Excerpt: ...spass caus e of action. Statute of Limitations. County argues that the tort claims for nuisance and trespass fail because Plaintiff did not file the Complaint within six months from the County's rejection of the claim under the Government Claims Act, and that any damage suffered by Plaintiff accrued prior to July 2019, and is thus timebarred by the one - year statute of limitations under the Government Claims Act. County further contends that th...

Excerpt: ...t failed to keep the parking lot in a safe condition and failed to properly inspect its property. The complaint asserts a claim for negligence and premises liability. Defendant contends that Plaintiff's claims fail because the hose was open and obvious. Defendant had plac ed a yellow caution sign out because its employee was watering plants. It argues that Plaintiff ignored these signs, its employee, the water on the ground, and the red/orange ho...

Excerpt: ...o meet and confer in good faith as ordered may result in sanctions. The Court also notes that it has reviewed motions and oppositions at issue. Based on the tone of the documents, the Court finds it is necessary to remind all counsel that civility and professionalis m among counsel should be the norm and not the exception. Counsel need not always agree, but their disagreements, especially when relayed to the Court, should be free of rancor unbec...

Excerpt: ... with 20 days leave to amend. Because the Court is sustaining with leave to amend, the Motion to Strike is moot. Factual/Procedural Context On October 31, 2023, Plaintiff Shirley Hicks (“Decedent”), by and through her Successorin- Interest, Latish Hicks (“Plaintiff s”), filed their operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Mt Rubidouxidence Opco, LLC; Providence Group of Southern California, LLC; Providence Group, ...

Excerpt: ...aintiff's harm. (CACI 1201; see also Collins v. Navistar, Inc. (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1486, 1500.) The SAC here alleges that Defendant manufactured the battery and it was defective as it was manufactured with wire insulation that was not of adequate resistance and a rem ovable or loose terminal cap (SAC ¶ 24.) It further alleges that Plaintiff was harmed and the defect was a substantial factor in causing the harm. As such, the Demurrer to this c...

Excerpt: ... employment action based on alleged disability discrimination. Plaintiff Amy Zeta alleges she was employed by defendant County of Riverside (the “County”) as a Deputy District Attorney (“DDA”) from 2008 to 2023. Defendants John Henry (“Henry”), Melissa Moore (“Moore”), Kelly Catlett (“Catlett”) and Michelle Paradise (“Paradise”) (collectively “Individual Defendants” or “Defendants”) are her former supervisors and m...

Excerpt: ...dant Sarnowski, only. The remainder of the demurrer is overruled as to the fraud cause of action. Motion to strike is moot. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Cross -Defendants request that the Court take judicial notice of 17 documents. These documents include various court records from the underlying action (Exs. 1 -8, 12- 14, and 17); the recorded quit claim deeds (Exs. 9 -11); and discovery responses in this action (Exs. 15- 16.). The court grants t...

Excerpt: ...t Bank FSB; and U.S. Bank National Page 2 of 6 Association, as Trustee for Bank of America Funding Corporation Mortgage Pass -Through Certificates, Series 2006- D (erroneously sued as U.S. Bank National Association.) Plaintiff alleged causes of action for: (1) Quiet Titl e; (2) Cancellation of Instrument; and (3) Wrongful Foreclosure. On 1/17/24, the Court sustained a demurrer to the FAC with leave to amend. The Minute Order from the 1/17/24 hea...

Excerpt: ...evaluating a demurrer, the court gives the pleading a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all of its parts in their context. (Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990) 51 Cal.3d 120, 125.) The court assumes the truth of all material facts which have been properly pleaded, of facts which may be inferred from those expressly pleaded, and of any material facts of which judicial notice has been requested and may be taken....

Excerpt: ... Santos Guillen Martinez (“Plaintiff”) alleges that on March 6, 2018, he was involved in an automobile collision caused solely by the negligence of third- party Javier Legaspi (“Legaspi”). (Complaint, ¶ 12.) As a result, Plaintiff suffered injuries totaling at least $242,315 as of November 2018. (Id., ¶ 18.) Legaspi's liability insurer, Kemper Insurance, paid the $15,000 policy limit for Plaintiff's injuries, which was insufficient to c...

Excerpt: ...ge Property Fund 2 016, LLC (“Breckenridge”) and Sam Chandra (“Chandra”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Following a demurrer, Plaintiff filed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) on November 27, 2023. The FAC set forth eleven causes of action: (1) Violation of HBOR – Dual Tr acking (against RMF); (2) Breach of Contract (against Breckenridge); (3) Gross Negligence (against Breckenridge); (4) Intentional Misrepresentation (against...

Excerpt: ...alifornia (“OCTCSC”) pr ovided BOBS with escrow and title services and BOBS required title insurance through Plaintiff Real Advantage Title Insurance Company (“RATIC”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Barker executed an Indemnity Agreement both on behalf of Sunniva, and Barker indiv idually (“2018 Indemnity Agreement”). In 2019, BOBS agreed to loan Sunniva an additional $6 million, and Barker executed an additional indemnity agreement...

