Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2505 Results

Location: San Mateo x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 242))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 50,50
Array
(
)
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Arbitration 639
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ontinued t he hearing to the instant hearing date: [T]o permit plaintiff to depose declarant Alberto Germano for the limited purpose of inquiring into the two screenshots at Paragraph 5 at of his two otherwise identical declarations filed on December 28, 2023 and Feb ruary 13, 2024, respectively, and explanation regarding a printing error. (See Reply, filed February 13, 2024, at p. 3:25 -28, fn. 2; Defendant's Response, filed February 21, 2024...
2024.04.24 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Answer 289
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... any terms as may be proper.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) There is a policy of “great liberality” in allowing amendments to pleadings at any stage of the proceeding so as to dispose of cases upon their merits where the authorization does not prejudice the substantial rights of others. (Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 1154, 1163.) When considering whether to permit amendments to pleadings, court should...
2024.04.23 Motion to Consolidate 041
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...ase no. 24UD U00101, for all purposes. The former involves claims and cross -claims for breaches of contract and various torts arising out of an alleged oral agreement to sell a business and lease the premises to Vargas. The latter involves a claim for unlawful detainer arising out of an alleged termination of the lease of the premises. As a preliminary matter, there are multiple procedural defects in the moving papers. The notice of motion does ...
2024.04.23 Motion to Bifurcate Proceedings and Stay Certain Discovery 303
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...ek before th e conference proposing dates before the end of 2024 for a court trial on defendants' issue preclusion defense and including a trial estimate for the trial on this affirmative defense. Defendants litigated this case extensively in federal court with CVS Pha rmacy, Inc., who defendants claim is the parent of plaintiff Aetna, Inc. The court denied defendants' issue preclusion motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendants now seek ...
2024.04.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 452
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...scaffolding t hat had been erected as part of the construction. Defendants' operative First Amended Cross -Complaint (“FACC”) alleges causes of action against certain subcontractors, including defendant/crossdefendant James P. Silva Construction, Inc. (Silva) for express indemnity, implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, apportionment/contribution, duty to defend, and declaratory relief. Cross -defendant Silva for moves for summary judgment o...
2024.04.23 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 258
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...dence are rule d upon as follows: • Obj. No. 1. SUSTAINED. (Evid. Code, §. 702 [lacks personal knowledge]; id., § 403 [lacks foundation].) • Obj. No. 2. SUSTAINED to the extent Plaintiff purports to testify as to whether DOE 4 was employed by the church, or held any off icial position as a pastor. (Evid. Code, § 702 [lacks personal knowledge]; id., § 403 (lacks foundation). Otherwise OVERRULED. • Obj. No. 3. OVERRULED as to Plaintiff's ...
2024.04.23 Motion for Leave to File FAC 789
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...he damages to th e principal amount sought for the 2018 and 2019 policy periods and second, to add treble damages to the prayer for relief pursuant to Insurance Code section 11760.1 subdivision (a) for defendants alleged failure to complete a physical audit for the 2020 po licy. The motion is unopposed. Initially, the court notes that plaintiff has yet again provided the improper address for the hearing. Department 4 is not located in Redwood Cit...
2024.04.22 Motion to File Portions of Attachment to Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award 316
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...orandum in supp ort of the petition and by subsequent motion filed April 8, 2024, petitioners also requested this court seal the personal identification information in the operating agreement which is attached to the petition as attachment 4(b). The Motion to seal is GRA NTED. This court in exercising its discretion, after considering and balancing all the factors in California Rules of Court, rule 2.550 and NBC Subsidiary (KNBC -TV), Inc. v. S...
2024.04.22 Motion to Compel Production of Docs and Further Responses 860
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...roduction of Documents, Set Two, and Requests for Admission, Set One from Defendant Herbert Perez is DENIED. As a preliminary matter, the motion is untimely. Notice of a motion to compel further responses must be given “given within 45 days of the service of the verifi ed response, or any supplemental verified response” otherwise “the requesting party waives any right to compel a further response to the” request for production or reques...
2024.04.22 Motion for Summary Adjudication 219
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...Laws and Disgorg ement Per Business and Professions Code section 7031(b). “Except as provided in subdivision (e), a person who utilizes the services of an unlicensed contractor may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state to recover all compensation paid to the unlicensed contractor for performance of any act or contract.” (Bus. & Prof. Code § 7031(b).) “Section 7031 is directed at precluding unlicensed contract...
