Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

15908 Results

Location: Orange County x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 236))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 600,100
Array
(
)
2024.03.22 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 282
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...rivate Attorneys General act (“Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Defendant Belshire Environmental Services, Inc. (“Defendant”). (ROA 2). The Complaint alleges the following 11 causes of action: 1. Violation of Labor Code §§ 510 and 1198 (Unpaid Overtime); 2. Violation of Labor Code §§ 226.7 and 512(a) (Unpaid Meal Period Premium s); 3. Violation of Labor Code § 226.7 (Unpaid Rest Period Premiums); 4. Violation of Labor Code §�...
2024.03.22 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement, OSC Re Sanctions, Dismissal 122
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ... Failure to Provide Meal Periods; 2. Violation of PAGA for Failure to Provide Rest Periods; 3. Violation of PAGA for Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; 4. Violation of PAGA for Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; 5. Violation of PAGA for Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; and 6. Violation of PAGA for Fai lure to Timely Pay Wages at Separation Plaintiff alleges she was employed as a non -exempt worker for Defendant, a nonprofit organizat...
2024.03.22 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 890
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...10 causes of action for: 1. Failure to Pay Overtime; 2. Failure to P ay Minimum Wages; 3. Failure to Provide Compliant Meal Breaks; 4. Failure to Provide Compliant Rest Breaks; 5. Failure to Provide Itemized Wage Statements; 6. Failure to Maintain Accurate Employment Records; 7. Failure to Pay Wages Timely During Employment ; 8. Waiting Time Penalties; 9. Failure to Indemnify All Necessary Business Expenses; and 10. Unfair Business Practices. On ...
2024.03.22 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 497
Location: Orange County
Judge: Dourbetas, Nico
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ... action is viable because it relies upon allegations of a breach of a duty owed to the minor Plaintiff. As noted in the authority Defendant cit es in support of the demurrer, “unless the defendant has assumed a duty to plaintiff in which the emotional condition of the plaintiff is an object, recovery is available only if the emotional distress arises out of the defendant's breach of some other leg al duty and the emotional distress is proximate...
2024.03.22 Demurrer, Motion to Compel Arbitration 155
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...led a statement that would file an amended answer by the hearing date. As of the day before the hearing, the Court has no record of the amended answer having been filed. The Court takes Defendant's failure to oppose the demurrer as a concession, and on that basis sustains the demurrer. Defendant shall file an amended answer by April 2, 2024. For a complete record, Defendant shall also file by April 2 its original answer as no such filing can be f...
2024.03.22 Demurrer to SAC 026
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...r Competition Law. Defendant challenges the pleading on the ground that plaintiff has failed to allege a defect in materials or workmanship, as required under 13 C.C.R. §2037(b)(2). Plaintiff relies on 13 C.C.R. §2037(b)(1), which discusses design issues, but the extended warranty is found only in 13 C.C.R. §2037( b)(2) and requires a defect in materials or workmanship. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint adds legal arguments as to why the Em...
2024.03.22 Demurrer 667
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...est for judicial notice filed in reply (ROA 24) is DENIED as immaterial to the Court's decision. Statute of Limitations Defendants contend Plaintiff's complaint for legal malpractice and “(a) An action against an attorney for a wrongful act or omission, other than for actual fraud, arising in the performance of prof essional services shall be commenced within one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence sh...
2024.03.22 Demurrer 578
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...ckich, Cruz & McCort (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 875, 882.) To the extent Plaintiff is requesting that the court take judicial notice of the fact that these cases exist, the request is denied as irrelevant to the issue presented in the demurrer. (Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Assn. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 194 [noting that the court may take judicial notice of a recorded deed, but declining to do so where deed was not relevant].) Special Demurrer Sp...
2024.03.22 Motion for Final Approval 127
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hurwitz, Lon F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...Pay Overtime Wages; 3. Failure to Provide Meal Periods; 4. Failure to Permit Rest Breaks; 5. Failure to Reimburse Business Expenses; 6. Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; 7. Failure to Pay All Wages Due Upon Separation of Employment; and 8. Violation of Business & Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq. On Oct ober 23, 2019, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint adding two causes of action for Unlawful Deduction from Wages...
2024.03.21 Motion for Attorney Fees 943
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Civil Code section 1717, as they are authorized by the Promissory Note at issue in this case. Plaintiff asserts that the motion is timely; that the lodestar applies; that 172.6 hours of attorney time was expended for this action which commenced in October 2020 through August 2023 by Sean Cooney, principal of Cooney Law PC, and is reasonable as this case was aggressively defended until coun...
2024.03.21 Motion for Preference 444
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...ed in subdivision (b), actions brought under the provisions of thi s chapter shall be set for trial at the earliest possible date and shall take precedence over all other cases, except older matters of the same character and maters to which special precedence may be given by law. “(b) Any action brought under the provisio ns of this chapter in which the plaintiff seeks any relief, in addition to a declaration of rights and duties, shall take su...
2024.03.21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 223
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...ings is based on the claim that there is no statutory ba sis for the claim and therefore no cause of action can be stated against the City under Government Code section 815. A motion for judgment on the pleadings serves the same basic purpose as a demurrer. It asks the court to determine whether as a matter of law a cause of action has been stated. (See Tung v. Chicago Title Co. (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 734, 743- 744.) However, it may not be used as...
