Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

121 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: Larsh, Erick x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 236)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 794)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 25,25
Array
(
)
2024.02.08 Demurrer 906
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.02.08
Excerpt: ...ing members/board o directors o POKI CAT INNOVATIONS, LLC ("POKI CAT" or "deendant LLC"), a Caliornia limited liability company ("LLC"), and its member managers/presumptive Board o Directors to pursue the below-described claims against POKI CAT, Does 1 to 25, inclusive, deendants, and each o them, and the various co-deendants or diversion, conversion, deception, embezzlement, tax raud, securities raud, breach o contract, sel-dealing,...
2024.02.01 Motion for Summary Adjudication 375
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ... (See Cal. Code Civ. Proc., §437c, subds. ()(1) and (p)(2); Aguilar v. Atlantic RichÞeld Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850-851.) In support o their Motion, Plainti¯s cite to Deendant's responses to various requests or admission and a corresponding Form Interrogatory No. 17.1. Plainti¯s contend that Deendant's responses are devoid o actual content, evasive, and demonstrate that Deendant has no evidence to support the a¯irmative deens...
2024.01.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 628
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...ants provided pursuant to this Court's Order is inadequate because it does not contain sufficient detail to enable Plaintiff to evaluate the merits of Defendants' privilege objection. Upon review of Defendants' privilege log, the Court finds the privilege log to contain sufficient information to evaluate Defendants' claims of privilege and/or work product protection. Defendants have complied with the Court's Order that they produce a privilege lo...
2024.01.25 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 481
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...'s discretion to deny motion on the basis of failure to comply with Rule 3.1350]. ) Summary judgment is denied because moving parties have not shown that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's entire operative Second Amended Complaint [SAC]. (Code Civ. Proc„ S 437c, subd. (c).) Specifically, as to the 1st cause of action, moving parties have not met their init...
2024.01.25 Motion for Summary Judgment 084
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...f quantum meruit —that the plaintiff acted pursuant to an express or implied request for services by the defendant. LHS focuses on presenting evidence that it did not make an express request to Plaintiffs to provide any services to the non-party patients. However, LHS overlooks that a quantum meruit claim can arise where the services are provided pursuant to an implied request for services. (Ochs v. PacifiCare (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 782, 794 ["...
2024.01.25 Motion for Summary Adjudication 880
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...intiff's complaint alleges that "Ryan Morris agreed to rent from Plaintiffs Insured, Ability Center / Arch Channel Investments, LLC, a 20 Toyota Sienna." (Comp'. BC-I) Plaintiff's evidnece only establishes the existence of a rental agreement between Ryan Morris and Ability Center. There is no evidnece of a rental agreement between Mr. Morris and Arch Channel Investments, LLC, or the plaintiffs other INSURED. Where a party seeking summary judgment...
2024.01.25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 485
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...�6th causes of action for breach of contract, negligence, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, wrongful foreclosure, cancellation of instruments, and declaratory relief. (See Mtn. P&As at pp. 5-12.) All six causes of action are based on the same set of factual allegations and the same alleged misconduct with respect to the foreclosure on plaintiff's second mortgage. (See, e.g„ Compl. 1, 4, 12, 15-21, 23 [general allegations], ...
2024.01.18 Motion to Quash Records Subpoenas 375
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...uch records. Thus, the subpoenas to the billing departments of Saint Mary's and TNA Residential Care are quashed in full, and the balance of the subpoenas are quashed to the extent that they seek billing records. The motion is denied as to the balance of the records subpoenas issued by defendant. While the plaintiffs may assert a claim under the physician-patient privilege (See California Consumer Health Care Council, Inc. v. California Dept. of ...
2024.01.18 Motion for Protective Order 689
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...ved informally. The party moving for a protective order bears the burden of showing good cause for issuance of the order by a preponderance of the evidence. (Stadish v. Superior Court (Southern California Gas Co.) (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1130 at 1145.) Ford seeks a protective order that restricts the disclosure of trade secrets. In order to show good cause for entry of such an order, Ford must present evidence that establishes the material it seeks...
2024.01.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 430
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...ng a cause of action "...constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language" The FAC also fails to identify each cause of action and which defendant is being asserted against. The FAC fails to allege facts sufficient as to breach of fiduciary duty. (Pierce v. Lyman (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 1093, 1101 [elementsl.) This cause of action is duplicative of the cause of action for legal malpractice and is subject to demurrer. (Couch v. San ...
2024.01.18 Anti-SLAPP Motion 199
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...lifornia, Case No. 8:23-cv-00103. (See Caiafa Prof. Law Corp. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 800, 804 (Caiafa) ["when a federal action has been filed covering the same subject matter as is involved in a California action, the California court has the discretion but not the obligation to stay the state court action"; relevant considerations]; accord, Benitez v. Williams (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 270, 276.) The hearing on this OSC...
2024.01.11 Demurrer to FAC 136
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...audulent transfer and 5th cause of action for promissory estoppel/unjust enrichment are also MOOT, given the ruling on these defendants' motion to strike, discussed further below. Defendant Sheybani's demurrer to the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd causes of action are OVERRULED. The court takes judicial notice on its own motion of plaintiff's original complaint and attached exhibits. (Evid. Code, S 452, subd. (d) [court records].) 1st cause of action: breach ...
2024.01.11 Demurrer 311
