Excerpt: ...ctions are preserved for appeal. In the operative Third Amended Complaint, Breakaway asserts causes of action against Hoorizadeh and White Ridge for fraud (second cause of action), negligent misrepresentation (fourth cause of action) and aiding and abetting fraud (seventh cause of action). Meridian asserts causes of action against Hoorizadeh and White Ridge for fraud (first cause of action), negligent misrepresentation (third cause of action), a...

Excerpt: ...d Code of Civ il Procedure section 437c(c) states, “(c) The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In de termining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to...

Excerpt: ...ential to justify oppositio n may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c(h).) “When lack of diligence results in a party's having insufficient information to know if facts essential to justify opposition may exist, and the party is therefore unable to p...

Excerpt: ...mplaint (FACC). The motion also requests summary adjudication of the first cause of action for common counts in the Law Firm's complaint. The motion is MOOT as to Jocelyn Plummer because the Court entered judgment on the FACC in favor of Jocelyn Plummer on 4/4/24 after sustaining her demurrer without leave to amend. As to the remaining Movants, the motion is DENIED in its entirety. Movants' request for judicial notice (ROA 1356) is granted as to...

Excerpt: ... (c) [“official ac ts”]; Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. City of San Jose (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 730, 740, citing Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of California (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 77, 85 -86 [court may take judicial notice of government claims and any response as “official acts”].) 4th cause of action: declaratory relief. Petitioners' 4th cause of action seeks a declaration that the emergency laws and orders that were in effect during t...

Excerpt: ...ion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike.”].) On April 10, 2024, Defendant The Summit At Turtle Ridge Communi ty Association WITHDREW its Demurrer and Motion to Strike. Defendant MLG Assessment Recovery LLC's Demurrer remains on calendar but it is MOOT since Plaintiff timely filed...

Excerpt: ...jections ( ROA 1122) as immaterial to the Court's ruling but the objections are preserved for purposes of appeal. (See Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 526 [“the trial court's failure to rule expressly on any of Google's evidentiary objections did not waiv e them on appeal”]) On 12/6/22, the Court sustained Movants' demurrer to the fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action against Movants in the TAC. Movants seek summary judgm...

Excerpt: ...pplies? D efendants contend that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) applies to this action because the Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims expressly states that “[t]he Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) (‘FAA') governs this Agreement, which evidences a transaction involving commerce.” (See Gralak Decl., ¶ 10, Exh. A, p. 1, lines 4 -5). Defendants also present evidence that Defendant HEARTLAND operates more than 62 health...

Excerpt: ...ment. (See Govt. Code §§ 911.2(a) and 945.4 [setting forth claims presentation requirements].) The FAC alleges Government Code section 905(m), which was amended by AB 218, exempts any requirement that Plaintiff comply with the claim presentation requirement. The District argues that the change to Government Code section 905(m) made by AB 218 was unconstitutional as an improper gift of public funds under Article XVI, section 6 of the California ...

Excerpt: ...gwick is ORDERED to se rve the Complaint-In -Intervention upon all parties within 30 days of filing the Complaint -In -Intervention. Proposed Plaintiff -In -Intervention Sedgwick moves for leave to file a Complaint -In -Intervention. Standard for Intervention A non- party, who is referred to as an “intervenor,” may become a party to an action or proceeding between other persons by: (1) Joining a plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the c...

Excerpt: ...the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights. Standard for Motion for Protective Order Civil Procedure Code section 2030.090 provides that: (b) The co urt, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppressi...

Excerpt: ...the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights. Standard for Motion for Protective Order Civil Procedure Code section 2030.090 provides that: (b) The co urt, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppressi...

Excerpt: ...ness of the defect, the foreseeability of danger to Plaintiff, and the trivialness of the defect. Defendant's evidentiary objections are overruled. Basic Rules for Summary Judgment/Adjudication Under Code Civ. Proc. § 437, a party may move for summary adjudicatio n as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if that party contends that the c...