2024.03.21 Motion for Attorney Fees 953
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...berts dba Image Auto Group; 2. that all parties to this acti on are hereby restrained from instituting or further prosecuting any other proceeding in any other court in the State of California, or any other jurisdiction, affecting the rights and obligations between the parties to this interpleader; 3. that Hudson b e dismissed with prejudice from the instant action, and any legal actions pending against the bond proceeds; 4. that Hudson be awarde...
2024.03.21 Demurrer 027
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...n their opposition, cross -defendants have withdrawn the following aff irmative defenses: 14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 55 and 56 (i.e., 55(2)). Becerra's demurrer to affirmative defenses 14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 55 and 56 (i.e., 55(2)) is thus overruled as moot. For the following reasons, Becerra's demurrer to affirmativ e defenses 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 41, 42, 44, 46, 47, 48 and 50 is sustained ...
2024.03.21 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 398
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ..., 986. PAGA settlements are subject to trial court review “to determine whether [they are] fair, reasonable, and adequate in view of PAGA's purposes to remediate present labor law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77. The cour t has reviewed and considered the papers filed in support of plaintiff's motion for approval of a $600,000 PAGA set...
2024.03.21 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 269
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...6 Cal.4th 969, 986. PAGA settlements are subject to trial court review “to determin e whether [they are] fair, reasonable, and adequate in view of PAGA's purposes to remediate present labor law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of state labor laws.” Moniz v. Adecco USA, Inc. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 56, 77. The cou rt has reviewed and considered the papers filed in support of plaintiff's motion for approval of a $45...
2024.03.21 Demurrer 942
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...s Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) Absent court orders or other i tems subject to judicial notice, or items attached as exhibits to the complaint, the court may not consider the contents of pleadings or other exhibits when ruling on a demurrer. (Day v. Sharp (1975) 50 Cal.3d 904, 914; Sosinsky v. Grant (1992) 6 Cal.Ap p.4th 1746, 1749.) “In our examination of the complaint we are guided by the well settled principles governing the testing o...
2024.03.21 Demurrer 249
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... Fourteenth Amendment, and Third Cause of Action for Civil Harassment. D efendant contends that although the caption of Plaintiff's Complaint appears to allege violations of the 4th and 14th Amendments, the body of the Complaint states no facts regarding any such violations, and that actions were taken in accordance with the OC Municipal Code. Defendants also contend that Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 concerns harassment, and that Plainti...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 337
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...operty. ISSUE NO. 2: Summary Adjudication is proper as to Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action for Premises Liability because Defendant had no actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition on Defendant's property. Initially, the Court notes that the instant motion and moving papers were filed and served on February 8, 2024, which is only 42 days before the noticed hearing date of March 21, 2024. 75 -days' notice is required on a motion fo...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...y judgment is to provide courts with a mecha nism to cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) “A party may move for summary judgm ent in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code ...
2024.03.21 Demurrer to FAC 970
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... set for this day and Plaintiff has not sought ex parte relie f to continue Defendants' Demurrer and/or Motion to Strike portions of FAC. The court declines to continue the hearing on the Demurrer and Motion to Strike set for this day. The unopposed Request for Judicial Notice is granted. “The court may take judicia l notice of the filing and contents of a government claim, but not the truth of the claim.” (Gong v. City of Rosemead (2014) 22...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 789
Location: Orange County
Judge: Larsh, Erick
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...[same].) Specifically, defendants failed to meet their initial burden as to Noticed Issue No. 1 because the issue fails to completely dispose of any cause of action. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (f)(1).) Defendants met their initial evidentiary burden as to Noticed Issues No. 3. & 5, Even if defendants had met their initial burden as to each noticed issue, plaintiffs met their shifted burden to show triable issues of material fact. (See C...
2024.03.21 Motion to Allow Limited Discovery, for Relief from Stay on Discovery 745
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... of Civil Procedure section 425.16(g) provides: “All discovery proceedings in the action sh all be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this section. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. The court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that s pecified discovery be conducted notwithstanding this subdivision.” “If the plaintiff makes a ...
2024.03.21 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel, for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 475
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...lves a high - end residential lease. Plaintiffs filed a 12-count complaint against the property owner, Yuan Mu, real estate agent Nancy Milne, and Ascendant International, Inc., dba Re/Max Luxury Properties. It includes causes of action for breach of contract, common counts, fraud, and dec laratory relief. Plaintiffs complain that the house they rented had numerous issues and Yuan Mu refused to fix them. Yuan Mu filed a 13 -count cross -compla...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Continued Depositions 211
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...��If a deponent fails to answer any question or to produce any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing under the deponent's control that is specified in the deposition notice or a deposition subpoena, the party seeking discovery may move the court for an order compelling that answer or production.” Co de of Civil Procedure section 2025.480(b) states, in relevant part: “[t]his motion [motion to compel answers or pro...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... for deposition. (Id. at ¶¶ 3 -4.) On Apri l 26, 2023, Defendant served objections to the Notice of Deposition. (Id. at ¶ 7.) Plaintiff sent a meet and confer letter on May 11, 2023 discussing Defendant's objections and the particular categories of examination and document requests. (Id.) Defen dant provides no evidence that it responded to the May 11, 2023 letter. (See Major Dec.) GM has evidently agreed to produce a witness for deposition on...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ 952
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...ion).” But the reply attempts to mislead the court and ob tain discovery plaintiff's counsel knows this court has denied in prior cases. Indeed, and contrary to its initial assertion, this motion is all about the request to produce all the documents in the General Motors universe about the Silverado vehicle. Th e final sentence of the reply gives the game away: “Based on the foregoing, GM must be ordered to produce its PMQ for deposition on ...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Further Responses 390
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...5, 162, 164, and 238 -239). The court GRANTS the motions pursuant to CCP §§ 2031.280, 2031.300, a nd 2031.320. The court first notes that none of the documents that were produced in response to the RFP were produced to the court for its review. Based upon the arguments however, it appears that some redacted documents were produced in the responses. Defendants state that many of the redacted documents were not responsive to the requests, nor to...