Excerpt: ...ad an insur able interest in real property located at 73290 Highway 111 in Palm Desert. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant, AVI Commercial Insurance Marketing, Inc. (“AVI”) engages in the business of procuring commercial insurance policies for consumers and businesses i n California. Plaintiff alleges that it advised AVI that the property was 3,560 square feet, which should be confirmed by AVI. However, AVI did not inspect the property. Instea...

Excerpt: ...ay bring a motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents, if it finds the responses evasive, incomplete, or an objection to a request is made without merit or is too general. CCP § 2031.310(a). A party bringing a motion to compel further respons es to requests for production of documents must engage in a good faith meet and confer attempt before bringing a motion. CCP § 2031.310(b)(1). A meet and confer requires a ...

Excerpt: ...enied. Defen dant shall provide further responses and documents within 30 days. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is granted in the reasonable reduced amount of $860 (2 x $400/hr. plus filing fee), to be paid within 30 days. EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS Plaintiff objects to statements made in the declaration of Cameron Major based on improper legal argument, lack of foundation, lack of personal knowledge, misstatement of evidence, etc. Plaintiff's obj...

Excerpt: ...uit occurre d in Wyoming (Compl. ¶¶ 6, 8– 9); Plaintiff's claims are not time -barred in Wyoming;1 and all Defendants are subject to and have agreed to submit to jurisdiction in Wyoming regarding this lawsuit. (Razavi Decl. ¶ 3; Hahn v. Diaz - Barba (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1177, 1190 [“It is well settled under California law that the moving parties satisfy their burden on the threshold suitability issue by stipulating to submit to the juris...

Excerpt: ...y various judgment debtors in this case as means to avoid judgment creditors from reaching those assets to satisfy a prior judgment entered in favor of creditors in a separate lawsuit. On 4/14/23, this Court entered a judgment in favor of Plaintiffs to set aside the fraudulent transfers of real properties and awarding monetary awards in various amounts, jointly and severally, against the judgment debtors. The instant application seeks an order au...

Excerpt: ...oice”), and Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc. (“AEG”) for: (1) negligence (against all Defendants); (2) strict liability (against Palma only), and (3) premises liability (against Goldenvoice and AEG). Plaintiff alleges that on April 23, 2022, while attending the Coachella Va l ley Music and Arts Festival (“Coachella”), located at 81 -800 Avenue 51, Indio, California (the “Premises”), Plaintiff was bit by a dog brought onto the Prem...

Excerpt: ...s (l992) 4 Cal.App. 4th 238, 244.) “Allowable costs shall be reasonable in amount.” (CCP §1033.5(c)(3).) The court may allow or deny costs not mentioned in CCP § 1033.5. (CCP §1033.5(c)(4).) A “properly verified memorandum of costs is considered prima facie evidence that the costs listed in the memorandum were necessarily incurred.” (Bach v. Cnty. of Butte (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 294, 308; see CRC Rule 3.1700(a)(1) [“The memorandum of...

Excerpt: ...ime to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action...” (C.C.P. § 473.5(a).) “This section is designed to provide relief where there has been proper service of summons (e.g., by substitute service or by publication) but defendant nevertheless did not find out about the action in time to defend.” (Weil & Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2022) ¶ 5:420, p. 5 -1222...

Excerpt: ...��), suffers from Brake Defects ("Defects"), and that GM has been unable to repair the Subject Vehicle within a reasonable number of attempts. Plaintiffs further allege that GM knew that the Subject Vehicle suffered from these Defects and knew that it lacked any ability to repair them y et failed to disclose these facts to Plaintiffs at the time of sale, repair, or thereafter. GM thus willfully violated the Song -Beverly Consumer Warranty...

Excerpt: ... objections are without merit or too general. In a motion to compel further responses as to document requests, the moving party must state specific facts demonstrating good cause justifying the discovery sought. (CCP §2031.310(b)(1).) To establish good cause, the moving party must demonstrate relevance and specific facts justifying discovery. (Kirkland v. Superior Court (Guess? Inc.) (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98.) The burden to show good cause...

Excerpt: ...ed a ne w 2022 Ford F-150 from Fritts Ford. (Complaint, ¶ 13.) Plaintiffs allege that, the subject vehicle was delivered to Plaintiffs with serious defects and nonconformities to warranty and developed other serious defects and nonconformities to warranty includi ng, “screen blacking out, the speakers not working, a crackling noise coming from the passenger speakers, the Vehicle veering side to side when in cruise control, the rear axle hub br...

Excerpt: ...t Centers, I nc. For its part, Banning RV claims that Horgan had misappropriated funds. In the cross- complaint, Horgan alleges that, in the wake of lay -offs during the COVID -19 pandemic, he was given monthly bonuses as compensation for the additional work he was being required to do. In his crosscomplaint Horgan alleges causes of action for intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and p...

Excerpt: ...1) 91 Cal.App.4th 875, 881.) “It is not sufficient that the complaint might be barred.” (Roman v. County of Los Angeles (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 316, 324.) Fraud is subject to a 3 -year statute of limitations from the date of discovery. (C.C.P., §338(d).) “The discovery rule provides that the accrual date of a cause of action is delayed until the plaintiff is aware of her injury and its negligent cause.” (Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1988) 44 ...