Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

16064 Results

Location: Orange County x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 236))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 650,50
Array
(
)
2024.04.05 Demurrer 258
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ustained without leave to amend. Aiding and Abetting Fraud or Breach of Fiduciary Duties (Seventh Cause of Action) The seventh cause of action is against the Starboard Defendants for "aiding and abetting fraud and/or breach of fiduciary duties". (TAC, at pp. 54 -57.) TPG alleg es Starboard had actual knowledge of Defendant Honarkar's planned fraud and breach of fiduciary duties, and that Starboard “actively concealed” that it was �...
2024.04.05 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...1) the existen ce of the contract, (2) [the party's] performance or excuse for nonperformance, (3) the [other party's] breach, and (4) resulting damages to the [party].” (Maxwell v. Dolezal (2014) 231 Cal. App. 4th 93, 97- 98.) A complaint need only plead the legal effect or substance of the contract's material terms, even for oral contracts. (See, e.g., Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616 [“An oral contrac...
2024.04.04 Motion for Summary Judgment to SAC 970
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...tion for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party cannot show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 8 26, 843.) BREACH OF ORAL CONTRACT – 1ST cause of action In this action, Plaintiff asserts that approximately 60 years ago, it entered into an oral contract with W...
2024.04.04 Demurrer 448
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...nst him. Plaintiff asserts these causes of action against Defendant CITY only. The Court DENIES Defendants' request for judicial notice of Exhibits D and E. These documents are not the proper subject of judicial notice. As to Defendant's special demurrer, the Court OVERRULE S same. These causes of action are not so unintelligible that Defendants cannot reasonably respond. Any ambiguities can be clarified through discovery. (Lickiss v. Financial ...
2024.04.04 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 631
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...day, December 13, 2023, on December 18, 2023, plaintiff and cross -defendant filed a declaration for an automatic extension. The extension expired on January 17, 2024, but the demurrer and motion to strike were not filed until March 1, 2024. And then, cross -defendant s et the matters for hearing on May 16, 2024, in violation of Rules 3.1320(d) and 3.1322(b) of the California Rules of Court [demurrer must be set for a hearing within 35 days of ...
2024.04.04 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement, Attorney Fees 309
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...iminary Appr oval (ROA 255) served on the LWDA? Plaintiff must file a proof of service with the court reflecting service of the August 26, 2020 order on the LWDA. 2. Has defendant paid all sums owed under the settlement? See Hernandez Decl. (ROA 265) ¶ 15. If not, w hen will defendant pay the outstanding sums owed? 3. Was the escalator clause triggered? 4. The settlement administrator should state whether any disputes were received. 5. The set...
2024.04.04 Motion for Relief from Entry of Default 793
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...operly serve an amen ded Complaint by April 3, 2023, or thereafter; that at the May 4, 2023, Case Management Conference, Plaintiff had still not filed the First Amended Complaint and represented to the Court that one would be filed but that one had still not been filed and tha t Plaintiff never requested additional time to file and serve an amended complaint, and no extension was granted. Defendant asserts that the entry of default appears to...
2024.04.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 502
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...lation of Class and PAGA Action Settlement, ¶ 4(A)). The release must be fairly tailored to the claims that were or reasonably could have been asserted in the lawsuit based on the facts alleged in the operative complaint. E.g., the word “reasonably” should be i nserted before “could have been pled”; “[t]he Complaints” should be replaced with “[t]he Second Amended Complaint”; and the phrase “(including the contemplated Second Am...
2024.04.04 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 224
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...initial matter, the court not es Officer Clay was dismissed from Plaintiffs' Complaint on 03/21/24 and Officer Clay dismissed his Cross -Complaint on the same date. (ROA 117, 119.) Thus, Officer Clay is no longer a party to this action. Accordingly, Defendants' request for judgment in f avor of Officer Clay is DENIED AS MOOT. The City raises several arguments in support of its contention that it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor as to ...
2024.04.04 Motion to Amend Judgment 136
Location: Orange County
Judge: Melzer, Layne H
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ... A. Ju dgment Creditor can correct its name. A court of general jurisdiction has the power, after final judgment and regardless of lapse of time, to correct clerical errors or misprisions in its records, whether made by the clerk, counsel, or the court itself, so that the records will conform to and speak the truth. (Estate of Goldberg (1938) 10 Cal.2d 709, 713.) This inherent power is confirmed by statute. “The court may, upon motion of the ...