2024.03.21 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 283
Location: Orange County
Judge: Melzer, Layne H
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...f the petition. Code Civ. Proc. § 1290.6. Respondent Shrier has not filed a r esponse to the petition. Nor was any opposition filed despite the prior motion for continuance, and continuance granted, for purposes of filing an opposition. A petition to confirm an arbitration award must: (1) set forth the substance of or attach a cop y of the arbitration agreement; (2) set forth the name of the arbitrators; and (3) set forth or attach a copy of...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...§ 2031.310, subd. (b)(1).) “To establish good cause, a discovery proponent must identify a disputed fact that is of consequence in the action and explain how the discovery sought will tend in reason to prove or disprove that fact or lead to other evidence that will tend to prove or disprove the fact.” (Digital Music News LLC v. Superior Court (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 216, 224, disapproved of, on other grounds, by Williams v. Superior Court (20...
2024.03.21 Motion to Compel Physical, Mental Exam 012
Location: Orange County
Judge: Leal, Sandy N
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...ve of court. Sections 2032.310 and 2032.3 20 provide for additional physical examination with leave of court if good cause is shown. (See Shapira v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 1249 -1256.) Defendant has demonstrated there is good cause to allow additional examinations. Plaintiff listed 72 injuries in response to Form Interrogatory 6.2 and stated he consulted with 15 different providers in response to Form Interrogatory 6.4, including a ...
2024.03.21 Petition to Compel Arbitration 578
Location: Orange County
Judge: Melzer, Layne H
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC and Safeco Insurance Co mpany of America join the petition. The petition is granted in part and denied in part as discussed in detail below. The petition is granted as to Defendant Autonation Ford Tustin but denied as to the 5th cause of action for violation of the CLRA to the extent this claim seeks public injunctive relief. The joinder is granted as to Defendants Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Credit Com...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 926
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...omplaint was filed May 26, 2020. (ROA 2. ) The motion for summary judgment is supported by the declaration of John Battista, a licensed Certified Access Specialist (CASp). He visited the shopping center on May 20, 2022, and found various violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Uniform Building Code, which he detailed in his report. In opposition to the motion, defendant filed a declaration from Jong Park, also a licensed CASp...
2024.03.20 Demurrer (2)
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gaffney, Donald F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...tions in the pleading o r the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. (Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1404 -05.) Questions of fact cannot be decided on demurrer. (Berryman v. Merit Prop. Mgmt., Inc. (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1556.) Because a demu rrer tests only the sufficiency of the complaint, a court will not consider facts that have not been alleged in the complaint unless they may be reasonably inferred from ...
2024.03.20 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...intiff. (See Bily v. Arthur Young & Co. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 370, 397 [Biakanja factors], 406 [auditor's liability “is confined to the client”]; Richard B. LeVine, Inc. v. Higashi (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 566, 580- 586 [accountant to partnership owed no professional duties to individual partners ].) Plaintiff asserts Welch is liable for aiding and abetting the other defendants' breaches of fiduciary duty, not for breaching any fiduciary duty of ...
2024.03.20 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gaffney, Donald F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...nswer. (ROA Nos. 3233; see ROA No. 23.) Code of C ivil Procedure section 472 provides: “Any pleading may be amended once by the party of course, and without costs, at any time before the answer or demurrer is filed, or after demurrer and before the trial of the issue of law thereon, by filing the same as amended and serving a copy on the adverse party, ….” In Barton v. Khan (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1216, a shareholder who was a former emplo...
2024.03.20 Demurrer 401
Location: Orange County
Judge: Steiner, Scott
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...is divests the opinion of the Court of Appeal of binding or precedential effect, it may still be cited for “potentially persuasive value.” (See Cal. Rules of Ct. rule 8.1115(e)(1).) Based on the existing persuasive authority, including the Court of Appeal's decision in Dhital, the court concludes Plaintiff's fr audulent concealment claim is not barred by the economic loss rule as a matter of law. If the California Supreme Court reaches th...
2024.03.20 Motion for Terminating Sanction
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gaffney, Donald F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...ting sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.030, subds. (a) -I.) Misuse of the discovery process includes, but is not limited to, using a discovery method in a manner that does not comply with its specified procedures, employing a discovery method in a manner or to an extent that causes unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden, failing to submi...