2024.04.22 Demurrer 238
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...y appear t o have been served by regular mail, in violation of Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 1005(c). The Court will overlook the violation in this instance, but may continue future hearings, or disregard filings, for non- compliance with Sect. 1005(c). Legal standard. A demu rrer is used to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading, or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 31...
2024.04.19 Demurrer to Verified Complaint for Forcible Detainer 454
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ...ossession of the Property without permission of Plaintiff. Defendant's Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. A. Legal standard on demurrer The purpose of a demurrer is to test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the operative complaint to see whether they state a cause of action under any legal theory, as a matter of law. New Livable California v. Association of Bay Area Governments (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 709, 714 –715. The demurr...
2024.04.19 Motion to Dismiss Cross-Complaints for Lack of Prosecution 641
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ...ortation Holdings, L LC's and Akira Takei's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, joined by Cross -Defendants Philip White and Brandon Lawrence, dba Sportscars Italiano, is GRANTED. Code of Civil Procedure § 583.360 provides than an action shall be brought to tr ial within five years after it was commenced. The five- year period begins to run on the date the action is filed against the defendant. Davalos v. County of Los Angele...
2024.04.19 Motion to Strike 597
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ... - 437.) Defendants' No tice of Motion incorrectly states that the hearing on this Motion will take place in Department 21. This matter will be heard in Department 24, located of 400 County Center, Redwood City, Ca. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice (RJN) is GRANTED as foll ows: As to the document(s) filed in prior court proceedings, and as to the documents recorded with a County Recorder's office, the RJN is GRANTED. (Evid. C. § 452(...
2024.04.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 762
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19
Excerpt: ...alleged in th e operative complaint to see whether they state a cause of action under any legal theory, as a matter of law. (New Livable California v. Association of Bay Area Governments (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 709, 714 –715.) The demurrer may be made to the entire complai nt or to any of the cause of action therein. (CCP § 430.50(a).) To properly state a cause of action, a complaint must allege every element of that cause of action. (Shaeffer v...
2024.04.18 Motion to Strike 773
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...tled law that e ach party to a lawsuit must pay its own fees absent an applicable statute or an attorney fees provision in a valid contract. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1021; Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc. (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1582, [as modified Feb. 15, 2008]; see also Royst er Construction Co. v. Urban West Communities (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1158, 1170 [“A contract which provides for the payment of ‘costs' alone does not usually include attorn...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, for Sanctions 151
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...April 25, 202 4. Sanctions as imposed below shall be paid no later than May 2, 2024. Plaintiff Jane Doe moves here to compel further responses and compel production with respect to three requests for production of documents nos. 10 and 13 –14 propounded to Defendant Gold en Gate Bell, LLC (“GGB”). Each seeks documents relating to the respective personnel files and background checks of three employees of GGB, who purportedly sexually harass...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 444
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ... a staffing agency wh ich placed her for a work assignment with its client, Alcon. Defendants now jointly move to compel arbitration of Plaintiff's claims. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. As a preliminary matter, the Court SUSTAINS the evidentiary objecti ons raised by Plaintiff as to Mr. Gohil's declaration, and OVERRULES the evidentiary objections raised by Defendants as to Plaintiff's declaration. California law, like fe...
2024.04.16 Petition for Writ of Mandate 654
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...iving under the influence of alcohol. He was admonished that his driving privilege would be administratively suspended for one year or administratively revoked for two or three years by the DMV if he refused or failed to take a chemical test. Subsequently, Llanes ref used to take a chemical test of his breath or blood. Llanes timely exercised his right to request an administrative hearing regarding the suspension, and the DMV held a hearing via ...
2024.04.16 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 632
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set Two, nos. 88, 89, 90 and 97 (“RFP”), from Defendant Vinod Bhardwaj (“Defendant”), is DENIED. This Motion appears to be untimely. The IDC Minute Order states that the parties agreed that any motion as t o these RFP would be timely if filed by February 29, 2024. (See December 19, 2023 Minute Order.) This Motion was not filed until March 1, 2024 though. Further, even if ...