2024.04.04 Motion to Compel Arbitration 422
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...ion. For the followi ng reasons, defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part. The sixth cause of action (failure to provide accurate wage statements) and the seventh cause of action (failure to reimburse for expenses) in plaintiff's complaint are ordered to arbitr ation. The remaining claims are stayed pending completion of the arbitration. Civ. Proc. Code § 1281.4. Defendants' motion to strike the class allegations is denied. The a...
2024.04.04 Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena 074
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...urt Orde r Plaintiff's motion to compel compliance with this court's order of September 28, 2023, is DENIED. Further responses were served on October 4, 2023, but plaintiff complains the responses are “nearly identical” to the prior responses. The motion is not accompanied by a separate statement as required by Rule 3.1324 of the California Rules of Court, and the motion fails to establish how the responses were not compliant with the court's...
2024.04.04 Motion to Compel Responses 272
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...1, 2023 be deemed admi tted and conclusively established for all purposes in this action. Defendants additionally move for an order awarding monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the sum of $690 each for three filed motions for a total of $2,070 for all motions. Defendants contend that Plaintiff has not served responses to the discovery at issue and that Plaintiff has asserted that she has already responded to the discovery via her complaint a...
2024.04.04 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 361
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ... must consider the objections to the interrogatories, the interrogatories themselves, the pleadings, and the contentions of the interrogating party as to the purpose and validity of the interrogatories. (Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Superior Court for Los Angeles C ounty (1968) 263 Cal.App.3d 12, 18- 19.) “If the interrogatories stray too far and seek information which cannot reasonably serve the acknowledge purposes of pretrial discov...
2024.04.04 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 660
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.04.04
Excerpt: ...o effectua te personal service. Instead, Plaintiff served all Defendants by emailing the summons and complaint to Defendant Chavez. Defendants argue that Chavez did not agree to accept service of the summons and complaint by email and further did not agree to accep t service on behalf of the other Defendants. Defendants also argue that Plaintiff did not establish that she made diligent attempts to personally serve Defendants prior to serving them...
2024.04.02 Application for Preliminary Injunction
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hesseltine, David J.
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...court notes it is unclear whether the papers were properly served on Defendants. The proofs of service filed on March 1, 2024 (ROA 31, 33) are internally inconsistent. The proof of service on the judicial council form states the documents identified in the attachme nt were personally served on Nino Riazati on March 1, 2024, at 10:05 a.m., at 4343 Von Karmen Ave, Ste. 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660, which is the office of Plaintiff's counsel. This...
2024.04.02 Applications for Right to Attach Order 492
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...in Departme nt N15. Plaintiff Tesser, LLC is ORDERED to serve by mail all application papers and notice of this ruling on Defendant Bridget Simpson, Defendant Lee B. Simpson, and their counsel of record. Plaintiff Tesser, LLC applies for a right to attach order and order for issuance of a writ of attachment against Defendant Bridget Simpson aka Bridget Scordo (Defendant Bridget) and Defendant Lee B. Simpson (Defendant Lee) in the amount of $358,5...
2024.04.02 Demurrer 642
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...limited to t he “four corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code §§ 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfu lly drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficient precision to inform the defendant of what plaintiff is c...
2024.04.02 Demurrer 821
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...Cal.App.5th 356, 384.) Plaintiffs are granted limited leave to amend, however, to plead this remedy within the underlying cause of action they believe supports this relief. The demurrer to the second cause of action for conversion and the third cause of action for tr espass to chattel, is sustained, on the basis Plaintiffs have not alleged interference with Plaintiff's possession of the identified property. (PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fin...
2024.04.02 Demurrers 441
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...Inc., M S Int ernational, Inc., Lotte Chemical California, Inc., and NGY Group (Orange County) Inc. demur to the fourth cause of action for fraudulent concealment. For the following reasons, the demurrers are overruled. In ruling on a demurrer, a court must accept as true all allegations of fact contained in the complaint. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318. A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the affected pleading, not the...