2024.03.20 Motion to Compel Further Responses
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gaffney, Donald F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...nly objections. (Jenkins Decl. ¶ 4, Ex. B.) Defendant initiated the meet and confer process on 11/01/2023 and demanded further responses and responsive documents no later than Monday 11/13/2023. (Jenkins Decl. ¶ 5, Ex. C.) On Thursday 11/09/2023, Plaintiff asked for a 30- day extension to respond. (Jenkins Decl. ¶ 6, Ex. D.) Defendant compromised by offering a three -day extension to Thursday 11/16/2023. (Jenkins Decl. ¶ 7, Ex. E.) Plaintiff ...
2024.03.20 Motion for Summary Judgment 299
Location: Orange County
Judge: Steiner, Scott
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...ore affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if that party contends that the cause of action has no merit or that there is no affirmative defense thereto, or that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, or both, or that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty...
2024.03.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 946
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ... be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs.” “This language has been interpret ed to allow recovery of not only litigation costs, but also reasonable attorney fees and costs expended in prelitigation alternative dispute resolution (ADR) pursuant to the Davis -Stirling Act. [Citation.]” (Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Assn. v. H azelbaker (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 252, 258.) A homeowner association's complaint seeking relief in the f...
2024.03.19 Demurrer 807
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...et seq., (6) quiet title, and (7) injunctive relief. I. All filings were untimely. As an initial matter, the Demurrer, Opposition, and Reply were all untimely. First, the First Amended Complaint was served by email on November 8, 2022. Thus, the declaration for the automatic 30 -day extension was due December 8, 2022. Defendant did not file its declaration for an extension until a month later on January 8, 2023. This was untimely. Since the dea...
2024.03.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 650
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...cts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and uncertainty. Initially, the op posing points and authorities is over the 15- page limit under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(d). The Court disregards the last three pages (pages 21 -23). (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(d).) First Cause of Action for Disability Discriminati on in Violation of the FEHA A prima facie case of disability discrimination requires a plaintiff to show that...
2024.03.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 655
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...ly noticed. ( Javor v. State Board of Equalization (1974) 12 Cal.3d 790, 796 [117 Cal.Rptr. 305, 527 P.2d 1153]; Code Civ. Proc., §§ 430.30, 430.70.) “Accordingly, a complaint otherwise good on its face is subject to demurrer when facts judicially noticed render it defective.” ( Iram Enterprises v. Veditz (1981) 12 6 Cal.App.3d 603, 608 [179 Cal.Rptr. 1].) Taking judicial notice of a document is not the same as accepting the truth of its co...
2024.03.19 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 797
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gabriel, Lee
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...#39;s breach, and (4) the resulting damages to the plaintiff.” (D'Arrigo Bros. of Calif ornia v. United Farmworkers of America (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 790, 800.) As to the First Cause of Action, Plaintiff has demonstrated (1) the existence of the Loan Agreement with Media Graphix, (2) Plaintiff's performance, (3) Media Graphix breach of the L oan Agreement, and (4) resulting damages in the amount of $364,874.72. (Undisputed Facts 1, 5, 6, 10...
2024.03.19 Motion to Compel Physical and Mental Exam 824
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gabriel, Lee
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...urt if good cause is shown. (See Shapira v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App .3d 12491256.) Plaintiff objects to the examination because Plaintiff has already agreed to an examination by Defendant's orthopedic expert on 3/27/24 and a remote mental examination on 3/18/24. Plaintiff also contends the examination must be conducted within 75 miles of Plaintiff's residence, which is in North Carolina. Defendant has shown good cause for its scar revis...
2024.03.19 Motion to Dismiss 381
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...an be raised at any time (even for the first time on appeal). It can be raised: — by demurrer to the complain t where the defect appears on the face of the complaint or from matters judicially noticeable (CCP § 430.10(a)); — by motion to strike (CCP §§ 435, 437); — by motion for judgment on the pleadings (CCP § 438); — by motion for summary judgment (CCP § 437c); or — as an affirmative defense in the answer. [Greener v. Workers...
2024.03.19 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 711
Location: Orange County
Judge: Oberholzer, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...business in California, nor ever had any offices in California, it has no employees in California, it has no customers outside of Florida, and it does not advertise outside of Florida. Defendant's request for judicial notice as to Exhibit B (Plaintiff's Complaint) is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452(d).) The request as to Exhibit C i s DENIED, as the material is not relevant to a resolution of the issues raised in this Motion. (State Compensation Ins...
2024.03.19 Motion to Set Aside or Vacate Default, Judgment 815
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gabriel, Lee
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...accept service if the process server identifies himself, tells the person they are being served, and leaves the papers as close as possible to the person. (Trujillo v. Trujillo (1945) 71 CA2d 257, 260.) Here, Tuttle announced that he was serving Defendant and left the papers on Defendant's front doorstep. Thus, Tuttle's service complied with the statutory requirements. The Court CONTINUES the Motion to allow Defendant an opportunity to submit ev...
2024.03.18 Application for Right to Attach Order, Writ of Attachment 329
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...Defendant Smith Investment Group, LLC. (¶4 of Yun Declaration and E xhibit 2 thereto.) The Commercial Guarantee is a written contract which provides that “Guarantor absolutely and unconditionally guarantees full and punctual payment and satisfaction of the Indebtedness of Borrower [Smith Investment Group, LLC] to Lender [F irst Bank].” (Id.) Based on the above, the relevant claim is a “claim for money based on a contract,” as required. C...
2024.03.18 Motion for Monetary Sanctions
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hesseltine, David J.