Excerpt: ...ez -Bass mov es for terminating sanctions and monetary sanctions against Defendant Roberto Francisco Gallegos (Defendant Gallegos). Standard for Monetary and Non- Monetary Discovery Sanctions The court may impose monetary, issue, evidence, terminating, or contempt san ctions against any person engaging in any misuse of the discovery process. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.030, subds. (a) -(e).) Misuse of the discovery process includes, but is not ...

Excerpt: ... a termi nating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process by an order striking out the pleadings or parts of the pleadings of any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, an order staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, an order dismissing the action, or any part of that action, of that party, or an order rendering a judgment by default against tha...

Excerpt: ...itigation is p roposed to be filed, pursuant to Civil Procedure Code section 391.7. The court ORDERS that Petitioner Daniel Escamilla furnish security in the amount of $25,000.00 within 30 days of notice of this ruling, without prejudice to Respondents requesting an inc rease in the security at a later date. Petitioner Daniel Escamilla's Application for Permission to File A Longer Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Prefiling Ord...

Excerpt: ...o Parikh are MOOT except for sanctions. The motion directed to Fazeli is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Motions Directed to Parikh (ROA 190 and 198) The oppositions indicate Parikh served verified substantive supplemental responses to the at issue discovery on February 7, 2024. (ROA 249 at Exhibit 3; ROA 251 at Exhibit 3.) The court thus deems these motions MOOT, except for the issue of sanctions. (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pac...

Excerpt: ...der compelling a further response if the propounding party deems that any of the following apply: [¶] (1) An answer to a particular interrogatory is evasive or incomplete. [¶] (2) An exercise of the option to produce documents under Section 2030.230 is unwarranted or th e required specification of those documents is inadequate. [¶] (3) An objection to an interrogatory is without merit or too general. (b)(1) A motion under subdivision (a) shal...

Excerpt: ...the lines of each page must be one and onehalf spaced or double spaced and numbered consecutively.” This discovery motion was continued from 3/18/2024 for additional meet -and -confer efforts. Plaintiff withdraws its Motion with respect to Request Nos. 7, 16, and 24 . (Witkow Decl., ¶ 4.) Defendant asserts supplemental responses were served to Request Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 24, though there is no indication when. (Le Decl., ¶ 3....

Excerpt: ...itigation is p roposed to be filed, pursuant to Civil Procedure Code section 391.7. The court ORDERS that Petitioner Daniel Escamilla furnish security in the amount of $25,000.00 within 30 days of notice of this ruling, without prejudice to Respondents requesting an inc rease in the security at a later date. Petitioner Daniel Escamilla's Application for Permission to File A Longer Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Prefiling Ord...

Excerpt: ...itigation is p roposed to be filed, pursuant to Civil Procedure Code section 391.7. The court ORDERS that Petitioner Daniel Escamilla furnish security in the amount of $30,000.00 within 30 days of notice of this ruling, without prejudice to Respondents requesting an inc rease in the security at a later date. Petitioner Daniel Escamilla's Application for Permission to File A Longer Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Prefiling Ord...

Excerpt: ...to control the conduct of its m inisterial officers and of all other persons connected with its proceedings in furtherance of justice.” Doe v. Yim (2020) 55 Cal.App.5th 573, 581. California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.9 provides in pertinent part: “(a) A lawyer who has formerl y represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interest...

Excerpt: ...esponses t o Form Interrogatories – General, Set One, Number 17.1 within 21 days of service of the notice of ruling. Defendant Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP is ORDERED to serve full, complete, and verified responses to Special Interrogatories from Special Interrogato ries from Defendant Daniel Perales to Defendant Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP, Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 21, and 23, as amended, within 21 days of service of the notice of ruling. Def...

Excerpt: ...es to Interroga tories Nos. 4.1, 15.1, 16.1, 17.1 and 50.1 - 50.6. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300, states, in part, “(a) On receipt of a response to interrogatories the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding par ty deems that any of the following apply: [¶] (1) An answer to a particular interrogatory is evasive or incomplete . . . [¶] (3) An objection to an interrogatory is without m...

Excerpt: ...dgment on the plea dings with respect to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 7030. Standard for Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings A defendant may make a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii); Stevenson Real Estate Servs., Inc. v. CB Richard Ellis Real E...