2024.04.02 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement, for Attorney Fees 459
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...oval of the class action and PAGA settlement. UPCOMING EVENTS: None FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is a putative wage -and -hour class action and PAGA matter. The operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was filed March 24, 2021 (ROA 55), and alleges the following eight causes of action: 1. Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; 2. Failure to Pay Overtime; 3. Failure to Provide Rest Breaks; 4. Failure to Provide Meal Periods; 5. Failure to Provide Accurate Wa...
2024.04.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 342
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...ff requests be stricken. (Id., 3:20 -22.) The memorandum also seeks an order striking the separate statement and references in Defendants' brief to the facts contained in the separate statement. (Id., 8:14 -16.) The Court considers this a motion to strike the entire separate statement only. (Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1322(a).) “The paragraphs in a separate statement should be limited to facts that address the elements of a cause of action or an...
2024.04.02 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 606
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...nt bears the burden of persuasion that there is no triable issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A “party moving for summary judgment bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact. . . .” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) “A...
2024.04.02 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 727
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ... an ov erlong brief due to Defendant's improperly single -spacing and use of less than 12 point font for numerous footnotes. The court is inclined to continue the hearing, and trial as necessary, to order Defendant to file a compliant memorandum and permit Plaintiff to respond pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. §437c. The court will hear from counsel on this point. Issues with Defendants' Moving Papers The Memorandum For its memorandum in support of i...
2024.04.02 Motion to Approve Amended Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release Under PAGA 515
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...802 for Defendant's fa ilure to reimburse necessary business expenses. (ROA 2.) On July 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) adding a PAGA claim. (ROA 17.) The class consisted of those employees who sought mileage/travel reimbursement. An Unlaw ful Business Practices claim is alleged on the same basis. The PAGA claim is based on violations of Labor Code sections 2802 and 204 (timely payment of wages). The L...
2024.04.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 372
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gabriel, Lee
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ... On receipt of a response to interrogatories, the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding party deems that any of the following apply: [¶] (1) An answer to a particular interrogatory is evasive or incomplete. [¶] (2) An exercise of the option to produce documents under Section 2030.230 is unwarranted or the required specification of those d ocum en ts i s i n ad eq uate. [ ¶] ( 3 ) A n ob j ect...
2024.04.02 Motion to Compel Production, for Sanctions 512
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...electronic service RELIEF SOUGHT: Moving Plaintiffs move for an order to compel Defendants to provide responses to Requests for Production of Documents, and to impose monetary sanctions on Defendants. UPCOMING EVENTS: 1. Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication – May 24, 2024 2. Status Conference – October 2, 2024 FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is an individual wage -and -hour action and representative PAGA action. This is not a class action. O...
2024.04.02 Motion to Dismiss 888
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...hard moves to dismiss the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Causes of Action of the Complaint for Property Damages, Breach of Contract, Fraud and Punitive Damages filed by Plaintiff Daniel Escamilla. 1st Cause of Action (Willful Misconduct Resulting in Property Damage) The crux of Plaintiff's claim is that Defendant rented a 2018 Ford F- 150 Lariat vehicle and caused damage to it when he had a duty not to do to so. Defendant argues that Plaintiff lacks standing...
2024.04.02 Motion to Quash 337
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...and First A mended Complaint (FAC) for lack of personal jurisdiction due to defective service. Standard to Quash Service of Process A court lacks jurisdiction over a defendant if there has not been proper service of process upon that defendant.  (See Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, 808.) Therefore, “[a] defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good c...
2024.04.02 Motion to Quash 439
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...ent Reques ts 1-5. Non -Party Avalon Laboratory Services, LLC is ORDERED to serve full, complete, and verified responses and responsive documents to Document Requests 6 and 7 of the Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records Served on Nonparty Avalon Labo ratory Services, LLC, within 30 days of service of the notice of ruling. Defendant Integritox Laboratories, LLC (Defendant Integritox) and Defendant Laboratory Services, MSO, LLC (D...