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...n 1: Sanctions Motion by Defenda nts Defendants' request for sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7 is DENIED because Defendants failed to comply with the safe harbor requirements. Section 128.7, subdivision (c)(1) requires notice of motion to be served as provided in Sect ion 1010, but shall not be filed or presented to the court unless, within 21 days after service of the motion the challenged paper is not withdrawn. Section 101...
2024.03.18 Demurrer 116
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...f action. Plaintiff sues Defendants for (1) actual fraud, (2) fraud in the inducement, (3) breach of contract, (4) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (5) breach of implied in fact contract, (6) work, labor, and services rendered, (7) recovery of stolen property received pursuant to Penal Code § 496, (8) intentional interference with contractual relations, (9) intentional interference with prospective economic relation...
2024.03.18 Demurrer 511
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...ssica J. Gallardo Celis. Standard for Demurrer A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the affected pleading, not the truth of the factual allegations in the pleading or the pleader's ability to prove those allegations. (Cundiff v. GTE Cal., Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1404- 05.) For this reason, the court will not decide questions of fact on demurrer. (See Berryman v. Merit Prop. Mgmt., Inc. (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1556.) ...
2024.03.18 Demurrer 642
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside t he pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code §§ 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfully drawn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficient precision to inform the defendant of what plaintiff is complaining, and what remedies are being sought. (L...
2024.03.18 Demurrer to FAC 646
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...toppel; and (2) Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. (Defense Supplemental Brief: 2:17 -21.) While Defendant does not include an additional request for judicial notice, which addresses the resolution of this appeal, a copy of the relevant opinion is attached to a Notice of Ruling which was filed by Defendant on Augus t 15, 2023. (ROA No. 147.) The Court takes judicial notice of this opinion, pursuant to Evidence Code section 452,...
2024.03.18 Demurrer to SAC 520
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...in connection with a Motion for Summary Judgment (¶23, ¶24, ¶28, ¶30, ¶31, ¶32, ¶34, ¶35, ¶39, ¶40, ¶41, ¶43, ¶44- ¶83, ¶85-¶97 and ¶99 -¶103 of SAC) and Declarations filed in support of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a TRO. (¶30, ¶31, ¶32, ¶33 and ¶36 of SAC.) As a demurrer assumes the truth of factual allegations (Blank v. Kirwan ( 1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318), Plaintiffs' intention in offering these citations is uncl...
2024.03.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 772
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...y Patrol. 181 Cal. App. 4th 856, 868 (2010) (c itation omitted). Defendant Kenneally contends that the Complaint does not allege that he disclosed facts to the public, but rather that he only disclosed them to Defendant Ladd. Kenneally also contends that the facts disclosed were not private facts since the information was found in records that can be obtained by members of the public pursuant to Govt. Code § 6254. In opposition, Plaintiff conten...
2024.03.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 992
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...a. 42 and Para. 3 of the Prayer. I. DEMURRER 1st cause of action: Gender/Pregnancy Dis crimination (vs. EWL) A prima facie case for a discrimination requires a showing by the plaintiff of the following elements: (1) that he or she was a member of a protected class; (2) that he or she was qualified for the position he or she sought or that he or she was performing competently in the position he or she held; (3) that he or she suffered an adverse ...
2024.03.18 Motion to Set Aside Dismissal 963
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hoffer, David A
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this r elief…shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken…Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's swor...
2024.03.18 Motion for Summary Adjudication
Location: Orange County
Judge: Hesseltine, David J.
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... third causes of action in the F AC. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are DENIED. Because the motions and oppositions raise essentially the same arguments, involve very similar evidence, and are directed to the same pleading, the court will discuss both motions together. Th e party moving for summary judgment “bears an initial burden of production to make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fa...
2024.03.18 Motion to Consolidate 393
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...022- 01291747). The court clerk is ORDERED to file this ruling in each of the above cases. Defendant, Cross -Complainant, and CrossDefendant Jennifer Landsman (Defendant Landsman) moves to consolidate the following cases: 1) Rangel v. Landsman (Case Number 30 - 2022- 01252534); 2) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Landsman (Case Number 30-2022- 01259393); and 3) Nielsen v. Landsman (Case Number 302022- 01291747). Standard to Cons...
2024.03.18 Motions to Compel Discovery 453
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...nses to Defendant ClearChoice Management Services, LLC's Form Interrogatories —Employment, Set One, without objections and within 30 days of service of the notice of ruling. Plaintiff Susanne Feusi is ORDERED to serve full, complete, and verified responses to Defendant ClearChoice Management Services, LLC's Special Interrogatories, Set One, without objections and within 30 days of service of the notice of ruling. Plaintiff Susanne Feusi is ORD...
2024.03.18 Motion to Consolidate 534
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...D to file this ruling in each of the above cases. Defendant, Cross -Complainant, and CrossDefendant Jennifer Landsman (Defendant Landsman) moves to consolidate the following cases: 1) Rangel v. Landsman (Case Number 30 - 2022- 01252534); 2) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Landsman (Case Number 30-2022- 01259393); and 3) Nielsen v. Landsman (Case Number 302022- 01291747). Standard to Consolidate “When actions involving a commo...
