the partition referee with the discretion to hire real estate agent Kristi Taylor to sell...
2024.01.19 Motion for Leave to File SAC 124
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...cial policy favors resolution of all disputed matters between the parties in the same lawsuit, and courts are bound to apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint "at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial," absent prejudice to the adverse party. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.) "Generally, leave to amend must be liberally granted (Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Ca...
2024.01.19 Motion for Reconsideration 380
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...ay do so on its own moton and enter a different order." Plaintiff argues that Defendant's moton to compel arbitration was granted based upon the ruling in Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486 compelling arbitration based upon principles of equitable estoppel. Plaintiff argues that the Third District Court of Appeal has recently determined that Felisilda does not apply to the issue of whether a manufacturer can compel arbitration via ...
2024.01.19 Motion for Summary Adjudication 494
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ... is addressed below. Defendants' counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Request for Judicial Notice: Defendants' request for judicial notice of Exhibit A and Exhibit 8 is GRANTED. As for the remainder of the request, the Court will take judicial notice of each version of Plaintiffs' complaint and the date on which it was filed. However, the Court will not judicially notice th...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Further Responses 065
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...cuments ("RPODs"), Set One, Nos. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 32, 34, 36, and 39, against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. The motion is GRANTED. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control" of another party. A party to whom a document demand is...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Arbitration 759
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...or Code violations, and civil penalties thereon(the "Complaint"). This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Defendant to compel arbitration pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 USC SS 1-15. Defendant's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is DENIED. Facts and Procedure This matter arises out of an employment relationship between the parties. Defendant avers that Plaintiff, as part of his on...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Production of Docs, for Sanctions 104
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...tions in the amount of $1,000. Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a written order consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule 3.1312. Analysis: "California law prov-des parties with expansive discovery rights." (Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of N.Y., Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 590-591.) Specifically, the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "any party may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged...
2024.01.19 Motion to Continue Trial 905
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...ng attempting to sell a portion of his general partner interest (the "GP Interest") to Kelly. As a result of developments during this litigation, including Defendat' efforts to sell an important Partnership asset, real property comprising the Summerfield Shopping Center (the "Property"), he ultimately filed a second amended complaint ("SAC") which includes, amongst others, claims for wrongdoing based on Defendants' efforts to sell the Property. M...
2024.01.19 Motion to Seal or Redact Previously Filed Motion 677
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...daughter Vanessa French ("Decedent"), negligently caused Decedent's death. They allege that Decedent sought medical care from Defendants for a combination of physical and emotional complaints which included skin conditions, back pack, severe depression, and suicidal ideations, but that Defendants negligently failed to provide proper treatment, resulting in Decedent handing herself. Plaintiff Wendy French ("Wendy" or "Mother Plaintiff"), individua...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 470
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...mplaint, Plaintiff alleges that 275 and Walden are the lessors of the Property. 275 and Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on February 8, 2020. Plaintiff filed the Complaint based on Defendants' alleged violations of the lease agreement, particularly as it pertained to issues of the parking lot and other common areas on the Property. Plaintiff thereafter moved the Court for a preliminary injunction, which was heard on July 26, 2023. The Cou...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...t has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appropriate. See Cal. Evid. Code...
2024.01.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 907
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...l LLC") and the Oregon Corp. The cross-complaint alleges that Cal LLC and Shimadzu entered into agreements wherein Shimadzu agreed to sell Cal LLC certain scientific equipment. Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC has failed to pay all invoices. In addition, Shimadzu alleges that Cal LLC transferred personal property to the Oregon Corp. without receiving the reasonable value of the assets. Shimadzu alleges that the Oregon Corp. now carries on the former...
2024.01.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 314
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...cedure ("CCP") S 418.10(a)(1) on the grounds that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over Laird because the summons and complaint were never properly served. Governing Law The Code of Civil Procedure states that "[a] defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion [tlo quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jur...
2024.01.10 Motion to Enter Judgment 384
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...ount. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance...
2024.01.10 Motion to Dismiss Complaint 208
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...e, "Cabinet Vision." Plaintiffs allege that the software was defective, crashed constantly, and did not cut the cabinet pieces at the specifications stated by the software. Forum non conveniens is an equitable doctrine, codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 410.30, under which a trial court has discretion to stay or dismiss a transitory cause of acton that it believes may be more appropriately and justly tried elsewhere. (Anima/ Film, LLC v...
2024.01.10 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 874
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...n the second motion. The motions are DENIED. 1. Request for Admissions, Set One Defendants' counsel states that on August 15, 2022, Plaintiff was served by and through his attorney of record with Defendants' Request for Admissions, Set One. (Peebles decl., 93.) However, Plaintiff has been self-represented throughout this entire action. In addition, while the proof of service of Defendants' Requests for Admissions has an attached "Service List" wh...

2604 Results

Per page

Pages