2024.04.02 Motion to Seal 000
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...rt ORDERS that the version of the Declaration of Jemma E. Dunn in Support of Plaintiff Jane Doe 7030's Opposition to NewportMesa Unified School District's Motion for Summary Judgment that does not redact Plaintiff's true name, (ROA #144), shall not be made available to the public without court order. The court ORDERS that the version of the Declaration of Jemma E. Dunn in Support of Plaintiff Jane Doe 7030's Opposition to NewportMesa Unified Sc...
2024.04.02 Motion to Stay Proceedings 368
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...he Estate o f Jeffrey Russell, Case No. 213400266 (the “Utah Probate Case”). Plaintiffs contend that the issues in the Utah Probate Case are substantively identical to these proceedings as it involves many of the same claims at issue and the same parties here. The C ourt disagrees. Plaintiffs' claims in the Utah action are as follows: (1) determining invalidity of purported trust; or in the alternative (1) enforcing decedent's contract to lea...
2024.04.02 Motion to Strike 633
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gabriel, Lee
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...ive dam ages, Plaintiff must establish Defendants are guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice. (Civ. Code § 3294(a).) Moreover, Civil Code section 3294(b) provides, “An employer shall not be liable for damages pursuant to subdivision (a), based upon acts of an em ployee of the employer, unless the employer had advance knowledge of the unfitness of the employee and employed him or her with a conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others...
2024.04.02 Motion to Compel Discovery 013
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...ing. Plain tiff Meadows Bank LP is ORDERED to pay to Defendant Kimberly Ann Gavin sanctions in the amount of $1,600 (4 hours x $400 per hour) within 30 days of service of the notice of ruling. If the sanctions are not paid in a timely manner, they shall accrue intere st at the legal rate of 10% per annum. Defendant Kimberly Ann Gavin (Defendant Gavin) moves to compel Plaintiff Meadows Bank to provide further responses to Requests for Production o...
2024.03.29 Motion for Leave to Amend 782
Location: Orange County
Judge: Dourbetas, Nico
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...h 1422. “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of the motion will not prejudice the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend and where the refusal also results in a party being deprived of the right to assert a meritorious cause of action…it is not only error but abuse of discretion”.  Morgan v. Superior Court  (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 527.        Plaintiff argues that Defendant' s proposed A...
2024.03.29 Demurrer 001
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff has failed to adequately allege a cause of action for intentional interference with expected inheritance (IIEI). An IIEI claim requires: 1) an expectancy of inheritance; (2) proof amounting to a reasonable degree of certainty that the bequest would have been in effect at the time of the testator's death; (3) that the defendant(s) had knowledge of the expectation of inheritance; (4) that interference was conducted by independently to...
2024.03.29 Demurrer 779
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...n is overruled. The demurrer is sustained as to the third cause of action is sustained without leave to amend. Dependent Adult Abuse/Neglect (First Cause of Action) The first cause of action is for dependent adult abuse/neglect. “The purpose of the [Elder Abuse Act] is essentially to protect a particularly vulnerable portion of the population from gross mistreatment in the form of abuse and custodial neglect.” (Delaney v. Baker (1999) 20 Cal...
2024.03.29 Demurrer to SAC 079
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...n will receive.' [Citations.]” (People ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Weitzman (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 534, 538 (Weitzman).) The term “qui tam” comes from the Latin expression “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur,” which means, “'who pursues this action on our Lord the King's behalf as well as his own'.” (Ibid.) The Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA) was enacted in 1993 to combat workers' ...
2024.03.29 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 072
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ble result in light of the quality of the result obtained, the work performed by class counsel, a review of the billing records provided, and the estimated lodestar. In approving this amount and examining the billing records provided, the Court is not approving any particular hourly billing rates proposed by class counsel. 2. Litigation costs in the amount of $40,571.39, the full amount sought. 3. An enhancement of $2,500 to Plaintiff. In making ...
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses 908
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ing party is required to set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the inspection demand, pursuant to Code of Civil Pro cedure section 2031.310, subdivision (b)(1). To establish “good cause,” the burden is on the moving party to show both: (1) relevance to the subject matter (e.g., how the information in the document would tend to prove or disprove some issue in the case); and (2) specific facts justifyi...