2024.03.18 Motion to Quash 056
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... records. (See Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Attorney Tony Wong of Wong & Associates Lawyers are ORDERED to produce to Plaintiff Wei He, Plaintiff Xizoning Ren, Plaintiff Yueli Zhao, and Defendant Qiaoyun Zhang any retainer agreement(s) between himself and/or Wong & Associates, on the one hand, a nd Plaintiff Wei He, Plaintiff Xizoning Ren, Plaintiff Yueli Zhao, Defendant Qiaoyun Zhang, Neede Education Investment Management, Inc., and/or Irvine...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 253
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... by Plaintiff Yenely Lopez are MOOT in part and GRANTED in part. (1) Plai ntiff seeks an order from the Court compelling Defendant Home Express Delivery Service, LLC to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories -General, Set One. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks monetary sanctions against Defendant and its attorneys of reco rd, Shannon Finley, esq., Greg Feldman, Esq. and PETTIT KOHN jointly and severally in the sum of $2,060.00. (ROA No. 47...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Production 893
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...mjula”) and non -party Tulsan Partners LLC (“Tulsan”), and compelling third- party witness, Ump qua Bank to comply with Strategic's deposition subpoena for production of business records, issued November 3, 2023. The Motion to Compel is DENIED except as to Request Nos. 9 and 13. Plaintiff Strategic and Cross -Defendants, Farshad Hashemi aka Sean Hashemi and Jeanette Hashemi (collectively, the “Sellers”) were the sellers of the assets an...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Physical, Mental Exam, to Strike or Seal, for Sanctions 089
Location: Orange County
Judge: Fish, Jonathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... treat a motion by the nature of the relief sought rather than the title given. (See Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 187, 193.) In addition, when the Court continued the trial date on 1/17/24, it stated in its order, “[t]he Court does NOT extend any discovery or motion deadlines other than deadlines associated with the motion to compel independent medical examination.” (ROA 400.) Based on this, Plaintiff's argume...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration 379
Location: Orange County
Judge: Strickroth, Michael J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...th Edon who is a “Manager, HR Operations” for ELEVANCE “(f/k/ a Anthem, Inc.)” who attests as follows: --In her role as Manager, HR Operations, she is responsible for managing technology processes for all new hire activities from the verbal and written offer through their start date; --Throughout he employment and i ncluding 2022 to the present, ELEVANCE has utilized an online applicant tracking system called “Taleo” to facilitate emp...
2024.03.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 000
Location: Orange County
Judge: Vu, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ... and 14- 16. With respect to the evidentiary objection numbers 2- 3, 5, 6, 7, 11-12, and 14- 16, Defendant Newport Mesa Unified School District did not quote the portions of the evidence to which it was objects but did provide a brief description of what it found to be objectionable. (See Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1354(b).) Based on the limited des cription, the court sustains these objections only to the extent that they seek to challenge evide...
2024.03.15 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 609
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...so should provide a red -lined version of any revised papers, inc luding the class notice. Counsel also should provide the court with an explanation of how the pending issues were resolved, with references to any corrections to the settlement agreement and the class notice, rather than with just a supplemental declarati on or brief that simply asserts the issues have been resolved. The moving papers do not include a copy of the letter that was se...
2024.03.15 Demurrer
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ... can be clarified under modern dis covery procedures.” (Ibid.) 1st cause of action, trespass. The complaint states facts sufficient to state this cause of action. “‘The essence of the cause of action for trespass is an ‘unauthorized entry' onto the land of another . . . . regardless of the actor's motivation.'” (Hensley v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 1337, 1355.) Here, the complaint alleges the subsidence of d...
2024.03.15 Demurrer 604
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...does not know” why her employment was terminated. However, paragraph 36 of the complaint alleg es, “Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that her race and/or national origin and her complaint about discrimination and harassment due to race were substantial, motivating and/or determining factors in the discriminatory treatment Defen dant subjected her to, including the termination of her employment.” Plaintiff also alleges ...
2024.03.15 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 830
Location: Orange County
Judge: Knill, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ..., ¶¶ 5, 6.) Defendant contends Plaintiff fails to allege compliance with paragrap h 15 of the contract, which requires the parties to attend mediation before initiating a lawsuit. However, paragraphs 11 -17 of the FAC allege Plaintiff asked Defendant to attend mediation and proposed a tolling agreement, and Plaintiff filed suit to preser ve its claims when Defendant did not promptly agree. Plaintiff has adequately alleged an attempt to comply ...
2024.03.15 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 322
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...ed, a redline version showing all changes, deletions and additions must be submitted as well. In addition, Plaintiff must provide proof of service of any revised settlement agreement and supplemental papers on the LWDA. 1. In a supplemental declaration, Plaintiffs' counsel Millay Kogan states tha t no depositions were taken. But the prior declaration of Plaintiffs' counsel Vincent Granberry says Plaintiffs' depositions were taken. (ROA 131, ¶ 12...
2024.03.15 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Attorney Fees 173
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...hours on this case. Objector Andrew Mapes' Objection to Settleme nt is overruled. Plaintiff has adequately explained the large increase in the number of class members, and has justified the gross settlement amount remaining unchanged. Objector argues that plaintiff failed to provide sufficient information for the cour t to evaluate the validity of the Pick Up Stix settlements in this case. Objector concedes there is no controlling authority perm...