2024.04.16 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 366
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...order gra nting terminating sanctions against co -defendant Ramson Mumba, Lugo's spouse or former spouse based upon a hearing held on October 31, 2023. On April 25, 2022, Lugo in pro per filed her answer to the first amended complaint. She did not include her telepho ne number or an email address. The court does not remember her ever appearing at any hearing or conference. Mumba has represented to the court that Lugo does not have an email addr...
2024.04.15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 074
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ...edwood City, CA, which is part of the Lynda Lake Gardens (“LLG”) development. In short, this action concerns Plaintiffs' access to the central lake in their housing development (“Lot A”) and its surrounding pathway easements. Among other matters, Plaintiffs primarily contend that the actions of the Homeowners' Association (“HOA”) and in particular, Defendant Gary Ernst as owner of the plot in between Plaintiffs' and the lake, prevent ...
2024.04.15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 998
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ... Equity Growth Asset Management (“EGAM”) did not attempt to meet and confer with him before filing this motion. Under penalty of perjury, he denies EGAM's counsel's declaration that she called Suafai on four separate days, that no one picked up, that the number does not permit leaving a message, and that she sent an email a week before filing the motion. (See Jan. 16, 2024 Declaration of Joanna Kozubal, ¶¶ 3 –7.) Without weighing the cr...
2024.04.15 Demurrer, Motion to Strike SAC 677
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ...plaint (“SAC”) is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. (Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 430.10(e).) Hearing location. Defendants' 12 -28 -23 Notice of Demurrer incorrectly states that the hearing on this Demurrer will take place in the San Mateo courthouse. The hearing will take pla ce in Department 23, which is located to 400 County Center, Redwood City, Ca. Defendants' 12 -28 -23 Request for Judicial Notice (RJN) is GRANTED. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(d).) T...
2024.04.15 Demurrer 083
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ...er than five (5) days after service of written notice of this order. Defendants demur to the Complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e). They argue that the three -day notice to pay rent or quit (referred to as the “Notice”) served to them should have specified that payment of the overdue rent could be made by mail, rather than solely by personal delivery. “A valid three -day pay rent or quit notice is a prere...
2024.04.12 Demurrer 776
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ...r. (CCP § 430.41.) Cross -D efendant also failed to file a declaration regarding its meet and confer obligations. (CCP § 430.41(a)(3).) Since insufficient meet and confer efforts are not grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer (CCP § 430.41(a)(4)), and Cross - Defendant's special dem urrer is without merit, the Court will reach those merits and OVERRULE the demurrer on those ground separate and apart from the failure to meet and confer. Col...
2024.04.12 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 147
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ... Song and Kooyeon Son g (collectively, “the Songs”). On January 18, 2023, the Songs crosscomplained against Streamlined and added Cross -defendant Paul Hugh Johnson, “the principal and officer” of Streamlined, in his personal capacity. (Jan. 31, 2024 Declaration of Paul Johnson (“Johnson Decl.”), ¶ 2; see id., at ¶¶ 4– 5 [referring to Streamlined as “my corporation”].) The Songs attempted to serve process on Johnson via Strea...
2024.04.12 Motion to Dismiss 365
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ...in April 2019, ab out five years ago. In February 2020, Defendant served Plaintiff with Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents, which broadly asked Plaintiff to explain the claims that Plaintiff was asserting against Defendan t, and the basis therefore. Plaintiff did not … and has never … serve(d) responses to the discovery requests. In May 2020 and again in Jan. 2021, Defendant's counsel sent...
2024.04.12 Demurrers 827
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12
Excerpt: ... of Action for Medical Malpr actice is SUSTAINED with leave to amend based on failure to allege facts sufficient to support this cause of action. The elements of a cause of action for medical malpractice are: “(1) the duty of the professional to use such skill, prudence, and diligence as other members of his profession commonly possess and exercise; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a proximate causal connection between the negligent conduct and t...
2024.04.11 Motion to Tax Costs 806
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...re not recovera ble as of right or otherwise barred by statute. Id. at § 1033.5(c)(4). An award of costs is subject to the court's determination that those costs: (1) are reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation rather than merely convenient or beneficial to its purpose; and (2) that the costs are reasonable in amount. Id. at § 1033.5(c)(2) –(3). To claim costs, the prevailing party must serve and file a memorandum of costs wit...