2024.03.29 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 431
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ed, a redline showing all changes, deletions and additions must be submitted as well. In addition, please provide proof of service of any revised agreement on the LWDA. As to the Settlement: 1. Please provide a copy of Plaintiff's pre - filing letter to the LWDA . 2. Are there any other actions, whether individua l, class, or PAGA (including in the pre -filing LWDA stage) that may be affected by this settlement? 3. Please provide 60 days, rathe...
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Arbitration 574
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...ed “Grievance of Disputes”) that states the following, in relevant part: [A]ll employee claims or disputes concerning violations of, or arising under Wage Order 16 (except as noted in the immediately preceding paragraph), the California Labor Code Sections identified in California Labor Code section 2699.5 as amended, all derivative claims under California Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., all associated penalties, and fe...
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 408
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...erbroad word “REFER”. Defendants also must serve all d ocuments responsive to Request for Production Nos. 14, 19, 20- 22, 45, 50, 56, 58- 60, 70-72 and 75 within 20 days, except that Request Nos. 14, 19, 56 and 72 will be deemed to exclude the overbroad word “REFER”. Such documents should include the pay summaries, time records, commission reports and commission summaries for all putative class members. Defendants also must serve a veri�...
2024.03.29 Motion to Contest Legitimacy of Assertion of Attorney-Client Privilege
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...lectively “Goe Forsythe”) and Attorney MICHAEL LEBOFF and the Law firm KLEIN & WILSON (collectively “ LeBoff”). The Parks move pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.285, which provides in pertinent part: (a) If electronically stored information produced in discovery is subject to a clai m of privilege or of protection as attorney work product, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the...
2024.03.29 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...t argues that it only agreed to “perform” and not t o “complete” the work. Such appears to be a tortured reading of the parties' agreement and not consistent with the apparent intent of the parties. For example, Defendant's interpretation of the word “performed” would allow Defendant to merely begin the r epair/replace work without ever having to complete the work. The agreement entered into on or about May 9, 2023, called for work to...
2024.03.28 Special Motion to Strike 177
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ...intiff Michael Kinney (“Plaintiff”). The Motion is GRANTED as to COAs 5 and 6 but DENIED as to COAs 3 and 4. As a preliminary matter, Plaintiff claims that this Motion is untimely under C.C.P. § 425.16(f). However, although it is based on allegations that were also made in a prior pleading, the statutory deadline is reopened for a new COA in an amended pleading, even if based on protected activity alleged in the original complaint. (Starview...
2024.03.28 OSC Re Contempt 357
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ... that no signed order to show cause was issued for the present OSC hearing. Wh ile the Court previously issued a signed OSC for the OSC hearing on 01/25/24, that OSC was taken off calendar and the OSC was then continued to 03/28/24. (See ROA 2222.) The Court only issued a minute order continuing the OSC to the current date of 03/28/2 4. No signed order was issued. Because the OSC must formally notify respondent of the time and place of the contem...
2024.03.28 Motion to Tax Costs 600
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ... on appeal and thus it is entitled to its costs so l ong as those costs were timely requested and are allowable. In its opposition, filed the same day, defendant states that, “Hussein has indicated he does not challenge Defendants appellate cost bill.” But, in Hussein's reply, he iterates that he does chal lenge defendant's right to costs on appeal. He iterates that defendant “forfeited” its right to those costs because it failed to fil...
2024.03.28 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 022
Location: Orange County
Judge: Melzer, Layne H
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ...(Law Offices of David S. Karton v. Segreto (2009) 176 CA4th 1, 9— § 1286 is mandatory in this respect.) A court has the power to vacate or correct an arbitrator's award on specific grounds. (CCP § 1286.) Unless a petition to correct or vacate the award has b een timely filed, the court must render a judgment confirming the arbitrator's award. [See CCP § 1286 —“the court shall confirm the award as made …”; see also Valsan ...
2024.03.28 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 257
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.28
Excerpt: ...ng party has 30 days after service of a demand for inspection to ser ve a response, Page 4 of 16 unless the parties agree to extend the date for a response and the agreement is “confirmed in a writing that specifies the extended date . . . for the service of a response.” (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2031.260(a), 2031.270(a) -(b).) If a party to whom requests for production of documents were directed fails to serve a timely response, the propoundin...

16064 Results

Per page

Pages