2024.03.15 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 738
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...is GRANTED. The Reeds are ordered to file and serve t he FAXC (Rubin Decl., Ex. A) by March 22, 2023. The Court finds no prejudice will result from consideration of Azadian's untimely opposition. GROUNDS FOR RULING A court “may, in the furtherance of justice . . . allow a party to amend any pleading.” (CCP § 473(a)(1).) “[C]ourts are bound to apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint at any stage of the...
2024.03.15 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 571
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...edline showing all changes, deletions and additions must be submitted as well. In addition, please provide proof of service of any revised agreement on the LWDA. As to the Settlement: 1. Please provide copies of all PAGA notice letters sent by Plaintiff to the LWDA. 2. Per a notice of related cases, there are two cases in Los Angeles titled Garibaldo vs. Ware Disposal, Inc. that are related to this matter. How will this settlement affect the Gari...
2024.03.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...RA cap for non -economic damages;” and (2) “ Defendant, FIRST LIGHT RECOVERY, LLC (First Light) is not a health care provider, contrary to what is asserted by the First Light in their Eleventh Affirmative Defense in their Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, thus, First Light would not be s hielded by the $250,000 MICRA cap for non -economic damages”. (Not. of Motion, p. 2, lines 7 -16, emphasis added.) Defendant argues that the i...
2024.03.15 Motion to Compel Arbitration 510
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...fendant's motion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration of plaintiff Piplack's individual PAGA claim. Defendant's Objections to the Robinson Declaration are sustained as to #6, and overruled as to #1 - 5 and 7- 11. Defendant's Objections to the Sherrod Declaration are sustained as to #1 -3, and o verruled as to #4. Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice is denied as irrelevant. Zucchet v. Galardi (2014) 229 Cal. App. 4th 1466...
2024.03.15 Motion to Compel Further Responses
Location: Orange County
Judge: Recio, Sheila
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...ogatory No. 12.1 and Special Interrogatory No. 18 are evasive and incomplete. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.220(a) requires that “[e]ach answer in a response to interrogatories shall be as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.220(a).) GM, who failed to respond to these motions regarding interrogatories, failed to meet its burden to justify the obj...
2024.03.15 Motion to Compel Responses 899
Location: Orange County
Judge: McConville, Thomas S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ... responses were provided on 03 -08- 23. (Mem. at 3.) Accordingly , as Defendant Home Depot points out, Plaintiff has relied upon the incorrect statutory provision (CCP § 2030.290), as what this motion actually seeks is to compel further responses pursuant to CCP § 2030.300. Plaintiff failed to comply with the statutor y requirements for seeking further responses. Motion related to Special Interrogatories Plaintiff's Motion to Compel The Home De...
2024.03.15 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 179
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...d on Defendant Beverly Mitchell; Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Beverly Mitchell in the Amount of $1,560.00 ROA 832 3. Plaintiff Zenith Insurance Company's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Productions, Set One Propounded on Defendant Beverly Mitchell; Request for Monetary Sanctions A gainst Def endant Beverly Mitchell in the Amount of $1,560.00 ROA 833 Zenith Insurance Company has filed three motions co...
2024.03.15 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 195
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sherman, Randall J
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...ave standing to bring this motion, let a lone adequate grounds for disqualification of plaintiff's counsel as class counsel in this action. Standing generally requires that the party be able to allege an invasion of a legally protected interest. Great Lakes Construction, Inc. v. Burman (2010) 1 86 Cal. App. 4th 1347, 1356. Generally, before the disqualification of an attorney is proper, the complaining party must have or have had an attorney -c...
2024.03.15 Motion to Quash 109
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...notice of continuance of Plaintiff's deposition; (6) notice of taking Plaintiff's deposition off calendar ; (7) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to demands for inspection of documents; (8) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories; (9) proposed order granting motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories; (10) statement of special interrogatories; (11) statement of...
2024.03.15 Motion to Transfer Action 902
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...r any applicable statute. (Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Superior Court (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 1069, 1075.) “Venue is determined based on the complaint on file at the time the motion to change venue is made.” (Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 482; Malloy v. Superior Court (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 543, 553.) Code of Civil Procedure section 395, subdivision (a) sets forth the general venue rule. It states in relevant part: “E...
2024.03.15 Motion to Amend Judgment
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2024.03.15
Excerpt: ...e is also a judgment against the general partner.” (Corp. Code, § 15904.05, subd. (b); accord Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 17 -21 -307, subd. (c).) Even “[w]here a judgment has been obtained against both the partnership and a general partner, the judgment creditor may not levy against the general partner's assets based on a claim against the partnership unless the general partner is personally liable for the claim” and at least one of several speci�...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Deposition 920
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ... “What are the last four digits of your Social Security number?” Ob jections: “Irrelevant and not discoverable, and instruct Ms. Mora not to answer.” Ruling: Motion to compel denied. See discussion below. 2. Mora Depo. at 15:14 -18: Question No. 2: “Do you understand that you actually sued my client because they would no t use the last four digits of your Social Security number?” Objections: “Argumentative; harassing witness. I inst...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...g the claim has no merit, that the plaintiff cannot prove an element of the claim, or that the defendant has a complete defense entitling it to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850- 51.) Issue 1: first cause of action for negligence Plaintiffs allege that in May 2018, Decedent Richard Arnold (Plaintiff Lisa Arnold's husband) sustained injuries at work from whic...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication (2)
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...ises liability claim are the same: a legal duty of care, breach of that duty, and proximate cause resulting in injury.” (Kesner v. Superior Court (2016) 1 Cal.5th 1132, 1158; Castellon v. U.S. Bancorp (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 994, 998.) “[L]andowners are required ‘to maintain land in their poss ession and control in a reasonably safe condition' [citation], and to use due care to eliminate dangerous conditions on their property [citations].”...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 812
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...egations of the plaintiff's complaint. (FPI Development v. Nakas hima (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 367, 381 -382 (pleadings serve as the outer measure of materiality in a summary judgment motion)). Once a defendant meets its prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show by reference to specific facts the exist ence of a triable issue as to that affirmative defense or cause of action. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4...