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...ecause the Cross-complaint does not attach the contract as an exhibit, set forth the material terms of the contract verbatim, or allege the legal effect of the contract. Responding Party does not dispute that a copy of the written contract that forms the basis of the first cause of action is not attached to the Cross-complaint, and the relevant terms are not set out verbatim. Instead, Respond-ng Party argues that the Cross-complaint sufficiently ...
2024.01.11 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 908
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...mate decision to deny the Moton does not necessarily rely upon any point or authority raised in Defendant's filing. Plaintiff will be afforded an opportunity to respond to any argument raised in the Opposition at the hearing on the Mohon. Plaintiff's Meet and Confer Efforts A moton to compel further responses to a Request for Production of Documents "shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040." (Cal. Code Civ. Pr...
2024.01.11 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 223
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...835,000.00 after completion of the LTRMN/UMBRLA transaction, breach of the obligation to give notice of the closing of the LTRMN/UMBRLA transaction, and by disparaging plaintiff in violation of section 10 of the separation agreement. Defendants only provide evidence that the term of the separation agreement did not require them to make the $835,000.00 payment, and fail to address the other two breaches that may require them to pay damages, and th...
2024.01.11 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint 062
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...n over defendant); Pavlovich v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal. 4th 262, 273.) Validity of Service Plaintiff has failed to establish that substituted service to George Hong or HJC America, Inc. is effective as to Moving Party. Plaintiff's argument that service was made to Moving Party's 'general manager' in California is not well taken. It is possible for service upon a wholly owned subsidiary or a contractor of a foreign entity defendant could be ...
2024.01.04 Motion to Consolidate 733
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ...yled as an "Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Consolidate." (ROA No. 82.) Even if Plaintiff's Motion met the requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.350, Plaintiff has failed to establish good cause for consolidation of these matters. In assessing a motion to consolidate, courts will typically consider the following factors: (1) timeliness of the motion: i.e., whether granting consolidation would delay t...
2024.01.04 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 208
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ...motion is a renewed motion for summary judgment that was denied on 08/03/23. A renewed motion must be based upon" new or different facts, circumstances, or law..." (See Code Civ. Proc. 1008, subd. (b).) Dr. Perlman's moton is not based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, and therefore is denied on that basis. Where a party seeking summary judgment has not addressed all of the relevant allegations of the complaint and/or all theori...
2023.12.21 Motion to Compel Further Responses 375
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ...8) The Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (ROA No. 48), brought by Plaintiff David Ulises Castro Herrera, by and through his successor in interest Leslie Plascencia, is GRANTED, in part, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure secton 2030.300. Defendant Grace Retirement Village, Inc. shall provide further verified responses, without objections, to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories Nos. 26, 28, 30, 31, 32 and 33, within 15...
2023.12.21 Motion to Compel Further Responses 061
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ...and 2, is GRANTED. Defendant Blum shall provide full, complete, and verified responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2, without objection, within 20 days. Plaintiff Carno Law Group's motion to compel defendant Jack Blum to provide further responses to Requests for Production, Set One, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Code Civ. Proc., S 2031.310.) The motion is DENIED as to Request Nos. 10-12, which r...
2023.12.21 Motion for Attorney Fees 222
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ...ntitled to its post offer costs and fees. In a typical action, Moving Party would be correct. But this action is founded on discrimination and seeks the protections of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA.) Where, as here, the prevailing defendant seeks a post offer claim of attorney fees and costs, it must first show the action was "frivolous." Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC (1978) 434 LIS 412. The Christianburg court affirmed that alth...
2023.12.21 Demurrer 835
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ... injury." (Ladd v. County of San Mateo (1996) 12 Cal. 4th 913, 917.) Here, Cross-Defendant argues that the Crosscomplaint contains no allegation of a duty owed by Cross- Defendant, and as such, no claim for negligence can be stated against CrossDefendant. Review of the Cross-complaint itself confirms this argument. Cross-complainant's cause of action for negligence consists of a single paragraph that is nothing more than a conclusory statement th...
2023.12.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 061
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.14
Excerpt: ...ROA 555] MOTION #7 of 9: Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two [ROA 547, 559] MOTION #8 of 9: Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admission, Set Three [ROA 542, 546] MOTION #9 of 9: Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, set Three [ROA 561] Plaintiff Charles S. Mosesian's ("Plaintiff") Motion to Compel Responses to his Demand for Production of Documents, Set One is GRAN ED. (See Code Civ. SS 2031.3Cü) Defen...
2023.12.07 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena for Site Inspection 038
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ... Court, rule 3.1346 [except under circumstances not applicable here, personal service required].) While defendants' proof of service claims that Sybilla Green Dorros (hereinafter, Ms. Green Dorros) was personally served, it states she was so served "via First Legal" and not by the declarant. This lacks personal knowledge and is insufficient to establish service. (See Katelaris v. County of Orange (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1211, 1215.) The messenger w...
2023.12.07 Motion for Attorney Fees 612
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ...than the offer at trial. (ROA No. 502; Smalley v. Subaru of America, Inc. (2022) 87 Cal.App.5th 450, 453, 458 [subject 998 offer was valid, reasonable, and made in good faith; plaintiff failed to do better than the offer at triall.) Plaintiff can therefore recover only his preoffer attorney fees. "[A] valid and reasonable section 998 offer by the seller, where the buyer recovers less than the offer, precludes recovery by the buyer of postoffer at...

121 Results

Per page

Pages