2024.04.11 Motion to Set Aside Notice of Settlement and Restore Case to Active Calendar 191
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...hether the se rvice provided to Defendant Caixing Xie is sufficient. Prior filings with this court show that Xie is likely incarcerated in China. Notice of Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition, filed Mar. 29, 2024, Ex. A, at 1 –2. However, Plaintiffs have only pr ovided notice to Xie's United States -based counsel. The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that if a person is entitle...
2024.04.11 Motion to Compel Responses, to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 764
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...ests for Admi ssions, Set One, to be deemed admitted. Defendants also request monetary sanctions. The motion to compel and for sanctions is GRANTED in its entirety, as set forth in further detail below. Interrogatories Defendants seek to compel responses, not compel f urther responses, as they contend that no response to their interrogatories was ever received. (Declaration of William H. Coke (“Coke Decl.”) in support of Motion.) Therefore, t...
2024.04.11 Motion for Summary Judgment 149
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...an action or proce eding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (a)(1).) Summary judgment will only be granted “if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable iss ue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Id., at subd. (c).) A defendant moving for summary judgment has an...
2024.04.11 Motion for Sanctions 436
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ... admissions (“RFAs”) were denied without objection or explanation from Plaintiffs Robert Michael and Ellen Williams (“the Williamses”). Having successfully defended himself from all twelve causes of action in the Williamses' suit, he claims that he is entitled to cost of proof sanctions. If a party is requested to admit the truth of any matter and fails to do so, and the propounding party subsequently proves the truth of that matter, the ...
2024.04.11 Demurrer 158
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.11
Excerpt: ...action pending between the same parties due to the wrongful foreclosure of the property. Defendant claims that a wrongful foreclosure action (“foreclosure action”) was filed on August 22, 2023. (See Steven Yu v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. (Super. Ct. San Mateo County No. 23C IV03933).) Defendant has not requested judicial notice of the operative pleading in the foreclosure action to support this argument though. A demurrer may be used to chal...
2024.04.10 Motion for Summary Judgment 552
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...Proc., § 437c.) Accordingly, defendants' alternative Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED AS MOOT. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) Hearing location. Defendants' January 11, 2024 Notice of Motion incorrectly states that the April 10, 2024 hearing will take place in the Redwood City courthouse. The hearing will take place in Department 28 in the San Mateo courthouse, which is located at 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, California 94401. Defenda...
2024.04.10 Demurrer 838
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...20(g); Code Civ. Proc. § 472b.) Defendant City of San Mateo's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to all items for the purposes of this demurrer. The Complaint asserts a single cause of action against defendant City of San Mateo (City) for dangerous conditio n of public property. It alleges that plaintiff William Trapp was riding his bicycle along the Bay Trail in San Mateo when he “encountered orange barrier fencing that had entered his...
2024.04.10 Motion for Summary Judgment 747
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...nopposed motion for summary judgment against defendant Andreas Tzortiz (“Defendant”). This Court denied plaintiff's first motion for summary judgment due to procedural deficiencies with the proof of service. As to plaintiff's second motion for summary judgment, the Court fin ds that a rebuttable presumption of proper service has been established, and therefore proceeds to consider the merits of the motion for summary judgment. In ruling on...
2024.04.10 Petition to Release Mechanic's Lien 325
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...shall be verifie d and allege all of the following: (a) The date of recordation of the claim of lien. A certified copy of the claim of lien shall be attached to the petition. (b) The county in which the claim of lien is recorded. (c) The book and page or series number of t he place in the official records where the claim of lien is recorded. (d) The legal description of the property subject to the claim of lien. (e) Whether an extension of cred...
2024.04.09 Motion to Continue Trial Date 642
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...fers to the Ca lifornia Rules of Court).) A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. (Oliveros v. County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1395 (Oliveros).) Rule 3.1332(c) sets forth seven grounds for continuance upon a showing of good cause, mostly related to the unavailability of a party, essential lay or expert witness, or trial counsel due to death, illness, or other excusable circumstances. Th...
2024.04.09 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 121
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...dently dete rmine whether a settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 129 (Kullar) [“ ‘The court has a fiduciary responsibility as guardians of the rights of the absentee class members when deciding whether to approve a settlement agreement.' ”]; In re Microsoft I -V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) After conducting its independent review, the court concludes that pl...