2024.03.14 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 014
Location: Orange County
Judge: Leal, Sandy N
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...amily Trust failed to pay sanctions as ordered by this Court on 10- 19-23. Thus, Defendants violated the 10- 19-23 and 11 -16- 23 orders. Therefore, Defendants' conduct is sanctionable. Nonmonetary Sanctions Defendants' conduct does not warrant terminating sanctions. Terminating sanctions are appropriate wh en the “violation is willful, preceded by a history of abuse, and the evidence shows that less severe sanctions would not produce complianc...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Arbitration 551
Location: Orange County
Judge: McCormick, Melissa R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...c performance of that contract. Little v. Pullman (2013 ) 219 Cal.App.4th 558, 565. The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. Id. Plaintiff argues defendant has not carried its burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration ...
2024.03.14 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 532
Location: Orange County
Judge: Leal, Sandy N
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...urt to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggreg ate amount of costs and expenses . . . determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” (Civ. Code § 1794(d).) “If the items appearing in a cost bill appear to be pro per charges, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show that were not reasonable or necessary. On the other ha...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses 863
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lee, Richard
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...o. 7, and awarding monetary sanctions in the amount of at least $1,387.57 against Defendant. Plaintiff additionally moves for an order compelling further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One (“RFP”), Nos. 4 -6, 8, 9, 15, and 19, and compelling compliance with RFP, Nos. 1 -3, 7, 10, 14, 16, and 17, as well as awarding monetary sanctions in the amount of at least $3,862.57 against Defendant. Lastly, Plaintiff moves for an o...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions
Location: Orange County
Judge: Nelson, R. Shawn
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...atory no. 4.1. (Exhibit D, F to Declaration of Troy Candio tti; Exhibit 4, 6, 9 to Declaration of Richard Angel.) Thus, the Court grants Plaintiff's Motion as to Form Interrogatory no. 4.1. Given the October 30, 2023 deadline for Plaintiff to file his Motion, it was not wholly unreasonable for Plaintiff to file h is Motion when Defendant advised he would not serve a supplemental response until November 3, 2023. (Exhibit 9 to Declaration of Rich...
2024.03.14 Motion to Enforce Settlement 875
Location: Orange County
Judge: Melzer, Layne H
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...Exhs., Exh. 2].) The settlement agreement provides, in relevant part, that: “No later than 45 days after execution of this Settlement Agreement, the Parties will jointly cooperate and cause to be performed the below described work of improvement for the mutual benefit of their adjoining Properties (the ‘Re medial Work')…” These competing motions were filed after the parties failed to “jointly cooperate” to cause the Remedial Work to...
2024.03.14 Motion to Remand Case from Arbitration 668
Location: Orange County
Judge: Salter, Glenn R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...ntional Infliction Emotional Distress 8. Mental Disability Discrimination 9. No Reasonable Accommodation/Mental Disability 10. Failure to Pay Wages When Due In the complaint, she mentioned the term “sexual harassment” in paragraphs 11, 15- 16, 22, 40, 57- 59, 78, 81-84, 122, 128- 129, and 146. The claims of sexual harassment are general. They are for the most part non -specific. She alleges she was sexually harassed by two non - employees w...
2024.03.14 Motions To Compel Further Responses 683
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...“RFP”) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. On 01/25/24, the court continued the h earing on these motions and ordered Defendants to produce an updated privilege log that complied with the requirements laid out in Catalina Island Yacht Club v. Superior Ct. (2015) 242 Cal. App. 4th 1116 (“Catalina”). (ROA #131.) The court first notes De fendants did not produce a timely privilege log that permitted Plaintiff to review prior to the deadl...
2024.03.14 Petition for Writ of Mandate 010
Location: Orange County
Judge: Leal, Sandy N
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...s required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the infe rior tribunal, corporation, board or officer…” (Code Civ. Proc., §1094.5, subd. (a).) “The inquiry in such a case shall extend to the questions whether the respondent has proceeded without, or in excess of, jurisdiction; whether there was a fair trial; an d whether there was any prejudicial abuse of discretion.” (C...
2024.03.14 Motion for Sanctions 888
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...inst cross -defendants Joel Farkas (“Farkas” indivi dually), Gateway American Resources, LLC, Kings Co. LLC, Latitude Accounting LLC (“CD” all together), and their attorneys Todd C. Theodora, Esq., Christopher J. Harney, Esq., Adrian L. Canzoneri, Esq. and Theodora Oringher PC. This matter involved a perso nal dispute between an Farkas and his former love interest (Smith). The pair did not split amicably and Farkas accused Smith of using ...

15908 Results

Per page

Pages