Excerpt: ...de Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).) A demurrer tests the legal su
¯iciency of the pleading, not the truth of the plainti
¯'s allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court, however, does not accep...

Excerpt: ... a partial payment of $1,554.83. In October and November 2023 after judgment had been entered, the parties, through counsel, exchanged several emails regarding the amount owed. In one of these emails on October 20, 2023, defense counsel indicated the "total amount owed as of today is $2,680.68" and that interest is accruing at $0.72 per day. On October 23, 2023, plaintiff's counsel indicated an intention to make payment in early November. On Nove...

Excerpt: ...008, subd. (a).) The motion must also present a satisfactory explanation as to why the evidence was not presented at an earlier time. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1008; Shifter v. CBS Corp. (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 246, 255.) The moving party bears the burden of showing that the information supporting reconsideration is such that the moving party could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered or produced it earlier. (New York Times Co. v. Superior Co...

Excerpt: ...uth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court, however, does not accept the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of aw (Genesis Environment Services v. San Joaquin...

Excerpt: ...tions or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6.) The court may only refe...

Excerpt: ...e of Civil Procedure secton 515.010. (Code Civ. Proc., S 512.060, subd. (a).) "No writ directing the levying officer to enter a private place to take possession of any property shall be issued unless the plaintiff has established that there is probable cause to believe that the property is located there." (Code Civ. Proc., S 512.060, subd. (b).) Plaintiff prov-des declaratory evidence the tractors are likely to be in defendants' possession becaus...

Excerpt: ...e court exercises its discretion and considers the untimely opposition. The parties stipulated in writing for the sale of real property as part of a resolution of all claims with various terms. (Defendant's Exh. 1.) The settlement agreement provdes that tme is of the essence and contemplates a 60-day escrow period once the real property is appraised. (ld. 1, 4.) Defendants present evidence the real property was appraised pursuant to paragraph 1 o...

Excerpt: ...the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or where the pleading is uncertain. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subds. (e), (f).) A pleading is "uncertain" if it is ambiguous and unintelligible. (ld. at subd. (f).) A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in th...

Excerpt: ..., however, the court takes judicial notice of the fact of filing of the documents, but not the truth of the information alleged therein. Plaintiff's objections to the request for judicial notice are overruled. Ruling on the Mohon A party may demur where the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of acton or where the pleading is uncertain. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subds. (e), (f).) A pleading is "uncertain" if it is amb...

Excerpt: ...e pleading are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) The court, however, does not accept the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of aw. (Genesis Environment Services v. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 597, 603.) The demurrer is reviewed keeping this in mind. Second Cause of Ac...

Excerpt: ...ust be measurable by the contract or by reference to the contract itself and the basis for computing damages must be reasonable and certain. (CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Super DVD, Inc. (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 537, 541.) "A claim has 'probable validity' where is more likely than not that the plaintiff will obtain a judgment against the defendant on that claim." (Code Civ. Proc., S 481.190.) At a noticed hearing, the court shall issue a ...

Excerpt: ... the Demurrer Defendants Austin Mallory ("Mallory") and County of Placer ("the County") demur to plaintiffs first and second causes of action alleged in the second amended complaint ("SAC"). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleading are deemed to be true no matter how...

Excerpt: ...to the court a motion or other document, they certify to the court (1) the document is not presented primarily for an improper purposes, (2) the contentons therein are warranted by existing law, (3) the factual contentions have or are likely to have evidentiary support, and (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or reasonably based on a lack of information or belief. (Code Civ. Proc., S 128.7, subd. (b).) "If, after ...

Excerpt: ...ion based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1008, subd. (a).) The court may at any time reconsider its prior order if it determines there has been a change of awthat warrants reconsideration. (ld. subd. (c).) As plaintiff's motion is pursuant to Section 1008(c), defendant's contention that the motion is untimely lacks merit. Here, plaintiff contends there has been a change in the aw warranting reconsideration...

Excerpt: ...the parties is required on January 2, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for possible vacation of the January 8th trial date and selection of a firm trial date to take place no later than May 1, 2024 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure secton 36(f). Motion for Leave to Augment Expert Witness Designation Plaintiff David A. Rodgers moves for an order granting leave to augment his expert witness designation to substitute Caroline Van Alst in place a...

Excerpt: ...very was not completed 11 earlier, whether a delay in trial or other prejudice would occur, and the length of time between a previous trial date and the instant date. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2024.050.) As to witness Kate Nuss, plaintiff presents evidence Nuss is a necessary witness as the parties' tax preparer when they owned a business together and that she will be unavailable to testify for the current trial dates. Further, plaintiff did not depose...

Excerpt: ...hey also assert their identities were actually known at the time the complaint was filed, which renders the complaint barred against them under the statute of limitations and the Privette doctrine. A motion to quash is the proper method for challenging a doe amendment and may be granted where a plaintiff knew the defendant's identity prior to filing the complaint. (McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLP (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 368, 374.) ...

Excerpt: ...rous objections to the declaration of Jennifer G. Redmond and exhibits thereto. The objections do not satisfy the requirements of the California Rules of Court, as they identify the evidence but do not "[q]uote or set forth the objectionable statement or material." (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b)(3).) Additionally, many of the individually numbered objections include several objections. For example, objection number one objects to forty-eigh...

Excerpt: ... be a motion for reconsideration of defendant's motion for new trial or motion to set aside void judgment. The party seeking reconsideration shall identify the "application that was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown." (Code Civ. Proc., S 1008, subd. (a).) A motion for reconsideration requires a showing by affdavit of new or differe...

Excerpt: ...s to exhibits A, 8, C, and E. Plaintiff moves for an order of general reference pursuant to the written agreement of the parties and Code of Civil Procedure section 638 et seq. Plaintiff further requests the court appoint a referee pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 640(b). The court may appoint a referee "upon the motion of a party to a written contract or lease that prov-des that any controversy arising therefrom shall be heard by a re...

Excerpt: ...to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." (Code Civ. Proc. S 437c, subd. (c).) Plaintiff, as the moving party, meets their burden if they prove each element of the cause of action. (ld. subd. (p)(l).) Only when this initial burden is met does the burden shift to the opposing party to show a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action. (Ibid.) In reviewing a motion for summary judg...

Excerpt: ...urt notes that Nextitle was granted leave to strike crossdefendants from the second cause of action for contribution. The order was entered on January 22, 2023. In light of this, the court will only address the motion as to the remaining causes of action for equitable indemnity; tort of another; and declaratory relief. Ruling on Objections Nextitle's objections are overruled in their entirety. Ruling on Request for Judicial Notice Cross-defendant...

Excerpt: ...ed. Ruling on the Motion The court may grant a preliminary injunction when it appears from the pleading that cross complainant is entitled to the demanded relief and plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury if the enjoined action were allowed to proceed. (Code Civ. Proc., S 526, subd. (a).) In making this determination, "the court must consider whether the party seeking the injunction is likely to prevail on the merits" and balances the relative...

Excerpt: ...therein. Defendants initially filed the instant motion acting in pro persona and requested relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 473(b) and 473(d). However, such a motion under Section 473(b) is untimely as brought more than 180 days after entry of default; further, the motion provided no basis on which Section 473(d) relief could be granted. Defendants' statutory motion to set aside entry of default is denied. Defendants subsequent...

Excerpt: ...telligible. (ld. at subd. (f).) A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed true no matter how improbable they may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) 3 However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, d...