2024.04.09 Demurrer to FAC 190
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...by 4:00 p.m. on April 8, 2024 that the tentative is contested, then the Court will adopt the tentative at the April 9, 2024 hearing and there will be no oral argument on the motion. Defendant Xuan Xu's Demurrer to Plaintiff Yifan Jiang's Verified First Amended Comp laint for Partition of Real Property is SUSTAINED in part with leave to amend and OVERRULED in part. Defendant Xuan Xu's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to all items. Plaint...
2024.04.09 Demurrer to Complaint 497
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ... forth below. (1) Initial ly, the court notes that Plaintiff has provided the improper address for the hearing. Department 4 is not located in Redwood City as the notice states, but instead at the Central Courthouse, Courtroom G, 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, CA 94401. (See Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110 [the Notice “must specify” the location of the hearing].) Plaintiff is cautioned to comply with this rule in the future. (2) Defendan...
2024.04.08 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 473
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08
Excerpt: ...s Third Cause of Action for Breach of Implied Warranties of Fitness and Merchantability under the SongBeverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Act”) based on failure to allege facts sufficient to support this claim. Defendant argues that Plaintiff has not alleged facts sufficient to support that he gave Defendant pre -suit notice to allow Defendant an opportunity to repair or replace the bicycle, as required under the Act. However, Defendant fails to ...
2024.04.08 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 260
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08
Excerpt: ...matter, Defendant The Charles Armstrong School (“the School”) fails to demonstrate it satisfied its meet -and -confer obligations. The Declaration of Kellie M. Murphy reveals that the parties' counsel only exchanged correspondence and did not “meet and confer in person, by t elephone, or by video conference” as required. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 430.41, subd. (a).) “A determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insuf...
2024.04.08 Application for Right to Attach Order 583
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08
Excerpt: ...graph 3 of the lease, Defendant PCHRG agreed to pay initial base rent of $15,500.00 monthly for the first two years of the lease, with annual increases thereafter. (See Compl. Ex. 1.) Under paragraph 3, the base rent increased to $17,505.00 on Jan. 1, 2023 and again to $ 18,030.00 on Jan. 1, 2024. Under paragraph 5 of the lease, PCHRG agreed to pay Plaintiff 100% of all real estate taxes assessed against the Premises as additional rent. Accordin...
2024.04.05 Motion for Leave to File FAC 494
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ... liberal allow ance of amendments should prevail. Nestle v. Santa Monica (1971) 6 Cal.2d 920, 939. California courts have held that for an original complaint, whether or not the plaintiff has requested leave to amend, denial of leave to amend constitutes an abuse of disc retion unless the complaint is clearly incapable of amendment. Tarrar Enterprises, Inc. v. Associated Indemnity Corp. (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 685, 688 (quoting King v. Mortimer (19...
2024.04.04 Motion to Stay Proceedings 126
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...g Plaintiff's time as a student at a high school run by the District, he was sexually assaulted by Perpetrator after being sent to be evaluated by Perpetrator, a psychiatrist, as part of a special education program. Plaintiff's claim against the District is brought under Govt. Code § 81 5.2, alleging negligent supervision and protection of a minor student. The District demurred to the FAC on the basis that Assembly Bill (“AB”) 218, which mod...
2024.04.04 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena for Production of Business Records 446
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...ileged documen ts no later than April 18, 2024 or a date agreed upon in writing by Oracle Corp. and Oracle America, Inc. and Plaintiff David Weiner. On December 1, 2023, Weiner served on non- parties Oracle Corp. and Oracle America, Inc. (collectively, “Oracle”) Oracle a subpoena for production of business records issued on November 30, 2023. Neither Weiner nor Oracle raises a relevant distinction between Oracle Corp. and Oracle America, Inc....
2024.04.04 Motion for Determination of Evidentiary and Legal Issues, to Resolve Disputed Evidentiary and Legal Issues 560
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...�Motion Number One for Determination of Evidentiary and Legal Issues Affecting the Determination of Compensation,” filed Feb. 20, 2024, is DENIED. The Gearings' 2- 20-24 Request for Judicial Notice (RJN) is GRANTED. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(d).) The Gearings request judicial n otice of 22 documents previously filed with this Court. The RJN provides no explanation as to their significance/relevance, although of these documents are referenced in ...

2505 Results

Per page

Pages